Nothing wrong with the X2 at all – just find some of the comments above to be slightly ridiculous.
Shock performance is as related to the geometry of the bike as it is to the particulars of the spring. “Coil v air” is too simple a breakdown to base comments on and then to conclude the argument by saying the right answer is to spend £1200 on a shock makes me laugh, as does the comment about the X2 being a poor shock cos it’s not shimmed
I’ve read a lot of toms posts – some make sense but I don’t always agree with him. I’ve got a swoop – ridden both the coil (vector hlr) and air (X2) shock on it and think I know a bit about what I’m talking about (and understand what chris porter wanted to get it set up to ride like). The comments about the coil v air he put up there make as much sense as my commment about a toilet roll filled with £20 notes