Amflow PL Carbon Pro: first ride review

by 44

“After more riding, I was pretty convinced that this is the best ebike motor out there, and by some margin” – Benji gets blown away for a day by the Amflow PL Carbon Pro.

  • Brand: Amflow
  • Product: PL Carbon Pro
  • From: Amflow Bikes
  • Price: £8,999
  • Tested by: Benji for a day

Pros

  • Incredible levels of motor-to-rider response
  • Decent frame and suspension feel
  • And yeah, the power is massive

Cons

  • Unknown reliability and after-sales support
  • Geometry could be more up to date
  • Headline-making power numbers not all that useable on the trail

Earlier this year it felt like the bike industry was quite happy being on one timeline and then Amflow/DJI entered the chat with a system seemingly from the future.

It’s fair to say that this bike – or more accurately the hugely powerful DJI Avinox motor it contains – has got a lot of headlines and general punter attention this past few months.

The Amflow aspect of this whole thing has been easily glossed over. Which is understandable; the bike aspect of the deal is almost wilfully discreet and middle-of-the-road. It’s A.N. Other carbon fibre 4-bar bike, in black, with very averaged-out geometry.

It is most definitely not like the wild ‘n’ wacky styled eMTBs that we see from other non-pushbike brands; am thinking mainly of the often ‘interesting looking’ models from bold and brash motorbike and car brands.

In terms of travel and type of bike, the Amflow has 150mm rear travel, 160mm fork travel and is squarely aimed at the trail bike sector. This is not an E-nduro sled, or even a woodland/bikepark lapper. This bikes is for doing the miles on.

Being the people pleaser that I am, I will go more into the frame and components later on. You clearly want me to get on with the Main Event first the DJI Avinox M1 motor.

Numbers. The power. The battery capacity. The bike weight.

*with Continental Kryptotal Supersoft DH tyres, DMR Vault pedals and mudguard

The power: 105Nm of torque. 850 watts of peak power. That’s the top figures for when you’re riding in the regular assist levels (Eco, Trail and Turbo). There is also an Auto setting that goes up and down the Eco-Turbo spectrum as it deems fit according to what it thinks you need at any one time.

There is also a temporary ‘Boost’ level that gives you access to 120Nm of torque and 1,000 watts of peak power for a timed period of 30 seconds. To ‘Boost’ you long-press (half a second) on the ‘+’ button on the left hand bar remote. You can quit the Boost at any point in its timed 30 seconds by pressing any button.

For those of you not au fait with your E numbers, yer typical full-power eMTBs offer around 85Nm of torque and 600 watts of peak power. And that’s with motors that weigh a bit more than the 2.5kg DJI Avinox.

And if we compare the Amflow to some similar weight (circa 20kg) ‘mid-power’ eMTBs from established bike brands – with motors such as the TQ HPR-50, Fazua Ride60, Bosch SX or the Specialized SL2 giving out 50-60Nm of torque – the numbers there are dwarfed by the DJI motor’s muscle.

The internal battery is available in two capacities on the top Pro model of the Amflow Carbon PL: 600Wh and 800Wh. I rode the bike with the 3.74kg 800Wh battery, which is internal and not easily removed (you need to remove the motor etc). As is the way with the ebike market, I can’t imagine very many people not going for the biggest battery.

Personally, I think I would have the 2.87kg 600Wh to help keep the ‘kerb weight’ nearer the magic 20kg mark. But then again, I may change my tune in the real world if it was my money/credit card! There are no current plans to offer a range extender battery either. Which is food for thought.

And as mentioned, the lesser priced models only ship with 800Wh batteries anyway. So the choice is out of your hands unless you can stump up the funds for the Pro model.

Overall bike weight. I rode the Amflow Carbon PL Pro with heftier tyres (Continental Kryptotal Super Soft DH), a front mudguard and DMR Vault flat pedals. On my scales, this Large size weighed in at 21.69kg. A 600Wh battery version would have been 20.82kg FWIW. This is pretty close to my ideal bike (of any sort) handling weight of 20kg.

The final part of the ebike system is often where brands come unstuck. The interface. The controls. The smartphone app. There’s a lot of times the user experience can be “nice motor, shame about the display/remote”.

