Home › Forums › Chat Forum › Prostate examination and PSA test
- This topic has 65 replies, 37 voices, and was last updated 18 hours ago by tjagain.
-
Prostate examination and PSA test
-
susepicFull Member
Following with interest, and sympathy with binners and nicknameless
Just had a pre-booked call w my GP this morning. He’s seen an uptick in interest due to Chris Hoy’s news, and while mentioning lack of screening program, he said that the increase in interest had picked up some abnormal results that get referred on for further assessment most likely MRI.
So I’ll be getting the blood test. I do have nocturnal wees, and the odd post wee dribble and am 59
I personally would prefer to get some kind of early warning to find anything sooner as there are less invasive options to treat earlier
blokeuptheroadFull MemberI personally would prefer to get some kind of early warning to find anything sooner as there are less invasive options to treat earlier
Are there? With a currently untreated (by choice) cancer diagnosis, I’m not aware of any. As far as I’m aware, the main treatment options are surgery (prostatectomy) or radiation therapy. Both can have unpleasant side effects. Far, far better than the alternative if you have an aggressive cancer yes, but a tougher decision if you have a low volume, low grade cancer, which might not cause an issue in a normal life span. These things are never black and white.
redmexFree MemberThe finger probe and giving a vial of blood every wee while is nothing to worry aboutother than not using you will feel a wee prick, it’s a small scratch you feel now when giving blood
Its the harpoon getting fired a few times with your knees up to your chest that’s a bit more uninviting to say the least
Mounty_73Full MemberWow, its good to see other people are doing something about it and seeking help and advice.
For the last 6 months I have been peeing a lot (but not during the night) but my bladder never felt empty and sometimes I would go again within 2 or 3 minutes, also recently the flow of pee has been up and down.
It felt like my GP could have been a bit more delicate with the finger, although it probably felt worse than it was. But I think its the not knowing that is the very unsettling bit and it could be another 2 or 3 weeks before I find out…
@binners and @nicknameless I am really sorry to hear that.1nippyFree MemberEvery guy should get it done without hesitation. I got diagnosed with a Gleason 6 prostate tumour 3 years ago after a raised PSA result in a general blood scan. Thankfully this type is the lowest risk and just needs monitoring. Hopefully prostate testing will become standard because it is extremely easy to diagnose and treat if caught early. Don’t let the prospect of “The Finger” put you off 😀 To be honest, that’s the easy bit. The biopsy was………… image a staple gun in action on your tenders…….
5nicknamelessFree MemberJust in case anyone is interested – reasonably accessible summary.
Now back off to the other PSA thread to spend some money no doubt!
2spaceyFull MemberTo add to nicks contribution there was an excellent discussion on the topic on radio 4 last week, highly recommended https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m0024vtd
stanleyFull MemberI do not agree with the naysayers who claim that we shouldn’t get tested and that it can lead to unnecessary harms. I’ve never once heard of a man declaring that he wished he hadn’t been tested; that it led to further problems and regrets it all. I personally know many that are glad they were tested. Just wish I’d been tested earlier!
I know some of you have read it before, and I really should start writing again, but here is my experience of testing and things. I describe my experience of the biopsy in Post 5. https://adventureswithprostatecancer.com/cancer-journey/
1iaincFull MemberIt is interesting when reading these threads to note that all of us who have had positive prostate cancer diagnoses, including Sir Chris, are advocates of early PSA screening. I do not think I have see a single opposing view from anyone with Prostate cancer.
4blokeuptheroadFull MemberI’ve never once heard of a man declaring that he wished he hadn’t been tested; that it led to further problems and regrets it all.
We all come at this from different angles, based on our own life experiences. I respect your views Stanley and I know you have a good deal of insight based on your own experience, I have read your blog and previous posts on the subject and learned from them.
However in regard the quoted bit of your post above, if treated they would not necessarily know enough to have regrets. There is evidence that in the past, over diagnosis and treatment has left some men with symptoms such as incontinence, impotence etc. when they had low risk tumours which would probably not have caused them an issue. The wider use of MRI as well as biopsy in diagnosis has improved this, allowing a better understanding of the grade and risk of a tumour.
