Cotic Rocket: first ride review

by 50

The Cotic Rocket looks like nothing else. Don’t like it? Do like it? Either is fine. Shall we talk about how the bike actually handles? Yes, let’s.

  • Brand: Cotic
  • Product: Rocket
  • From: Cotic
  • Price: from £8,799
  • Tested by: Benji for a day

Pros

  • Flexibility (in every sense)
  • Sorted geometry
  • Easy to live with

Cons

  • Cost
  • Unconventional aesthetic

Although I only had a few hours playtime on the new Cotic Rocket, I have a sneaking suspicion it’s easily the most capable Cotic mountain bike ever.

Which may sound unsurprising – seeing as it has a motor – but I’m not just talking about climbing capability. Although it is an extremely adept ascender; steeper actual seat tube, longer chain stays and grippy rear suspension in full effect. It is its capability on descents and traverses that is also a step up from any analogue Cotic I’ve ridden before.

If you’ve followed Cotic over the years you’ll probably have noticed that it doesn’t really release bad bikes. It also doesn’t really release ‘safe’, conservative or retro-minded bikes either.

First and foremost a Cotic bike is designed to handle well. It is also designed to be easy to live with. You’ll not see any cabling passing through headsets on a Cotic.

I talk about these historical aspects of Cotic as a way of addressing the main contentious aspect of the Rocket. That externally mounted battery.

Anyone who’s been on any bike website with a story about the Cotic Rocket on it can’t fail to have noticed the haters.

It is not an old fashioned location for a battery. It is not a cheaper location for a battery. It is not the easiest location for a battery. Cotic has gone with an externally mounted battery because it is the best location. It is the best location from a flexibility point of view.

And I mean flexibility in every sense.

The easy-on easy-off nature of the external battery makes it possible to choose what battery to run (Cotic has 418Wh, 504Wh or 630Wh option). You have flexibility in terms of what weight-to-range ratio you wish to run. Run the lower capacity and have a considerably lighter bike. Or go all in with the 630Wh for big mileage days.

And not having a whacking great down tube means you can actually have some compliance in your frame. There is no point in a Cotic that doesn’t offer controlled chassis flex. Compliance is the whole flipping USP of the brand.

Aluminium e-bikes with internally mounted batteries housed in oversized down tubes are incredibly stiff. So are most carbon e-bikes with similar designs. Not all carbon ebikes, mind. Some are okay. But not everyone wants carbon fibre.

I’d actually say that having the external battery weight where it is on the Cotic Rocket is pretty much the ideal spot for it. A lot of brands may state that having the battery nearer the bottom bracket is beneficial as it’s “low and central” but I’ve not found that to be the case.

First of all, the BB is not the centre of the bike (the centre of the wheelbase is the centre of the bike). And secondly, low slung weight can make bikes handle worse; like you’ve got an anchor between your ankles. Having the battery weight basically at the midpoint between your feet (BB) and your hands (cockpit) is a good thing in my experience. It makes traction much more predictable and controllable and also improves the bike’s turn-in feel.

So yeah. I’m a big fan of the externally mounted battery. I have frequently bemoaned the move away from them.

Before we get on to the bike handling stuff, let’s go in to the motorspeak. The Shimano EP801 should probably have been given a whole new number name. It is not the same as the previous EP8. It has the same headline power numbers (85Nm of torque, 600 watts peak power) but it’s quieter both when delivering power and when coasting (there’s minimal rattle). Anecdotally the EP801 is way more reliable too. (We’re currently going through our recent e-bike owners survey results to assess things like this)

One thing that really stands out about Shimano motors is their fuel economy. For the same capacity battery and same Nm/watts stats, we get more range out of a Shimano system than any other. Obviously, ‘your mileage may vary’ (as they say) depending on a whole swathe of variables but for us, Shimano are the rulers of range. The modest 504Wh battery is very possibly all most people will ever need.

I don’t think there’s any magic to this fuel economy. I think it’s just a by-product of Shimano motors not giving you maximum assist levels as eagerly/early as other motor brands do. You do get 85Nm/600w, just not as frequently as, say, with a Bosch motor. I haven’t yet ridden an EP801 with the new ‘Race’ firmware, which may make things a bit more Bosch-y (with an attendant loss in mpg too no doubt).

