Subscribe now and choose from over 30 free gifts worth up to £49 - Plus get £25 to spend in our shop
I don't have stats to hand, I don't know if they exist, but given that I'm a non-posh bloke, in the military, I think my instincts on this can be trusted, no?
Why should I trust you at all? I don't know you from Adam mate. So, you can't actually prove what you claim? Thought not.
Whereas you're not in the military, so you're trading on the equivalent of what some bloke in a pub told you years ago
So, you've met me, you know all my friends and acquaintances, do you? Thought not.
I don't know you from Adam mate.
If you don't know him from Adam, how can you call him "mate"?
Hmm.
surely though... it's only the middle management places that are meritocrital(?)?
your supervisors.. managers.. maybe even one or two of your area managers.. just for the look of the thing..
looks like a case of closing ranks to me..
get out while you can Elfin.. you'll never beat the conditioning that this lot have undergone..
A quick bit of googling reveals that the last three Chiefs of the Air Staff (the head honcho) attended the University of Bath, ICL and none! None had been to a school I'd heard of. Eton/Oxbridge conspiracy?
Why should I trust you at all? I don't know you from Adam mate. So, you can't actually prove what you claim? Thought not.
I could say the same about you, and everyone else on this forum. There has to be a degree of trust surely? Alternatively, ask a military person you know if my posts are genuine. My comment on your source was based on what you have so far divulged.
If you don't know him from Adam, how can you call him "mate"?
It's a term of endearment often directed at strangers ........ it doesn't signify that the user has "mated" with the receiver.
HTH
If you don't know him from Adam, how can you call him "mate"?
Sorry, you're right; he/she's in the RAF, not the Navy. 🙂
get out while you can Elfin.. you'll never beat the conditioning that this lot have undergone..
S'ok; I've proved me point, so I'm done now. I dare say various individuals will waffle on about something or other, but very few will actually face up to the [b]reality[/b] that we simply don't live in a [i]true[/i] meritocracy, as such a concept is a bit too much for them to contemplate.
S'ok; I've proved me point, so I'm done now
Well you've certainly proved something, but most of us knew it anyway....
Same as teachers
woohooo I'm middle class, when do I get the secrete handsahke thingy and all the money?
Me and Ernie got called 'Middle Class' the other day. 😀
I have been scrubbing myself with carbolic soap ever since....
Had a quick read of this, I could spend hours correcting stuff on here, but I will restrict myself to just a few points:
(i) My father joined the army as a private left as a brigadier.
(ii) In my experience, the "old boy network" is more pervasive (certainly in Banking) in the Netherlands, France and Germany.
(iii) the gap between educational attainment of the state and private sectors seems to have widened over recent years, reducing social mobility, and something needs to be done to address this.
Since I made the "old boys network" comment which has brought oh so much joy to this thread 😆 I thought I'd give you the heads up on this:
[url] http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00yb5kv [/url]
I expect some here to accuse the BBC of being some lefty organisation next.
anagallis_arvensis - Member[b]Same as teachers[/b]
woohooo I'm middle class, when do I get the secrete handsahke thingy and all the money?
When you learn how to spell ffs 😐
Social mobility is low in the UK as a result of widening inequality as measured by the Gini coefficient and represented in a Lorenz curve. Or simply that the gap between the bottom and the top has become much greater. It started with Thatcher and Labour governments have made little impact on it (remember Mandelson '....filthy rich under NL' etc etc). Education cannot compensate for society and anyway the problem is not so much about mobility but rather inequality. Those that have been socially mobile like that nasty little piece of work Alan Sugar are used to justify inequality with the illusion that it's down to just rewards for talent and effort whereas most of the rich got there by choosing their parents carefully.
How do you spell 'ffs' then, Ernie?
elf there have been numerous AVM in the RAF who have entered as boy entrants as apprentices and quite a sizeable number of offices of air are ex apprentices. Officer appraisals are very direct and quite blunt if somebody isnt upto it they are found out very quickly.
Similary if an airman wants to be commissioned and gets approval from their Boss and CO they apply and if good enough get commissioned.
