[Closed] David Icke at Wembley last Saturday

Hasn't that been proven (and published) though? 🙂

Cougar - Moderator 
you can count on my slipping it into more credible threads every now and again to keep everyone on their toes.
I refer you to your recent warning.

[b]We've no issues with threads like this one discussing your hoary ideas, but derailing other threads and disrupting ongoing conversations isn't on.[/b]

POSTED 1 HOUR AGO # REPORT-POST

Jeeez
Like walking on egg shells on here!
A bit OTT I would say 🙄

It's a bit like getting schrodinger to flash his pussy this thread.

Jeeez
Like walking on egg shells on here!
A bit OTT I would say

It's not like walking on egg shells.
And it's not OTT either.

It's perfectly logical, just like it would be in real life.

If I knew someone in real life who suddenly started to derail every conversation and twist it round so he could preach shit to me about conspiracy theories, he would be told to shut up or **** off.

Once in a while, when it's relevant to the conversation is fine.

Other than that, people start to get pissed off. And the preacher ends up sitting alone in the corner of a pub muttering to nobody but themselves.

Like walking on egg shells on here!
A bit OTT I would say

FWIW he enters threads and says yes its terrible but what about - INSERT CONSPIRACY HERE- and this is not allowed and is a bit swiss Tony but without the humour

As you have just proven you can disagree with and even mock a mod openly so its hardly as you have portrayed it

The Fermat Defence?

There must be some kind of conspiracy at work, because I haven't had any warning...

anyway, exposing a vast global network involving those the media encourages you to revere is like making love to a beautiful woman.

You have to build it up slowly, working your way around, until things start to spread, then little by little, with a few teasers along the way, you go in for the kill, thrusting away until the climax. 😆

Now that's more like it 😉

anyway, exposing a vast global network involving those the media encourages you to revere is like making love to a beautiful woman.

he will have his day in court soon enough...the other bit well he has had some fanciful views but that one takes the biscuit.

something you dream about?

Might be a bit weird if I didn't eh, you?

Which do you reckon: Jessica Alba or Megan Fox?

Are you now saying that Jessica Alba is a kiddie fiddler?

FFS there you go lusting after

those the media encourages you to revere

They even got to you.

Are you now saying that Jessica Alba is a kiddie fiddler?

Not that I recall, are you?

FFS there you go lusting after

those the media encourages you to revere

They even got to you.

Well, I'm mostly human 😉

Junkyard - lazarus 
Like walking on egg shells on here!
A bit OTT I would say

TBH if you are worried about how "egg shelly " it is here [b]i would have thought the least wise response would be to highlight how much you disagree with a moderator and then roll your eyes at them[/b]
FWIW he enters threads and says yes its terrible but what about - INSERT CONSPIRACY HERE- and this is not allowed and is a bit swiss Tony but without the humour

As you have just proven you can disagree with and even mock a mod openly so its hardly as you have portrayed it
The Fermat Defence?

I would be happier if it was his last theorem
It has been proved - UK maths bod name escapes me- WILES - I checked

oh dear... Yes I very much disagreewith the moderator, jeewiz am I not aloud? Or have I got to lick ass like the rest of you sheep... 🙄
If I don't reply to the nonsense you put back it's probably that I've been banned or just can't be arsed! 😆

💡 more copying and pasting than me and worse spelling ...am I being trolled 😉

Of course you are allowed to disagree bit it negates your walking on egg shell claim?

How many times do I need to type it for you to get the point?

walking on egg shells :to be very diplomatic and inoffensive

It seems very strange to threaten people with bans for talking shit on a David Icke thread.

...to give you an insight into the bigger picture.

exposing a vast global network...

like the rest of you sheep...

The Second round of Conspiracy Theory Bullshit Bingo starts here.

Eyes down for a Full House !

It seems very strange to threaten people with bans for talking shit on a David Icke thread.

It might be because he tried to call me out, then got schooled...

or maybe he's a Freemason:

[img] [/img]

😆

is it just me or does that look like a massive knob

I'll take that compliment, thank you very much 😉

It seems very strange to threaten people with bans for talking shit on a David Icke thread.

We've no issues with threads like this one discussing your hoary ideas, but derailing other threads and disrupting ongoing conversations isn't on.

What in this statement leads you to conclude the opposite of what it says?

he tried to call me out, then got schooled.

does that look like a massive knob

It's OK, it's just my lizard tattoo!!

And my [s]3rd[/s] 4th eye...

Can you read ?

Yes. However, the Mod has apparently already issued him a warning earlier. Just seems a but strange with the topic of this thread. The Mods seem to be contradicting themselves.