I like the Shimano bar remote. Simple, two-buttons. I kinda like the beside-the-stem display from a size and location point of view but I just wish the specced display would show the current time permanently (instead of defaulting back to current speed after a minute or two). The Shimano EN600 (I think) display with its customisable multiple screens would be a good option.

I’ve only ridden the Cotic Rocket for a day but the immediate sensation was that it was very similar to a Cotic RocketMAX but with even more calmness and grip. And more standover by virtue of the improved seatpost insertion from the revised rear suspension layout. Cotic’s Droplink suspension design has been… er, dropped. The new design (without a pivot passing through the seat tube and limiting dropper insertion) is called Rocklink.

Anyhoo, the Rocket ducked and dived into all of the more challenging trails on my test loop and just felt like I’d known the bike for a long time already.

In terms of build kit, this demo bike was a mix of model and model’s own. Basically it had different wheels and fork damper compared to the official spec. It did have the Magura MT7 Pro brakes and Cane Creek DB Air IL rear shock. Both of which are truly excellent performers.

Overall

In terms of what matters, the Cotic Rocket feels like a winner. Great geometry – the best geometry from Cotic so far in my opinion. An impressively retained classic Cotic chassis feel. Good motor. Excellent range. Impressive overall weight for a capable full power eMTB (22.1kg for an XL size bike including pedals).

Oh yes, it ain’t cheap. But that is literally the price you pay for getting things made in the UK.

Cotic Rocket Custom Build Specification

  • Frame // Reynolds 853 steel w/ alloy chain stays, 150mm
  • Shock // Cane Creek DB Air IL G2, 185x55mm Trunnion
  • Fork // Rock Shox Lyrik w/ custom damper, 160mm
  • Wheels // Reserve Alloy MX
  • Front tyre // Maxxis Assegai, 29×2.5in
  • Rear tyre // Maxxis Minion DHR II, 29×2.4in
  • Chainset // Shimano
  • Drivetrain // Shimano XT Di2
  • Brakes // Magura MT7 Pro, 203/203mm
  • Stem // Cotic SHORTERSTEM, 35mm, 35mm
  • Bars // Cotic Calver
  • Grips // Cotic Lock-on
  • Seatpost // One-Up V3 Dropper
  • Saddle //WTB
  • Bottom Bracket //Shimano
  • Motor // Shimano EP801, 85Nm
  • Battery // 504Wh tested
  • Size tested // C5
  • Sizes available // C1, C2, C3, C4, C5
  • Weight // 22.1kg (‘kerb weight’ inc. pedals as depicted in photos)

Geometry of our size C5

  • Head angle // 64.5°
  • Effective seat angle // 76.7°
  • Seat tube length // 465mm
  • Head tube length // 140mm
  • Effective top tube // 674mm
  • BB height // 40mm BB drop (from front wheel)
  • Reach // 520mm
  • Chainstay // 456mm
  • Wheelbase // 1,324mm

Home Forums Cotic Rocket: first ride review

  • This topic has 50 replies, 35 voices, and was last updated 3 weeks ago by James.
Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 50 total)
  • Cotic Rocket: first ride review
  • 2
    sharkattack
    Full Member

    Go on then, I’ll have one. You’ve talked me into it.

    chakaping
    Full Member

    it ain’t cheap. But that is literally the price you pay for getting things made in the UK.

    Bike journalists are so good at spending other people’s money.

    I only wish Cotic good fortune as a business, but let’s see how many people want to pay that price eh?

     

    ayjaydoubleyou
    Full Member

    But that is literally the price you pay for getting things made in the UK.

    Only the frame is UK made right? Then the other foreign parts are assembled in the UK

    Seems like a massive ebike tax if you compare data points from Cotic’s and other made-in-the-UK brands’ meat powered offerings

    sharkattack
    Full Member

    Having had a proper look at the spec and the configurator I’d be only be really interested in a frame if you could delete the shock. I don’t want CC or Fox based on previous experience with both brands.

    Then you’re still nearly 6k deep before you start building it.

    No doubt they’ll sell some but it’s a non-starter for me.