But even so, the choice of whether to be treated or go on surveillance if you have a low grade tumour is down to the patient. Some may feel pressured to have treatment that may not be needed. Not pressured by medical staff, but by well meaning but ill informed family and friends and by themselves. I was in this position. I was given leaflets on all the treatment options, plus active surveillance, with no steer at all from the hospital as to which was best. I did a lot of research and took a lot of advice. AFTER I gave them my decision to go on surveillance, my urologist THEN said he would have done exactly the same in my position. I worry that a lot of men in that position will simply hear “cancer” and understandably want it nuked from orbit, and go on to experience side effects which may affect their mental health/quality of life which may not have been necessary.
Don’t get me wrong, for those with more aggressive tumours swift treatment is life saving or life extending and absolutely necessary. I am specifically talking here about possible unnecessary treatment for lesser tumours. It is a thing.
This has been a good thread by the way, very useful to hear people’s thoughts on this. @binners and @nicknameless, sorry to hear of your experiences and anyone else touched by this awful disease.
1stanleyFull MemberYes, completely agree with your post. It seems then that, maybe, the process after testing is flawed. Patients need more guidance at that point perhaps. Not testing seems to be a case of “ignorance is bliss”… until it isn’t and it’s all too late.
I guess that my experience has allowed me to meet lots of men who have prostate cancer. Most have been lower grades that have been cured, although probably half of those do report having problems years later… urinary retention and erections in the main. Yet, they remain glad that they were tested and treated. Can’t comment on how many were symptomatic or otherwise though.
Most of the stage 3 or 4 guys that I’ve met describe being asymptomatic at diagnosis; their cancer being discovered following other problems. I don’t think I’ve yet met a chap who has been diagnosed in an early stage that has then progressed to stage 4. Maybe that’s owing to effective treatment or it’s old buggers that die anyway?!
scotroutesFull MemberYes, completely agree with your post. It seems then that, maybe, the process after testing is flawed.
That’s been my take-away from this. Being tested and finding out early seems like a no-brainer but there are potential unnecessary harms thereafter. It seems that there should be something else between test and treatment.
nippyFree MemberVery good points! Its not difficult to get information on what type of tumour you have and whether or not there is a risk of it getting worse, spreading and leading to Chris Hoy’s sad state. Monitoring will give the medic’s the data they need to let YOU make the best decision regarding treatment.
outofbreathFree MemberMy NHS doc has just told me ‘no’ to my request for a PSA test. **
I sent back the link from the Prostate Cancer website saying it was my “right” to have a test on request. (That sounds more militant than it was.) Got no response.
So is this something I can do privately? How?
**They also hilariously said no to stopping a recurring yearly blood test which is on their system in error. I thought they might be grateful to me for pointing out their admin error but no….
1outofbreathFree MemberTo add to nicks contribution there was an excellent discussion on the topic on radio 4 last week, highly recommended https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m0024vtd
I’ve listened.
There seems to be an awful lot of “making the case” agaisnt PSA testing. At one point the guy says “for a few extra months of life”. It just sounds like a politican trying to convince people not to do something because there isn’t the resource to deal with the fallout.
The people in my Dad’s circle of friends (including him) didn’t lose a few months of life. They were all active, healthy people in early retirement living the dream who’s first health problem was the Prostate cancer that was detected when their bones started aching and killed them. None had symptoms until it was in their bones. I really sense that they’re letting blokes die to save the cost of MRI scans. Plenty of places abroad do routine PSA tests.
I just googled and symptoms:
“Urinary symptoms including frequent urination at night, poor urine stream, dribbling at the end of passing urine, or slow to start the urine flow”
Is all of that unusual? Do many people sleep 8 hours without get up for a piss?
poolmanFree MemberOutofbreath – i am in spain so pay privately, i ve known the same doc for 20 years as i was insured and insurance used to pay, however now i just payg. Its 60 euros for psa, 200e for full bloods, cholesterol, liver function.
That includes the blood taking, analysis, review.
SandwichFull MemberDo many people sleep 8 hours without get up for a piss?
About 15 years ago I used to sleep through the night. Not any more.
