Home › Forums › Chat Forum › Another "why am I fat" thread…
- This topic has 237 replies, 66 voices, and was last updated 11 years ago by molgrips.
-
Another "why am I fat" thread…
-
PaineyFree Member
It’s pretty simple to lose weight. Eat less than you do now and move about more.
Or a more detailed version, either eat less or eat healthier food and do more of the right type of exercise, dependent upon your physicality.
Guaranteed results every time.
trail_ratFree Member“3) Becoming a fat-burning mile-munching machine takes a different approach to just losing weight. It might take longer but it’ll make you a better cyclist (lighter, more endurance, faster cruising speed) 4) If you do 2), it won’t help with number 3).”
the thing about number 3 is the results last longer 😉 i havent done the type of milage im doing today in years yet an elephant never forgets.
how ever a friend did tell me when i started out – Be fit when your young and itll last a life time. he returned to cycling at 32 after dropping out the ratrace and went pro.
Kryton57Full Membercrispycross I think thats a good summary and is basically what I have taken from this thread and adjusted at the beginning of this week accordingly, as follows:
a) I’ve reduced my carb intake (could still do more aka idiet)
b) My midweek rides have basically become HIIT
c) My weekend ride is Z2, that will fluctuate to “fun MTB” when outside a training window for an event.
d) I’m eating clean (I was anyway).Its been a very useful thread this, thanks everyone.
mogrimFull MemberOne thing to bear in mind is that exercise to get fit is not the same as exercise to lose weight, in the first case you don’t want to run out of carbs (unless you’re training for a marathon or similar, and you want to simulate hitting the wall).
But cutting the crap from your diet is almost certainly a good thing, whatever your motives for riding may be.
loumFree MemberKryton57 – Member
Tomorrow’s breakfast was: 2 slices granary toast with butter, filter coffe with milk and sugarTomorrow’s breakfast is now: Poached egg, parma ham and chorizo, black filter coffee.
If you’re going to give it a go, then that might not be filling enough. Could add some bulk with some refried beans, peas or green beans. maybe a tomato, courgette or pepper too.
Just starting it too, and IMO, it’s about filling up on veg.
Once you get over the perception of them not really being “breakfasty”, then adding a bowl of microwaved caulli and broccoli can bulk out any meal to be more filling without resorting to bread.
The point is, if you’re not full then you’re going to snack on something easy by mid morning. 🙂loumFree Membercrispycross – Member
So are we agreed then?
1) To lose weight, calories in must be less than calories out.No. Not at all.
It can work if other conditions are suitable, but it’s not a “must”. And it’s a shit mantra for losing weight. Counting and measuring anything is going to increase awareness of what you’re eating. So it can work. But as a unit, they’re a poor measurement. It’s popular in the industry because it’s easy to sell.
The so called “calorie content ” of food bares no relationship to how your body absorbs and processes it. Try drinking a pint of “calorie rich” diesel and watch the immediate weight loss as your body “empties”.Quality of food is more important than numbers of “calories”. Like your no.5 :
5) Eat nice food, prepared by your own fair hand if possible.
SoloFree MemberIts been a very useful thread this
Agreed, let us know how you get along.
😀The point is, if you’re not full then you’re going to snack on something easy by mid morning.
Yes, satiety is a watch word. You’ll be better fed and hunger free for longer on a breakfast of meat, eggs, etc. Than you would be on milk, sugar and grains.
ime.
🙂EDIT:
The so called “calorie content ” of food bares no relationship to how your body absorbs and processes it. Try drinking a pint of “calorie rich” diesel and watch the immediate weight loss as your body “empties”.
I’ve had this very same thought, but its been a good thread so far.
Imo, theres no need to hassle the calorie counters, esp if it works for them.