Disclaimer: during my day with the Amflow, I did not try the phone app. So I’m not going to mention it anymore.

In terms of controls and interface, the Amflow scores very highly indeed. Sure, the slightly naff ‘Transformers’ aesthetic to the fonts, and the fairly cringe ‘punch it Chewie’ starburst vibe to the OLED display’s background during the 30 seconds of Boost, isn’t my cup of electric tea. But there’s no denying the intuitive nature of the dual bar remotes (more of that in a minute), the clarity of the OLED and the amount of information on offer.

The 2in OLED display in the top tube is also touchscreen affair. Though I must also confess to not really using it during the test period. Partly because I just was fine using the second bar remote for screen adjusting/scrolling.

Dual remotes? Yep, there’s a two-button remote adjacent to the left hand grip and also one next to the right hand grip. The left remote does the usual e-bike thing of going up and down the power assist levels via +/- buttons. The right hand remote also has two buttons: the top one scrolls through the OLED display screens, the bottom one can be assigned via the app to do… something. For example, you can use it to start/stop recording on your wirelessly connected DJI action cam.

You can also do without one or even both of the bar remotes (which are wireless Bluetooth by the way) and just use the OLED touchscreen and the physical (on/off) button that sits immediately below it.

One feature I did actively use a lot – much to my surprise – was the Auto assist/power setting. Unlike some other motors’ Auto modes, the DJI Avinox’s Auto wasn’t slow-to-react, nor did it ever noticeably choose an undesirable assist level. I genuinely think if I had this bike, I’d probably just leave it in Auto for 99% of the time. That feature was very impressive.

The DJI stuff on the Amflow essentially does not feel like a tentative first attempt. This is not a suck it and see how it goes operation. This is probably because it is not their first attempt. Although this is the first production bike, there have been something like 11 iterations of the motor (and seven of the Amflow frame) during the whole process up to this point.

I realise that every ebike motor design team claims that their motor is stuffed with clever sensors doing lots of clever… sensing. But if there was one key takeaway I had from my day with the Amflow it was not the sheer Nm/watts on offer, it was how responsive the motor was. It felt very much like there was a great deal more at play than a speed sensor at the wheel and cadence and torque sensors at the crank.

Amongst the sensors are inertia sensors for acceleration and, intriguingly, a speed sensor on the rear wheel that has 42 points of pick-up (as opposed to the more common single sensor on other e-bikes). It looks a lot like the multi-slotted thin disc you see on Magura’s ABS system.

Essentially the motor knows a heck of lot more about how fast you’re moving as a result of all these sensors (especially the 42 point speed sensor). I think this level of speed information flow was vital in making all of the motor’s power impressively useful.

The Avinox motor knows when to rein it in. You don’t have to second guess when the surge-shoving of the motor will die off; it begins to die away pretty much the instant that your pedaling does. Personally, I immediately found this level of response far more useful (and less sketchy) on steep, technical climbs than the oft-fanfared ‘overrun’ feature of other motors (where the motor keeps the power down for up to 2m after pedal input stops). It was self-evidently a better method when encountering either brand new terrain or trails that are in constant state of change. I find I can only really use overrun when I know what’s coming up. That might just be me though.

So yeah, the Amflow is already well up there with the best climbing eMTBs available. I’d probably already go as far as saying that the DJI Avinox motor is probably the best climbing motor around. It’s the frame’s geometry that prevents it from being an instant ascending champ. To be brief, the bike could do with a steeper seat angle and (on the larger sizes) longer chainstays for it to be a true e-mountain G.O.A.T.

There’s only so much raw power can do. Eventually the front wheel lifts as your mass falls too far rearward in relation to the rear axle. (And I imagine the specced Maxxis Dissector rear tyre spits traction pretty quick too). There are better steep, technical climbing eMTBs out there with less Nm but more seat angle degrees and chain stay mm.

In terms of the (in)famous Boost mode. I basically couldn’t use it safely on proper terrain ie. singletrack. Just too fast and/or impossible to lay consistent traction down. On roads and fireroads it was a different matter. Genuinely f*cking well fast. But… and it’s a big but, there’s still the 15mph cut-off. And it arrives pretty f*cking fast too.