    17
    cy
    Full Member

    This frame is 100% UK made. Every. Single. Piece. The rear ends of the droplink frames are made in Taiwan, which does keep the price lower on those than they might otherwise be. Nobody’s scoring Porsches or mansions out of this. We are building the very best thing we can the very best way we know how.

    munrobiker
    Free Member

    https://www.pinkbike.com/news/pinkbikes-2024-community-survey-what-bikes-do-pinkbike-readers-ride.html

    Only 8.3% of the 13,000 people who responded to Pinkbike’s survey said looks weren’t important when buying a bike. Wiping out over 90% of your customers doesn’t sound like great business to me.

    9
    cy
    Full Member

    We think it looks ace. YMMV.

    4
    bootsy
    Full Member

    Nah, haters gonna hate. Betcha it will be one of the best riding eebs out there.

    sharkattack
    Full Member

    Nobody’s scoring Porsches or mansions out of this. We are building the very best thing we can the very best way we know how.

    That’s great. I’m totally on board with the ethos and the approach and I bet the bike is mint to ride. I also don’t mind if you made shedloads of money selling them.

    The sad reality is that I’m priced out and I’m not the only one.

    3
    kelvin
    Full Member

    Seems like a massive ebike tax if you compare data points from Cotic’s and other made-in-the-UK brands’ meat powered offerings

    Have a look at the work that goes into the custom made motor cradles… a hell of a lot lighter than any off the shelf forged cradle you’ll find on other steel ebikes (what few there are) but an awful lot of work… far more than the front triangles of the droplink frames (made by the same people):

    Fiveland_production_Rocket_ebike_1585Fiveland_production_Rocket_ebike_1771

    4
    hardtailonly
    Full Member

    I don’t think anyone is saying the cost isn’t justified given the expense of fabricating the frame in the UK. Or that Cotic are “taking the p*ss” with their pricing … It’s just the reality that the price of the bike will put it out of reach of all but a very small proportion of riders/potential buyers.

    I’m guessing that, for a small company, factoring in the notorious unreliability of ebikes and the likely need for warranty issues, a certain extra margin needs to be reflected in the asking price.

    As regards looks – this is covered in depth in the comments on the FGF issue a couple of weeks ago. Personally, I think it looks alright; the basic frame silhouette is very similar to the Swarf Contour I used to have, which was a gorgeous looking bike. The battery is a bit of a carbuncle, but I think it’s something you’d get used to. Besides, if in the market for an eMTB, looks / aesthetics are pretty much compromised whatever ebike you’re looking at.

    Good luck to Cotic, I hope they do OK with this.

    montylikesbeer
    Full Member

    When my right knee eventually packs in it’s going to have to be an e-bike.

    Unfortunately my pockets are not deep enough.

    1
    HansRey
    Full Member

    I don’t mind the looks, and I like the swappable nature of the battery. I won’t be buying one, but it did persuade me to go for a cotic jeht or rocket next year.

    1
    ampthill
    Full Member

    My hunch is that there Will be enough people who are happy with the looks and with deep enough pockets to make this work.

    My amateur knowledge of markets says that this enough unique features to make it work. Yes you could buy an ebike for less. But you couldn’t buy an ebike for less and get everything on offer here.

    If this looked like every other ebike, had an intergrated battery and was made in far East then the only reason to buy it would be if it was cheaper

    bikesandboots
    Full Member

    The price would be more palatable if I knew I could replace the motor with a latest gen tech one in a couple of years. That has value.

    But water bottle under the downtube in small and medium sizes, especially when the latter has a reach of 463 and a stack of 639.

    I really appreciate this as a creation though.

    chiefgrooveguru
    Full Member

    “The price would be more palatable if I knew I could replace the motor with a latest gen tech one in a couple of years. That has value.”

    I’m not sure what you’re expecting to change? These electric motors are a mature technology and nothing radical will happen with batteries either – that kind of R&D is very slow moving. My ebike is now 6 years old and the motor and battery are essentially identical to what you get in a new equivalent bike.

    Making stuff in the UK is expensive and not a route to great wealth (certainly isn’t for me!) but I’m glad to see Cotic doing this and hopeful others will buy into their concept.

    It feels like they’re ahead of the curve with building a compliant ebike frame, as that’s one of the big focuses on non-ebikes now that geometry and suspension have converged to pretty similar places.

    Rubber_Buccaneer
    Full Member

    off topic but did I see you on TV last night @chiefgrooveguru ?  Working in the ‘ugliest building in Brighton’ 🙂

    2
    jaketurbo
    Free Member

    What a surprise, an STW review of a cotic bike, with absolutely no critical comments made.