Besides, as he seems to be upsetting a number of people on this thread why do they keep replying to him?

Consider it a community service.

or maybe he's a Freemason ....

Anyone got a line yet ?

[img] [/img]
Can't say too much but just throwing it out there like, you know, that sort of thing

Why can't you say too much ?

because Tom Cruise is here

If you're under duress tap once.

[img] [/img]

[img] [/img]

Mention of Scientologists reminds me about this documentary about the anonymous movement.

Well worth a watch.

Looking at that [s]Dan Brown plot[/s] pyramid diagram again:

[img] [/img]

Say you want to become a policeman, lawyer, psychiatrist, journalist, social worker or one of those other professions in the purple "Core of Child Abuse".

At what point do you think they bring up that requirement?
I've never seen it mentioned in the job adverts. Do they just casually mention it during the interview or something?

Fair play Graham, your logic is spot on...

[rubbish joke] They have posters of those weird childrens beauty pageants they have in the U.S. behind the interviewer and monitor your body language. [/rubbish joke]

From what I understand, recruitment generally occurs over some time, outside the workplace, within the social network of lodges.

In some respects it's similar to grooming.

In all fairness cougar, I don't recall a recent warning:

would you care to clarify?

Yes, you were sent a warning yesterday. If you didn't receive it I'd suggest ensuring that the email address you have registered with the site is valid, or checking your email's spam filters. After all, I'd hate for you to get a lengthy ban due to you ignoring warnings.

Failing that, it's probably part of some big conspiracy.

Yes. However, the Mod has apparently already issued him a warning earlier. Just seems a but strange with the topic of this thread. The Mods seem to be contradicting themselves.

It was in relation to shoehorning in a 'won't somebody think of the children' conspiracy theory in another unrelated thread. I'm an advocate of freedom of speech, but we can't have the entire forum get bogged down with one person's personal agenda. Seems pretty consistent (and reasonable) to me, no?

Did you send the warning yourself Cougar?

because Tom Cruise is here

every thing is ok as satan has [url= http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/society/satan-quits-over-debenhams-christmas-advert-2014110492416 ]thrown in the towel[/url]

My wrist slaps for swear filter avoidance come through fine though I only read them as it might also mean I won the Tuesday treat comps 😉

Anyway Tom has left he saw a tall aussie ginger and had to run

From what I understand, recruitment generally occurs over some time, outside the workplace, within the social network of lodges.

So does that mean it's only the police/lawyers/psychiatrists/journalists etc that also happen to be masons that are in this purple core? Non-masons are okay?

Don't the people in those professions who don't happen to be masons get a bit suspicious?

And does the "grooming" you suggest have a 100% take up rate? Surely there must occasionally be someone in those professions, who is mason, but just doesn't fancy raping children very much?

(Incidentally my dad is a regular at his local lodge and he's never laid a finger on me. Maybe I'm not his type).

I'm sure we're not supposed to talk about warnings on here....

Take it offline please (American business speak intentional!)
moderator@singletrackworld.com

[i]From what I understand, recruitment generally occurs over some time, outside the workplace, within the social network of lodges.[/i]

So that's masons (BTW have you ever met any masons?) , what about the child protection services, mil intel, psychiatrist (why them, and not say; doctors or dentists who have much more access to children), political media? the papers? TV? Radio? Family courts...? Wouldn't some-one who's been tapped for recruitment said something after all this time, seems unlikely that no one ever has?

As opposed the say: Jimmy Saville a vile, dirty old man who realised that under the cover of charitable works and choosing his victims carefully, could plausibly "get away with it for years" which he did...

edit; Dammit! beaten by GrahS again!!

So does that mean it's only the police/lawyers/psychiatrists/journalists etc that also happen to be masons that are in this purple core?

Don't the people in those professions who don't happen to be masons get a bit suspicious?

And what about masons that aren't in that group? Can they join the conspiracy too?

can we agree to stop using the phrase "purple core" please as well? it's all a bit y'know....

You know what there might be something in this.
It's been a slow day at work so I took the time to "do my own research"* and found this:

[IMG] [/img]

Makes you think doesn't it

That wins teh interwebz for today!

I'm applying for a position in the propagation of idiocy High Command...It's about the only job I think I'm actually pretty qualified to do...

So does that mean it's only the police/lawyers/psychiatrists/journalists etc that also happen to be masons that are in this purple core? Non-masons are okay?

Don't the people in those professions who don't happen to be masons get a bit suspicious?

And does the "grooming" you suggest have a 100% take up rate? Surely there must occasionally be someone in those professions, who is mason, but just doesn't fancy raping children very much?

