SS better on 26 or ...
 

[Closed] SS better on 26 or 29?

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Does wheel size make much difference for SS duties?
Thinking of Cotic Soul v Solaris. ( not the Simple as I may want gears in the future)
Would one give a better SS experience over the other?
Thank you.


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 11:33 am
Posts: 1980
Full Member
 

I'll let you know. I've just changed my 26in Inbred SS for a 29in Inbred SS. First ride coming up...

I can tell you that a 29in front wheel makes a big difference if you're riding rigid forks. I ran the old Inbred as a 69er for a while and really liked it


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 11:38 am
Posts: 920
Free Member
 

I've done both (Dialled Love/Hate and a Singular Swift. I have a geared Soul too). 29 because it rolls better, unless you must have the flickability of 26.


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 11:43 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

As far as I can tell, 29ers seem to have been almost universally accepted as best for SS racing.


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 11:44 am
Posts: 5121
Full Member
 

I'm just in the middle of a comparison between a Kona Unit 26" and a 29er Kona Unit, both SS, both rigid and lastly both the same weight to within 1/2lbs

[url= http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8352/8314700949_481ee358c0_b.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8352/8314700949_481ee358c0_b.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/17059060@N00/8314700949/ ]IMAG0226[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/17059060@N00/ ]eastham_david[/url], on Flickr

[url= http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8045/8377208700_1f09cb947d_b.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8045/8377208700_1f09cb947d_b.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/17059060@N00/8377208700/ ]P1040954[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/17059060@N00/ ]eastham_david[/url], on Flickr

Initial thoughts are that the 29er does take a bit more to get rolling and TBH seems hardwork in comparison to the 26" one. It does roll a bit better over rough terrain, such as the cobbled roads up Rivington.

I have not really seen much difference in the muddy stuff, except the 26" Unit seems easier to pick up and move about. I'm also struggling to get the front wheel up easily on the 29er, but thats probably because i'm crap at manualling. ๐Ÿ™

I think the SS bit is not influenced by the wheel size as much as the fork type ie as stated above 29er is probably better with the rigid fork.


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 11:47 am
Posts: 920
Free Member
 

29 because it rolls better

I should have phrased that as "holds momentum better". IMO I do notice the difference and for SS it's a big win.


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 11:52 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I went 26 to 69 to 29 and 29 is where its at.


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 12:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

yeh 29ers are harder work vortex. i'd stick with the 26er if i were you and i can take that cumbersome 29er frame off your hands ; )

26er does actually look better of the the 2 IMO


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 10:14 pm
Posts: 920
Free Member
 

Canal towpaths - the ideal place to test singlespeeds ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 10:18 pm
Posts: 5121
Full Member
 

Canal towpaths - the ideal place to test singlespeeds

๐Ÿ™„


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 11:42 pm
Posts: 2061
Full Member
 

Just replaced my 26 with a 29 - up-geared slightly and seems to climb better/faster but that also might be because it has rigid forks and/or new bike syndrome ๐Ÿ˜ฎ


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 11:52 pm
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

Canal towpaths - the ideal place to test [s]singlespeeds[/s]29r's

Feel how it just rolls right over the dog eggs


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 11:55 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

SS makes no difference.

It's just the usual 29 vs 26 debate.


 
Posted : 20/01/2013 11:57 pm
Posts: 10654
Full Member
 

Rocketdog off here once used the phrase "sitting in rather than sitting on", & for me it summed up how it felt. I like climbing out the saddle & the 29er seems to handle that better. In terms of traction it's better on a 29er, I rarely spin out with bigger wheels, & this is important with my immense power. ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 21/01/2013 12:02 am
Posts: 35
Free Member
 

I have both, I haven't used the 26er since I bought the Karate Monkeys. I ride 1 fixed, now that is nice.........


 
Posted : 21/01/2013 8:15 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

A better 26" will outride a crap 29" anyday.

Buy the bike that rides the best not because of the wheel size.

26er does actually look better of the the 2 IMO

On small or medium frame yeah, but larger frames 29er looks right.


 
Posted : 21/01/2013 8:41 am
 Sam
Posts: 2390
Free Member
 

I think there is a bit more to it than the usual 26/29 debate. Riding a single speed effectively means carrying momentum as much as possible. As that's one of the things 29ers do best I think they make particularly good single speeds.


 
Posted : 21/01/2013 9:29 am
Posts: 920
Free Member
 

SS makes no difference.

It's just the usual 29 vs 26 debate.

Wrong.

Sam has it.


 
Posted : 21/01/2013 9:46 am
Posts: 2006
Free Member
 

Sam - Member
I think there is a bit more to it than the usual 26/29 debate. Riding a single speed effectively means carrying momentum as much as possible. As that's one of the things 29ers do best I think they make particularly good single speeds.

+1
many a confirmed 26er rider surprised by a try on a 29er SS


 
Posted : 21/01/2013 9:50 am
Posts: 920
Free Member
 

A 29 front wheel also works well with rigid forks, it's smoother than a 26. And SS rigid is a natural combo I find.


 
Posted : 21/01/2013 10:01 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm also struggling to get the front wheel up easily on the 29er

I've got a Unit 29er and was disappointed at how difficult it was to get the front wheel up. A cheap and cheerful shorter stem made it much better, but it's still not a patch on my old rigid for manualling. Whether that's the fact it's a 29er, it's steel, the forks are heavy, the chain stays are too long or what I don't know. It did a decent job on the snowy hills yesterday though.