I knew a guy from a big council estate in Birkenhead who followed the path above,if you are good enough you are in .
The same as being a Pilot they are from a variety of different backgrounds some working class and others very wealthy but one things for sure if you arnt up to the job you are out regardless of who you are.
As for cannonfodder in the Airforce the officers go off to War
the gap between educational attainment of the state and private sectors seems to have widened over recent years
do you have any evidence for this as it would be quite hard to work out
Have to agree with airtragic. There is also some complete rubbish posted above regarding what class/schooling/academic achievements are required to become an Officer in our modern armed forces. As for the "cannonfodder" comments, jesus.
I don't think that anyone has argued against my point though have they ?
You don't find Old Etonians in the ranks regardless of how easy it might be for us peasants to become officers.
Social mobility has to move both ways because there isn't enough room or everyone at the top table.
Happy to be informed that I'm misinformed.
most Etonians parents whould have higher expectations for their children dont you think especialy after spending all that cash?
elf there have been numerous AVM in the RAF
AVM =?
I'm not disputing the fact that there is a [i]degree[/i] of meritocracy in the armed forces, I'm merely stating that the [i]majority[/i] of top officers are from pivileged backgrounds. As there are such people in most top jobs. Exceptions do not prove the rule. You can't tell me that the organisation of the armed forces is proportionate and representative of society overall. It's not. There are of course complex reasons for this, but the overall reason is that a class system exists which divides people and serves as a framework for discrimination. I accept that the armed forces have become more meritocratic than they were in the past.
The same outdated and unequal system exists in business, in Law, in all sorts of areas of public life. Things are changing, but all too slowly. Those who seek to preserve the Status Quo are hindering the natural development of society, to serve their own ends.
most Etonians parents whould have higher expectations for their children dont you think especialy after spending all that cash?
If expectations is all that is required, then why bother wasting all that money sending your son to Eton ?
I suppose you could send them for just a term though ....... just to prove that you expect a lot from them.
Elf
Have a look at this
http://www.raf.mod.uk/organisation/seniorcommanders.cfm
not many old etonians
Ernie
Do you think somebody who can spend 30K+ of taxed income would settle for their child fliping burgers in maccyDs.?
not many old etonians
Well we don't know what secondary school any of them went to, as it doesn't state such information. And the top bloke there is a university graduate, as are others. Other than that it gives no info as to their backgrounds. They could all have been to Eton for all we know.
I'm merely stating that the majority of top officers are from pivileged backgrounds.
Define "priveleged"? It's been demonstrated that the top ranks of the RAF didn't go to the famous public schools or Oxbridge. They almost certainly didn't know each other before they joined up. They've mostly got degrees because to be a star ranked officer, you have to be clever, ambitious, confident and articulate. People like that tend to go to uni.
Yes, it certainly helps to have been given a supportive upbringing, in which confidence has been developed and one has been pushed to achieve, whether at home or at school. This is surely not unique to the upper classes though? Also, there surely comes a point when you have to stand on your own feet and stop bleating about how rubbish your school was and how they're all out to get you.
There are of course complex reasons for this, but the overall reason is that a class system exists which divides people and serves as a framework for discrimination.
Moving away from the military now. The above quote makes the old boy network sound like some kind of conspiracy, rather than a large scale expression of the fact that people in positions of power (regardless of class) are more likely to appoint those they know, or failing that, have some common ground with. Human nature. So the pace of change is slow.
You don't find Old Etonians in the ranks regardless of how easy it might be for us peasants to become officers.
I suspect that's due to parental ambition. The only Etonian I've ever met was a scholarship boy!
AVM = Air Vice Marshal, 2* officer, Maj Gen equivalent
Elfinsafety - Member
Me and Ernie got called 'Middle Class' the other day.
I have been scrubbing myself with carbolic soap ever since....
Such a middle class comment 🙂
Also, there surely comes a point when you have to stand on your own feet and stop bleating about how rubbish your school was and how they're all out to get you.