So yes, you can pretty much do 15mph up any smooth wide-ish track you can find without worrying a three-figure heart rate. In that sense, the motor’s Boost mode is perfect for gravity lappers. But… and it’s another sizeable but, the bike part of this ebike isn’t going to shine at such hot lapz of grrr. It has neither the suspension travel nor the geometry. As stated, it’s a trail bike through and through.

As regards the suspension, I have mostly good things to report. The Fox 36 is a great fork. I prefer it to the Fox 38 in fact (which always ramps up too much for my 73kg). I didn’t even really notice any harshness from the Grip X2 damper but that may have been offset by the well-damped Continental tyres and general squishy terrain.

The rear suspension is a 4-bar design actuating a Fox Float X Factory Evol shock. Although it ostensibly looks like a Specialized, I didn’t feel it rode that much like a Stumpjumper. The Amflow feels much, much more progressive.

It was suggested that I run a healthy amount of sag (35% ish) and I feel that was good advice. It had the double effect of accessing decent amount of travel and remaining calm and grippy, whilst also effectively slackening the head angle and lowering the BB (useful when you’re riding a bike that a shorter reach and wheelbase than you’re used to).

Kudos to Amflow for speccing 155mm cranks (on Medium and Large sizes) by the way. The fact that I didn’t notice them tells you everything about short cranks. The XL and XXL sizes come with 160mm cranks, which is a bit odd. 155s for e-veryone I say.

Anything else before I sign off? The motor was not as virtually-silent as a TQ but it was much, much quieter than most full power motors. The battery fuel economy was decent too. I’m not going to say anything more than that at this stage, as a lot more riding is required to accurately assess ‘MPG’ performance. Suffice to say, I’m currently not worried about it. (If anything, it definitely makes me want to try the 600Wh battery version now)

Which leaves us with two elephants in the room.

Will Amflow be available to buy in the USA, now that DJI is on the US Department of Commerce’s Entity List, which classifies the Chinese company as a national security concern? Well, apparently Amflow are still intending to sell e-bikes in 2025 (the Entity List does not mean a ban on sales, it’s more of a limit of US exports, re-exports and transfers to DJI).

And there’s the big question of reliability and after-sales support. I, obviously, cannot say much of anything about either at this point.

Overall

All in all, I will just come out and unashamedly say I had loads of fun on the Amflow PL Carbon Pro. The DJI Avinox motor really is everything it’s cracked up to be. The Boost-ed numbers turned out to be not that relevant to trail riding in my opinion, but the unparalleled level of responsiveness and intuitive control of the rest of it was stunning.

It took less than half an hour of proper mountain biking for all of my cynicism to be exploded away. After a few more hours of riding, I was pretty convinced that this is the best ebike motor out there, and by some margin. I was a bit less convinced by the ‘strictly trail bike’ remit of the bike but if Amflow can tweak some geometry numbers (and/or introduce some flippy-chippy geo adjustment), this thing would be unbeatable.

Any questions?

Leave a comment below. I’ll do my best to answer them – or find out the answer!

Amflow PL Carbon Pro Specification

  • Frame // Carbon, 150mm
  • Shock // Fox Float X Factory Evol, 185x55mm Trunnion
  • Fork // FOX 36 Float Factory Grip X2, 160mm
  • Wheels // Amflow HMC-30
  • Front tyre // Maxxis Assegai, EXO+, 3C MaxxTerra 29×2.5in*
  • Rear tyre // Maxxis Dissector, 3C MaxxTerra, 29×2.4in*
  • Chainset // DJI Avinox SL Crank, 155mm, 34T
  • Drivetrain // SRAM Eagle X0 AXS Transmission, 10-52T
  • Brakes // Magura MT7 Pro, 203/203mm
  • Stem // Amflow Enduro Stem One-piece CNC, 35mm, 35mm
  • Bars // Amflow Enduro Carbon Handlebar 35, 800x25mm, 9° x 5°
  • Grips // Amflow Enduro Lock-on
  • Seatpost // Fox Transfer Factory, 155-180mm
  • Saddle // Ergon SM Pro
  • Bottom Bracket // DJI
  • Motor // DJI Avinox M1, 105Nm (30 secs Boost at 120Nm)
  • Battery // 800Wh tested
  • Size tested // L
  • Sizes available // M, L, XL, XXL
  • Weight // 21.69kg (‘kerb weight’ as tested with *Continental Kryptotal Supersoft DH tyres, DMR Vault pedals and mudguard)

