What exactly was “bollocks” in what I said?
I was banned for 3 days for commenting on the magazine layout.
You said you were banned for “constructive criticism.” It’s before my tenure so I had to look back, but as far as I can see that’s bollocks on two levels.
a) your criticism wasn’t constructive, it amounted to ‘the magazine isn’t very good’, and b) it appears to me that you weren’t banned for criticising, constructive or otherwise, you were banned for ignoring warnings (after being given Mark’s direct dial to discuss your issues).