And just who said that? All we ask for is a level playing feild.
how many did you read
Air Vice-Marshal B M North OBE MA RAF
Barry Mark North (Baz) was born on 13 September 1959 and educated at Carre’s Grammar School, Sleaford and at Trent Polytechnic, Nottingham, where he gained a Higher National Diploma in Business Studies;
Define "priveleged"? It's been demonstrated that the top ranks of the RAF didn't go to the famous public schools or Oxbridge.
Maybe, but they're not from a Hackney comprehensive, are they? And not likely to be, really, let's face it.
'Privileged' I'd say is coming from a background with sufficient wealth to enable fee-paying education.
Peter Wall, Chief of General Staff, British Army. Educated at public school and Sandhurst.
Nick Parker; CinC Land Forces. Educated at public school and Sandhurst:
I'm sure there's loads more. I think my point is quite clear. If you can give me an example of a top officer who hasn't been to public school and University, and/or who has risen from the rank of Private to the top position, then fair enough. But I think it's fair enough to say that the whole system is weighted pretty heavily in favour of those who enjoy wealth and privilege to begin with.
Name the top serving officers of the British Military who rose up through the ranks from the very bottom. Go on.
Y'know, the Cheif Air Marshalls, the Brigadiers, the Admirals, the Commodores. That lot.
When these guys started their careers circa 25 years ago it may have been the case that only certain people could make it to the top.
Now 1/3 naval officers come from the rating cadre (NCO for any pongo speaking types).
Times are a'changing...
raf
both rose to the very top
Sir Michael Beetham joined as an airman was an LAC (private)
Sir Keith Williamson ex apprentice
Do you think somebody who can spend 30K+ of taxed income would settle for their child fliping burgers in maccyDs.?
Is that supposed to be a suitable metaphor for serving ( and dying ) in the ranks ?
Fair enough. But both were educated at public or grammar school, so probbly not from the least privileged backgrounds. And don't you think they are exceptions to the rule, really?
All Army Officers are educated at Sandhurst. It's the Army Officer training academy!
"Sir Michael Beetham joined as an airman was an LAC (private)"
And he was the Chief during the Falklands War.
Plenty of grammar schoolboys up there too.
Whitgift School is an independent day school educating approximately 1,200 boys aged 10 to 18 in South Croydon, London in a 45-acre (180,000 m2) parkland site.
Gen Wall is an alumnus. OK, it's probably not a Croydon comp, but hey, it's close....
Fred, you really are so far up your own arse on this one, that we're planning on sending in a cave rescue team to try and get you out of there.
Firstly it devalues the soldiers and junior officers who contribute so much in today's forces, particularly on contemporary operations. You clearly underestimate the complexity and responsibility that we now expect our soldiers to cope with, from eighteen year old Privates handling multi-million weapons systems, to lowly non commissioned officers flying hugely complex Apache helicopters.
Secondly you clearly do not understand the difference between a graduate and a potential officer, the two are often far from synonymous!
Thirdly, you overlook the esprit de corps and can do attitude that leads people to the highest ranks - the reason you so often see people with public school backgrounds in the forces is because frequently their Fathers were in the forces too, and the military paid for their schooling because of the disruptive effect of frequent moves on children's educations, the CCF system in public schools, and the desire to achieve arrived at through their family example. This is not an example of nepotism or an old boys network any more than an Electrician or plumbers son going on to become one himself.
Finally, you overlook the fact that so many officers have degrees that they obtained through military sponsorship - they often would not have been to university if it was not for the forward looking, progressive outlook taken by the forces.
The officer in charge of sandhurst in 91ish joined the army as a private soldier
so much for the Sandhurst education in the those days
Do you think somebody who can spend 30K+ of taxed income would settle for their child fliping burgers in maccyDs.?
Comments like this prove that the class system is well and truly entrenched in this country.
It may not be a profession which would feature high up on many people's list of aspirations (largely because of the sneering prejudice and condescension shown by others), but it's an honest job, and as it involves providing one of life's basic necessities, a fairly admirable one, I'd say. I'd have more respect for someone who works at Mac Ds to pay their way in life, than the person who looks down on someone else for doing an honest day's graft.
