Home Forums Chat Forum Abergeldie Castle – could it be saved from the Dee?

Viewing 40 posts - 41 through 80 (of 305 total)
  • Abergeldie Castle – could it be saved from the Dee?
  • Klunk
    Free Member

    but the whole point is that risk should be spread amongst policy holders for the benefit of the policyholders

    that just encourages building in stupid places, i’m not subsidizing idiots.

    cynic-al
    Free Member

    So because this guy is rich and stops people using rights of way/accessing his land, the stw massive hate him…

    …but love Jeremy Clarkson?

    scotroutes
    Full Member

    I certainly don’t hate him. I just think public funds would be better spent elsewhere

    bencooper
    Free Member

    I’m happy for public funds to be used to help out an A-listed building – as long as the public gets to own the building afterwards.

    nickc
    Full Member

    that just encourages building in stupid places, i’m not subsidizing idiots.

    It doesn’t have too, it just needs some better regulation is all.

    piemonster
    Free Member

    .but love Jeremy Clarkson?

    Yeh, STW is a full blown unanimous Clarkson circle jerk

    bencooper
    Free Member

    I think Clarkson is funny. I also think it’d be funny if his house fell in a river.

    matt_outandabout
    Full Member

    Or a mutual.

    Hang on, didn’t we sell most of them off?

    piemonster
    Free Member

    bencooper – Member

    I’m happy for public funds to be used to help out an A-listed building – as long as the public gets to own the building afterwards.

    Pretty much this for me.

    And I dont hate him, but I dont have any more sympathy for him than anyone else losing their home in this.

    thecaptain
    Free Member

    Flood insurance is for spreading risk not for transferring predictable costs.

    matt_outandabout
    Full Member

    How is it going metalheart? Looks like a more prolonged rain but less intense??

    bedmaker
    Full Member

    meh..he may lose just one of his houses.
    I feel sorry for those who lose their only home and don’t have other easy options available to them.

    Recycle the stone into a modern building that doesn’t gobble up resources trying to keep it warm for (I’m guessing) a couple of people.
    I’m really not sentimental about these buildings and what they often represent.

    metalheart
    Free Member

    How is it going metalheart? Looks like a more prolonged rain but less intense??

    Ironically much more rain locally (A93 here to halfway into Aberdeen has localised flooding, all the way across in a couple of instances) but the seems to have less impact on the river itself (at least here).

    The river is about 3/4 – 4/5 of lasts weeks peak. This was previously thought to be be roughly the high point as recently (i.e. Within the the last 30 years). And it’s taken 36 hours to get this high (as opposed to 6). Last time at this point you could see height rising within 15-30 minutes. With more rain forecast it’ll likely rise further. Fingers crossed that it’s gradual and not as high!

    pictonroad
    Full Member

    That looks incredibly perilous. I can’t see any way of driving piles to protect that building. Localised placement of rock could stop the immediate problem, a long term solution would involve work from within the watercourse and that could take a while.

    properbikeco
    Free Member

    karma always seems to have a way of catching up with you…

    project
    Free Member

    Quite a few houses owned by ordianry people have been demolished with all their furniturre inside due to previous flooding, absolutely nothing different fot this house, cost of repairs versus cost of letting it fall down.

    Lets just hope us the tax payer dont have to fund anything to save it.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cumbria-24864996

    bear-uk
    Free Member

    Its not much of a castle.
    This is a proper castle.

    http://www.brickshow.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/6098-castle.jpg

    irc
    Free Member

    Indeed, but the whole point is that risk should be spread amongst policy holders for the benefit of the policyholders

    But insurance only really works for low risk high cost events. If recent experience shows that flood risk have been underestimated and some houses have for example a 1:20 risk of flooding each year. Say a big claim is £40k. The insurance co needs to charge 2K a year just to break even. Multiply that for cases where houses have flooded twice in 10 or 15 years.

    High flood risk houses need high premiums and excesses. Just like low risk drivers don’t pay the same premium as drivers with numerous convictions, if they can get insured at all.