Geometry of our size L

  • Head angle // 64.5°
  • Effective seat angle // 77°
  • Seat tube length // 450mm
  • Head tube length // 115mm
  • Effective top tube // 620mm
  • BB height // 29mm BB drop
  • Reach // 475mm
  • Chainstay // 445mm
  • Wheelbase // 1,255mm

Best sellers

Over 80% of our range is organic and sustainably produced. All our merch sales help support the future of Singletrack in these very challenging times for the cycling media. Our subscribers get the best deals and always get free postage. Not a subscriber yet? Join us today and get up to £25 credit to spend on our extensive 2025 merch range.

Click the buttons to view size and colour options.


Home Forums Amflow PL Carbon Pro: first ride review

Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 44 total)
  • Amflow PL Carbon Pro: first ride review
  • 4
    weeksy
    Full Member

    Of all the Eebs out this, this is the one i understand the least. Unless using for racing and an uphill speed stage then i simply don’t get it’s purpose. I find even a 60Nm bike plenty out on the trails and sometimes WAY too much as it kicks you at the wrong time, let alone something with double the power.

    Once you factor in the 15mph which they’re determined to keep enforced (and i’m fine with that) then i understand it even less.

    4
    mrhoppy
    Full Member

    But from what I’ve seen it has lots of control options so you can just down tune the modes and get increased range most of the time but you have oomph if you really want to use it, it gives optionality.

    I suspect they’re playing smart and only want to build one motor option to be put into anything (keeps costs down) so this gives as good as it gets power compared to full fats for the weight of an SL/mid power. Give the freedom for users to tune and what’s the downside?

    1
    weeksy
    Full Member

    Well that’s like buying a Lambo and having it restricted to 125bhp…. it seems somewhat pointless.  Especially if when you unlock the power you’re in the middle of town and can’t use it.

    I can’t see a world where you ‘need’ anything like 120Nm.

    for me, 70Nm with a battery that could last 50+ miles makes more sense.

    5
    mrhoppy
    Full Member

    It’s not though is it. Buying a supercar comes with limitations, they’re crap to take down the shops, luggage the kids around in, etc.

    It’s more like having a sleeper estate car that you can drive around normally in but give it the beans if you want to take it to the track. There’s no downside to it.

    My understanding is you can control the available torque & power and it will give you your 70nm and get close to the 50+ miles range, for the same weight as a mid range that will struggle to do that.

    2
    fitnessischeating
    Free Member

    the point is obvious… its for getting to the top of steeps climbs as quickly and easily as possible for as many downs as you can….

    Yeah, you don’t need that for a rolling 50 mile xc loop, but then I would say an e-bike for that purpose is of less point…

    Combine this and the pinion MGU and you pretty much have my ideal 🙂

    1
    julians
    Free Member

    Looks good to me, I would just need that motor system in a more enduro frame, and some evidence of longer term reliability plus evidence of what the vendors support is like when it does break, both inside and outside warranty periods, before I spend my own cash on it.

    My current ebike will probably need replacing in 2 years, so the timing should be good.

    8
    b33k34
    Full Member

    So much of bike reviews comes down to the prejudices/preferences of the person writing the review:

    The geo of the Amflow is within a few mm of the Orbea reviewed a week or so back. Same travel – 160/150.  I think the Rise has 5mm more on the reach and a few mm less on the chain stays, half a degree on the head/seat angles depending on the geo mode.

