A close look at Classified Powershift. Two-by is back!

by 70

The Classified Powershift system revolves around a two-speed hub, made in Belgium, that is electronically shifted by a remote shifter.

The Classified Powershift system, with axle/receiver, hub, shifter and 11-40T cassette

It might surprise you to discover, but after years of refining one-by gear systems, Belgium’s Classified Cycling reckons that it’s time to bring back two-by. Specifically 2×12 that uses a custom 11-40T cassette and its new two-speed, electronically-shifted two-speed hub.

Before you completely dismiss this as another ‘mad inventor in a shed’ story, Classified has some serious industry, and pro-(road)-racer backing and it’s serious about the benefits of a two-by system, even off-road. It’s currently being trialled, and raced, on the road and cyclocross scene, and the brand has recently announced its mountain bike system.

The Powershift System

Let’s start by looking at what’s involved: The Classified Powershift system revolves around a two-speed hub, made in Belgium, that is electronically shifted by a remote shifter. The special hub needs a special cassette, so for the mountain bike system, there’s an 11-40T 12 speed cassette, machined with a hollow cone below the sprockets (as you’ll see on high-end SRAM cassettes) and this mounts to the cone-shaped hub.

So how does it shift? The clever bit is the supplied thru-axle. It features a battery in the ‘lever’ which houses the wireless receiver. The through-axle induces a shift, wirelessly in the hub, with battery life in the ‘thousands of shifts’ mark. The hub is capable of either a 1:1 ratio, or a reduced ratio of 0.7:1. Roughly the kind of shift in ratios you’d get from a 42T – 32T chainset on a mountain bike (or a 50/34T on the road).

The shift is virtually instant – 150m/s and can be done under full load – up to 1000Watts (and tested to more) and it’s done using a very ergonomic and aesthetically-pleasing ring shifter that offers a light, magnetically-sprung up/down shift on the bars (though it can also be incorporated into road shifters). Everything has magnetic-coupled USB chargers to keep the systems all sealed and fully waterproof.

The ring shifter and magnetic USB charger. A charge should last around 10,000 shifts

But why?

So, after all the effort to remove the front derailleur from mountain bikes in the last decade, why is Classified keen to bring back the two-by mentality?

Bigger gear ratios is one argument. It’s 11-40T cassette offers a range of 530%, bigger than Rohloff’s 14 speed Speedhub gear hub and bigger than the 520% of SRAM’s biggest 10-52 Eagle cassette. Having a second range of gears means that Classified can offer a 10.5% step size in gearing, which feels more natural than some of the bigger jumps in modern 1×12 cassettes. You can also shift without pedalling (in fact, it’s similar in principle to SRAM’s short-lived Hammerschmidt two-speed cranks, only way lighter and not draggy in the slightest).

There’s also an argument that you can run a bigger chainring, as you’re no longer limited by how big a dinnerplate low gear you have, so bikes can run a 34T or 36T ring, which is often the size of ring that bike suspension is designed around (bike companies don’t employ weedy 28T-toting bike journos, when designing frames, they use people like Nino Schurter) and so your suspension should work better with the chain in the ‘correct’ position. (Though arguably, you’ve increased the weight of the back wheel, which isn’t ideal). The Classified MTB hubs are beefed up with ten pawls per hub instead of the normal five for the road wheels.

And how?

Classified argues that having an instantly-accessible second set of gears, whether bigger or smaller than the ones you’re currently in, will make you a faster rider. It allows you to ride full-gas towards the bottom of a climb and then dump it into the ‘little’ ring, which would otherwise see two or three rear shifts, and then mash up the hill. Once you’re at the top of the hill, you can instantly be back in the ‘big’ ring and back on the gas. The same is true of tight singletrack where you might be braking heavily for corners and can instantly shift into smaller gears ready to power out of them again. For racers, there’s even an 11-34T cassette with even tighter ratios.

