Home Forums Chat Forum Bad News in Afganistan

Viewing 39 posts - 1 through 39 (of 39 total)
  • Bad News in Afganistan
  • willard
    Full Member

    Just heard that on the radio. A very sad day for 3YORKS and 1LANCS.

    Rest easy lads.

    soobalias
    Free Member

    thoughts with the families, not just of those killed, but the families of all those serving

    binners
    Full Member

    Its absolutely tragic. How many more have to be sacrificed in this utterly pointless conflict? What are we actually achieving? Why are we even there?

    Just get out and leave them to their medieval barbarism, and spare yet more families news like this

    elzorillo
    Free Member

    Its absolutely tragic. How many more have to be sacrificed in this utterly pointless conflict? What are we actually achieving? Why are we even there?

    Just get out and leave them to their medieval barbarism, and spare yet more families news like this

    Exactly

    ernie_lynch
    Free Member

    Why are we even there?

    Because the Taliban government under Mullah Omar refused to hand over Osman Bin Laden to the United States to stand trial for alleged involvement in the attack on the Twin Towers. They did agree to hand him over to a neutral country were he could stand trial but the US and Britain said that was unacceptable. Then soon after the rejection Mullah Omar claimed that the Afghan government had no idea where Osman Bin Laden was, this was deemed unacceptable by the US and Britain who had assured Mullah Omar that Afghanistan would not be attacked if they handed over Bin Laden, so Afghanistan was attacked through air strikes. This allowed the Northern Alliance led by warlords and which only controlled only a very small enclave inside Afghanistan (where 90% of opium production occurred) to seize power. Unable to effectively maintain control of Afghanistan, NATO committed ground troops to help the Northern Alliance. Very soon all attempts to find Osman Bin Laden and arrest him so that he could stand trial were forgotten, and the objective completely changed to one in which the overriding priority became to stop the Taliban regaining power. NATO are still in Afghanistan to “train” the Afghan army, apparently Afghans are rubbish when it comes to fighting wars and even after over 10 years we haven’t finished training them. Although I suspect the real reason we’re still there is that the Afghan government and army can’t be trusted to do what we tell them unless we are there to make certain they do. We are also busy negotiating with the Taliban – apparently they are not as bad as we first thought. Shame we didn’t realise that negotiating with the Taliban was an option over 10 years ago before we went to war.

    Interestingly as far back as 1998 the Taliban were apparently considering handing over Bin Laden to the US, but this was scuppered by the US government’s cack-handed behaviour :

    Taliban agreed Bin Laden handover in 1998

    “The Taliban leader, Mullah Mohammed Omar agreed three years ago to hand over Osama bin Laden, but changed his mind after US cruise missile attacks, the former head of Saudi Arabian intelligence said yesterday.

    The claim, by Prince Turki al-Faisal, is likely to raise questions about whether more efforts could have been made to negotiate Bin Laden’s extradition before launching the latest bombing campaign.”

    I’m sure the fact that the original objective of the attack on Afghanistan, ie to arrest Osman Bin Laden and put on trial, was so quickly and completely forgotten, was the reason why Tony Blair was so confident that he could use disarming Iraq of WMDs as an excuse for attacking Iraq. He undoubtedly assumed that very quickly people would forget why we had attacked and invaded Iraq. Unfortunately for Blair whilst people six months on weren’t asking “so where’s Osman Bin Laden ? why haven’t we arrested him?”, they did in the case of Iraq ask “so where’s these WMDs then ?”. He was extremely unlucky on that score.

    yossarian
    Free Member

    Good summary Ernie.

    Meanwhile everyone on ground bleeds. Western soldiers, Taliban and civilians. The same blood. The same devastation to families. The same waste of life.

    project
    Free Member

    if we pull out all the arms making companies in the uk plc will be seriously short of profits for the next year,and thats not good for cam and his mates, it also takes peeps minds of the problems here and creates jobs in the arms factories and defence related industries, but then theres always syria and israel to start a fight with.

    weester
    Free Member

    Because its strategically important to an invasion of Iran.

    weester
    Free Member

    Oh, and Russia!

    allmountainventure
    Free Member

    Just get out and leave them to their medieval barbarism, and spare yet more families news like this

    It didn’t work well the last time we did that.

    WTC bombing, Somalia, Dhahran, Kenya, Tanzania, Yemen, 911, Shoe Bomber, Djerba, Dirty Bomb Plot, Bali, Mombasa, Riyadh, Casablanca, UN’s headquarters in Baghdad, Istanbul (synagogues, British Consulate and HSBC), golden dome of the al-Askari shrine in Samarra Iraq – one of the holiest sites in Shia Islam, al-Zarqawi & 10s of 1,000s dead in Iraq civil war, Madrid, Khobar, Paul Johnson, Daniel Pearl , London, Edinburgh, Liquid bomb plot, Toner cartridge bomb….. and so on.

    Global medieval barbarism

    renton
    Free Member

    Bit of a sombre atmosphere out here at the moment!!

    RIP Fellas, rest easy

    scraprider
    Free Member

    RIP lads.

    Teetosugars
    Free Member

    Stand down lads.

    Rest easy.

    bigG
    Free Member

    Fu**ing tragic, may all your yomps be downhill lads.

    Time to stand easy and let the last call sound..

    richmtb
    Full Member

    Guardian story on civilians killed in Afghanistan

    Puts the death of these soldiers into perspective.

    British soldiers losing their lives is tragic but they were at least combatants.

    Women and children murdered in their sleep is another thing entirely.