    It isn’t spreading risk if the owners of high risk houses are insured from the premiums paid by those who choose not to buy houses in areas with a known flood risk.

    globalti
    Free Member

    Is the house of any real architectural or historic interest? Wiki says there’s another almost identical building. Surely the best solution for the owner, if he can bear the loss of social standing, is to knock it down and use the stone to build a modern place further up the bank with decent insulation, solar water and PV, huge glass windows and all mod cons and turn it into a money-spinning B&B rather than a massive financial drain that will hang like a millstone around the necks of future generations of his family.

    bikebouy
    Free Member

    Is it only me now whose logging into this thread to see if it’s fallen over yet 😕

    Simwit
    Full Member

    No, not just you 😐

    properbikeco
    Free Member

    ditto 🙂

    nedrapier
    Full Member

    Maybe it’s possible to protect the bank.

    Bit academic, though. Would you put your hands up to work in that river, within toppling distance of that place?

    tomd
    Free Member

    Bit academic, though. Would you put your hands up to work in that river, within toppling distance of that place?

    Not a chance in hell, but I think the other huge problem will be finding a civils contractor who could do that sort of work. I think they’ll all be pretty busy for a while doing easier work for bigger clients.

    nedrapier
    Full Member

    On the insurance front – no-one wants to pay any more than they need to for insurance, and the insurance industry is extremely competitive.

    If you’ve got the choice between buying an expensive policy from insurer a) who takes on everything and anyone for the same premium, regardless of risk, or a cheaper policy from company b) that’s a bit more selective and precise, and able to offer insurance at a price more in line with your level of risk, which would you choose?

    insurance company a) will end up attracting only the worst risks, leaving company b) with the pick of the better risks.

    Lucky you if you’re a bad risk with company a), as long as they don’t go bust before you need to claim.

    richc
    Free Member

    piemonster – Member

    bencooper – Member

    I’m happy for public funds to be used to help out an A-listed building – as long as the public gets to own the building afterwards.

    Pretty much this for me.

    Just for balance, would you happy for the state to take automatic ownership of any property they help save? Or does this only apply to social groups you don’t like?

    tomd
    Free Member

    I think folk’s worry is that millions of public money will be spent shoring up one person’s, albeit very nice, house. If it was a row of flats they would be condemned as being uneconomic to save without a 2nd thought.

    piemonster
    Free Member

    @richc

    come the revolution youll be first up against the wall 😈

    Probably the not that castlse wall admittedly!

    More seriously, wot tom said.

    aracer
    Free Member

    Those poor castle owning minority groups. We demand equality for them.

    oldnpastit
    Full Member

    would you happy for the state to take automatic ownership of any property they help save? Or does this only apply to social groups you don’t like?

    Remind me – what was it that happened to Northern Rock and RBS shareholders in 2008?

    downgrade
    Free Member

    Abergeldie? More like Aber-fell-in-the-Dee, am I right?

    (Too soon? Read it again tomorrow)

    bruneep
    Full Member

    not yet, but part of the garden wall has

    mrhoppy
    Full Member

    I was worried archie was going to be homeless for a moment.

    matt_outandabout
    Full Member

    It was quite high…

    Normal level
    Royal Dee Canoe by Matt Robinson[/url], on Flickr

    The flood level

    Now.

    scotroutes
    Full Member

    Nuke it from orbit…..

    bruneep
    Full Member

    Glendoll, Bachnagairn foot bridge up the Moulzie track past the Moulzie Cottage has been completely washed away, so until further notice please be advised NO access to Bachnagairn, the Rangers are checking other foot bridges in the Glendoll area, so please seek advice from the Glendoll Ranger centre on the current conditions of paths and bridges before heading out.
    Tel: 01575 550233
    email: GlenDollRanger@angus.gov.uk

    Oh hum that was a regular bridge for me

    scotroutes
    Full Member

    That’s on the Capel Mounth circuit so very popular. I guess it’ll be less busy thus time of year though.

    The bridge at Linn of Quoich survived but it no longer crosses the river which has cut a new line further East of the bridge.

    The bridges at the west end of Loch Muick are also no more

    unknown
    Free Member

    That’s a real shame about the Cambus. Spent many a happy summer day jumping off that bridge, one of my favourite spots in the world as a result.

    project
    Free Member

    has it fallen yet

    bikebouy
    Free Member

    Great Pics Matt Oooot NaBoooot.

    That river looks monstrous in the second pic… 😯

Viewing 40 posts - 41 through 80 (of 305 total)

The topic ‘Abergeldie Castle – could it be saved from the Dee?’ is closed to new replies.