I’ve got a 26″ full suss (Five) and a 29er hardtail (FF29). When I first got them they behaved exactly as you’d expect them to. Not just in the way they felt but comparing Strava times each was faster where you’d expect it to be. This isn’t too surprising. Any time you do an experiment where neither the subject nor the observer are blinded you get the result you expect to get.
What is interesting is that now the honeymoon period has worn off they both just feel like bikes. It’s not just the feel though; those Strava times have converged too. It’s reached the point where I’d struggle to show a significant difference between them.
I’ve recently been comparing times on a 3 hour loop with around 90 minutes on the road, some nice steep off-road climbs, some rocky descents and some rooty stuff. You’d think the FF29 would kill the Five on the road at least. But even there I can’t really detect a difference. In fact the Five was faster on the road section the last two times. Similarly you’d expect the Five to kill the FF29 on a technical descent, but I find that anything I can ride on the Five I can also ride on the FF29 and my speed is governed by my (lack of) nerve and how much I brake, which doesn’t change.
I would still say that I enjoy descents more on the Five and climbs more on the FF29, but even there the difference is insignificant compared with the large variability in how much fun I have based on external factors (weather, my mood etc).
That’s comparing two bikes that are quite far apart on the MTB spectrum. So, good luck trying to find a meaningful and sustained difference between, say a full suss bike with 26″ wheels and one with 650b.