What I'm trying to say is that I really don't know ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 21/01/2013 10:50 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Try a jones- really easy to pop a wheel up- bit pricey mind!


 
Posted : 21/01/2013 10:58 am
Posts: 920
Free Member
 

I'm also struggling to get the front wheel up easily on the 29er

Do you mean just to lift it over roots etc (I have no problem) or for wheelies and bike park tricks (in which case you're on the wrong bike)?

As tortoise says a short stem will help, or perhaps your frame is too big, but it's never going to handle like a BMX.


 
Posted : 21/01/2013 10:59 am
Posts: 9544
Free Member
 

I've had very similar set ups on 26 and 29 SS rigid bikes, while the 26 was an ace little bmx of a bike, the 29 is more suited to the purpose and may just take a bit more attention to get it balanced. ss-rigid-29" is a great combo.

Try a jones- really easy to pop a wheel up
and they have 445-450mm stays. Bar to rear axle distance gets overlooked while people obsess over chain stay length.. I don't hop/pop the bike up with my feet, if I did I'd not be able to do it on flats.
A cheap and cheerful shorter stem made it much better
Exactly )


 
Posted : 21/01/2013 11:29 am
 GDRS
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Things I have noticed since I went from 26 inbred to 29 scandal.....

It's lighter - but I've ditched suspension other than than that all things are pretty equal. Except I have noticed that I am braking more on the runs I am familar with - and I do think that's because I am going faster.

If I could be arsed at some stage to use this strava thing to do some objective testing I would know if this is true - but in the meantime I think I am a bit quicker. However, add cake stops, faff, and other trail related nonsense I am still out for the same amount of time........


 
Posted : 21/01/2013 11:46 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

I've got 2 Inbreds in 26" & 29",had them for a few years & have tried both in many guises..
My thoughts...
Rigid - 29er hands down,just rolls over everything better
SS - Swings & roundabouts here, 26 picks up speed quicker,29 holds speed better.
MTB Gears - Pretty much as above really
Road gears with slick tyres - 29" wheels just work much better when churning tarmac miles out imo.Rode both for a few 100 milers & the big wheel felt better for comfort & was always a bit quicker overall.
With bounce on the front - 26",don't really know why but it just rides/feels better than the bigger wheel with bounce.
Rigid 69er - only tried the 26" one with this but it rides loads better than with a smaller wheel on the front.


 
Posted : 21/01/2013 12:16 pm
Posts: 13570
Full Member
 

69er.

Front wheel rolls over the lumps better.
Rear wheel spins up easier.

More niche too!


 
Posted : 21/01/2013 2:00 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

Fair point Sam et al *resolves to think more before posting*


 
Posted : 21/01/2013 2:07 pm
Posts: 2091
Full Member
 

WorldClassAccident - Member
69er.

Front wheel rolls over the lumps better.
Rear wheel spins up easier.

More niche too!

This ^^^


 
Posted : 21/01/2013 2:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So does this mean there should soon be an influx of quality 26" ss wheelsets in the classifieds? Ace!

*rubs hand together excitedly*


 
Posted : 22/01/2013 12:06 am
Posts: 2061
Full Member
 

So does this mean there should soon be an influx of quality 26" ss wheelsets in the classifieds?

Just got my hope SS rebuilt onto a 29" rim cos there were a couple of folds to the rim surface anyway! Front has gone onto the 'bay as noone seemed to want it on here.


 
Posted : 22/01/2013 10:00 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Both can work really well but I think it depends on the terrain and whether you're running suspension or not.

I run a Surly 1x1 and a Karate Monkey.

The 29er rolls faster and is better able to ride out the bumps in a rigid SS setup but is slower to get up to speed and hence as a singlespeed is a bit more of a handful on techy, thrutchy climbs than a 26er in my experience. Downhill its pretty much unstoppable though!

The 1x1 requires a bit more management over fast rocky descents but is generally a lot more chuckable and better able to cope with steep techy climbs than the 29er.


 
Posted : 22/01/2013 10:54 am
Posts: 770
Free Member
 

I'd say the benefits of 29ers match a single speed very well.
It all depends how you define "better"


 
Posted : 22/01/2013 11:04 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've got both. The 29er's the race bike, the 26er's the 'pratting about in the woods' bike. They're both fantastic in the right situation.


 
Posted : 22/01/2013 12:31 pm
Posts: 2061
Full Member
 

the 26er's the 'pratting about in the woods' bike

If you can call a custom DEAN titanium a pratting about in the woods bike ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 22/01/2013 2:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I take my 'pratting about' very seriously.


 
Posted : 23/01/2013 10:45 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You need to do some demo rides to answer this question, 26 v 29 on here just rattles cages ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 23/01/2013 11:35 am
Posts: 920
Free Member
 

I'm actually quite surprised the usual suspects haven't turned up here to rattle on about lack of choice and how some photogenic French teenager wins Enduro on a 26 so it's a closed book for them.

Maybe they're not cool enough for SS.


 
Posted : 23/01/2013 11:54 am
Posts: 15433
Full Member
 

It all depends how you define "better"

I built my cheap 26" Rigid SS for chopping out offroad winter miles while requiring me to do a minimum amount of maintenance, given the efficient rolling of 29" wheels I can see me building a replacement rigid SS 29er in the next few years... Right tool for the job really innit...


 
Posted : 23/01/2013 1:53 pm
Posts: 5121
Full Member
 

You need to do some demo rides to answer this question

Then he will be able to come on here with factual evidence, which as you know is completely against STW rules ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 23/01/2013 2:28 pm