Anyone for Semis? Fort William World Cup DH results & talking points

The first World Cup Downhill round of the year took place in not-rainy Scotland. Here’s the results, reports, highlights vids and some chat.

…

By ben_haworth

Get the full story here:

Anyone for Semis? Fort William World Cup DH results & talking points

A few typos in there…

 

Bruni’s brake cover is to keep them dry apparently, not aero.

Semis need to be canned. Bernard Kerr talks some shmack and some sense, but he’s bob on about semis.

TBH, the new format is a PITA. The only reason semis are a thing is so that ESO can say they’ve broadcast ‘some’ racing FOC. It’s just another layer of qualifying when all is said and done. You’re also asking the riders to do 50% more ‘live’ runs per weekend – the attrition will creep us as a result.

Back with RB you could always watch the full programme later on YT. Now, I can’t see a way to do it. It is either live or not at all. So, if it doesn’t fit in with what else I’ve got going on (it frequently doesn’t), I end up not bothering at all. I’m no great loss to ESO money-wise, but I’ll just drift away in the end I guess.

Other thoughts – I hope stuff like electric suspension changing can either be adopted across the board or sanctioned somehow. I’d prefer it if DH didn’t go down the F1 route.

It was an awesome weekend’s racing.

I think qualy and semi’s on the same day worked really well – meant the riders were fresh to smash the race run on Sunday.

I didn’t think any of the semis were broadcast?

I didn’t think any of the semis were broadcast?

Eurosport?

TBH I was a bit busy this weekend so only ended up watching some highlights on YT.

Semis have been rendered even more pointless by not being broadcast. Somehow ESO have introduced something supposedly to increase the racing, yet reduced the broadcast output at the same time. Sponsors of lower tier riders will be struggling to justify why they bother.

30 and 10 in the final is just too few- I would have been gutted to have paid for a ticket, only to see a fraction of the entrants actually ride on sunday, especially with 5 minutes between them. Wide taping looks awful for spectating too.

Spectator numbers on site looks way down on previous years, so I hope Nevis aren’t taking too big a financial hit from it.

Shortening the course at the start and finish just to satisfy TV schedules is just wrong. Especially the finish line..

Coverage was a bit better than last year, but the moody bike and rider studio shots can do one.

Aero and suspension tech is going too far for me, electronic suspension that’s not likely to ever be for the mass market is a step too far.

Racing was great though- rider standards are about the only thing the UCI/ESO haven’t been able to mess up!

Not much love for the semis on WynTV.

After the frustration of watching semis only on Ceefax, I thought finals day was great. TV commentary was better with Tahnee on

I bet the Semis not being shown was a scheduling conflict decision at Eurosport/Discovery, or maybe a technical issue (were qualis shown?).

The lack of comms on the issue is more damning, and typical of the new management.

Aaron Gwin, Downhill Ambassador of the WHOOP UCI Mountain Bike World Series, said: “The first UCI Downhill World Cup in Fort William didn’t disappoint! The Men’s and Women’s Elite finals showed that this season will be one to watch, and this legendary course served up some amazing racing once again.”

Yeah, he definitely said that.

TV commentary was better with Tahnee on

The spell with Tahnee and Gwin was great, Ric actually shut his yapper for a bit and let them give some real insight.

Bruni’s brake cover is to keep them dry apparently, not aero.

Won’t hurt though. I’d bet money there’s an streamlining effect.

dont really care about electronic suspension.  Really like that some bike companies like spesh are making world cup specials rather than the standard bikes anyone can buy.

Doesnt take away from the spectacle.  Plenty of bigger issues.

The semis (and qualifying too I think) were broadcast last year. I’m pretty sure they were advertising being able to watch the qualifying and semis live earlier in the month for Fort William too, so maybe there was a technical issue which meant they couldn’t, but it was pretty disappointing that they didn’t. The whole point of the semis was that it was a way to trim down the field but also give some airtime for those outside the top riders so I don’t see the point in having it if they aren’t going to broadcast it. May as well just have the finals be top 60 and just broadcast the top 30 plus any of the protected riders as they do for finals now.

Andrew Neethling had a pretty good idea for it. He said you have qualifying and the top 30 go through to finals, and then those outside the top 30 get a second run and the top 10 of that go through to finals. If someone has a mechanical in the semis then they are out at least this way you’ve had 2 chances to make it through. It also means the top guys are doing less runs and some privateer that has the run of their life in quali and finishes 5th makes it to the final rather than having to do it all again for semis.

What about the return of (they might as well be) skinsuits? I mean, I really don’t give a monkeys what they wear, but flibbermegibbet there are some extraordinarily ugly kits out there! Nothing that anyone would be seen dead in anywhere else but in a UCI downhill race. Must be bad for the clothing sponsors!

I like the idea being floated of scrapping the semis, having 20 go through from the quali straight to the final followed by a Supercross inspired last chance qualifier to decide the other 10. Raise the women’s final to 15 riders, so 10 straight to final and 5 from the LCQ.

For the TV viewing public it makes sense to have the junior final preceding the elites on the Sunday. Having the semis followed by the final last year was exhausting to watch in it’s entirety, but that does mean if you’re there on site quali day is more interesting.

Shortening the course at the start and finish just to satisfy TV schedules is just wrong.

If it means being able to broadcast the top 5 riders full runs live with some quick replays of the spicy bits, that’s the pay off. It’s still better to have a slightly shortened version of Ft Bill than none at all.

Shorter course was fine by me. FW is boring anyway.

