Home Forums Bike Forum 1996 Kona Fire Mountain

Viewing 35 posts - 1 through 35 (of 35 total)
  • 1996 Kona Fire Mountain
  • masterwatson2000
    Free Member

    My wife has inherited a rarely ridden Kona Fire Mountain from the mid / late nineties which appears to be in good nick. Is it something that is now worth anything or is it safe territory for me to mess about with and make into a SS hack / pub bike?

    It is a 3×7 setup with an STX rear derailleur and the Kona project 2 rigid forks. It is blue in colour which has lead me to the conclusion of its age.

    Let me know if it’s worth owt or whether it’s worth playing with to create a bike for some winter fun!

    wiggles
    Free Member

    Check retrobike

    russjp
    Free Member

    Not worth a penny, I will give you a tenner to take it off your hands 🙂

    jimster01
    Full Member

    STX,pft, not even worth a tenner. 🙂

    Onzadog
    Free Member

    Not sure why, but something about that screams at me to leave it in its original condition.

    I’ll give you £11.27 and a half finish cough sweet for it.

    st
    Full Member

    Without seeing pictures I’d suggest expecting around £100-150 if you were to sell it but as above check the forum at Retrobike.co.uk

    Mackem
    Full Member

    Leave it be and just ride it.

    Munqe-chick
    Free Member

    I don’t’ think that is 1996 as mine is 96 and it was red, sat in my shed as a town bike. Love it first ever MTB thumb shifters still going strong and are the best!

    ahwiles
    Free Member

    there was often a choice of colours back then…

    (my 96(?) cindercone was available in pink or green)

    great bikes!

    luddite
    Free Member
    Reluctant
    Free Member

    Fire Mt 96 was grey. 1998 was blue.

    FOG
    Full Member

    Quite the worst MTB I have ever owned. Not the frame particularly although it was a bit steep for the wife who it was bought for originally, but the components. I can’t remember all the bits on it but something broke almost every ride. By the time it descended to the oldest boy it was a complete wreck despite a relatively sheltered life. Not just the available componentry of the era either, other bikes we had in the family were fine.

    Kuco
    Full Member

    Looking at the 88 catalogue at the Cindercone made me think of all the people who asked me how did I spill paint on my frame 😀

    allyharp
    Full Member

    They ride brilliantly. Keep it!

    zbonty
    Full Member

    It was their bottom of the range number. They generally cut component corners so had crap bits compared to the competition. Sold for £400 iirc.

    dc11
    Free Member

    Blue with red decals? As Reluctant says, probably a ’98.

    masterwatson2000
    Free Member

    Thanks all for the responses. Yeah, on further inspection it may well be a ’98 Fire Mountain. I certainly do plan to ride it, why wouldn’t i?!

    I’m kind of happy that some of you say that it’s further down the pile of classic Kona’s because now I know that I’m not going to ruin anything potentially worth keeping if I run it as my pub bike!

    When I’ve sorted it, I’ll get some pics up for you all.

    jimster01
    Full Member

    I used to have a 95 cinder cone, the fire dome was the same frame but with a couple hundred quid lower “spec” bike, stilworth an absolute mint.l

    highlandman
    Free Member

    Dark red with ‘Hawaian’ text stickers, RST or rigid fork, tektro Vs, 8 speed STX-RC, flat Ritchey bars & Mavic 117 rims? 1998 and yes, about £400 at that time. Rides like a lump of gas-pipe. Will make a brilliant rigid hack.

    cookeaa
    Full Member

    Same sort of blue as this?:

    I was told 1997 when I paid £50 for the frame and fork on retrobike.

    I also owned a 1995 fire mountain, which came in a sort of battleship grey with 3×7 STX and gripshift, did me well for quite a while actually…

    My advice would be, get it rolling either geared or SS as your milage, budget or knees require, and use it as a winter hack to save the nicer, newer kit from the ravages of winter.

    If you flog it adopt the “pay it on philosophy” and don’t charge the earth, as nostalgic as I am for old konas, these were decent but basic bikes, intended for people to ride, a show pony it ain’t…

    jerrys
    Free Member

    This is my 1992 one with a few changes (girvin flexstem and Avid v-brakes). Undecided at the moment whether to keep it or change it for a roadbike or a 29er of some description.

    kimbers
    Full Member

    cookeaas one is a 97

    nice bike, dont sell, ride it, lots

    mindmap3
    Free Member

    1997 was blue with blue decals wasn’t it? Whereas the ’98 was like Cookeas.

    I love old Kona’s and fond memories if my Koa. 1997 was my favourite range the colours and decals were brilliant.

    hopkinsgm
    Full Member

    1996 Fire Mountain was available in blue with light blue decals and grey Project 2’s or grey with grey decals and grey Project 2’s. Other spec highlights include canti brakes, threaded forks and headset with quill stem (ahead/threadless from 1997 onwards) and gripshift. I believe 1996 was the last year of the serif font for the decals, before they went over to the “jungle-y” font.

    Mine, owned from new, is now a long way from the original spec with 3×9 LX transmission, V brakes, upgraded wheelset, threadless Project 2’s and riser bars – upgraded various bits and pieces as they wore out and/or broke. The only remaining original component is the frame. Sadly, it doesn’t get used as much as it used to, but it does still see the light of day from time to time…

    cookeaa
    Full Member

    Having GIS’d it looks like Mine is a 98 and my old Grey one which I thought was a 95 was in fact a 96… You live and learn.

    Ultimately very little changed Year on year other than paint and decals so from about 1990-1999 They’re all good.

    clubber
    Free Member

    zbonty – Member
    It was their bottom of the range number.

    Hahanna was BOR surely?

    zbonty
    Full Member

    Thats what i said meant.

    plus-one
    Full Member

    Can’t beat a 90’s Kona

    [/url]
    Untitled[/url] by Plus one2010[/url], on Flickr

    xiphon
    Free Member

    Holy seat post Batman!

    clubber
    Free Member

    It’s a 90s bike. of course it has a long seatpost!

    cookeaa
    Full Member

    zbonty – Member
    It was their bottom of the range number.

    Hahanna was BOR surely?

    [/quote]

    Hahanna and Fire-Mtn had the same basic frame I reckon (anyone care to correct me?), just different parts fitted and paint job to meet price points, Shirley?

    kimbers
    Full Member

    yeah hahhana and fm had same frame (well in 97) but the FM came with rockshox instead of P2s

    the frames singly and doubly butted, the lava dome/ cinder cone had some tripple butting

    I bought my hahhana in 1997 in Gearworks Cyclery, Massachusetts some low life nicked it from outside tescos in Fulbourne 🙁

    GaryLake
    Free Member

    Hahanna and Fire-Mtn had the same basic frame I reckon (anyone care to correct me?), just different parts fitted and paint job to meet price points, Shirley?

    Depends on the year, I had a 94 Fire Mountain and it was Tange, whereas Hahanna wasn’t. I don’t know what appreciable difference that actually made though…

    Had a 94 Cinder Cone too (we had a few 94 Konas that got passed around the family) – Kona’s peaked that year I reckon – vintage year.

    94 Hei Hei must be one of the prettiest off the peg bikes ever made.

    PimpmasterJazz
    Free Member

    Can’t beat a 90’s Kona

    You can, with a 150mm stem. 😉

Viewing 35 posts - 1 through 35 (of 35 total)

The topic ‘1996 Kona Fire Mountain’ is closed to new replies.