Home Forums Chat Forum JaGUar

Viewing 40 posts - 81 through 120 (of 175 total)
  • JaGUar
  • 2
    mert
    Free Member

    It’s not that long since £100,000 for a Land Rover product would have been unthinkable.

    05/06, i was working there when a factory optioned Range Rover finally topped the £100k mark, without getting into special vehicle territory.

    DT78
    Free Member

    In 10 years I’ve had 2 cars, a focus diesel and a kia sportage.  If I could have afforded a decent sportscar in a sensible price range the f type was high up on the list.  Maybe like many it was a brand I was looking at for a ‘retirement’ present to myself

    I suppose I get it, the need for to target different segment – retirees is not sustainable for a business, lets hope the rebrand is truely something awesome and unique and they don’t produce something that just looks like all the other electric suvs out there (like that lotus up there…)

    I still think the ad is absolute trash, and they really need an exceptional product now, as jaGUar has gone from top of my aspirational wish list to the bottom based on that tripe

    2
    cookeaa
    Full Member

    To all the people saying they love Jaguars, or that Jags should should be petrol saloons or coupes, not diesel or electric or SUV…

    TBF I don’t think anyone is saying that, not many people at least, mostly it’s just got the ‘anti-wokes‘ in a bit of a huff cos they don’t really understand the world anymore, which I think was half the point, if Nigel is unimpressed that is a win.

    …how many new Jaguars have you actually bought in the last 10 years?

    Is the main point, nobody is buying Jags anymore, whether it’s due to a lack of reliability or the price is kind of irrelevant, to carry on doing the same thing would be stupid. Good luck to them I guess…

    1
    Houns
    Full Member

    +1 for Sniff’s comments about this on Smith and Sniff.

    Even us lot are talking about it, it’s worked, and extra bonus of upsetting the worst kind of people.

    endoverend
    Full Member

    That looks like 5 mins of design by intern using Ai. Woeful.

    But, yeah… massive wheels so its current, how big are yours? these are 24’s…

    And nametag on tyres because Racecar.

    3
    nickc
    Full Member

    I understand why Jaguar thought a re-brand was necessary given the demographic* of the people who currently buy the cars they make now, and Jaguar also completely understand that those folks are unlikely to want to buy the cars that  they’re (and every other car manufacturer) going to be making 10-20 years from now.

    I also get why that demographic, despite the fact that they don’t want the jaguar cars of the future, think and feel they’re entitled to get all hufty about the fact that the world is moving on – because for the last 50 years they’ve had the world pandering to their needs and they don’t like that it’s changing .

    *generally white, generally men, of a certain age and status (perceived or otherwise)

    dissonance
    Full Member

    I do wonder why not just a new brand whilst keeping Jaguar going for a bit. Like how Volvo has Polestar (or did not sure if its still the case).

    The level of rebranding does seem to be effectively new brand levels for the intended target audience but still has the downside of annoying those who liked the previous style.

    joshvegas
    Free Member

    Like how Volvo has Polestar

    Polestar isn’t a new brand.

    2
    timmys
    Full Member

    Can’t work out if I am a total hypocritic here. Absolutely fine with the Jaguar rebrand, but find the whole BYD “Build Your Own Dreams” branding so vomit inducingly cringe that I wouldn’t consider one of their cars in a bazillion years.

    kelvin
    Full Member

    Agree that repositioning was needed. And obviously with no actual new product yet, it was going to be a bit vague. But what they’ve done is very 1990s… a mix of the launch of the Smart Car brand, a bit of Benetton, plenty of Jean Paul Gaultier… that may well all be very well targeted at a certain demographic (people in their 40/50s who feel they are young but have forgotten everything before Y2K?)… but it doesn’t work for me at all, yet… let’s see what they build on their new scorched ground…

    endoverend
    Full Member

    .

    dissonance
    Full Member

    Polestar isn’t a new brand.

    Not now but originally it was a minor racing/performance tuning brand which Volvo brought and then used for their EVs.

    1
    piemonster
    Free Member

    as jaGUar has gone from top of my aspirational wish list to the bottom based on that tripe

    If you were aspiring to an F Type, they’re not after you as a customer.

    mrmonkfinger
    Free Member

    So, they’re dropping the large limos to replace them with… a large limo.

