I think people who just go straight to the top i.e the proverbial Colnago with Di2 without having turned a pedal are prats

What an odd attitude. Why does it bother you so much? You should concentrate more on yourself rather than what others are doing, maybe if that happens we’ll see less of your whinging ‘I’m not very good at racing’ posts this season.

oldgit, I don’t think you really realise it but you’re very much the epitome of why so many road clubs died on their arses in the last 20 years and why so many of the older clubs are being ignored by all the wiggo-inspired newbies even now.

You often moan about the problems with road racing and the lack of support in the UK. Ever thought there might be some connection?

What an odd attitude. Why does it bother you so much? You should concentrate more on yourself rather than what others are doing, maybe if that happens we’ll see less of your whinging ‘I’m not very good at racing’ posts this season.

This. It just seems pathetic that people feel others should have to ‘earn’ a nice bike.

How long before we are being forced to pay for the Tour of France and the rest by having to Subscribe to Sky sports, its coming mark my words

If Sky did a better job of it than ITV I would be happy to get a Sky sports sub for 1 month while the tour is on (and no bloody adverts either!)

They’re not gonna sell a one month sub though are they! Must admit I’d not be surprised, but I think it’d be a shame. I like the ITV coverage anyway.

TdF is free to watch in France…

They’re not gonna sell a one month sub though are they!

afaik – they can and do.

Anyway, it’ll always be on Eurosport 🙂
And cycling is one of those sports where I really enjoy the highlights.

As a cyclist you should be concentrating on the pleasure of riding your own bike and not the bitterness of seeing others ride theirs – whatever bike it is.

I’m so glad I’m not a ‘proper cyclist’. It seems to be very stressful.

I believe in a bit of humbleness, an apprenticeship if you like.

I kind of get where Oldgit is coming from on this. In the motorbike world, you get older folk going out, passing their test and then buying the latest fastest bike to wobble around on. Not that it affects me in any way apart from the fact that if there’s a sportsbike involved in an RTA, nine times out of ten it’ll be a middle aged bloke who has only been riding a year or so.

In cycling circles, I went out on a club ride (in winter!) with a local club in Kingston. Without question I was on the least expensive bike there, literally every other bike was a De Rosa with carbon this and Di2 that. Now this alone doesn’t bother me, but was does bother me is the fact that they had absolutely no road sense whatsoever. Riding three abreast, no clue about riding in a group, not stopping at red lights – just generally incapable of riding as you should on a club run, almost to the point where they think buying posh gear somehow lets them overlook the need to learn certain skills.

Additionally, ride the fourth cat race at Dunsfold on a friday and look at the value of the kit being ridden there. Then look at all the brakechecking/dropping wheels/inability to ride a bike that goes on. My point (and I think Oldgits to some extent) is that you need to put the time in to learn about riding on the road. Buying Rapha and lots of carbon portrays an image that you know what you’re doing. Rapha themselves portray this image that most folks wearing their kit are time served cyclists who put the hours in – ironic as most don’t have a clue.

The fact that Nalini make the kit for Rapha sponsored Sky team is a joke. A triumph of marketing in my eyes – fair enough Rapha are funding Team Sky just like QuickStep sponsor a team (I’m pretty certain Boonen doesn’t have cheap laminate in his living room). But for a cycling clothing ‘brander’ (I’m not going to use the term manufacturer) to sponsor a team but their kit not be good enough to race in is a joke considering the image Rapha portray (and charge for).

This. It just seems pathetic that people feel others should have to ‘earn’ a nice bike.

I think they are saying that you should have reached a standard where you can use it andyou “earn” it by being good enough to justify it. What is so wrong with this – could you articulate without insulting those you disagree with? I have read your view now a few times. is there any chance you could explain it?

Bit like say in racing you start of in carts, then get cars then something else
You dont just have pots of money and therefore go straight to a F1 car.

TBH you seem more annoyed at their view than they are about folk being over biked…can I start insulting you now I disagree with you ?

Pathetic, Jealous etc 🙄

TBH i dont actually care what bike folk ride but if you have an expensive bike – be it an Orange 5 for canal towpaths or a top of the range road bike for pootles then i will consider you overbiked and a tad foolish [ or wealthy enough to have really expensive toys that dont add any to your ability to do the “sport”].

I also love it when you’re milling around the race afterwards and two blokes will be stood there chatting, one saying to the other that he NEEDS to get a lighter set of wheels because that’s why he got dropped on the nth lap. When the race was probably won by someone on a bone stock middle of the range Giant.