Being as it's a control mechanism, they generally target professions with influence, but of course, that diagram is just to give insight into the basic premise, it's not comprehensive.

Not all ritual abuse is carried out in the name of Freemasonry; there are a number of secret societies, many of which link in covertly, some of which are entirely separate.

Of course, there is also several abusers who are not linked to any secret societies, either acting entirely independently, or being covertly manipulated by the networks who procure and traffick children, without knowing the background.

I'm sure your dad is a fine bloke and removed from the actions of the core abusers... as I've already said, the vast majority don't realize what is occurring.

With regards to the grooming, it's a long winded process, subtly done over a period of months and years, to ensure tolerance and indoctrination. Most commonly, recruits are from public/boarding school backgrounds, where they are conditioned from a young age. As a back up, compromising situations will be devised for blackmail purposes, should the recruit attempt to blow the whistle.

Nonetheless, there are some whistleblowers, who are of course always discredited by those around them.

For those reasons, I'm not going to provide any specific names, as of course you will find material to refute their claims.

However, you could google 'masonic ritual abuse' to get an idea of how widespread it is.

[img] [/img]

😆 Funny, not funny

Oh, alright it is funny

😆

Where did you get that, it has almost Chris Morris levels of genius!?!

I'm currently debatorising whether I'm a bullshiner or a madeupwordist.

once more just for shits and giggles....

and this represents a "centralised control structure"....how?

recruits are from public/boarding school backgrounds, where they are conditioned from a young age.

And your proof for that is....?

The backgrounds of the vast majority of the names I have which I can't currently mention for legal reasons.

And the well known prevalence of abuse in such institutions.

[i]And the well known prevalence of abuse in such institutions.[/i]

and your proof of this is...?

edit: is this theory just based around some hoary old tropes about civil servants, the masons, and public school fagging?

So, their background is [b]proof[/b] how?
Well known prevalence? Again, how and where is that [b]proof[/b] part of your statements. Also, what about the prevalence of abuse in Mancunian terraced houses, or Glaswegian blocks of flats*? Y'know, places where it's equally prevalent.

What a load of epic twaddle.

*Random examples, no intention to besmirch either.

Nick, no, it's more simple than that. It's the classic "They're toffs so they must be at it. Bad people, the lot of them". There's as much abuse in the state education sector, in the home, in anywhere, really. It's just nice and easy to prod at anyone in a perceived position of privilege.

[i]What a load of epic twaddle.[/i]

innit.

capt: aye, them vs us.

the names I have which I can't currently mention for legal reasons.

I'm not going to provide any specific names

I only need "..do your own research!" For a diagonal line !

It's a well known phenomenon...

As examples, staff at the schools of Nick Clegg, Boris Johnson, George Osborne, Tony Blair have all been linked to sexual abuse, but it is generally known that boarding schools are often rife with abuse.

And to clarify, though the above names may be complicit in the cover up of abuse, none have any direct allegations of paedophilia against them.

So, their background is proof how?
Well known prevalence? Again, how and where is that proof part of your statements. Also, what about the prevalence of abuse in Mancunian terraced houses, or Glaswegian blocks of flats*?

What kind of proof do you want?

Names of perpetrators?

Names of victims?

For obvious reasons, I can't give you those.

As for abuse in terraced houses and flats, yes, it is terrible, but it is not used for blackmail purposes to control political agendas which have national and international repercussions.

it is generally known that boarding schools are often rife with abuse.

It is also generally known that non-boarding schools are often rife with abuse. As examples, staff at the schools of Richard Head, , Mike Hunt and Ivor Bigun* have all been linked to sexual abuse.

Again, epic twaddle.

*And, obviously, not real people.

As examples, staff at the schools of Nick Clegg, Boris Johnson, George Osborne, Tony Blair have all been linked to sexual abuse,

Which staff, which schools, what charges made, names and details please ?

It is also generally known that non-boarding schools are often rife with abuse. As examples, staff at the schools of Richard Head, , Mike Hunt and Ivor Bigun* have all been linked to sexual abuse.

Again, epic twaddle.

Cool, so you provide epic twaddle as evidence, when I provide real names and real incidents... google any of the names mentioned regarding abuse in their schools; I just picked them off the top of my head but it is far more wide ranging

Failing that, here you go, let's make it simple eh?

[url= http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Abuse+in+boarding+schools ]Abuse in Boarding Schools[/url]

Which staff, which schools, names and details please ?

You've got the names, just add school and abuse and google to your hearts content...

[i]but it is generally known that boarding schools are often rife with abuse.[/i]

It is generally known?

