Home Forums Bike Forum 27.5 V 29 hmmmm…

Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 49 total)
  • 27.5 V 29 hmmmm…
  • rOcKeTdOg
    Full Member

    27.5 x 2.35 against 29 x 2.25,both Nobby Nic, there’s not much in it is there??

    hmmmm

    believe the hype 😉

    rOcKeTdOg
    Full Member

    ,both Nobby NicSchwalbe

    aracer
    Free Member

    Do you reckon a narrow enough 29er tyre could make the trails come alive?

    unknown
    Free Member

    Seriously? Again?

    nmdbasetherevenge
    Free Member

    Says hans dampf on the tyre, are you on the beers?

    cbmotorsport
    Free Member

    Bit overbiked for the park???

    belugabob
    Free Member

    The 27.5 is nearer than the 29, so you have to allow for perspective 😉

    rOcKeTdOg
    Full Member

    nmdbasetherevenge – Member

    Says hans dampf on the tyre, are you on the beers?

    are you?*

    *try reading more than one post 😉

    cbmotorsport – Member

    Bit overbiked for the park??

    not for the tea and cake stop though

    uselesshippy
    Free Member

    Its got to be said, my mates norco made more sense when he put the massive Hans dampfs on it. But it didn’t make as much difference as that PIC suggests.

    kimbers
    Full Member

    My 650b wheels with 2.4 highrollers measure 28.5″

    DT78
    Free Member

    Bit overbiked for the park???

    *chuckle*

    I thought the same 🙂

    asterix
    Free Member

    The 27.5 is nearer than the 29, so you have to allow for perspective

    avdave2
    Full Member

    The 29er is nearly a whole bike length ahead of the 27.5, you wouldn’t need a photo finish to sort that one out, it’s clearly a lot faster.

    rOcKeTdOg
    Full Member

    DT78 – Member

    Bit overbiked for the park???

    *chuckle*

    I thought the same

    most of the rest of the “park” looks like this though

    jaymoid
    Full Member

    What head angle for the park?

    kimbers
    Full Member

    rocketdog only rides park

    cbmotorsport
    Free Member

    Hitting that tree must have hurt..

    andyl
    Free Member

    the difference in the wheel sizes is more pronounced on the further away shot. Up close seems to be distorting it a bit.

    rOcKeTdOg
    Full Member

    more footy pitch,bowling green, pavillion and pitch n putt riding here

    jaymoid
    Full Member

    ^ That does look like a fun park

    bikebouy
    Free Member

    Me likee the dark colored looking bike 😉

    cbmotorsport
    Free Member

    Aww…. we didn’t mean it rOcKy

    limburger
    Free Member

    Hitting that tree must have hurt..

    No worries, it just hasn’t been photoshopped very well. The second one with the yellow bike (oops!) is a bit better, but the head is way too large for that body (which is Gee Atherton’s, I believe).
    8)

    rOcKeTdOg
    Full Member

    but the head is way too large for that body (which is Gee Atherton’s, I believe)

    you have made Ben’s day 😀

    mudmonster
    Free Member

    The HD’s look a lot fatter then the NN’s

    shortcut
    Full Member

    Ahhh but did the trail develop a pulse and start breathing when you got on the 27.5er?

    JohnClimber
    Free Member

    asterix – Member

    The 27.5 is nearer than the 29, so you have to allow for perspective

    Funniest post reply EVER……

    RocketDog, just get yourself a Fat Bike and stop worrying, you know you NEED one

    richieokeefe1
    Free Member

    650b is aload of tosh , I’ve owned it and it’s rubbish , they should of kept 26inch and 29ers

    rOcKeTdOg
    Full Member

    RocketDog, just get yourself a Fat Bike and stop worrying, you know you NEED one

    too mainstream now John

    JCL
    Free Member

    There is definitely not a lot in it when you put a much smaller tyre (don’t believe the numbers) on the 29″ and place it behind the 650b bike. Funny enough that headtube on the 650b bike looks like it would be too big for the 29″ too 😉

    luke1688
    Full Member

    Lickeys rocketdog?

    takisawa2
    Full Member

    I recognise that place.

    (RD’s pic, not the caravan )

    steve_b77
    Free Member

    Massive tyre closer to the lense appears almost as big as slightly smaller one further away shocker

    soulstealer
    Free Member

    The blue heckler is mine, ridden exclusively 26″ until today. All I have to say is that wheel size doesn’t matter one bit, but the smile on my face that just won’t go away after today’s ride does!

    aracer
    Free Member

    All I have to say is that wheel size doesn’t matter one bit

    Burn the witch.

    tenfoot
    Full Member

    I have one bike with a 26″ 2.4 high roller and another with a 650B 2.1 racing ralph. The difference in circumference for these is also negligible. The only difference I can see at the moment is that the racing ralphs will probably end in a slippery death for me due to the volume of mud around the Kent trails

    schmiken
    Full Member

    I struggle to see why the same argument (which is inherently flawed) is made again and again. Try putting the same tyre of the same width on a (more or less) identical rim and then make your point.

    Say for example a 26, 27.5, and 29 Schwalbe Racing Ralph on ZTR Crests at 30psi – then feel free to spout as much nonsense as you like.

    Comparing different tyres on rims with different profiles is just stupid.

    somafunk
    Full Member

    My 26″ x 2.35 hans dampf measures 27.25 inches on a stans crest, can i join the 27.5″ trail comes alive debate or does my lack of .25 of an inch mean i’m cast aside with all the other wannabe 26″ riding freaks?.

    schmiken
    Full Member

    Also, forgot to mention this, all the tyres should be the same width.

    Can we actually get the measurements of a 26, 27.5 and 29 x 2.25 on Crests at 30 psi? Then we can finally put this stupid debate to bed.

    steve_b77
    Free Member

    My Bonty TLR 29-4 on a 19mm internal width rim measures 29.5″. Can I join the almost Krampus club?

Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 49 total)

The topic ‘27.5 V 29 hmmmm…’ is closed to new replies.