No, what you NEED to do is get out and train a bit more….*

*I realise the irony in this post considering the bike I ride and the placings I get at races. I’m under no illusions that I’m over biked, I just like nice kit..

I can see where oldgit is coming from, I just think he phrased it quite badly. flange sums it up quite well ^^. There’s an image and in cycling, it’s very easy to buy into it. For relatively little money (compared to say, buying a top end car), you too can wear the pro kit, ride the pro bikes. Companies naturally play up to this – Rapha are far from the only culprit in that respect.

Look at any high-end “aspirational” brand – watches, clothing, cars – they all do it. In some instances it attracts the wealthy who have never turned a pedal (or driven a fast car/motorbike). As flange says, look at some of the local 4th Cat crits – riders on £6000 of kit who can’t hold a straight line. Or motorcyclists coming off cos they’ve gone out and bought a 600bhp superbike with none of the “gentle introduction” that oldgit alludes to.

Rapha themselves are pretty blameless as far as I can see. They spotted a niche in the market and went for it. The money they make gets ploughed back into cycling – sponsorship of 2 teams and loads of events from grassroots CX to top end road, a presence at lots of events.

You may not like their products or their marketing but Rapha are a very positive force in UK cycling. And no-one is forcing you to buy their kit or drink their coffee.

I also love it when you’re milling around the race afterwards and two blokes will be stood there chatting, one saying to the other that he NEEDS to get a lighter set of wheels because that’s why he got dropped on the nth lap. When the race was probably won by someone on a bone stock middle of the range Giant.

I did a winter crit on my singlespeed road bike last week. That got some comments. 😉 Rainy, windy, cold, generally minging and there were people there on £2000 carbon deep section wheels… 😯

There has been some inaccuracy written in previous comments about who will be making the kit for the sky team next year. Nalini have always been involved with Rapha as one of their suppliers/fabricators and like just about every clothing manufacturer you can mention most of their wares is made in factories that fabricate for multiple “brands”. Just because clothing is made in the same factory does not mean it is made of the same fabrics, assigned to the same level of machinist working to the same garment fabrication goal times, or given the same QA/QC procedures. This is how the modern manufacturing world works.

Sky/Rapha kit will come in 3 flavours – normal Rapha quality in smartwool at normal Rapha prices; “supporter” kit which will be of similar quality and price to every other replica kit on the market; and the stuff the actual racers will wear. The normal Rapha quality stuff was too heavy and warm for them so requested mostly mesh. With the exception of one rider in the team it also has to be custom made as they are too thin to wear off the peg sizes!

TBH i dont actually care what bike folk ride but if you have an expensive bike – be it an Orange 5 for canal towpaths or a top of the range road bike for pootles then i will consider you overbiked and a tad foolish [ or wealthy enough to have really expensive toys that dont add any to your ability to do the “sport”].

Thing is though, it’s all relative innit. The guy on his £70 supermarket full suss probably thinks you are overbiked on your £400 hardtail. The guy riding an Orange 5 on a canal towpath – that might be his only bike – so actually he’ll be getting mocked for not owning several different bikes perfectly suited to each occasion?

you are overbiked on your £400 hardtail

I have never been so insulted in my life my wheels cost more than that 😉

re towpath i meant buying an orange just for that- its not adding anything really

I ride them with my kids an do get looks now and again from proper mtbers when they see me on mine doing this i now take mty rigid SS so they know i am awesome

of course it is all relative and you could have another bike yourself but you do have nice brakes 😛

If you won the lottery, and went out to get a new bike, there’s no way you’re coming back with ultegra or xt or a mid range giant frame. And there’s no point trying to kid yourself either.

there’s no way you’re coming back with ultegra or xt or a mid range giant frame

or in fact anything that’s name wasn’t Ferrari 430 Scuderia

IMHO Rapha do make some quality gear, but considering the rapha-condor-sharp team shirt was no different in materials/manufacture to any other team strip and was £140…how much do we reckon for the Rapha-Sky replica shirt????

I seem to have created a monster with a fairly innocent thread. 😆 Years ago when I played Golf it was the same thing then , My uncle a 18 handicapper would show me his latest Taylor Made r500 driver that cost him £250 then promptly smash the ball 150 yards. I remember him getting upset when I said It was a cracking club but wont turn him into Tiger Woods.
I bought a Giant Defy 2 after trudging about on an old non compact Kona and felt like I was riding a Colnago c59 , would I like 2k deep set rims and a full Di2 set up ?. Well obviously, can I justify or afford them No.
At the end of the day what does It matter if someone has the money to buy a nice 5k Pinnarello or Colnago gets kitted up and plods about doing small 40k loops at 15 mph , some people will always have more money than others and If they can afford a Colnago why buy a Boardman.

