Home Forums Bike Forum are trail lights becoming too bright?

Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 82 total)
  • are trail lights becoming too bright?
  • bobbyspangles
    Free Member

    having been out recently with a local group during a night ride, it felt as if we where quite over lit.
    i didnt need to run my own lights at anywhere their full potential as the kindly chap behind had approximately 4000lumens lighing my way for me!

    i did feel that as the group was so large-19 riders good and true-that when our paths crossed those of other road users cars,horses,tramps etc we scared the bejesus out of them .My wife was actually driving past at one of these moments and made a comment that it was akin to ‘Close encounters of the third kind’ (an old film for those too young to remember 2d or intervals/kiora etc).

    so my question is…
    ‘are lights too bright or are they necessary?’

    thoughts please.

    Oxboy
    Free Member

    Nah 8)

    Mantastic
    Free Member

    Need brighter and longer burn times

    Northwind
    Full Member

    To be quite honest, anyone who gets scared by a bright light is low on my list of sympathies. I’ve got a bright light but I dim it on the road obviously, and there’s really nothing else out at night that should have to worry about it.

    Obviously they’re not neccesary though- we’re at the point now where one bright light can make it almost like riding in daylight. But that’s OK, as long as you’re just out for a ride at night rather than a nightride.

    scaredypants
    Full Member

    not too bright in general, but potentially dangerous on roads

    IMO

    Garry_Lager
    Full Member

    Don’t know a great deal about lights – I bought two p7 torches from dealextreme a few years back for £50 when they were popular on here. They’ve been great – bags of light, anything brighter would be way overkill IMO. People just like bright and shiny things I guess.

    If more lumens could do something about the flattening out effect you get under the lights I can see that being helpful – but AFAIK it wouldn’t change?

    skadkaer
    Free Member

    But that’s OK, as long as you’re just out for a ride at night rather than a nightride.

    Well spoken – But in concerns of traffic and potentially other peoples lives, it demands that those using these extreme lights make good use of a healthy common sense in terms of where and when to use them.

    cookeaa
    Full Member

    not too bright in general, but potentially dangerous on roads

    IMO

    Only dangerous if angled horizontal and left in high mode, down to the operator really innit…

    I think the key thing now isn’t the levels of illumination but more the quality of the light output, an XML might well be very bright, but it’s only any use if the reflector and lens make good use of that…

    IanW
    Free Member

    Im happy with a hope 2 and a helmet light if im on my own, in a group I need a small floodlight to avoid being in shadow.

    Northwind
    Full Member

    skadkaer – Member

    But in concerns of traffic and potentially other peoples lives, it demands that those using these extreme lights make good use of a healthy common sense in terms of where and when to use them.

    Just like car headlights then.

    GW
    Free Member

    ‘are lights too bright or are they necessary?’

    far too bright. cheap DX lights have made this years lumen wars get well out of hand. IMO the only time a 500 lumen light is necessary is for riding flat out DH, most people’s lights seem to be brighter than that on their dimmest setting these days. WTF is it going to be like next winter! 😯

    often don’t bother to switch mine on at all on group rides.

    Northwind
    Full Member

    Why does “neccesary” come into it at all?

    michaelmcc
    Free Member

    Maybe some people buy lights that are much brighter than they need for trail riding, but I know sometimes in the middle of the night during a 24 solo, it can seem very dark and gloomy indeed, especially if it gets misty or foggy.. and thats with an exposure six pack and joystick.

    GW
    Free Member

    Northwind – Member
    Why does “neccesary” come into it at all?

    Coz that’s what the OP asked 😉

    although he did spell it correctly 😛

    Northwind
    Full Member

    Goldarn it, so he did.

    DickBarton
    Full Member

    Yes…far too bright…no need for such brightness but the spread provided by this light is very usable. I never ride with my light on full…just too bright whether on my own or group.

    Personal choice though, some folk ‘need’ their personal sun as they don’t think they can manage otherwise…they paid their money so let them decide for themselves…

    Too much in my opinion though.

    takisawa2
    Full Member

    I remember riding on Cannock Chase with a set of Ever-Ready lights back in about 91′. Those weren’t the days, trust me.

    2000 lumens here & glad of all of them. Nice to ride with them switched off when its a full moon / in snow sometimes though.

    coffeeking
    Free Member

    I’m wholely with you on this thought, I hate being over-lit as seems customary these days. Everyone’s got a second sun blasting away, takes away all the fun of riding in the dark – might as well go out in the day. I remember the days of night riding with a 10w halogen. I still run a 20w halogen and I’m more than happy with it, it keeps the “on the edge, can’t quite see enough to relax” which to me is the whole point. Riding at night SHOULD be different from riding in the day. Can’t stand it when people join me with their second suns.

    Running dim lights has a couple of benefits too, one being that you keep your night vision so looking to the sides you an see things rather than just blackness and if for some reason you’re running on the edge of your runtime, a flat battery doesn’t leave you whimpering at the lack of light.

    Northwind
    Full Member

    coffeeking – Member

    might as well go out in the day

    I would do, if the day was longer. As it is, I have to go out at night.