I’m due for a follow up at Urology just before my birthday for another look inside to find out why there’s a good bit of bleeding just recently. Fingers crossed that it’s something curable.
blokeuptheroadFull MemberThe best of luck for a good outcome @Sandwich. You’re getting it all checked out which is a good thing.
SandwichFull MemberIt felt like my GP could have been a bit more delicate with the finger
As long as the nails are short it’s a win in my book!
stcolinFree MemberOddly I’ve been getting dull aches in the region these last few days, but extends to my other ‘region’ too. I’ve tried to get an appointment but failed, try again in the morning. It’s certainly a pain I’ve not had before, hopefully it’s nothing sinister, perhaps a UTI.
I get up in the night most nights for a wee, but it’s been like that for years for me. I’m 42 btw.
MoreCashThanDashFull MemberI always took the view that if I could go 8 hours without a pee, I was probably dehydrated.
I got checked after the flow/dribble became an issue. I still get up once a night maybe every other night. This recent discussion has made me more aware of it, I think, playing into my underrling general anxiety perhaps.
1ernielynchFull MemberIt’s certainly a pain I’ve not had before, hopefully it’s nothing sinister, perhaps a UTI.
Isn’t the big problem with prostate cancer that there are no obvious symptoms until the person has serious issues peeing by which time it is very advanced?
I think pain in that region is indeed typically a UTI but I would still seek medical advice fairly quickly as I believe that left untreated a UTI can spread and damage your kidneys.
scotroutesFull MemberDo many people sleep 8 hours without get up for a piss?
I usually do. I guess the important word in your quote is frequent.
pennineFree MemberFinger test embarrassment: At 77 I’ve had these quite a few times. On one annual GP visit the male doctor had a female trainee doctor & he asked if I was okay with her being present. Said fine carry on. Wasn’t expecting a finger test! Anyways, I get into position, knees bent etc. The GP explained to her how this was done by showing her how to insert a finger. He says don’t go straight in all the way, just go until resistance is felt. Wait a few seconds (telling me to relax!) for the muscles to relax, then ease ever upwards. He checked me out & then asked if I’d mind let her have a go (yikes!). However, with this method I felt very little discomfort. Most of the other GP/consultant sessions just pushed straight in….
2stanleyFull MemberIsn’t the big problem with prostate cancer that there are no obvious symptoms until the person has serious issues peeing by which time it is very advanced?
The “classically described” symptoms are: poor flow, frequency, not emptying , not finishing, etc.. However, you are correct, lots of men who develop prostate cancer do not experience these symptoms. It seems that if the cancer develops from the centre of the prostate, then you get symptoms; from the outer edges and you don’t.
I don’t think aching in the area is a symptom of PCa., although I did occasionally get an odd sensation after having a poo: I look back and imagine it was probably the tumour (that grew from the lower edge of the prostate) pressing against the rectum as poo came through, then settling back down. Sorry if too much information… lol!
I also experienced some back ache, although I always have. (My spine was clear btw).
I had another symptom that has rarely been discussed, and I’ve never seen it linked with PCa, but that might be because it’s never been researched or discussed! Here we go then… “Spaffing distance”. What’s your spaffing distance? As a teenager, mine would go halfway across the room. This reduced over the years until it didn’t really go any distance, and just before diagnosis it only just sort of oozed out (sorry!). So I would suggest keeping an eye on your “spaffing distance”.
I thoroughly expect our resident GPs to reject “Spaffing distance” as a symptom. Maybe an area for future research? Or just check it for fun anyway 🙂
2tjagainFull Member“Urinary symptoms including frequent urination at night, poor urine stream, dribbling at the end of passing urine, or slow to start the urine flow”
Is all of that unusual? Do many people sleep 8 hours without get up for a piss?
Yes it is unusual and yes most folk go thru night without needing to pee. Thats certainly a symptom of something if you need to pee in the night. Not necessarily prostrate cancer of course
prostate cancer testing has high numbers of false positives which is why routine screening is not done. There are real harms from this. Therefore testing or not is a decision to be made with your GP – taking into account family history, symptoms, etc.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.