Fact is, as cycling gets more popular due to Wiggens et al there will be a bigger influx of new cyclists, some of which have a large amount of disposable income to spend on team kit/bikes/coffee. It’s a good thing in so far as the usual ‘more second hand kit’ and bike companies doing well/cheaper better bikes model. But there will always be resistance from the old guard – those who were ‘in it before it was popular’. If you’re rich and have the cash why would you not buy a really nice bike? This I have no issue with, I think everyone would like a nice bike if they could afford it.

It’s the whole clique atmosphere of cycling that annoys me. Cycling is terrible for it, that whole Velorules thing really boils my piss. You should have your stem slammed, you should do this, not do that. Your top should match your shorts which should match your bar tape – really? This whole coffee culture thing is ridiculous and I think that’s what a lot of people who buy these top end bikes think their subscribing to. It doesn’t take much effort now to buy a bike that’s under the minimum UCI weight and a lot of people think they ‘need’ this in order to race/do well in cycling. I don’t want to be part of a sport that looks down on those that don’t stop for a poncy coffee every five minutes or have nice wool tops and a 4 grand fixie…

I’m not knocking Rapha for what they’ve done – as mentioned they’ve seen a niche and filled it very successfully. I even like the look of some of their stuff but personally I’d not wear it as I think it’s overpriced for what it is. The Nalini thing smacks of Emperors new clothes to me – those that can buying £200 cycling tops because they think it puts them in the same league as Froome ect, when Froome and crew are riding around in proper gear. But you pays your money…

I think people who just go straight to the top i.e the proverbial Colnago with Di2 without having turned a pedal are prats. I believe in a bit of humbleness, an apprenticeship if you like

seems a reasonable opinion. If I fancy giving golf a go I’m not going to go out and buy some silly expensive carbon/ti/whatever golfists get excited about, top of the range clubs and silly trousers and jumpers before I’ve actually hit a ball am I?
TBH I’d be bloody disappointed if some of my cycling buddies didn’t stage a bit of intervention before I actually made it into a golf shop.

Can’t see the point of replica kit myself either but I do accept it’s a fairly common thing.

Bit like say in racing you start of in carts, then get cars then something else
You dont just have pots of money and therefore go straight to a F1 car.

Not really anything like that though is it? Or the motorbike analogy. Expensive pushbikes are no harder to ride nor more dangerous than cheap ones. So given that it really isn’t hurting you at all if someone wants to “waste” their money, what could you possibly have against it, except jealousy/bitterness/some weird sense of superiority in the cycling “hierarchy”.

Getting back to the topic, surely all replica team kit, no matter who its made by, provides a valuable public service?

As a bell-end indicator, its probably as effective as a private number plate on a car? Rapha are doing us all a favour 😉

I was much faster and did better at races when I had rubbish bikes. The reason being is that I had more time to train because I was working less. These days I have more disposable income but less time to train and all the carbon in the world isn’t going to overlook the fact that I’m not as fit as I was. I’m sure I can’t be alone in this situation – the bankers and doctors and minted folk who can afford the bikes probably can’t afford the 3+ hours a day to train. So to them cycling is just a hobby to do when its a nice sunny afternoon. Not everyone wants to race or be the fastest.

Expensive pushbikes are no harder to ride nor more dangerous than cheap ones.

What so I could not actually drive a F1 Car? Are you sure. I reckon I could crash at the first corner like some of the best 😉
Have you read the comments above about folk pointing out when they are dangerous?

So given that it really isn’t hurting you at all if someone wants to “waste” their money, what could you possibly have against it,

The reasons given?

except jealousy/bitterness/some weird sense of superiority in the cycling “hierarchy”.

No that would just be you lazily insulting those you disagree with 🙄

I do agree with the point about not getting top of the range gear until you can ‘justify’ it. I see kids coming in to the community centre where I work who have just started learning guitar, and their parents have bought them really nice Fender Strats or Gibson Les Pauls, when they can barely strum a chord.

Seems totally wrong to me but I try not to be too judgemental. I just think you have to accept that people’s conception of what is ‘basic’ and what is ‘top of the range’ can vary wildly according to disposable income etc.

Have you read the comments above about folk pointing out when they are dangerous?

That’s got nothing to do with how much they’ve spent on their bike though.

This does seem to be like a “He’s got a nicer bike than me but I’m faster than him so it’s not fair!” kind of thing.

What so I could not actually drive a F1 Car?