    Orbea – Pro’s – Excellent Geometry – “In terms of geometry the Orbea Rise LT is on to a winner. Not only because of the aforementioned seat tube and resulting acres of dropper drop and standover, but also because of the principal angles. The head angle is 64°. The seat angle is 77°. That is a fine pairing. The reach is pretty generous”

    Amflow – Cons – Geometry could be more up to date. Head angle // 64.5° seat angle // 77°

    (also fitted with the same fork – Amflow – “The Fox 36 is a great fork. I didn’t even really notice any harshness from the Grip X2 damper” vs Orbea “The new GripX damper in the Fox 36 fork feels significantly less comfy than previous 36 dampers”

    I’ve just weighed my new Rise and it’s basically the same weight as the Amflow (a little adjustment for mud hugger, some mud, smaller battery) . I guess their launch bike needed to get headlines somehow to break into the market – and a (more than) full power Trail bike for the same weight as the best of the ‘mid power’ or ‘lightweight’ bikes will do that more than one that’s a full power enduro bike that might be a bit lighter than the competition but doesn’t have a weight that sounds impressive (heavier wheels/tyres/fork/rear shock etc and you’ll add a few kg).

    The review does confirm what I suspected – that the massive power and torque isn’t really that special/useful but again it gets more headlines than ‘it just rides better’. Smaller motor, (user imposed) limits on power& torque to get great range is probably where it works best.

    chakaping
    Full Member

    Combine this and the pinion MGU

    But then you’d have two motors – and it sounds like this one is more than enough anyway 😉

    My two cents: Getting less interested in eebs generally, but maybe when they bring out a half fat one in future – if it similarly smashes the competition.

    b33k34
    Full Member

    Two thoughts/questions looking at the images in that review.

    – it might just be the angle but rear Tyre clearance looks pretty tight both to the sides and in front.

    – what’s the wire for near the rear mech? the speed sensor appears to be on the brake disc on the other side, and I thought the battery was built into the Transmission mech.

    2
    benpinnick
    Full Member

    – what’s the wire for near the rear mech? the speed sensor appears to be on the brake disc on the other side, and I thought the battery was built into the Transmission mech.

    Its a hotshoe – you can run the mech off the main battery.

    1
    sharkattack
    Full Member

    Well that’s like buying a Lambo and having it restricted to 125bhp…. it seems somewhat pointless.  Especially if when you unlock the power you’re in the middle of town and can’t use it.

    It’s not though is it? It’s more like VAG putting the EA888 in every single fastish VW, Skoda, SEAT, Audi, so they don’t have to make a dozen different engines.

    The ‘headline’ power figure in this case is exactly that. It makes this bike newsworthy. Without those numbers no one would look away from the main brands long enough to care.

    1
    IA
    Full Member

    Question for Benji/STW – Why does the bike need a SIM card, what does it use the 4G for?

    You say you didn’t use the app, but this might be the first bike (I know of?) that’s phoning home?

    (I noticed on the website checking the size of a XXL that it includes a “SIM card removal screwdriver” in the box, so looked at the manual and sure enough, needs a nano sim for 4G)

    4
    jam-bo
    Full Member

    I can’t see a world where you ‘need’ anything like 120Nm.

    see

    gears

    disc brakes

    suspension

    dropper posts

    etc

    etc

    Gribs
    Full Member

    What’s the pivot/bearing hardware like? Do they appear built to last or to save weight? Spares?

    1
    IdleJon
    Free Member

    – it might just be the angle but rear Tyre clearance looks pretty tight both to the sides and in front.

    There’s a 2,4 in there with enough clearance but I’m not sure you’d fit anything much bigger. (I’m just looking at one now…)

     

    alanclarke
    Full Member

    Ebike power maths has always baffled me – I understand under the EU pedelec limit that 600W=250W

    – is it also the case than 850W=250W?

    And 1000W>250W but that’s fine because it’s only for 30 seconds?

    1
    zerocool
    Full Member

    This looks ideal for the SW (mainly Devon at the moment) where there is a lack of long, steep enduro descents so a long super slack bike is wasted and actually a bit less fun. Now I live in Devon I’ve been looking at all the new e-bikes and thinking there all just a bit too DH orientated for the DH down here. This looks like it’ll be just right for knocking out tons of short laps, trips to trail centres, BPW and still be capable of handling Tignes, Morzine, Finale, etc in the summer.