    In the meantime, a shit rebrand – crap new logo, mystical dreams woo woo corporate “what we stand for” statement, and a silly advert.

    Slow news day?

    1
    roger_mellie
    Full Member

    I do wonder why not just a new brand whilst keeping Jaguar going for a bit

    The Top Gear article the OP linked to claims Jaguar haven’t been consistently profitable for a long time, so perhaps a complete restart/ repositioning was thought in order, not just a rebrand with the same/ similar cars.

    chakaping
    Full Member

    But what they’ve done is very 1990s… a mix of the launch of the Smart Car brand, a bit of Benetton, plenty of Jean Paul Gaultier…

    Good comment, so maybe this is what retro looks like now?

    Capturing the style and energy of the target market’s formative years, which they probably remember fondly.

    2
    Superficial
    Free Member

    Rory Sutherland’s take on this was interesting. The basic thesis is:

    1) We are inevitably going electric

    2) It’s actually now very easy to engineer power, refinement and quietness into electric cars. These were traditionally the values of luxury cars but now a Honda / Kia does all that. How do you convince people to spend 4-10x the price of a Kia?

    3) If cars are all broadly similar, the point of differentiation may be styling, brand values and exclusivity

    4) There is likely to by a push by all manufacturers to define their brand very clearly in the way a fashion house would.

    Although it’s often middle aged people buying these things, the sense of ‘cool’ is defined by the younger generation. To me, it makes sense that Jag look to appeal to younger tastes, even if they are not expecting to sell loads to that demographic.

    endoverend
    Full Member

    plenty of Jean Paul Gaultier…     Capturing the style and energy of the target market’s formative years

    …. which bit, the Eurotrash era?

    This is nothing like Gaultiers fashion, its like a gen-z intern googled Gaultier…

    It’s bad, really bad.

    1
    mashr
    Full Member

    but find the whole BYD “Build Your Own Dreams” branding so vomit inducingly cringe that I wouldn’t consider one of their cars in a bazillion years.

    TBF they know that’s a problem. The first cars imported still had the full “Build Your Dreams” logo but they quickly got the message and changed to BYD. The trouble they now have is that nobody will ever want to have to explain to friend/family what BYD stands for…

    Speeder
    Full Member

    If I’ve got £200k to blow on a Jaaaaag, it’s not going to be an EV

    it’ll be something like this:-

    1963 Jaguar E-Type Green Manual Right Hand Drive in United Kingdom – For Sale | Car & Classic 

    perchypanther
    Free Member

    I’ve always been a massive Jaguar fan (x-type and XE excepted) and don’t give a shit about the rebrand.
    I’m prepared to judge the car, not the marketing.
    Jags have always been about grace, pace and space and EV’s easily provide the space and the pace. I’m hoping they lean heavily into the grace aspect and produce something beautiful.

    kelvin
    Full Member

    …. which bit, the Eurotrash era?

    Fifth Element.

    endoverend
    Full Member

    Fifth Element.

    Oh yeah, forgot about that… Intentionally ironic and ridiculous, that’ll sell well.

    Should’ve kept it bang on target with a shagtastic Austin Powers angle…

    kelvin
    Full Member

    I’m prepared to judge the car, not the marketing.

    Fair. But there is no new car. I think that’s what irks people the most… without any actual product this has to be pure marketing without even a nod to an actual car. Whatever form this marketing took, it could only be disappointing and alienating when there is zero substance. It comes across as aimless fluff. So why not hold off on the market resetting ’til there is a least a concept car to judge and to link this new approach to?

    perchypanther
    Free Member

    New car info coming 4th December-ish I believe

    kelvin
    Full Member

    Oh, by contrast… look at the stuff Renault are doing… completely over the top marketing wise… but each campaign has a planned new car, that you can see mock ups of etc, at its centre, amongst all the bright colours, fashionable people, and brand positioning.

    1
    BruceWee
    Free Member

    New car info coming 4th December-ish I believe

    Please be a monowheel, please be a monowheel…

    1
    wbo
    Free Member

    Well they sell very few cars, and they lost money on nearly all of them. So there’s not really anything to lose.  Unless all the people who claim to aspire them are going to commit to buying one in the near future.

