So you’re not really qualified to discuss the matter…

Various reasons, too many to list.

Solving crimes not being one of them.

Because it’s interesting.

Problem ?

I find it interesting and depressing in equal measure, that someone who obviously cares about something so much, is so incapable of understanding the process of investigation and the meaning of evidence, that he’s ill equipped to do anything about it.

Then your not really qualified to discuss the matter.

And Mark Williams Thomas for exposing Jimmy Savile, knowing the links he had to so many powerful people.

Agreed JHJ

I’ll ask again, why is this so much more interesting to you than the actual subject matter of high-level child abuse and corruption? You really do seem to have quite a bizarre fascination with it.

I’m not suggesting we can ‘solve’ the crimes on STW but some threads on here actually do contain interesting discussion and useful information about all sorts of issues.

What question is that oh great overlord?

If the topic is high level child abuse and corruption, then my critique of the “evidence” supplied to support it, is bang on topic.

Your critique of my motivations for posting however isn’t on topic at all.

Wind yer neck in.

This thread might have had a chance of being an interesting discussion, if it wasn’t for the constant posting of spurious “evidence” that’s turned into yet another conspiracy theory dumping ground.

I’m glad to report that from what I can see, the questions raised have been answered in the meantime.

If you have any further questions, please don’t hesitate to ask.

Enjoy… If at any point you feel you need a break from fiction to dabble in fact, you may want to have a good look through this to check if there’s any errors, though I’m sure most of it is in order

Until you clarify your question, there isn’t much I can answer that hasn’t already been answered…

In that case, it’s already been covered…

If you have any further questions, please don’t hesitate to ask.

enjoy your fiction

Chalk one up to Cougar for that comeback 😆

Interesting…we’ll have to see what figures come forward for

Judges
Military figures
Police officers
Clergy
Care workers

Also worth noting the relative influence of individuals depending on their profession and social circles

So it turns out the MP for Cheltenham from 1974-1992, Charles Irving, was a member of the Monday Club, who like Leon Brittan, Cyril Smith and Jimmy Savile, was known at Elm Guest House[/url]

He has also been mentioned by David, which if I’m not mistaken, is the guy from the Radio 4 program:

I was abused by top Tories then blackmailed to keep quiet

This passage is particularly interesting:

“He said if ‘we’ could murder 13 people on the streets of Northern Ireland and get away with it, there would be little trouble in arranging for an accident to befall a member of my family. I was out of my depth.”

As not only were members of Sinn Fein mentioned as visiting Elm Guest House, but also

Jimmy Savile boasted of IRA connections for protection

Read that story yesterday, hopefully her actions will move the investigations forward.

Jimmy Saville was in the IRA? 😯

It’s good that the Police and Crown Prosecution Service have ensured justice for the victims in those instances, instead of protecting the offenders, as they seem to have done in the case of MPs…

And given the clear knowledge of goings on around Rotherham as early as 2001 and the fact the Home Office was informed in 2003 not to mention missing files relating to Rotherham perhaps there was some degree of protection there too… but why? And how? Freemasons?

By the way, I’m not suggesting Jimmy Savile was in the IRA, but given the known links between Kincora, Elm Guest House and Sinn Fein, it certainly lends credibility to the fact that Savile knew members of the IRA.

Northern winters are too cold for lizards…

No.

Simple question –

The lizards comment is simply a flippant way of alluding to the conspiracy idea that there’s some massive all-pervading “control structure” at the heart of it all. cf the endless pictures of someone with someone, presented as evidence.

As before, the cause is laudable, the approach is laughable.

Yep, silly me, providing links from credible sources, as opposed to hot air from my nether regions…

Nonetheless:

is a good question…

Here’s another good question:

Why are Muslim terrorists given so much media coverage when you are as likely to be killed by the police?

I don’t want to answer that question so here’s another question alluding to what I want you to think