    As much as we want the latest, LLS enduro bike, realistically a decent Trail bike suits much of the UK most of the time.

    now I just need to start saving up

    1
    zerocool
    Full Member

    Quick question

    If a motor is more powerful, but still govorned at 15mph like the others, would that potentially mean that it should last longer due to not needing to be thrashed as hard to get the same power?  Like the difference between tuning a 1.3L Astra to 120bhp vs a 2L Astra running the same power?

    I understand that engines and motors are different but i just remember everyone tuning their 1.3 Novas and Astras to 120bhp and watching them go bang while my 2.0 Cavalier could match them for speed and power at much lower revs).

    1
    julians
    Free Member

    f a motor is more powerful, but still govorned at 15mph like the others, would that potentially mean that it should last longer due to not needing to be thrashed as hard to get the same power?  Like the difference between tuning a 1.3L Astra to 120bhp vs a 2L Astra running the same power?

    Ebike motors when used in mountain bikes rarely last long enough to wear out, they usually fail from water ingress or pedal strike before they get anywhere near wearing out.

    chakaping
    Full Member

     fail from water ingress or pedal strike

    Sorry for the tangent, but what does failure by pedal strike entail?

    The impact shock transferring and damaging the motor somehow?

    1
    VanHalen
    Full Member

    yes – impacts damaging internal components and bearing/seal failure (like a normal BB)

    in terms of hte bike – 150mm travel is fine for most UK riding. even jumps n stuff. as level most people know you can smash through most of BPW happily on a 150mm bike – including the blacks.

    joebristol
    Full Member

    160/150mm is perfect for a lot of stuff in the UK unless you’re enduro racing or doing some extreme stuff.

    That geometry seems pretty decent (maybe the reach is a little short vs some other brands at 475mm for a large) too – will do steep tech alright / trail centres / natural bridleways etc etc.

    timc
    Free Member

    The headlines are eye catching but the branding and aesthetic are a lil Chinese looking for my tastes if you know what i mean…

    kelvin
    Full Member

    Top tube might be a bit Raleigh Vektar, but the motor casing looks neat. Wireless controls make sense as well.

    1
    chipps
    Full Member

    How is the touchscreen in the wet or with gloved hands?

    IdleJon
    Free Member

    I rode one around the car park in work for about 10 minutes last night. It feels like an ebike! The boost mode is pointless on the flat – I was up to the 15.5mph limit very quickly, within maybe 20-30m, when in boost. I tried spinning the wheels on loose gravel but failed. I couldn’t get the touch screen to do anything with bare, dry hands, so maybe was doing something wrong. I’d be interested to try a longer, proper demo but I’m not in the market for an ebike anyway, so may be the wrong person for this bike.

    1
    chakaping
    Full Member

    aesthetic are a lil Chinese looking for my tastes if you know what i mean…

    Yes, it looks a bit “catalogue” and the flowing lines feel a little dated now that other brands are moving more to straighter tubes and squarer edges.

    It’s still pretty decent looking for an eeb though.

    Ben_Haworth
    Full Member

    @IA – I have asked Mr Amflow UK. Will let you know the reply.


    @Weeksy
    – I think you kind of answered your own question/bafflement (“I find even a 60Nm bike plenty out on the trails and sometimes WAY too much as it kicks you at the wrong time”). This motor has immense power but even more immense response/control of it.

    1
    teethgrinder
    Full Member

    From the website FAQ

    Can I control Amflow PL via 4G when it’s powered off?

    When Amflow PL is off, you can use the Avinox app over a 4G connection to check its battery level and location. If the bike’s location is abnormal, you will receive a notification from the Avinox app and can choose to remotely authorize unlocking or maintain the locked state and silence the alarm.

    Features related to 4G network communication require the additional purchase of a SIM card and are not available during data roaming.

    daffy0208
    Free Member

    “I was a bit less convinced by the ‘strictly trail bike’ remit of the bike but if Amflow can tweak some geometry numbers (and/or introduce some flippy-chippy geo adjustment), this thing would be unbeatable.”