    The only good thing that can come out of this is that NATO will now realise that there position in Afghanistan is now completely untenable and will just get out and yet another military misadventure in Afghanistan will be over.

    Teetosugars
    Free Member

    🙄

    konabunny
    Free Member

    Edinburgh

    Eh?

    cynic-al
    Free Member

    What on earth is the point in saying “these deaths were worse than those other ones”?

    AndyP
    Free Member

    What on earth is the point in saying “these deaths were worse than those other ones”?

    is that a serious question?

    tails
    Free Member

    Trolly trolly troll!

    bullheart
    Free Member

    Fairly poor subject to troll over, if that is the case.

    Junkyard
    Free Member

    why troll? Can we only discuss issues when our brave boys die but we should not discuss it when someone goes loco and kills lots of innocent people in their homes

    I know it is not one of ours but in reality a foreign force cannot win a hearts and minds excercise and certainly not when it burns the Koran and does this.

    I suspect Troll is being called because it is easier than discussing the issue.

    wrecker
    Free Member

    There is a bit on the chat forum page which says

    Topic — Add New »

    Why would anyone post about a tragic case of an american soldier going beserk in a thread for passing respects to fallen British soldiers?
    To get a response, that’s why and that’s why it’s a clear troll which has failed. Stroll on troller.

    bullheart
    Free Member

    why troll? Can we only discuss issues when our brave boys die but we should not discuss it when someone goes loco and kills lots of innocent people in their homes

    I know it is not one of ours but in reality a foreign force cannot win a hearts and minds excercise and certainly not when it burns the Koran and does this.

    I suspect Troll is being called because it is easier than discussing the issue.

    I call troll because only the truly near-sighted would argue that there is greater value in one life than another. Whilst I agree that discussion could be had, i struggle to believe that anyone would be daft enough to compare.

    Technically I agree with your sentiment Junky. I’m just inarticulate today…

    richmtb
    Full Member

    How is it a troll?

    Soldiers losing there life is tragic, no doubt. They are doing something very few of us have the bravery to do.

    But they are trained combatants in a war zone. Deaths are to a certain extent expected.

    Children shot in their beds aren’t really in the same category. Admittedly it appears to have been the act of one seriously disturbed US soldier acting alone.

    Its time we left Afghanistan too many lives are being wasted on all sides.

    cynic-al
    Free Member

    AndyP – Member
    What on earth is the point in saying “these deaths were worse than those other ones”?

    is that a serious question?

    Yes, but my points were more that:

    1. it’s of **** all relevance to this thread
    2. it’s not like anyone’s going to say “oh who cares about civilian deaths”
    3. a soldier going postal is entirely different.

    wrecker
    Free Member

    How is it a troll?

    Easy. Because this is a thread about 6 specific soldiers. These soldiers had nothing whatsoever to do with this tragedy. They are dead and people are paying virtual respects. Start another thread.

    kimbers
    Full Member

    to be fair the thread title is bad news in afghanistan

    id say this qualifies

    and the murdering of so many women and children while they slept in their beds will undoubtedly lead to reprisals beyond even the recent upsurge after the koran burnings, including the death of these 6 soldiers

    its very relevant and calling troll is the kind of denial of the facts thats left us locked in a cycle of violence with no seeming end

    richmtb
    Full Member

    1. it’s of **** all relevance to this thread

    Is this not “Bad News in Afghanistan” then?

    wrecker
    Free Member

    calling troll is the kind of denial of the facts thats left us locked in a cycle of violence with no seeming end

    Perhaps a little dramatic? 😀

    Worthy of discussion? yes. this thread? No (IMHO)
    Be happy to contribute to a different thread though.

    konabunny
    Free Member

    I call troll because only the truly near-sighted would argue that there is greater value in one life than another.

    Who is arguing that?

    Why would anyone post about a tragic case of an american soldier going beserk in a thread for passing respects to fallen British soldiers?

    You didn’t consider, for example, that the former event could lead to more of the latter?

    cynic-al
    Free Member

    richmtb – Member
    1. it’s of **** all relevance to this thread
    Is this not “Bad News in Afghanistan” then?

    Oh dear, pedantry taken too far & argument lost.

    TurnerGuy
    Free Member

    only the truly near-sighted would argue that there is greater value in one life than another.

    1. Martin Luther King

    2. Charles Milles Manson

    equivalent value ?

    kimbers
    Full Member

    The taliban have already vowed revenge attacks based on the village shooting

    and the base where it happened has seen large demonstrations alreday

    ultimately might this speed up the withdrawal of our troops?

    Papa_Lazarou
    Free Member

    People killing other people, it’s all horrible.

    Show some respect and stop the petty arguments.

    binners
    Full Member

    ultimately might this speed up the withdrawal of our troops?

    I doubt it. Every time something like this happens, we get the same rhetoric. “Seeing the mission through”, “increasing our resolve” etc etc etc.

    Its all sounding increasingly……

    khani
    Free Member

    It’s all fubar.. as for the troops the term Lions led by donkeys springs to mind..again…..
    Total waste of life on both sides IMHO….

    konabunny
    Free Member

    ultimately might this speed up the withdrawal of our troops?

    Objectives of invasion of Afghanistan:

    – capture Osama bin Laden
    – restore regional security in South and Central Asia
    – restore internal security within Afghanistan
    – protect human rights of Afghans
    – destroy opium trade
    – eliminate al Qaeda base of operations within Afghanistan

    Still, 1 out of 6 isn’t too bad, is it?

Viewing 39 posts - 1 through 39 (of 39 total)

The topic ‘Bad News in Afganistan’ is closed to new replies.