Home Forums Chat Forum So who here reckons humans don't cause climate change

  • This topic has 107 replies, 61 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by Klunk.
Viewing 40 posts - 41 through 80 (of 108 total)
  • So who here reckons humans don't cause climate change
  • thecaptain
    Free Member

    There is no ice age coming for many tens of thousands of years. There might have been, but we already put paid to that some years ago. Unless we decide to actively remove CO2 from the atmosphere…

    5thElefant
    Free Member

    I’ve got 3,000 trees to plant next month. Will I trigger an ice age?

    deadlydarcy
    Free Member

    LOLz…are we calling them “contrarians” now? How jolly nice of us! 😀

    jimmy
    Full Member

    Starvation, wars, mass migration. Not could happen, already is. Syria case in point.

    Pawsy_Bear
    Free Member

    Change is inevitable and over time will be huge

    Beyond contestation. Do you think we’re having an effect, though?

    everything causes some change, whats the point of the question?

    DrJ
    Full Member

    Lots of places suddenly becoming more habitable (or attractive to exploitation). There’ll be winners and losers.

    I won’t be giving a shit. Unless it doesn’t stop raining.

    I suspect you will when a whole load of Bangladeshis move in to your town.

    loddrik
    Free Member

    We can all just move to Bangladesh, our northern European industriousness will find a way to deal with the floods. Plus, the climate is much nicer and we can just pop over to Thailand for a holiday and a wife.

    molgrips
    Free Member

    I won’t be giving a shit. Unless it doesn’t stop raining.

    Millions dead and you really wouldn’t give a shit?

    Malvern Rider
    Free Member

    Isn’t it down to personal/political preference? Seems to be all the rage 🙄

    sirromj
    Full Member

    Did anyone watch that thing on C4 the other year back, the consipiracy thing where the goverments were spreading a virus to effectively sterilze a very sizable portion of the population? Oh for the days scaring myself reading about the forthcuming culling of all the useless eaters. And business… is it always such a terrible thing if the growth of the growth rate is in decline? We’ve finite resources! Hellooooooo!??!?!?

    trailhound101
    Full Member

    We’re all doomed.

    trailhound101
    Full Member

    According to many we’re now in the Anthropocene … defined as the point where man’s activities are having a lasting effect on earth systems – atmosphere, oceans, ecosystems, etc etc. Looks pretty convincing to me ..

    the anthropocene

    chestercopperpot
    Free Member

    Maybe it’s a tool to aid slowing down industrial growth of competing world powers/interests and to help us first worlders transition away from our unsustainable reliance on finite imported fuels and wanton wastage. As a bonus it’s a convenient tax tool for governments to prop up flagging incomes.

    The people need a cause to fight for and who can argue the climate isn’t changing, it clearly is and always has been.

    pondo
    Full Member

    I wouldn’t doubt that.

    It is one of the major reasons I choose not to have kids.

    Stone cold serious, me too.

    nickc
    Full Member

    Earths orbit isn’t circular. Shouldn’t the concentration of the Sun’s radiation vary regardless of axis tilt?

    I’m not sure, but I reckon that “some scientists” may have taken this into account already. Probably

    stewartc
    Free Member

    Though our affect on the climate could be debated, shirley its beyond doubt that we are polluting it to such a level, and breeding in ever increasing numbers, that climate change may just be one of the factors that would have an effect on all life in the near future?

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    Quite nickc. Always makes me laugh when folk talk about Earth’s orbit, or solar activity, or natural cycles, or “the climate has always changed” in a way that suggests they think those silly climate scientists, who do this for a living, have overlooked these things.

    Like they are going to read this thread and go:
    “Dave, we did remember to account for Milankovitch cycles didn’t we??”,
    “I thought you were going to do that.”,
    “No, I distinctly remember saying I’d do solar flares.”
    “I dunno, what are we like eh? We better call Al Gore”

    😀

    mikewsmith
    Free Member


    I think this really sums it up, the things we are doing to reduce carbon and pollution and end a dependence on fossil fuels has so many added benefits. As many have said oil is far too valuable a resource to simply burn.

    Northwind
    Full Member

    Ming The Merciless, you abject nerd.

    jonahtonto
    Free Member

    It is one of the major reasons I choose not to have kids.

    Stone cold serious, me too.

    same here

    daveh
    Free Member

    Should’ve kept the hole in the ozone layer, all the CO2 could have escaped then…

    gwaelod
    Free Member

    Depressing thread

    DrJ
    Full Member

    I’m not sure, but I reckon that “some scientists” may have taken this into account already. Probably

    Well indeed. I doubt there’s anyone on this forum actually qualified to judge the details of the climate change science – I know I’m not – so beyond a certain point we have to trust a process that leads to the current consensus among those who do have the time and ability to do so.

    Edukator
    Free Member

    It does seem that more and more STW members are convinced anthropogenic CO2 is a problem. Still only a tiny number letting it influence their lifestyle decisions though. Take a look at any car thread, the 174ps + models are still the ones to have. Take a look at heating threads, gas central heating is still the favourite and properly insulating walls dismissed as too expensive. Check out the utilities threads where somewhere around a grand seems the norm – but it’s not hard to make individual houses energy positive. People still have to have a long list of countries visited on their Facebook page even if people are universal in slagging off many of the destinations as tourist infested hell holes.

    edward2000
    Free Member

    DrJ you are referring to Milankovitch cycles

    Trimix
    Free Member

    Edukator summarises it quite well, which means we will have a very difficult future.

    thecaptain
    Free Member

    I think it’s pretty likely that some on this forum are well qualified. It seems a diverse bunch. The problem is the ones who are not qualified, but think that they are. (I don’t mean “qualified” in any formal sense.)

