- This topic has 86 replies, 59 voices, and was last updated 1 year ago by Rubber_Buccaneer.
-
Stanton Bikes Statement Re Administration
-
NorthwindFull Member
Don’t think it needs much explanation? It’s a side effect of how they upgraded the news stories to also be threads- mostly good, since it means you don’t have the old daftness of “here is fresh goods friday with a couple of comments” and “over here is the thread with the link to fresh goods friday and the actual discussion”, but it does mean that if there’s going to be a news story on something it also has to be the thread.
DelFull Membersorry to hear this. not an owner myself but have found myself looking at their website on more than a few occasions. all the best to the crew there.
chakapingFull MemberThe moderation on here is a bit poo lately tbh, threads just get closed with no explanation
I understand their desire to drive more traffic to their news content, but they’re making it look clumsy and opportunistic.
weeksyFull MemberI’m slightly surprised the forum doesn’t have a Merge functionality to merge multiple threads into 1.
It’d potentially be slightly messy at times, but would make more sense.
DaveyBoyWonderFree MemberI’m slightly surprised the forum doesn’t have a Merge functionality to merge multiple threads into 1.
Don’t think this talk of magazine price increases has mentioned the need for extra hamsters to power such functionality.
dangeourbrainFree MemberI’m not an accountant either, but I believe there is a hierarchy of creditors.
There is, but that’s not the same thing as administration with a view to selling the business as a going concern.
That hierarchy of creditors kicks in when doors close.
At present it’ll be the suppliers (and potentially staff) getting the short end, so rent reduction, pay you 90p in the pound on our orders, asking the bank to reduce interest or renegotiate the term of loans etc etc in order to try keep the business turning over money and trading its way out of administration and paying them back in the longer term.
Currently it’ll pretty much be a reverse of that hierarchy you mentioned, the only person they won’t be asking for help is the VAT man, beyond that tax right offs etc will all be at the top of the pile to look at as ways of reducing the debt.“administration” covers a few different things but the general perception is always the worst one.
reeksyFull MemberDan has posted on Facebook just now an explanation of the situation. Basically, orders will be completed, looking for a new owner.
… if it was a brewery we’d be crowd funding it by now
BruceWeeFree Member… if it was a brewery we’d be crowd funding it by now
if the STW hive mind owned a bike brand…
dangeourbrainFree Memberif the STW hive mind owned a bike brand…
Seriously, we’d end up with a high pivot, idler, gearbox, single speed with 26″ wheels, 20mm through axle front and 135mm qr rear, a 200mm front and rear travel and built to a target weight of 24lb.
multi21Free Memberhigh pivot, idler, gearbox, single speed with 26″ wheels, 20mm through axle front and 135mm qr rear, a 200mm front and rear travel and built to a target weight of 24lb.
I’m in!
benpinnickFull MemberThe moderation on here is a bit poo lately tbh, threads just get closed with no explanation
I understand their desire to drive more traffic to their news content, but they’re making it look clumsy and opportunistic.
I reckon we can probably get over it though, given that they do have to (continue to) make a living too.
weeksyFull MemberI do wonder though if the actual thought is as completely daft as it sounds of a Go Fund Me type page to keep them running, not the high idler SS/Hybrid/Gravel thing.
Would it be completely stupid ?
the-muffin-manFull MemberWould it be completely stupid ?
Without a good look at the company accounts – yes.
ads678Full MemberSTW crowd funded bike models include: The Badger, Sudocreme Cat and Picolax. All come equiped with Marzzochi Bombers as standard.
dangeourbrainFree MemberAll come equiped with Marzzochi Bombers as standard.
Unless it was bought for your brother in law, then it can’t be owned with bombers.
squealerFree MemberWithout a good look at the company accounts – yes.
The company appears to owe a load of money to Dan and some other chap called robert Atkinson – £800k ish in total from the last accounts. This seems to rise each year due to losses.
Dans loan was interest free but roberts loan (720k) was interest bearing so I suspect he’s the external investor who has called time on it. Maybe doesn’t want to put more money in?
ads678Full MemberThe Picolax would be a gravel bike, but we could market it as a new skool ‘pebble dash’ bike.
StirlingCrispinFull MemberI suspect he’s the external investor who has called time on it
Q: How do you make a small fortune in the bike industry?
A: Invest a large fortune!With regard to the moderation/ thread locking, a comment stating that a new article had been posted would have saved me a few minutes of wondering what was going on.
thepodgeFree MemberDidn’t a German forum kind of do that? Design & build a bike, not fine tune forum moderation.
BruceWeeFree MemberSeriously, we’d end up with a high pivot, idler, gearbox, single speed with 26″ wheels, 20mm through axle front and 135mm qr rear, a 200mm front and rear travel and built to a target weight of 24lb.
Yes! Exactly what I’m after (a singlespeed gearbox for extra extra nicheness).
Not sure if I’ve got 800k myself, let me just check the price of bitcoin…
reeksyFull MemberOoooh, I’d be interested in a bike that came with an inline auto-Plutoliner.