🙂_tom_Free MemberMy favourite easy keto/almost idiet friendly breakfast is flax porridge with cream and raspberries. 1 egg whisked, 30-40g of ground flax, some water to help mix it and your choice of flavourings/sweeteners. I like some cinnamon and a bit of vanilla protein powder. Mix it up and microwave for 2 minutes, stirring halfway. Tasty and it usually fills me up til lunchtime. Plus it contains a load of fibre. I’ll definitely stick to having this for breakfast even if/when I go back to a “normal” diet.
molgripsFree Membera) I’ve reduced my carb intake (could still do more aka idiet)
Important point – carbs are not bad, fast release carbs are bad – unless you’ve just finished exercising.
iDiet is not low carb, it’s slow carb. You can (in theory) eat as many carbs as you like. However, I found that really eating til I was full meant eating huge portions of beany chilli, or a small portion and a single biscuit or tea with one sugar. If you experience this, Google for information on leptin. If not, ignore it 🙂
The so called “calorie content ” of food bares no relationship to how your body absorbs and processes it.
Quite – it’s been known for decades that whilst meat contains plenty of calories, the energy required to digest it is more than the calories you get from it. Likewise cabbage and other things. The other day I had roast pork, broccoli and cabbage. Several hundred calories, but the energy value to my body was probably negative. And since I’d been biking that day I was sodding starving after eating it, despite having taken some time to plough through it 🙂
Another advantage to iDiet is that because you’re filling up on nutritious beans and veg, you eat far more nutrients than if you bulked up on pasta or spuds. You find yourself nomming down some incredibly healthy meals.
SoloFree MemberMolgrips.
I’ve seen your comments before on Leptin and they confuse me.
Could you elaborate on how you link Leptin, a hormone produced by adipose tissue. To eating a biscuit.
molgripsFree MemberIf I understand correctly, leptin is also produced by the stomach lining when it comes into contact with carbohydrate.
Incidentally, reading about this and grehlin.. holy cow, it’s very intricate.. seems that your grown hormones are also affected by these hormones which are affected by what you eat.. wow..
molgripsFree MemberMore info
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=127293643&page=1
This helps explain the ‘days off’ concept. It’s not quite the same role for leptin as I was thinking of though.. hmm.
FuzzyWuzzyFull MemberQuite – it’s been known for decades that whilst meat contains plenty of calories, the energy required to digest it is more than the calories you get from it. Likewise cabbage and other things. The other day I had roast pork, broccoli and cabbage. Several hundred calories, but the energy value to my body was probably negative.
Err there is NO scientific research that’s held up to peer review that supports the negative calorie food thing. Ofc some foods do take more calories to digest than others but that’s a long way from negative calories. Is it possible that certain types of food might just be negative calorie? Maybe but it’s virtually impossible to prove due to the complexity involve in researching it and trying to create an experiment that rules out other factors. If they do exist then they’re likely to be the high-water content foods with very few calories and little nutritional value (onions are often cited for example), broccoli and meat I would be highly sceptical of fitting in that category.
nickcFull MemberDid loads of reading last night on t’web trying to understand primarily where Molly and Solo where coming from prompted by Solo’s interesting comment about the study of starved rats dying but remaining fat. Seems that there’s loads of studies showing why cal in cal out doesnt always work for some people, not only that, I owe you both an apology
I’m sorry
some interesting and eye opening stuff! Much more reading to do
molgripsFree MemberInteresting FW, I had not done my own research on that.
Nickc – yep, there’s a hell of a lot to it 🙂 No need to apologise, scepticism is good in this area due to the amount of bollocks about.
As I understand it – there are loads of hormones involved, and different levels produced by the same stimuli in all of us. And different sensitivities to those levels, based on genetics and lifestyle so far. Being fat is just one consequence a whole host of different things going on, it’s just the most visible. However different things are going on in different people.
We all know people who eat loads and stay skinny without exercising, but we’re reluctant to believe that the opposite is possible – that people can fat without stuffing their faces constantly. We’re also quite open to the idea that some people are much better sprinters, and others are better distance athletes. I used to live with a guy who was 6’3 and looked like a renaissance statue of a god with his shirt off, despite loafing around, doing little exercise and eating and drinking tons of shite all the time.
SoloFree MemberNo need to apologise, scepticism is good in this area due to the amount of bollocks about.
Plus 1.
🙂BikingcatastropheFree MemberI used to live with a guy who was 6’3 and looked like a renaissance statue of a god with his shirt off, despite loafing around, doing little exercise and eating and drinking tons of shite all the time.