The thru-axle has a splined end, onto which you can bolt three different lengths and six different end-threads.

All of this comes at a bit of a cost, obviously, but with Classified claiming that it can make a recordable time difference to a tight singletrack loop, there will be racers already interested in the mountain bike system, as there are on the road.

The system includes shifter, axle (with three lengths and six threads available), hub shell and cassette, built onto a carbon wheel from Classified’s wheel partners (which includes DT Swiss and announced today, Hunt). The wheels will be distributed aftermarket in the UK by WindWave.

The Classified ring shifter plays neatly with dropper levers and has an addictively smooth action.

The Classified Powershift system will be around €2699 for all that, or you can get a hubshell set for building into a new wheel (minus shifter and axle) for €1549 and wheels will start appearing next month, with riders encouraged to try the system for themselves.

Micro-review

And, as a side-note, (I, Chipps) having ridden the 75km Tour of Flanders sportive on a Ridley Grifn bike and Classified wheels, I can testify that the Classified Powershift system does work flawlessly. But that’s on the road. Whether we ‘need’ two-by back off road, you’ll have to wait until we’ve had some wheels in on test for a while.

More details can be found at classified-cycling.cc

Singletrack Weekly Word

Sports Newsletter of the Year finalist at the Publisher Newsletter Awards 2024. Find out why our newsletter is different and give it a go.

Chipps Chippendale

Singletrackworld's Editor At Large

With 23 years as Editor of Singletrack World Magazine, Chipps is the longest-running mountain bike magazine editor in the world. He started in the bike trade in 1990 and became a full time mountain bike journalist at the start of 1994. Over the last 30 years as a bike writer and photographer, he has seen mountain bike culture flourish, strengthen and diversify and bike technology go from rigid steel frames to fully suspended carbon fibre (and sometimes back to rigid steel as well.)

More posts from Chipps

Home Forums A close look at Classified Powershift. Two-by is back!

Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 70 total)
  • A close look at Classified Powershift. Two-by is back!
  • 2
    robertajobb
    Full Member

    Why ? Maybe because 1x really is The Emperor’s New Clothes after all 🤔

    Anyway, I’m looking forward to getting one of these on my old Stumpy so I’ve got 54 gears to choose from 😁

    Kuco
    Full Member

    Hardly new, GCN did a video review of this about 2 years ago. Though I’ve not heard much about it since.

    1
    thols2
    Full Member

    The Classified Powershift system will be around €2699 for all that

    5lab
    Free Member

    Hardly new,

    It’s new for mountain bikes.

    I wonder if a better setup would be something like a 8 speed wide ratio cassette (11-50 or something) then use the power shift to do the small gears in-between? It would avoid lots of overlapping gears that wY

    martymac
    Full Member

    There seems to be an extra digit on that price, 2699 aint gonna be a big seller tbh, regardless of how good it is.
    I do think the idea has merit tho

    1
    chrestomanci
    Full Member

    It is basically a hub gear that you can mount a cassette on.

    Sturmey Archer have done that for years, and at a 10th of the price.

    Sturmey Archer CS-RK3 3Spd F30 Cassette Hub

    I dare say it is a fair bit heaver, you will need a cable shifter, and it is bolt through rather than quick release, but for £120 vs €2700 I will forgive some shortcomings. It even has 6 bolt disc brake mounts!

    ayjaydoubleyou
    Full Member

    It’s still a 12 speed cassette
    So you will still need a long cage, heavy, 12 speed mtb mech attached to the rear of the bike which negates most of the benefits.

    squirrelking
    Free Member

    Can someone explain to the hard of thinking amongst us how this is in any way better than either a front mech or a Hammerschmidt?


    @kuco

    He looks absolutely delighted with it 🤣

    5lab
    Free Member

    2700 EUR is for the full setup with a carbon rear wheel and cassette. From memory it’s not too far off other top end bike part pricing (xx1 axs etc)

    stevious
    Full Member

    Cost aside, I can see a use for it on road where having close gear ratios is the main reason why 1x hasn’t taken off.