Erm, the Frozen Wax Sausage?squirrelkingFree Member26″ wheels, 20mm through axle front and 135mm qr rear
You just described so many of my bikes. That I still own.
What’s the problem with any of those BTW? Or did marketing do it’s job 🙄
dangeourbrainFree MemberWhat’s the problem with any of those BTW? Or did marketing do it’s job 🙄
Any one of the things in that list? Nothing particularly. Everything on that list all together? Yeah quite a lot.
That being said though the things in that list are mostly old hat which does bring problems and difficulties and certainly means developing or buying new of them now would be daft.
Eg the dinky snippet you posted leaves very little choice of good tyres, good forks*, or wheels in the modern age, that’s not marketing its just reality. Same as I don’t fit the much better** clothes I had years ago but they’d still be perfectly functional as clothes.
*though I’m not sure if dh forks do tend to run 20mm axles still or not.
**I may think otherwise if they still fit, I mean that turtles jumper was bloody awesome when I was little, now, maybe it wouldn’t be so good.
StirlingCrispinFull MemberDan posted the following on Facebook.
It’s been alluded to above but worth repeating here:“our collective aim is trying to make sure that the handful of customers who have frames boxed up are ready to get their frames as fast as possible. We are currently in the process of having these shipped which is great news, and we are just waiting on new trading accounts being opened with the suppliers to achieve this.
As regards the 8 customers waiting on bikes, we are working hard to find a solution to get their new trail weapons shipped too, and we will provide an update on this situation in due course.”———-
In full:Dear friends
11 years ago, Stanton Bikes became a business built on the popularity of the first frame I ever made. It wouldn’t have happened without the faith and support shown by others in what I do, people who love the culture of MTB as much as I do. I appreciate it now as much as I did when I first started.
So, now I find myself in the heartbreaking situation of seeing the business I built falling into Administration, and I want to be as open as I can with everyone.
Like many businesses who want to grow, particularly in manufacturing, we rely on financial backing. The last 2 years have obviously been extremely difficult to navigate, and the exposure to severely unpredictable market forces has tested us to the limit. We now find ourselves in an unfortunate situation where our backers are looking to minimise their portfolio exposure. Meaning that we need to look for a new source of investment, and that’s the task that the Administrators have been brought in to achieve.
As things stand, Stanton Bikes Ltd is now under the control of the Administrators and our collective aim is trying to make sure that the handful of customers who have frames boxed up are ready to get their frames as fast as possible. We are currently in the process of having these shipped which is great news, and we are just waiting on new trading accounts being opened with the suppliers to achieve this.
As regards the 8 customers waiting on bikes, we are working hard to find a solution to get their new trail weapons shipped too, and we will provide an update on this situation in due course.
Goodwill and trust are hard earned, and it would be the worst outcome for me and the staff to see that damaged, and that’s why we are all working collectively to try and save this business and protect our customers and our brand. It’s clearly taking time to put new processes into place, but we are confident we can save this business, and continue to build premium bikes and frames for our loyal customers.
We understand there will be many questions and worries, and we will do our very best to answer them. Thank you to everyone who has been in touch with messages of support, it keeps us going and lets us know that you’re there for us whatever the outcome. What binds us here are our customers, and the wider MTB community, and together is our love and passion for the scene.
Keep the faiththe-muffin-manFull MemberDan’s bounced back.
…moved into the trouser business? Stanton Strides? 🙂
footflapsFull MemberMight take him a while to get up and running though, coming out of administration is always a protracted process esp if you need to open trade accounts with the same suppliers who just lost money from the same company. You get shit payment terms (understandably) and that makes your cash flow much worse from day 1, which also make it more likely you fail second time around….
chakapingFull Memberwhich also make it more likely you fail second time around
And without wanting to be negative, why did they go bust in the first place and what will be fixed?
Had they just been spending more than they were making?
Invested too much in full-sus development and didn’t sell any?
Production/management problems a while ago? (I have a vague memory of unhappy customers)
footflapsFull Memberwhy did they go bust in the first place and what will be fixed?
Probably Covid supply chain issues which would stretch any cash flow to breaking point…..
My current company (Telco) is in the same situation, we make money by selling Telecoms kit and we can’t buy the chips to make anything, so we can’t sell anything which means no revenue. Yet we have salaries to pay. We’ve survived by importing scrap kit from Africa and having people individually de-solder key components off the boards, which we can then re-use! We have orders we simply can’t fulfill as we still can’t access key components…
jamj1974Full MemberBest of luck Dan and the rest of the Stanton bikes crew.
Great bikes that ride extraordinarily well.
weeksyFull MemberSo, Stanton bikes owned by Dan Stanton, has closed, but Stanton Bicycles owned by Daniel Stanton has bought the company?
Rubber_BuccaneerFull MemberYou are mixing up Daniel Stanton, director of ‘Stanton Bicycles Ltd’ and ‘Fire House Design Ltd’
With Daniel Stanton, director of ‘Stanton Bikes Ltd’
Easily done
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.