    Now, don’t get me wrong, I’ve done plenty of night riding with poor lights, and sometimes it’s been great. Did most of the red at Glentress with no lights at all a few weeks ago, riding by memory, moon and luck… Fantastic. But there’s nothing wrong with wanting to ride at night with good light either.

    Bright lights generally have low settings but weak lights don’t have higher settings 😉

    trout
    Free Member

    Its all my fault 8)

    weeksy
    Full Member

    I’m of the preference of lesss is more. I like the feeling of ‘oh crap i don’t know what’s going on around me’ so low lighting is more my thing.

    I can see why others have the whole world illunminated on night ridees..but for me that’s spoiling the whole objective.

    racefaceec90
    Full Member

    NO! 😀 i don’t have bright lights myself,but i will be saving up for some,at some point.although i agree that there should be an option for lowering the output for the road.

    RDL-82
    Free Member

    I’ve got one of the old dealextreme bastid lights from a couple of years ago, bright enough for me in general a second on the bars would be perfect. I’d rather have a long battery life however rather than more and more lumens or whatever. The trouble is they seem to cost too much for me to justify for few months of use the lights get where the extra runtime would be beneficial.
    Something a touch brighter than my old bastid witha great battery life and a reasonable price and I’d be happy.

    Stoner
    Free Member

    While Im sure we can all give an idea of how bright is bright enough for our own purposes, LED tech will keep developing. What it ought to achieve is greater burntimes at lower temps and currents. Something that also doesnt get much attention yet is marrying the new SLEDs to new optics. There’s little value in the chinese factories putting much effort into developing better collimators, focusers, spreaders, lensing etc to create optimal trail shaped light when they can just through a cheaper more powerful LED on the PCB every 6 months.

    bobbyspangles
    Free Member

    some interesting points raised, some dull, but mostly interesting.

    scotsman
    Free Member

    For all those that have to many lumens.

    almightydutch
    Free Member

    I used to think I had more than enough with a single 1000 lumen on my head, but since my mate has bought a Niterider 3000 its changed the way i look at lights. More is definately better

    ooOOoo
    Free Member

    Won’t somebody think of the chil animals?

    allthepies
    Free Member

    Offroad, fill yer boots.
    On road, be careful and dip/dim/turn off the mucho lumen floods.

    rocketman
    Free Member

    Too bright? No, not really although riding in groups always tends to make your own light look weak.

    Solo riding only needs average illumination, can get by with a few hundred lumens IME.

    5thElefant
    Free Member

    Take your lights out at midday. Turn them on. Does it look brighter?

    If it does then yes. If not then no.

    TiRed
    Full Member

    Group ride yesterday (well me and three kids) with an Exposure Strada three small Cateyes and one slightly bigger one (nothing too technical of course). Personally, I think it is the beam pattern that really matters. I have been more impressed with the Strada off road than on the road. The Fresnel lens gives a wide beam for nice peripheral vision. The spot shows the way. 400 lumens plus some helmet lighting for the dips and bends is plenty.

    It’s a log scale anyway, so 1200 lumens beaming directly ahead isn’t worth much more than 400. 4000 lumens, and one might as well ride in daylight.

    kiwijohn
    Full Member

    I am the Nightrider. I’m a fuel injected suicide machine. I am the rocker, I am the roller, I am the out-of-controller!

    Had to be said.

    5thElefant
    Free Member

    4000 lumens, and one might as well ride in daylight.

    Have you tried turning a 4000 lumen light on in daylight?

    DezB
    Free Member

    Dunno about too bright, but the money people are prepared to spend on lights astounds me.
    Check the Lupine Betty on Evans.
    I mean, you’d have to be a complete dickwad to splash that much money on a light.

    TiRed
    Full Member

    An overcast day has a uniform luminance of 1000 lux (lumens/m2). So assuming those 4000 lumens are lighting 4 square metres, one might as well ride in the daylight. Of course the illumination may be spread more widely, but one should also factor in pupils being more dilated and increased retinal sensitivity.

    IanMunro
    Free Member

    Scotsman +1

    Having had to rely* on either NeverReadies and Wonder lights for several years of winter commutes in the past, I’ve been so traumatised by the experience that I’ve yet to find a light bright enough to compensate for those years of terror.

    Well when I say rely, reliable isn’t a word you’d associate with them apart from in the context of reliably shit.

    remoterob
    Free Member

    Diminishing returns, the brighter your lights, the less your eyes adjust, the less you see around you.

    thisisnotaspoon
    Free Member

    I remember those old smart halogens, batteries that weighed over a kilo, having to dim to 2.4w to eek out the last few miles as the light got yellower and yellower.

    Long live lightweight, silly bright, reliable LED lights 🙂

    spokebloke
    Free Member

    As mentioned above, the Chinese light explosion (in more ways than one)has caused this – very cheap (1/2 the price of last year…) and very bright lights are the norm.

    Off road – do what you want, it’s on road when the lights aren’t dipped that they cause problems. I’ve seen cars skidding to a halt and lorries just stopping trying to work out what’s going on.

    I sell lights, and I’ve got a box of different ones to choose from. Recently I’ve gone from 1200 lumens on the bars back down to a 450lumen Lezyne and I’ve never wished I had more available.

Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 82 total)

The topic ‘are trail lights becoming too bright?’ is closed to new replies.