    Struggling to think of a use case at all for MTB. Does anyone really need close ratios on their MTB?

    Edit: thinking about it, this would rule on a gravel bike.

    matt_outandabout
    Full Member

    I think it could also be great on a more touring orientated road bike.

    tomhoward
    Full Member

    Seen a few of them fitted to mega money road and gravel bikes, that look ace with a single front ring, that’s the main market for these I think, they’re just dipping a toe into MTB to see if there’s any takers. Not sure there will be.

    5
    boblo
    Free Member

    2x is back you say? For some of us, it never went away. Still riding several 2x 11 speed road/gravel bikes and several 3x 9 speed touring and MTB bikes.

    It only went away in the blink of a Marketeers eye…

    1
    ooOOoo
    Free Member

    it can make a recordable time difference to a tight singletrack loop

    But all the cool kids said 1x was better?

    squirrelking
    Free Member

    Does anyone really need close ratios on their MTB?

    Downhill riders…

    …yeah, exactly.

    tthew
    Full Member

    It’d be better if they could integrate it with Di2 and AXS to make proper sequential gear selection, for right nice bikes. Too expensive for 99% of us, even the 2by or hub gear gang.

    tomhoward
    Full Member

    It’d be better if they could integrate it with Di2 and AXS to make proper sequential gear selection,

    I *think* that is being worked on, with AXS anyway.

    ampthill
    Full Member

    The problem hear, other silly costs, is it looks like it doesn’t support a 10 tooth sprocket

    The idea that a very expensive hub and 11-42 cassette is 530% gearing only 10% more than 1×12

    The ratios are of course closer. But a 38-10 would do the same thing but you’d get a derailleur that was bit further off the ground and a bit lighter

    sillyoldman
    Full Member

    One of their focuses is efficiency, so they actively avoid 10T sprockets.

    ampthill
    Full Member

    One of their focuses is efficiency, so they actively avoid 10T sprockets

    I kind of get that. But I think off road that might be missing the point. In MTB races Drive Train damage is common and no one is spending very long at that end of the block.

    Onzadog
    Free Member

    One of their focuses is efficiency, so they actively avoid 10T sprockets.

    But use a planetary gear system.

    sillyoldman
    Full Member

    Yes – with less efficiency loss than any other. That’s partly why it’s only 2 speed.

    Efficiency is one of its benefits. You can spend more time in the best chainline area of the cassette by using the hub shift – better chainline is more efficient – esp when using the bigger ring sizes that the system encourages.
    Might struggle in MTB market as efficiency isn’t a prime consideration for many – lots of 28x 10-50/1/2 drivetrains in use.

    The other issue in MTBs is compatibility with a big enough chainring to reap the benefits. 38/40T would be useful, but few frames have clearance for that these days.

    Not an issue on road/gravel.

    squirrelking
    Free Member

    Efficiency is one of its benefits. You can spend more time in the best chainline area of the cassette by using the hub shift – better chainline is more efficient – esp when using the bigger ring sizes that the system encourages.

    You do know you can do that across an entire cassette using multiple rings up front?

    tomhoward
    Full Member

    You do know you can do that across an entire cassette using multiple rings up front?

    Some frames won’t accept a front mech nowadays.

    1
    Northwind
    Full Member

    sillyoldman
    Full Member

    Efficiency is one of its benefits. You can spend more time in the best chainline area of the cassette by using the hub shift – better chainline is more efficient – esp when using the bigger ring sizes that the system encourages.

    I bet you three scottish pounds that any chainline efficiency gains are more than outweighed by the planetary. Yes it’s more efficient than most, but drivechain losses are titchy.

    crazy-legs
    Full Member

    I bet you three scottish pounds that any chainline efficiency gains are more than outweighed by the planetary. Yes it’s more efficient than most, but drivechain losses are titchy.

