Home Forums Bike Forum Kenda Nevegals Vs Maxxis High Rollers or Crossmarks.

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • Kenda Nevegals Vs Maxxis High Rollers or Crossmarks.
  • oldfart
    Full Member

    I’ve made up my mind (nearly )on the Kendas any thoughts up against the others.Looking for something fast rolling and grippy n light!(i know moon on a stick!!!)

    ibis
    Free Member

    kenda’s ok. High rollers very good and light in u.s.t form

    shortbread_fanylion
    Free Member

    2.1 High rollers folding 62 eXCeption series are under 500 grams.

    coogan
    Free Member

    High Rollers. Kenda’s are utter shit.

    oldfart
    Full Member

    What are the High Rollers like in the wet?Crossmarks seem a bit grippier according to description.

    MrNutt
    Free Member

    High Rollers, yesterday saw wilts being hit by big rain and tree felling winds, I’ve just got back in from a very muddy (and thats wiltshire gloopy chalk/clay mud) ride both of us were using high rollers and they coped with all the mud as good if not better than I’d expected,and that shit is like thick glue!

    They also shed the stuff quickly, quicker than my old LUST Ignitors and Michelin DH16’s which I was very pleased with given that I was riding over roots, around corners and up and down the ruts/banks at about 20mph (gravity assisted) at one stage.

    I have the High Rollers in LUST and they are great. recommended!

    oh I got mine from Noahs just outside Stroud, they often carry stock.

    ibis
    Free Member

    not a specific wet/ mud tyre but they cope well compared to others, i have had the ust version and they are a great tyre fot the cash C.R.C. usually carry stock

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)

The topic ‘Kenda Nevegals Vs Maxxis High Rollers or Crossmarks.’ is closed to new replies.