Thirdly, you overlook the esprit de corps and can do attitude that leads people to the highest ranks - the reason you so often see people with public school backgrounds in the forces is because frequently their Fathers were in the forces too, and the military paid for their schooling because of the disruptive effect of frequent moves on children's educations, the CCF system in public schools, and the desire to achieve arrived at through their family example.
Good point, forgot to mention that earlier!
Is that supposed to be a suitable metaphor for serving ( and dying ) in the ranks ?
no it wasnt a metaphor for anything
Just trying to say that if a parent invests 30K+ per year in their childs education they wouldnt let their child end up flipping burgers, they would get them into a nice little earner no matter how thick they were ( mind you eton has an entrance exam )
Comments like this prove that the class system is well and truly entrenched in this country.
Every society has it's mcjobs that people look down on.
Out of interest what is a classless country? Germany? France? Netherlands? Italy? US? Sweden?
Which of those?
Elfinsafety,Congratulations, you've finally moved me to register and post.
Well there's something positive come out of it all, eh? 🙂
This argument's going to go round and round in circles. I will say, that my view of the leadership structure of the British Armed Forces has been enlightened slightly, it's good to see that they are moving (albeit very slowly) in the right direction, and there have been some good contributions from various people, but my overall point of view remains the same.
Really can't be bothered any more though, sorry. You're not going to change your opinions, I'm not going to change mine. There are several points I could take up and challenge (and in some cases prove wrong), but it's an awful waste of energy, tbh. So a bit pointless to continue really.
no it wasnt a metaphor for anythingJust trying to say that if a parent invests 30K+ per year in their childs education they wouldnt let their child end up flipping burgers, they would get them into a nice little earner no matter how thick they were ( mind you eton has an entrance exam )
But MacDonalds is not what we're talking about is it ? Are you saying that after spending 30k a year that Etonians parents would want something 'better' for their children than serving in the ranks ? I think it is because after I'd said
You don't find Old Etonians in the ranks regardless of how easy it might be for us peasants to become officers
You replied
most Etonians parents whould have higher expectations for their children dont you think especialy after spending all that cash?
I think that if you step back and take a look at what you're saying, you'd realise that you're being more than slightly disrespectful to those serving and dying in the ranks right now. Wouldn't you say ?
Elf admitting he is wrong 😀
Don't be so silly. I'm [b]never[/b] wrong. Have you learned [i]nothing[/i]??? 😕
Just bored with it now that's all.
I think I'm going to unregister. Afaik Fred has admitted to being wring which must mean that there's some sort of bodysnatcher thing going on!
This argument's going to go round and round in circles.......You're not going to change your opinions, I'm not going to change mine........So a bit pointless to continue really.
ffs don't stop because of that.
Start taking that attitude, and this place will be ****ed
Clubber stop being ridiculous. When am I ever wrong? Seriously? It isn't possible. Check on tinternet.
Ernie; it's just got a bit boring, sorry. Trouble is, when you're right all the time like I am, it's difficult to have to deal with all the poor folk who are wrong. 🙁
Ah well. Not everyone can be so privileged I spose...
public school backgrounds in the forces is because frequently their Fathers were in the forces too, and the military paid for their schooling because of the disruptive effect of frequent moves on children's educations, the CCF system in public schools, and the desire to achieve arrived at through their family example. This is not an example of nepotism or an old boys network
ridiculous and farcical. meritocratic or self perpetuating elite? That is exactly the kind of barriers to entry that perpetuates the old boys network.
Some bullshine on this thread but that takes the biscuit.
I think I'm going to unregister.
At least one good thing will have come from the thread.
Show me a comp that offers boarding, and I'm sure the military will send military kids there. The purpose of the boarding school allowance is to stop mil kids being uprooted as their parents move around every few years. It's a max of about £5000 a term so you're not going to Eton with it! The alternative to your
self perpetuating elite?
is therefore the systematic compromising of military kids' education. Hardly conducive to social mobility is it?
Elfinsafety - MemberDon't be so silly. I'm never wrong
Here :
http://www.singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/despicable-low-life-thieving-scum#post-2018701
When [u]you[/u] admitted that [u]you[/u] were wrong, and that [u]I was[/u] right 8)
Shhhhh!
