Something about that ‘M65’ jacket above looks a bit off, for starters, those patches look more like shoulder patches, they wouldn’t normally be on the pockets, and it would be the person issued the jacket who would sew them on; unlikely he’d sew them in such a way that the pockets would be unusable.
Also, I’m not sure that it would have a hood zipped into the collar – usually hoods are buttoned on, or folded under the collar; I’ve got a Goretex USAF jacket, which has the hood inside the collar, and a Danish M84 field jacket based on the M65, which has press studs for attaching a hood, but a hood was never supplied!
Great jacket, picked up a jacket and two pairs of combats for £75 after the Danish military changed their camo from a Flectarn style to Multicam similar to the British Army, and dumped their entire inventory onto the open market; almost impossible to find for any reasonable price now, and the jackets were £100 before the dump, combats £75.
Edit – just looked at the Buzz Rickson M65 field jacket, which does have the zipped-in hood in the collar, so that part is correct, Buzz Rickson are obsessive about period detail.
Still not sure about those patches, but they can be cut off.