I didn’t realise we had met before. [Cough]. Or not. 😀
And amidst all of this the vital ingredient for making it all work is the mental commitment to it. It is still quite easy to read all this debate and think it’s all positive and interesting but until you commit to doing something about it that’s all it will be. He says, taking a long hard look at himself!
_tom_Free MemberCommitting to a dinner of a massive rib eye steak with brocolli, cabbage and mushrooms is very easy. As I just proved to myself 🙂
dirtygirlonabikeFree Membertaking the mrs to the womans road race at garelochhead
trailrat, who is your mrs? i’m racing that one too 🙂
Not read all this thread but other things to consider are kettlebells/body weight core work (ie press ups, planks etc)- they definately help me shift fat/become leaner.
Kryton57Full MemberNot read all this thread but other things to consider are kettlebells/body weight core work (ie press ups, planks etc)- they definately help me shift fat/become leaner.
I think I wrote somewhere in the first page or too, when I was lean 3 years ago, co-incidentally I was working out with ‘bells 2 x per week and riding once per week.
dirtygirlonabikeFree MemberI’ve had to cut back on them now i’m racing so much and my body shape has changed as changed – I’m still the same weight, just not as “ripped”.
Also, why are you doing Z2 rides or you still in base?
molgripsFree MemberYou always need base, I think. Don’t forget that the principle of base in the winter and speed in the summer applies to people with a packed racing season like yourself DG… for general riders and loafers like me it’s a case of base when you have time 🙂
trail_ratFree MemberDgoab were you up racing the deeside womans only apr a couple weeks back ?
If so shes the one whos crank broke off about 2 miles in 🙂
Kryton57Full Memberdirtygirlonabike – Member
Also, why are you doing Z2 rides or you still in base?Mental r&r.
dirtygirlonabikeFree MemberDgoab were you up racing the deeside womans only apr a couple weeks back ? If so shes the one whos crank broke off about 2 miles in
Yes i was – i was in the scratch group 😯 Horrible racing in such cold conditions, my legs literally didn’t work for the whole race! Good field for tomorrow, its going to be an aggressive race i think. Racing down past Manchester on Sunday too. 8)
SoloFree MemberMolgrips.
I’ve read your link. I’m not sure that discussion on Leptin fits your model. I’ve not read anything about Leptin being produced by the stomach, not withstanding that Leptin has been discovered in gastric epithelial cells. However, if that was the case, it would still be a small amount of the hormone being released, in comparison to the amounts produced by adipose tissue in all but very lean people. Therefore, eating something high GI after a meal, a) isn’t going to give a real time feedback signal. b) is probably only going to contribute slightly to Leptin levels in the blood.
Keep eating your biscuit after dinner if you wish, but I’m not sure its an effective strategy. Indeed, it may be a behaviour to combat in order to give the satiety feedback loop better effect.
Just my opinion.
molgripsFree Memberbut I’m not sure its an effective strategy
Given that you’re not me, how would you know if it’s effective or not 🙂
It’s not something I do all the time anyway.
SoloFree MemberGiven that you’re not me, how would you know if it’s effective or not
Sorry, I thought you were having trouble shedding the last few Kg. My misunderstandingIt’s not something I do all the time anyway.
Again, a misunderstanding on my part.Anyway, in the next hour or so I am unemployed. So until the next time.
That’s probably it from me.Have fun kids.
😉molgripsFree MemberSo.. you’re being made redundant and paid off with enough money to buy a car? Or you’ve been working on that car and the job’s now finished?
Kryton57Full MemberOr is he a Driver? Is he the Transporter? OMFG Solo is Jason Statham?
Kryton57Full MemberWell there you go, 1 week of “normal” (yet clean other than beer) eating, and using molgrips “eat AFTER the ride” advice – 2lbs weight and 0.5% fat lost.
Huzzah.
molgripsFree MemberNice. I went back up recently, now I’ve lost a couple of KGs since upping the riding AND eating more fast carbs at the right times.
PS it’s not my advice as such.. it came from a certain forum user…
The topic ‘Another "why am I fat" thread…’ is closed to new replies.