    Every bike has flaws, for it to be a review it needs to be objective and critical, otherwise it’s pointless.

    In regards to the Shimano motor efficiency comments, that’s exactly the opposite of what every review from every other source has stated.

    1
    jaketurbo
    Free Member

    I’m not sure what you’re expecting to change? These electric motors are a mature technology and nothing radical will happen with batteries either – that kind of R&D is very slow moving. My ebike is now 6 years old and the motor and battery are essentially identical to what you get in a new equivalent bike.

    Ebike motors are fundamentally flawed, across the board they have extremely high failure rates, well beyond what most industries would consider acceptable and most of the suppliers of them have been in breach of consumer rights as a result. The amount of media is rapidly increasing covering this.

    As a result iterations to motor design are in the works from most suppliers/manufacturers to improve resilience and maintainability, to reduce cost and likelihood of the need for replacement under warranty. Bosch have stated this in reply to the guardian article on poor reliability.

    Likewise the associated technologies are changing rapidly – the size and capacity of batteries for example, the software upgrades that translate to increased efficiency, changes in power curves etc… Which are often locked to specific generations of motor.

    To say a) the tech is mature and b) things don’t change much, is frankly wrong.

    1
    davros
    Full Member

    Cons

    Cost

    Unconventional aesthetic

    There’s two for you…

    2
    hardtailonly
    Full Member

    What a surprise, an STW review of a cotic bike, with absolutely no critical comments made.

     

    Well, firstly, it’s a ‘First Ride Review’ … So more about initial impressions rather than an in depth long term review.

    Secondly, the price, and ‘unconventional aesthetic’ are listed as cons … So, y’know, a bit of balance there, contrary to what you claim.

    2
    Gribs
    Full Member

    I’m not sure what you’re expecting to change? These electric motors are a mature technology and nothing radical will happen with batteries either – that kind of R&D is very slow moving. My ebike is now 6 years old and the motor and battery are essentially identical to what you get in a new equivalent bike.

    The DJI motor has moved the game on massively in terms of power and torque in a lightweight unit. Combined gearbox and motor units are now available. Perhaps manufacturers will think about proper sealing and reparability in the future?

    DaveyBoyWonder
    Free Member

    People will probably buy them despite the fact its gopping. Take out a loan or something – its whats killed the used bike market. Cheap/low interest finance for a 10k ebike.

    Similar in the car market. Lets look at BMW. Loads of their new stuff makes this Cotic look like the equivalent of Keira Knightly and you’d be mental to buy one with “real” money but they’re a few hundred quid a month on finance/lease etc so they’re assaulting your eyeballs every time you drive anywhere.

    People have no taste.

    6
    intheborders
    Free Member

    Having had a proper look at the spec and the configurator I’d be only be really interested in a frame if you could delete the shock. I don’t want CC or Fox based on previous experience with both brands.

    Based on my 6 y/o Cotic Flare Max with a CC DBAIR that’s covered nearly 6k miles and over 1 million feet of elevation, with just one service (at 4 years) and still rides as smooth as – I’d happily buy another CC shock, and another Cotic.

    4
    b33k34
    Full Member

     

    The Shimano EP801 …it’s quieter both when delivering power and when coasting (there’s minimal rattle). Anecdotally the EP801 is way more reliable too.

    One thing that really stands out about Shimano motors is their fuel economy. For the same capacity battery and same Nm/watts stats, we get more range out of a Shimano system than any other…… I don’t think there’s any magic to this fuel economy. I think it’s just a by-product of Shimano motors not giving you maximum assist levels as eagerly/early as other motor brands do.


    @jaketurbo
    I suspect this is a sign that motors are basically mature tech now.  They feel a bit different to each other, but much harder to say ‘better’.

    “Give up power more readily” vs “more natural riding feel”.  Add a load of ‘just read press release” and “new different bike” to influence judgements.

    And it’s very hard to really assess efficiency – after 3+ years with a shimano motor it still surprises me sometimes.  It’s mostly about the amount of climbing but even then it depends on your pace – it’s not just switching to ‘boost’, but if its’ a fast ride with high cadence will use more battery power.  Doing the same distance and climbing but a bit more relaxed and chatting on the climbs gives more range.

    “The price would be more palatable if I knew I could replace the motor with a latest gen tech one in a couple of years. That has value.”

