I don’t disagree with either point aracer. Swann is notable (like all the best spin bowlers) in that he doesn’t relinquish control while still being an attacking threat. Compare from recent years Giles that could tie an end up very well but in doing so basically ceased to function as a wicket taker, unless batsmen got frustrated and got themselves out. I just don’t want Swann to have to become tighter if it makes him any less potent – he’s already leading wicket taker in the tests and so far they are relatively clueless against him. And left handed 🙂
On Tremlett being a potential match winner – potentially yes, and good to see that’s how Flower and Strauss see it too. But thus far Broad has been the control bowler so Tremlett for Broad is not actually that like-for-like on current performances (and I accept Broad has bowled well with little reward, could have had a few more in the right hand column than he did, and is not generally a control bowler but that’s the effect he’s had so far)
Thanks Molgrips. I have captained a few sides in my time, but I worry sometimes it’s boring to the less afficionado follower. Trouble is no-one at work understands the game properly, whereas here I can get a decent discussion / argument going.
Next Q: in current form do you leave Bell at 6 or move him ahead of Colly?