Without a good deal of practice and instruction, you’d be lucky to actually get it rolling 🙂

What so I could not actually drive a F1 Car? Are you sure. I reckon I could crash at the first corner like some of the best

I remember watching a Top Gear (I think) when Hammond could not even get the thing to pull away without stalling (and potentially wrecking the engine!)

The reasons given?

I appreciate why novice cyclists are dangerous but that has nothing to do with what bike they’re on.

This does seem to be like a “He’s got a nicer bike than me but I’m faster than him so it’s not fair!” kind of thing.

Exactly

As a bell-end indicator, its probably as effective as a private number plate on a car?

LOL. Our neighbours have matching number plates, effectively “b3llend1” and “b3llend2”. I’m embarressed by it when we have visitors.

That’s got nothing to do with how much they’ve spent on their bike though.

That was a response to a specific point not a general one I agree no one is saying they should not have them as it is dangerous per se for them to ride [an expensive bike in comparison to any other cheaper bike.
It may not be more dangerous for me to drive a powerful motorbike/car as it depends how i choose to ride it just like the bike.

This does seem to be like a “He’s got a nicer bike than me but I’m faster than him so it’s not fair!” kind of thing.Does it?

Does it?
I just read folk interpreting it as such yet no one actually saying this

Just because clothing is made in the same factory does not mean it is made of the same fabrics, assigned to the same level of machinist working to the same garment fabrication goal times, or given the same QA/QC procedures. This is how the modern manufacturing world works.

how does this work then? We’ll let the teaboy sew up aldi tops but rapha get our CEO stitching their shorts?
We’ll only cast a quick glance (with one eye closed) over the DHBs, rapha will get our full attention?

OK there may be an trace of truth in there but how do the factories sell their services that way? “We’ll do a half arsed job for base rates but you pay for pro service and we’ll do our very bestest and won’t cut corners, honest!”

Does it?

Yeah, it sort of does.

Giving reasons like “humbleness” is bollocks, you just don’t want to admit (to other people, yourself, whoever) that you’re annoyed someone has a better bike than you.

That’s exactly how it works.

Thanks for the mind reading and ignoring the answers given

Stick to the maths 😉

TBH i dont actually care what bike folk ride but if you have an expensive bike – be it an Orange 5 for canal towpaths or a top of the range road bike for pootles then i will consider you overbiked and a tad foolish [ or wealthy enough to have really expensive toys that dont add any to your ability to do the “sport”].

Giving reasons like “humbleness” is bollocks, you just don’t want to admit (to other people, yourself, whoever) that you’re annoyed someone has a better bike than you.

I don’t think anyone on here has said that or even hinted at it. Unless you’re talking úber bikes (£10k +) I think anyone if they were so inclined could stretch to a pretty nice bike. Finance/cutting out luxuries and most people could, its just what you see as important. Buying a half decent motorbike (new) would cost you at least £5k and look how many of those are around.

I think the issue for some people here is folk having mega money kit and not being able to ride to a certain level. Personally I don’t care what people ride as long as they don’t knock me off on a club ride or race. Or act like a ****t because they’ve got a nice set of wheels…

That’s exactly how it works.

so why would the cheaper brands put up with that? Why don’t they go to a manufacturer that does a proper job without being paid extra to do it right first time?

This does seem to be like a “He’s got a nicer bike than me but I’m faster than him so it’s not fair!” kind of thing.

I took it as (and my opinion is) that it’s bloody daft to spend a wedge on something when you’ve no idea if you are going to like it or stick with it.

Guess that sort of thing keeps the classifieds going tho so shouldn’t moan 😉

Like say a brand new SS CX bike 😉

they say that they dont do it 😉

Mate used to make bog roll in a massive factory

they did everyones and they ere all the same – iirc M & S did have a separate run but own brand to expensive stuff was all the same

Its not like you can have different machines to cut stuff or stitch it that almost do the job is it- perhaps use better material but that cost will be negligible.

I think they are saying that you should have reached a standard where you can use it andyou “earn” it by being good enough to justify it. What is so wrong with this – could you articulate without insulting those you disagree with? I have read your view now a few times. is there any chance you could explain it?

So, and please correct me if I’m wrong, you’re saying that when you see someone on a nice bike, who can’t ride to a standard that you believe the bike “deserves”, you feel that they are not worthy of the bike?

or wealthy enough to have really expensive toys that dont add any to your ability to do the “sport”

I’m “wealthy” enough to be able to afford some black and gold grips for my mountain bike (they cost a tenner I think, superstar). They look awesome. They don’t add anything to my ability to ride the bike, they work just the same as any old grip. Does that mean you resent me as well?