    As for house insulation, I’d like to see anyone’s ideas for making my draughty stone house energy positive. Got a lovely south facing roof, perfect for solar…but in a conservation area facing a road, isn’t possible (being in a particularly wet and cloudy bit of the country doesn’t help much either).

    monkeychild
    Free Member

    If the earth was round we wouldn’t have this problem 😉

    slowoldman
    Full Member

    Starvation, wars, mass migration. Not could happen, already is. Syria case in point.

    Ah I hadn’t realised global warming is responsible for war and food shortages in Syria.

    Of course there are cyclical climate changes but I think it’s undeniable that we as a species are having a huge impact on the environment and climate. All lifeforms do and we are a pandemic. Hopefully we’ll run out of fossil fuels to contribute to global warming before it’s too late.

    thecaptain
    Free Member

    Oh, we won’t run out. Not with the shale oil and fracking, not to mention that lovely oil and methane in the arctic. Enough fossil fuels to get from our current 400ppm CO2 to about 5000ppm. Yes there’s an extra zero in there.

    maccruiskeen
    Full Member

    It’s a sad fact that in the us climet change has become a political item of belief or non belief.

    Its more a question of political expedience. Climate change denial in the US is a republican position, the reason of that is its a goal of the republicans to shrink government and deregulate industry and generally pander to the kind of ****-you individualism that the right wing defines as ‘freedom’. The problem with climate change for them is if they recognise that it exists at all, or more so recognise that its man-made, then with that recognition comes the requirement for government to do something about it. Doing something would require growing government, imposing regulation and taxation, limiting peoples choices to consume and so on, all things fundamentally opposite to the republican cause.

    So the issue is not so much whether climate change is real or not, the issue is the Republican party don’t know how to be a Republican party in the face of climate change.

    Cougar
    Full Member

    Flame me now – I suspect that we are one of the causes, and we can do something about that bit, but some of it is not of our doing, and outside our control.

    That’s about the size of it, AIUI.

    “Global warming” would be happening right now irrespective of our actions. However, we are making it worse. This is the danger – it’s easy to trot out the first sentence and conveniently ignore the second.

    ahwiles
    Free Member

    i’ve looked, but can’t see anyone claiming that there’s been no warming for 18 years.

    “Avalanches and pebbles”, etc.

    this, basically.

    (a bit of leadership from our … er, leaders, wouldn’t hurt)

    oh, and this:

    “It is one of the major reasons I choose not to have kids”

    “Stone cold serious, me too.”

    “same here”

    ditto.

    MrWoppit
    Free Member

    I read that, although we are about to enter another every-10,000-year ice age cycle that would result in ice sheets covering most of the northern hemisphere (imagine what a catastrophe THAT would be!), the event will not now occur for another 50,000 years due to it being held back by…. (drum roll)…

    mad-made global warming.

    Drill baby, drill.

    mikewsmith
    Free Member

    Global warming is the worst phrase ever associated with climate change, there seems to be a one in a hundred year flood every year now, more cyclones, longer hotter summers down here in Oz, more drought bigger more frequent fires. Things are Changing and it’s not in a good way.

    MrWoppit
    Free Member

    On the upside, the Arctic ice is retreating and uncovering vast swathes of tundra, presenting new opportunities for exploitation by all sorts of flora and fauna (including us), so it’s not all bad…

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    I remember I once saw the cover of an oil industry magazine which basically said: “Retreat of Arctic ice opens up new drilling opportunities” 😕

    MrWoppit
    Free Member

    Like I said…

    Klunk
    Free Member

    Environmentalism poses a problem for libertarian ideology[/url]

    munrobiker
    Free Member

    Climate change was a major part of my degree and it baffles me that people can think we’re nothing to do with it. But it is complicated and when I think about it if you’ve not seen all the graphs, data and read the reports I can see why you may be a little reluctant to accept that we are a major factor.

    Yes, the global temperature does go up and down on a cycle. But the temperatures now are higher than they have been in the last 10,000 years. (2009 is the cross in the top right of this graph).

    This graph shows very neatly how it is our fault. There is a very clear link between CO2 and global temperature and the increase in atmospheric CO2 since 1855 and the slightly offset increase in temperature is clear. All the research points to the rise in CO2 being the cause of the rise in temperature.

    Here’s a graph showing the historic link between CO2 and temperature.

    It’s difficult to explain without getting into some fairly serious science and bamboozling people. But the evidence points to it, almost all scientific papers on it say that it exists and once you read some of these it becomes very difficult to deny.

    The big scare for the future in terms of climate change is really what we’re doing to the ocean. The amount of CO2 we are producing is increasing the acidity of the oceans- the oceans draw down a large amount of the CO2 we pump out, limiting the global temperature rise. Unfortunately this increases their acidity which impacts on calcareous life (corals etc) in the ocean. They are a major cause of the oceans drawing down CO2 and without them what would go into the oceans will go into the atmosphere. Then we’re really stuffed.

Viewing 40 posts - 41 through 80 (of 108 total)

The topic ‘So who here reckons humans don't cause climate change’ is closed to new replies.