I’m missing something.. A fat tyre on a small wheel is nearly the same as a thin tyre on a big wheel? What about a fat tyre on a big wheel and a thin tyre on a small wheel? Or a fat tyre on both sized wheels, or a thin tyre on both wheels?
Or both wheels with no tyres? Or both tyres with no wheels? Or no tyres and no wheels?
Onandonandonitgoeswhenitstopsnobuggerknows…
This is me vvv
I struggle to see why the same argument (which is inherently flawed) is made again and again. Try putting the same tyre of the same width on a (more or less) identical rim and then make your point.
I think the point is… that a change of tyres makes a difference. If you want to go bigger, it might be worth trying a bigger tyre before changing your whole bike.
I think the point is… that a change of tyres makes a difference. If you want to go bigger, it might be worth trying a bigger tyre before changing your whole bike.
But a 26*2.4 tyre feels and rolls nothing like a 27.5*2.1. The amount of cushioning, tyre squirm, etc all leads to a very different feel. Not to mention one is a lot wider for the same height!
My 29 HansDampf on a 25mm internal width rim is 30.5″..but as stated previously, no point unless comparing apples with apples, and I’m sure they are all fun on a swoopy dusty trail in the forest on a warm sunny evening 🙂