So it is hoary old tropes...is dissapoint

here's a thought, Are places where there are children routinely away from parents and guardians attractive places to work for people who's sexual preferences involve children...? Could that be why there are lots of cases of abuse at those sorts of places? Because if you wanted to be with kids you'd go for scout master, school teacher, kids entertainer....rather than say baker, or mechanic, wouldn't you?

makes you think...

CaptainFlashheart - Member

recruits are from public/boarding school backgrounds, where they are conditioned from a young age.

And your proof for that is....?

The documentary Casino Royale

First to crop up;

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/robert-peston-sex-abuse-at-my-north-london-state-school-haunts-me-9650669.html

So, it would appear that abuse isn't exclusively a rich toffs at boarding school thing. Still, anyone who went to a boarding school is clearly "one of them" and so we can cheerily discredit anything they say.

Yeah but Peston is part of the establishment so is only saying that to throw you off the scent.

(saving jbj the hassle of posting his reply)

So, it would appear that abuse isn't exclusively a rich toffs at boarding school thing.

No, but being in a sufficient position of power to influence national and international politics is far more likely to occur when you do come from that background.

i.e. the type of people the party whips/intelligence services want to coerce.

You've got the names, just add school and abuse and google to your hearts content...

I've got names of apparently irrelevant pupils who attended the same school.

I was asking for the names of the teachers/staff.
The charges that were brought against them.
The verdicts of the trials etc.

You know... The details.

I've got names of apparently irrelevant pupils who attended the same school.

No you haven't, all separate schools

I was asking for the names of the teachers/staff.
The charges that were brought against them.
The verdicts of the trials etc.

You know... The details.

Cool, you know where google is

Thing is jive, you've clearly made up your mind that toffs/the government/etc are bad and that there is a sinister plot (sorry, control mechanism or whatever sinister bond-type name you want to give it) going on. On that basis, anything that matches that view is apparently proof and anything that doesn't is a falsehood.

I think most people on here are coming from a more logical position that given the general incompetence of people it's actually quite hard to fully cover things up and increasingly so in these days of the internet.

Despite this, there's no facts to actually back up what you're saying (saying 'google it' is not providing proof and neither are hits on google from similar conspiracy theorists) so it seems highly likely that that's because it isn't out there - bad things unquestionably happened in the past and no doubt still go on but they're likely isolated groups of nasty people doing nasty things rather than this exciting global conspiracy that would be far more interesting especially if you were one of the special few who really understood the true nature of the world.

so let me get this straight, this is your theory:

A child (lets call him David Cameron) goes to a public school and is abused (because it is generally well known that what goes on there) rather than destroy his world, he goes onto to Oxford to study PPE, all the time saying nothing about his abuse and turning a blind eye to the routine abuse he now knows (presumably) that goes on all around him.

Other politians are then groomed to have sex with children at looked after chidren's homes, so that they can be blackmailed by the catholic church, the masons, Military Intelligence and John Humphries to toe the establishment line.

is that about it?

dammit, missed out the Royals...where do they fit in?

The backgrounds of the vast majority of the names I have which I can't currently mention for legal reasons.

Clearly certain professions, ones with access, attract paedos/sex abusers.
No one would be surprised. this facts is , as per, miles away from proving your hair brained BS

They're the lizards that really control DC and all the other abused politicians.

Hold on, does that mean I have to feel sorry for politicians?

No you haven't, all separate schools

The same school as the alleged abuser you muppet 🙄

Cool, you know where google is

Can I have a judges ruling please.

Does that count as "do your own research" for the purposes of Bullshit Bingo ?

If you know the details of all these "links" why not just tell me them ?

Or is it just something you were fed by someone else and believed blindly maybe.

It may be true, it may not be true.

If you are so convinced your "links" are accurate, why not just supply the Names, Dates, Charges, Sentences etc and have done with it.

Cool, you know where google is

* no not in that way
** is not a drugs reference

If you are so convinced your "links" are accurate, why not just supply the Names, Dates, Charges, Sentences etc and have done with it.

I have to be honest neal, you come across as a nasty little powertripper; if you were genuinely interested, you'd take the time and see everything I've mentioned is correct.

Tell you what, as an act of faith, do the googling; it's fairly evident I've put the work in... unless your googling proves me wrong; but it won't.

As examples, staff at the schools of Nick Clegg, Boris Johnson, George Osborne, Tony Blair have all been linked to sexual abuse, but it is generally known that boarding schools are often rife with abuse.

"Staff"* at one of my old schools were found to be inappropriately interested in their pupils. Who knew the comprehensive school system of Cumbria was a part of the NWO.

*one teacher who was fired shortly after and ended up drinking himself to death

[img] [/img]

Never a true word spoken 66 deg... 😉