That works out at an expensive 136g! A couple of chocolate bars will almost irradicate that expensive benefit. Thanks for sharing!!
I’d say, from experience, about £1 per gram weight saved on a bike (once you’ve done obvious things like tyres) is about the norm, so saving 136 grams for about £70 ain’t too bad really… Though of course it depends on your viewpoint, and how important it is to you to save that weight at all.
To fair the xt stuff looks nicer
Was my argument, rightly or wrongly, about 6 months ago when I needed to put a new groupset on my Maverick. That and I already had XT brakes and wanted it to all match! Haha
Thanks too, boring job and a tad obsessive but good to know that SLX is really no heavier and probably a whole lot stronger and cheaper.
VFM wise, SLX is an absolute steal. It performs pretty much just as well as XT, it’s only about 6% heavier overall, it’s 30% cheaper. It’s a massive step up from LX anyway. It is however no stronger than XT, and the durability verdict is still out in my case at least…
Interestingly, pretty much the entire weight difference between SLX and XT cassettes is down to the different lockrings! So when you wear out an XT cassette, just buy SLX next time and use the XT lockring on it instead, to save yourself £10.