    Ben, on the Amflow website in the video section, it shows you how to turn the flip chip around. This is done when putting a 27.5″ rear wheel on the bike as opposed to the 29″ it comes with. Unfortunately I couldn’t find any geometry data for this geometry set up.

    teethgrinder
    Full Member

    A riding friend has taken delivery of his – the pro 800Wh version.  It’s a lovely thing, and feels as light as my 320Wh KSL.  Can climb ridiculous hills on it in boost, but need to be careful not to loop out.  And even on lowest setting it makes a mockery of my KSL 1.1.

    It’ll be a very interesting 12-18m seeing what other brands do to counter it.  I can’t imagine Specialized etc. not bringing something out to match/beat it.

    My pick would be the cheaper 800Wh version for £6k.  Still a lot of money, but spec as good or better than other equivalent bikes like the KSL/LSL

    pothead
    Free Member

    Once you factor in the 15mph which they’re determined to keep enforced (and i’m fine with that) then i understand it even less.

    That’s in the UK and Europe, class 3 ebike cutoff in the US is 28mph and I’m guessing they plan to sell a lot over there

    1
    RickDraper
    Free Member

    A trunnion and clevis mount for the shock. That’s like going to dinner with Jeffrey Dahmer and Ted Bundy.

    FunkyDunc
    Free Member

    So had my own ebike now for 3 weeks, and nearly did cancel it to get an Amflow .

    TBH I’m glad I didn’t cancel. Some of the reviews coming through now are a bit shit.

    My bike has 85nm. Not once have I found a hill where my talent has given up first ie the bike has wheeled or lost traction. So maybe with the extra power you have more momentum do can get up steeper stuff, but then at the same time if I’m not getting up with 85nm I can’t see how I could handle the extra power

    Which in term brings you on to the power. It must get to speed limit very very quickly , which actually must be very frustrating.

    There must become a point where a motorbike or sur-Ron is more fun

    1
    julians
    Free Member

    Some of the reviews coming through now are a bit shit.

    Got any links to the poor reviews?

    FunkyDunc
    Free Member

    Have a look at Loam Wolf on YT

    Ive also watched a couple of others that have come out in the last week or so. Its not hard to find them on YT

    DaveyBoyWonder
    Free Member

    see

    gears

    disc brakes

    suspension

    dropper posts

    etc

    etc

    I’d say for certain types of riding then most/all of those are must-haves. Yes, the beardy rigid single-speeders might disagree but I can’t remember the last time I saw one of them where I ride/the type of stuff I ride/there certainly weren’t any in the Alps last summer…

    ta11pau1
    Full Member

    500mm seat tube on the XXL (which is the same size as an XL in other bikes) is a turn off, when other bikes have around 450-470mm seat tubes.

    Then there’s the ‘UK winter proofness’ of the motor, or (probable) lack of…

    Regardless, I don’t want or need the stupid power, or the other downsides that come with a full size motor (size, weight, noise…).

    1
    julians
    Free Member

    Some of the reviews coming through now are a bit shit.

    its a bit flexy according to loam wolf – not a huge surprise given the intended use of the bike, and its relative lightweight compared to others. It does sound noticeably flexier than others in its category though, which is why its been called out I guess.

    I don’t want or need the stupid power, or the other downsides that come with a full size motor (size, weight, noise…)

    apparently its a pretty light motor for the power it has, and seemingly not too noisy. Agree about not needing all the power ,although it’d be nice to have it and not need it, versus (occasionally) need it and not have it.

    I’ll keep watching for a couple more years on this one – see how it fares for reliability in UK and after care when things go wrong. also need to see that motor in more frames – ideally a decent enduro frame from a known good manufacturer.

    Blackflag
    Free Member

    My bike has 85nm. Not once have I found a hill where my talent has given up first ie the bike has wheeled or lost traction. So maybe with the extra power you have more momentum do can get up steeper stuff, but then at the same time if I’m not getting up with 85nm I can’t see how I could handle the extra power

    Very much this. I find i use trail mode for tech loose climbs. Boost is waaaay too much. But i use boost for long, steep road or gravel sections to get me to the top fast. But even then, with 85nm, i hit 15.5mph very quickly. More oompf just isnt needed unless your going to derestrict it.

Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 44 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.