There are a few decent ideas floating around, but IMO it’s becoming clear it should have been a top 40 in the mens’ rather than 30. The depth of talent is just that good now.

And should the World Champ have protected status? Gutted not to see Charlie Hatton in the final. Not least because he was in my fantasy team.

And should the World Champ have protected status? Gutted not to see Charlie Hatton in the final.

I’m really split on this. On the one hand he’s won an elite event and got no ongoing benefit from it. If he’d pulled that winning run out on any other year when Ft Bill was a world cup round not world champs, he’d probably be a protected rider.

On the other, giving him protected status it goes further to make world champs “just another world cup race” which seems to diminish the specialness of it.

There was also a very long (1+ hour) red flag on Saturday before the semi finals that might have thrown the broadcast schedule out of the window.

Interesting.

A competent broadcasting organistion would then have had the commentators apologise and explain the situation during the main show.

I’m still against protected status. Especially in the first race of a season. Why should the standings from last season be carried over to determine protection?  It should be a clean slate.

If the idea of  second chance qualifier was introduced, we could happily lose protected status.

As it is, the randomness of punctures and mechanicals can rob fans of seeing the riders they want to.

As it is, the randomness of punctures and mechanicals can rob fans of seeing the riders they want to.

But this is part and parcel of mountain biking.

Bk made a huge error but still gets into the final.  This wasn’t random.

In the first race last year Minnaar punctured in his quali, semi and final I think.

His protected status of finishing 10th in 2022 (by only 2 points over 11th) gifted him a free pass to that final, where he rode down on the rim to finish 30th and pick up 30 points.

He’s probably one of if not my favourite rider but I don’t want to see that. Getting a free gift based on past performance isn’t good for fairness or finding the best new talent.

I like Needle’s idea. Also like the alternate idea that “protected riders” get the option to have a second chance qualifying run if they mess up. No quali points on your second chance time but you do get to race.

“Shorter course was fine by me. FW is boring anyway.”

I’ve never liked the FW track as an online viewer. It would be so much more fun to watch if the motorway jumps at the bottom happened somewhere in the middle of the track, rather than dominating the viewing and being how the race appears to be won or lost (although I’m sure the race is really won by finding the right balance of speed vs effort at the top so you minimise time loss there vs lower down due to fatigue).

I haven’t watched a full race since it moved from Red Bull – paying for something that won’t fit as easily into my life, as well as being less exciting than the old free broadcast is not going to happen!

In the first race last year Minnaar punctured in his quali, semi and final I think.

Yep, one extra chance is enough.

I think just having outright protection gives an unfair advantage in that they don’t have to hang it out as much as the others if conditions are dicey.

Sponsors of lower tier riders will be struggling to justify why they bother.

i don’t see how tbh. Riders 60-30 were never broadcast anyway so it makes no difference. Personally I like that the ladies final rolls straight into the contenders for the men’s rather than an hours gap whilst 60-30 rolled down the hill to get no points and subdue the atmosphere whilst everyone else waits for the contenders to start. I appreciate this sounds harsh on that group of riders but it’s the reality of professional sport and TV exposure which is the only way to make the sport more valuable to sponsors and eventually riders

Previously riders 60-30 weren’t shown live but they were all filmed in case one of them made the podium and they still had a chance of a decent result.

With all the waffle from UCI about skinsuits I always thought the bikes themselves would be scrutinized before racing ? All those covers on hush hush prototype parts could potentially be hiding dodgy stuff ?

For me the last season and now this are the classic example of… if it ain’t broke, don’t try and fix it. But some bean counters who don’t actually understand the sport think they know better. It’s sad to see numbers at FW and, by the sound of it, energy in the crowd down too.  Commentary in the finish area sounded dire from what I could hear.

The format was fine before. Qualis one day final next- done.

Edit to agree, yes, outright protection makes the whole thing a lot less exciting.

With all the waffle from UCI about skinsuits I always thought the bikes themselves would be scrutinized before racing ? All those covers on hush hush prototype parts could potentially be hiding dodgy stuff ?

maybe the winning bikes get more scrutiny but I think the mojo team ran a mullet setup for two years before it became legal and nobody ever checked

Enduro is dead.

DH is dying.

Worth listening to the latest Making up the numbers podcast.

Martin Whitely basically says next year is likely to see semis scrapped and replaced with this “last chance qualifier”, and possibly no protection at all.

He had previously suggested a televised “WC2” small final for the riders who didn’t qualify, with the top ones going through to the main final.

Which may have been even better – but it sounds like progress anyway.

Martin Whitely seems to talk a lot of sense, perhaps he would be a better bet than the current team of organisers.

The format was fine before.

I don’t mind them trying new things to mix it up, but I think everybody can see that semi-finals isn’t adding anything to it, and I think probably needs to be shelved.

DH is dying.

I don’t think it is at all. There’s a changing of the guard fo’shure but the depth of talent is bigger than it’s ever been, the junior races are just as good now as the elites and some of the kids are stupid fast – certainly good enough to place top 10 -20 in elites, and the Elite racing is proper guess-work these days, there’s maybe 10-15 men who’re good enough to place on the podium and its genuinely who’s best on the day now, same with the women’s racing 5-6 riders any of whom could win on the day.

There’s so much griping about the broadcasting that folks have lost sight of the fact that the actual racing is as good as it’s ever been, if not better

Martin Whitely seems to talk a lot of sense, perhaps he would be a better bet than the current team of organisers.

Absolutely he would have done a much better job than Chris Ball & co.

But I feel you could pick a handful of random gobshites from the Pinkbike comments and they’d have done a better job.