😳
Nothing, nothing...
Charming dd!
Airtragic - I know a several teachers who made their careers teaching int eh army schools attached to military bases. Free. So there is certainly some free english language teaching day schools for the military kids
Does the ordinary squaddie get teh £5000 pa to send his kids to boarding school or just the officers?
Like the man in the orthopaedic shoes, I stand corrected. But at
you would probably be paying less than £10,000 a year at a state boarding school.
it's still using up most of the allowance. So if mil types want to send their sprogs to Harrow, they're still going to have to stump up a lot.
How is it
barriers to entry
Available to all ranks. Scaled down for those on higher pay rates, actually What made you ask that? Care for some vinegar with that chip?
These day schools, is there one at ALL locations military personnel are posted, in the UK and abroad?
because its self perpetuating. Your dad is an officer so you go to the right schools which smooths your way to become an officer - so entry depoends on your background not your ability or potential.
Its a classic example of a self perpetuating elite
edit
seeking knowledge. I genuinely didn't know and it makes a significant difference to the argument as clearly if the squaddies kids get he same dosh than it reduces the barriers but again clearly does not eliminate tehmactually What made you ask that?
Your Dad's (or Mum's, not very right on of you is it?) rank has nothing to do with it. It's an allowance to offset the disadvantages that serving in the military confers on your kids.
these day schools, is there one at ALL locations military personnel are posted, in the UK and abroad?
I have no idea. I know they are around and available in many locations. I would assume its only in the places with a big permanent presence
edit : Crossed posts - see my edit above
I would assume its only in the places with a big permanent presence
Correct. Very big.
So anyway airtragic, how you liking it so far on here .............reckon you'll stick around ?
Well I'm usually happy to just read, but I'm sitting around ill and when the subject is important to you...
when the subject is important to you
Oooou.............wrong answer 😐
The reason the uptake for boarding schools is high for officers is that many are on 2 year postings while airman can serve at one location for many years.Also there are more oversea postings for officer, both of which are not good for education.
because its self perpetuating. Your dad is an officer so you go to the right schools which smooths your way to become an officer - so entry depoends on your background not your ability or potential.Its a classic example of a self perpetuating elite
Totall cobblers
To gain entry first you have to undergo isometric tests then several interviews ,depending what academic qualifications you possess different careers are available. If you would like to gain a commission and pass all of the above then you have to go on a 2 day course where you are tested mentaly and physicaly.
Mikeypies - the ranks can also move around every two years also at the drop of a hat, and obviously children from the ranks can therefore go to boarding school.
I think one or two above really need to get down the recruiting office to ask for CO entrance criteria.
My father was in the RAF so I went to a public school subsidised by the tax payer. It's not about perpetuating an elite, it's about making sure the kids of forces personnel can have a stable education. You might not realise but there are lots of different exam boards out there (with differing exam focus for the same subject and schools don't have a standard curriculum). That would mean if I moved mid-year, even to a new school with the same exam board for a subject, I could be going over exactly what I did in term 1 at the old school again in term 2 at the new school but I'd never get taught what the new school did in term 1. Funnily enough I didn't end up an officer in the forces either.
I think there are different types of public school to, for sure there were some kids from pretty rich families at the place I went but only a couple were what you'd describe as toffs, and they were the ones that got bullied. Most were kids from middle class families whose parents were prepared to make sacrifices to get their kids the best education. Any speaking with a posh accent probably got the same treatment they'd get at a comprehensive school.
Mikeypies - the ranks can also move around every two years also at the drop of a hat, and obviously children from the ranks can therefore go to boarding school.
That is true but for the majority (airmen) in the RAF it dosnt apply many spend several years in post (5+) and if your children are in the last years you can defer posting. As for the Army and Navy ?
I get the impression the Army is a pain for singletons or non married couples regarding postings.
Mikey, I can only speak for us but my Wife being a RAF Flight Nurse has a two year posting (which is now up) then can in theory be posted elsewhere depending on apart from RAF requirements, her first and second choice postings, promotion and what she specialises in.