    I’m not sure that it is planetary. No idea how they’re doing it but all the reviews I’ve seen (including this one by Chipps) suggests that there’s no discernible drag in the lower ratios which sounds rather unlike a planetary.

    Classified have been quite tight lipped about the actual workings of the hub.

    thols2
    Full Member

    I’m not sure that it is planetary.

    tagnut69
    Free Member

    Hambini had a look at this a few weeks back

    mick_r
    Full Member

    3
    tomhoward
    Full Member

    Hambini had a look at this a few weeks back

    and? Not that I could give less of a **** what he thinks.

    1
    nickc
    Full Member

    It only went away in the blink of a Marketeers eye…

    Aye, every single development in anything that one doesn’t like, is always ‘just’ marketing.

    Hambini had a look at this a few weeks back

    Does anyone actually give a single shit about what that idiot clappers on about?

    sillyoldman
    Full Member

    I bet you three scottish pounds that any chainline efficiency gains are more than outweighed by the planetary. Yes it’s more efficient than most, but drivechain losses are titchy.

    There’s no discernible drag at all. They claim that the reduction gear has less efficiency loss than using the inner ring that the hub mimics on a 2x system.

    convert
    Full Member

    I wonder if a better setup would be something like a 8 speed wide ratio cassette (11-50 or something) then use the power shift to do the small gears in-between? It would avoid lots of overlapping gears that wY

    I like that. With the internal gear shift being so fast I think that could work really well.

    I built a recumbent up with the sturmey 2 speed setup a few years ago to get over some terrible chainline issues whilst keeping the jumps manageable (recumbents need an extraordinary gear range to work well on the flat and get up hills).

    On MTB I can see it might be a thing for xc bikes. 1X definitely freed up suspension design so I guess this could give you a tighter cassette and still have access to some lower gears. Gravel too I guess for those with super deep pockets.

    4
    crazy-legs
    Full Member

    Hambini had a look at this a few weeks back

    I forced myself to sit through that one because of interest in the product itself and after the sexist misogynist egomaniac had drivelled on for a while he finally admitted never seen one, never used one and was getting all his info off their website then leaping to his own conclusions about how it worked in order to give it a “Hambini Roasting”.
    The guy is a complete 🔔🔚

    tomhoward
    Full Member

    I forced myself to sit through that one

    Not all heroes wear capes.

    legometeorology
    Free Member

    I’m excited to make a dinglespeed XC/monstercross bike with one of these, as they are also bringing out a hub shell with a short, shimano-splined freehub fitting (see page 10)

    I’m kind of blanking out the price though. Not sure I can stomach it if it’s more expensive than a Rohloff

    thols2
    Full Member

    Hambini had a look at this a few weeks back

    and?

    And it’s a planetary gear hub.

    There’s no discernible drag at all. They claim that the reduction gear has less efficiency loss than using the inner ring that the hub mimics on a 2x system.

    “They” being the people trying to sell it? On a 2x system, you should only be using the inner ring on the largest 3 or 4 cogs so chainline isn’t an issue. I would be very surprised if a smaller chainring alone made enough of a difference to make it less efficient than a planetary gear system.

    boblo
    Free Member

    It only went away in the blink of a Marketeers eye…

    Aye, every single development in anything that one doesn’t like, is always ‘just’ marketing.

    Charming.

    We’ll see. Give it 10 years and see if you can still get their proprietary (very expensive) cassettes. See how well it worked out for Hope?

    mert
    Free Member

    On a 2x system, you should only be using the inner ring on the largest 3 or 4 cogs so chainline isn’t an issue. I would be very surprised if a smaller chainring alone made enough of a difference to make it less efficient than a planetary gear system.

    Whut? Why?

    What’s wrong with your bike that means you can only use 3 or 4 largest sprockets?

    Or is this one of those “everyone knows” that is so popular amongst those who don’t know?

    legometeorology
    Free Member
Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 70 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.