Home Forums Bike Forum How burly does a bike have to be….

Viewing 29 posts - 1 through 29 (of 29 total)
  • How burly does a bike have to be….
  • wilko1999
    Free Member

    …before it can be classed as a ‘rig’?

    weeksy
    Full Member

    35lb

    wilko1999
    Free Member

    Thanks for humouring me 🙂

    chakaping
    Full Member

    I think Weeksy is about right, but with the caveat that if it’s slacker than 65deg head angle it then becomes a “sled”.

    wilko1999
    Free Member

    Ah yes, another mystery unravelled, nice one!

    mikewsmith
    Free Member


    Just apply the would Josh Bender ride it test

    Northwind
    Full Member

    I’m still working on the exact parameters to become a gnarpoon.

    fatladridesbikes
    Free Member

    That’s not a bike! It’s a unicycle with a hard on 😆

    I_Ache
    Free Member

    weeksy – Member
    35lb

    chakaping – Member
    I think Weeksy is about right, but with the caveat that if it’s slacker than 65deg head angle it then becomes a “sled”.

    Crikey my bike is only just a rig then and very nearly a sled. Does this mean that according to the spirit of STW agreement I can refer to it as a rig without getting chastised?

    wobbliscott
    Free Member

    surely its if you have to push it up hill?

    greeble
    Free Member

    Where’s Elbry when you need him.

    chakaping
    Full Member

    according to the spirit of STW agreement

    Agreement? On here?

    Pffft!

    wrecker
    Free Member

    GNARPOON! 😀

    honourablegeorge
    Full Member

    There was a bloke who used work in the wee bike shop at the Mabie trail head, had a DH bike liek the one above, but on 24″ wheels, 3.0 Nokian tyres, massive forks, BMW pedals, crazy looking thing. I was fascinated with it. Must have been a pig to ride, mind.

    trevron73
    Free Member

    My Bike came with a sticker from the factory that says” Burly Iron” and i way 110k so i reckon together me and my Steed are a “Burly unit”

    chakaping
    Full Member

    Saw this sweet rig out in the Alps this summer…

    Surely even Bender would think it was a tad overbuilt.

    CaptainFlashheart
    Free Member

    GNARPOON!

    This is the single greatest word used on STW in ages. Bravo!

    greeble
    Free Member

    Les Gets 2007

    chakaping
    Full Member

    Toe overlap unlikely to be a problem on that badboy Greeble.

    IA
    Full Member

    Gnarpoon? genius. Can I use that as a verb too?

    wrecker
    Free Member

    This is the single greatest word used on STW in ages. Bravo!

    Alas, I can’t take credit. It belongs to northwind. I share your sentiment though.

    wilko1999
    Free Member

    Agreed, gnarpoon is awesome. Still don’t know what one is though. Maybe its down to the amount of chain devices/sprockets (not cogs) fitted in the drivetrain. Look at Josh Benders bike above – there’s 7 – including the cassette, mech jockey wheels, chain devices, chainring and another sprocket (not cog) of some sort above the chainring. > 5 = gnarpoon maybe (obviously it also has to comply with the rig and sled requirements)

    brakes
    Free Member

    what is a burly bike that weighs less than 35lbs called?

    hot_fiat
    Full Member

    French?

    chakaping
    Full Member

    what is a burly bike that weighs less than 35lbs called?

    A steed of course.

    Northwind
    Full Member

    wilko1999 – Member

    Still don’t know what one is though.

    You use them to kill gnarwhals.

    chives
    Free Member

    If it’s only c.25lbs but still gets used for downhill would that be classed as ‘lampoon’ then? 😉

    rOcKeTdOg
    Full Member

    Gnarpoon

    Worth the STW subscription alone

    rOcKeTdOg
    Full Member

    Same rule for Gnardtails?

Viewing 29 posts - 1 through 29 (of 29 total)

The topic ‘How burly does a bike have to be….’ is closed to new replies.