    Friend has an F-pace. can’t sell it. Well he obviously can but he isn’t desperate enough to take the hit yet.

    futonrivercrossing
    Free Member

    Well the marketing has got everyone talking – so job done. As for the new cars, wait and see l guess.

    personally I’ve never like Jag, the XJS is an especially awful design, and has a much grace as a brontosaurus.

    as for Porsche, their SUVs saved them from the brink

    4
    the-muffin-man
    Full Member

    Oh, by contrast… look at the stuff Renault are doing… completely over the top marketing wise…

    The new Renault 5 looks fantastic!

    Speeder
    Full Member

    I like the look of the Autocar sketches.  They’re not likely to be anywhere near what they really look like but I like the styling.  They do sound far too BIG though.  Why ARE cars so damn big now? Do designers not drive or park anywhere?

    1
    bikesandboots
    Full Member

    Should have just ended it and started a new brand.

    But isn’t that what they’ve effectively done?

    Not quite, as they’ve continued to use the name.

    To all the people saying they love Jaguars, or that Jags should should be petrol saloons or coupes, not diesel or electric or SUV, how many new Jaguars have you actually bought in the last 10 years?

    Yep Jaguar won’t care about the opinions of people who don’t buy their cars. People me included sometimes have fond thoughts of what a brand ought to be. Raleigh bikes for example.

    2
    dudeofdoom
    Full Member

    I think people get too hooked up on brands,most have been bought and sold a million times and have no real historic connection with the past.

    Its just a label to get you to buy something nothing,more nothing less.

    1
    mert
    Free Member

    The Top Gear article the OP linked to claims Jaguar haven’t been consistently profitable for a long time

    IIRC they hadn’t made an operating profit for something like 35 years when they finally merged with Land Rover. And JLR promptly made a much smaller profit…Dunno whats happened it the 20 years since i left, but from the outside looking in, it’s not been pretty viewing.

    But then, lately not much has been in the auto industry.

    2
    CountZero
    Full Member

    Just read some of the Autocar article, and came across this:

    At this stage, it’s understood that the saloon only has buttons on the steering wheel, with a slick wraparound digital display behind the steering wheel serving as the main infotainment interface.

    A smaller touchscreen on the centre console, meanwhile, handles key functions such as the climate control and audio. The centre console will either extend through the length of the cabin to divide the rear seat into two separate areas or be of a shortened design to give a more conventional five-seat layout.

    If I had the money, and was in the market for a large saloon car, that is an immediate hard no from me! I won’t have anything to do with any vehicle that relies on a fully touch-screen system for driver input.
    It is illegal for me to use a mobile phone in my car when driving, so this should be illegal as well. It’s distracting and downright dangerous – I have driven cars with touchscreens for all driver input, and I absolutely hate it, trying to dig down through successive screens to find a demist control, when the screen is in the middle of the dashboard, and you’re driving and attempting to maintain control of the car at 70 on a motorway is ****ing stupid.

    halifaxpete
    Full Member

    Yep, the wife’s xc40 has most of the climate controls ect on the screen and I find it a struggle to use while on the move. No such problems in my 13 year old Caddy though!

    DickBarton
    Full Member

    I’m in total agreement with that…form over function and it is detrimental. Actual button or sliders or dials that need held is more sensible as those can be done by feel without taking eyes off the road.
    Pulling over to make the adjustments is probably the solution, but isn’t always possible to do that safely.

    sirromj
    Full Member

    I see your points, and whilst I tend to agree with where you’re coming from, I don’t see it as a net win for society. All it does is further feed and stoke the fires of the culture war bullshit.

    Well it made me laugh, found it fun and entertaining. Fun is the lesser stoker of culture wars than what many do which is resort to insults and sanctimony.

    1
    Waderider
    Free Member

    Continuing with the touch screen digression I went from hundreds of buttons (Volvo V70) to everything on touch screen (Volvo V90), and I can confirm next car change I will be looking for hundreds of buttons again. So I won’t be buying a Jaguar……..

Viewing 40 posts - 81 through 120 (of 175 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.