    The DJI motor has moved the game on massively in terms of power and torque in a lightweight unit.

    Theoretically possible – Shimano haven’t changed their mounts yet.  (though Bosch just did).  With it all strapped the outside Cotic could offer an refurb/upgrade fairly easily.  But you’re unlikely to want/need it – much like forks year on year I think we’re already into marginal gains on motors. the new Shimano doesn’t seem any quieter in use to me, but the rattle on mine is definitely more muted (but not gone).  It’s not a radically different ride though.  DJI is only 200g lighter than the Shimano and reliability and support are basically an unknown for the next few years.

    On reliability/repairability/lifespan personally I think there are some unrealistic exceptions.  We’ve added another c£1000 part to our bikes in the motor and another c£500 part in the battery.  That’s no different to the £1000 fork and £500 shock (cheaper and more expensive options available on both).  Servicing the suspension is >£200 a year (and if you’re riding a lot should probably be twice a year).  That’s £1000 running costs over 5 years.

    Shimano supposedly has a 5 year motor life with discounted replacement out of warranty up to that point.  If your motor lasts 5 years and then needs replacing thats no more expensive that keeping your suspension in good condition.  (and many people are ‘upgrading’ to a newer fork or shock inside 5 years anyway.  Stanchions get scratched, internal parts fail).  I’ve been through some number of XT mechs in the last few years and they’re not cheap.  Mtb is an expensive hobby and e-bikes have made it more so both one off and, realistically, ongoing.

     

    4
    BadlyWiredDog
    Full Member

    On reliability/repairability/lifespan personally I think there are some unrealistic exceptions.

    I’m guessing you meant to say ‘expectations’. Fwiw, I don’t think it’s particularly unrealistic to expect an e-mtb motor to be adequately sealed against water and grit ingress. I think if you were speccing an e-bike for all-year, off-road use in the UK, it would be high on your list of priorities.

    I think it’s more that a lot of consumers have such low expectations, that brands have got away with poorly designed products for years. Remember the Rockshox forks that basically ate their own stanchions? Or any number of Crank Bros self-destructing components? If I bought, say, a car or a fridge that turned out to be as unreliable as a lot of e-mtbs, I’d be quite cross and someone telling me that I had ‘unrealistic expectations’, wouldn’t do much for my mood either.

    For some reason, mountain bikers seem to accept that things failing repeatedly is just part of the experience.

    3
    ads678
    Full Member

    This might be a really stupid question, but how is the battery housing fixed to the frame? And is it in danger of getting knocked off when it gets crashed?

    I know people are not knocking bottle cages off their bikes all the time but they are a LOT lighter and more flexible, I assume any way….

    I’m not in the market for one, far too expensive, so doesn’t really matter to me, just curious.

    sharkattack
    Full Member

    Based on my 6 y/o Cotic Flare Max with a CC DBAIR that’s covered nearly 6k miles and over 1 million feet of elevation, with just one service (at 4 years) and still rides as smooth as – I’d happily buy another CC shock, and another Cotic.

    Congratulations. Another ‘different people have different experiences’ shocker.

    Personally I think some companies like Cane Creek (and also Fox, Crank Brothers, and a few others) are perfectly willing to sell you shit and tell you it’s sugar.

    2
    chakaping
    Full Member

    Theoretically possible – Shimano haven’t changed their mounts yet.

    IIRC (and it is an “if”), Ben from Bird said they’d picked Shimano for their (now aborted?) eeb partially because Shimano had committed to maintaining the same mounting pattern for future motors, for the foreseeable.

    May also have said that Shimano were the only company willing and able to supply them at that time though. And of course they canned the project because of the high failure rate in testing.

    1
    chakaping
    Full Member

    And my experience is that, apart from the incredibly unreliable early Inline Air shocks, Cane Creek suspension is generally pretty durable.

    Owned 2x DB coil, 1x DB air, 4x InlineAir (2 of which failed in early days), 1x Inline coil (fixed under warranty for top out issue) and 1x Helm Coil.

    2
    Blackflag
    Free Member

    Congratulations. Another ‘different people have different experiences’ shocker.

    Bit harsh

    2
    intheborders
    Free Member

    Congratulations. Another ‘different people have different experiences’ shocker.

    And what’s your personal experience?

