cynic-al – Member
Jesus they play some crap, repeatedly!
Bowie’s new stuff was fairly poor but back to the Pixies now and it’s utterly GASH!
No it isn’t.
muggomagic – Member
They’re playing the Pixies for all the 30 somethings that were listening to jason donovan and kylie at the time and completely missed them. It’s the same with all these come back tours by the likes of the specials and the stone roses. the majority of people there would never have been to one of their gigs 1st time round.
Bowie can do no wrong and if you don’t like it then it’s you that has the problem.
How about for the 50-something’s, who were there, but never managed to see them, for whatever reason, and are just glad to a) have a possibility of seeing the band live, and b) see new material being produced.
I can’t hear any significant difference between the new Pixies stuff, and the likes of Monkey Goes To Heaven,
And I’ve got all the original Pixies albums, and the two new EPs.
From what I’ve seen of Cynic-al and dd’s music tastes, I can’t take seriously any post that says the new Pixies stuff is crap.
Just out of interest, how many gigs do either of you two actually go to each year, and how much music do you own?
I can’t actually say how many a year, it varies, and I’ve no idea how many in total; my best year I went to thirty nine, and I’ve been going to gigs for forty-four years. So far I’ve got eight between now and June, three in two weeks in April.
Along with several hundred singles, a couple of hundred albums, and maybe three hundred CD’s, with nearly 16,000 tracks in iTunes.
I think I know a bit about music.