    2
    b33k34
    Full Member

    @badlywireddog

    . Fwiw, I don’t think it’s particularly unrealistic to expect an e-mtb motor to be adequately sealed against water and grit ingress. I think if you were speccing an e-bike for all-year, off-road use in the UK, it would be high on your list of priorities.

    completely agree on that. My point is more that if you think of the motor like a fork and look at any replacement costs as effectively being a ‘service’ then the costs of replacing a £900 motor after 5 years doesn’t sound so bad.

    That’s not to say there aren’t a load of other issues – how often they’re typically failing, how quickly you can get a replacement etc – but failures seem to be becoming less common (or at least further apart).  The days when every Specialized motor was failing inside a year have gone. If a motor lasts a 2? 3? years and then needs a ‘service’ which might well still be free, or a couple of hundred £ then that’s no different to a fork in terms of running costs or, if motor swap is quick, time the bike is out of action*.

    off-road use in the UK

    that might be key.  I don’t know what people are doing but I don’t think river crossings or hub deep puddles on an e bike are ever going to be a good idea. Rohloff hubs are the ‘sealed, super low maintenance gearing option’.  People have ridden huge mileages on them in foul conditions but SDBarnes was destroying them.  they did not like total immersion. I suspect e bike motors are always going to be the same – the balance of friction/sealing (especially if you add in some temperature shocks from hitting cold water) is a hell of an ask.

    *(if it takes many weeks to sort a new motor not so good, but it really shouldn’t.  Shops could carry stock of these and it’s not a long or difficult job to swap out a motor (even if warranty assessment happened afterwards)

    VanHalen
    Full Member

    cy,

    As this is shimano motor mount – you need to lower the driveside chainstay so you can retrofit a Intradrive motor/gearbox in one of these!

    that would be ace.

    you could then lose the derailleur and maybe also even go belt drive if you can work out the tensioner.

    5
    gdm4
    Full Member

    Its a properly thought out design enabling interchangeable batteries.

    Charting your own unique course based on your own (well tested) views and not following the vanilla crowd should be applauded.

    You don’t have to like it to respect it…..I happen to think it looks and sounds fantastic and is the first ebike I’ve seen that I would actually consider buying!!!

    Well done Cotic. Glad you exist.

     

     

     

     

     

    3
    Sanny
    Free Member

    I have to say that I really like it. I am currently testing a Pivot Shuttle SL. Really lovely bike but the inability to take the battery out and charge it is a bit of a pain. The Cotic solves that. It is also not a mish mash of internal cables everywhere which for me is another bonus.

    I know it is not all swoopy fancy carbon with the massive seat mast but to my mind, it is all the better for it. The colour is gorgeous too.

    What it has done is got me contemplating a Cotic full susser for when my Turner wears out (although I hope it doesn’t!)

    Cheers

    Sanny

    2
    Sanny
    Free Member

    @munrobiker

    I really like the look of it and how a bike looks matters to me! Ha! Ha!


    @cy

    If you ever fancy doing the big Cairngorm loop we considered for the Cascade, just let me know? There is definite scope to do it on e bikes. You will need to pedal with the motor off on some sections to make it round but that is part of the challenge.

    Cheers

    Sanny

    Ps The promo video made me think the bike just looks right. I cannot explain it but in a world where every mountain bike seems to follow the same aesthetic, I like that this one is different.

    1
    chestrockwell
    Full Member

    Must admit the looks are growing on me a little bit. The battery box is still ugly as hell but overall it’s not too bad. Can’t see where the extra £1000/2000 over a slightly higher/lower spec Orange is coming from though considering STW seem to think the Halifax bikes are hideously expensive to start with?

    2
    chrismac
    Full Member

    I wonder how much choice some of the smaller manufacturers have in motor spec. I would presume many suppliers have minimum order quantities that might be too many in terms of numbers or cash flow commitments to make them impossible spec in the real world.  I doubt you can ring up many of them and say how much for 100 over the next year. They are more interested in talking to the big brands who say how much for 1000 a month.

    chiefgrooveguru
    Full Member

    “off topic but did I see you on TV last night @chiefgrooveguru ? Working in the ‘ugliest building in Brighton’ ?”

    You did indeed. Working there whilst wondering if we’re suddenly going to have nowhere to work thanks to the council’s spectacularly inept mismanagement as a landlord…

Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 50 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.