Photos you have taken in the last month of which you are proud?

On my commute one morning recently

Pin the tail by Matthew Hampshire[/url], on Flickr

Taken a while ago but edited recently as I have a bit of a backlog of folders building up
[/url]Plication by Matthew Hampshire[/url], on Flickr[/img]

Breaks a few rules for a good photo but I really like it:

[/url]20171124_115322_Richtone(HDR) by Da_Milky_Bar_Kid[/url], on Flickr[/img]

Taken on yesterday’s ride in the Beacons. Never seen the water so still there before!

[/url]The numbers are just too low by Matthew Hampshire[/url], on Flickr[/img]

IMG_0695 by Mike Smith[/url], on Flickr
Caught this little fella on the trail today, being very shy

Kasper sort of enjoying the snow yesterday morning…

kasper-hazlehead-snow-15 by Jamie Emerson[/url], on Flickr

Stepped way outside my comfort zone a few weeks ago and shot a band in a studio.
I’m normally found shooting bikes outside with natural light, so it was great fun playing around with huge studio lights

I haven’t done any recreational photography for months. Either been working on my distillery, or shooting events.

However, picked up a drone last week for distillery promo work and finally got an SD card for it today. One of the first photos from it. Proud I didn’t crash the thing!

Dormont by Kit Carruthers[/url], on Flickr

Which drone did you get Kit?

I’m really liking stills from drones.
That looks great Kit.

Boy oh, buoy.

Washed Up Bouy[/url] by [/url] – Flickr2BBcode LITE

Hunting tackle vision. Works sometimes 😉

Hunting Tackle Vision[/url] by [/url] – Flickr2BBcode LITE

I enjoy getting down to the beach this time of year,& I enjoy the light.
Formby Point.

The drone’s a Phantom 3 Professional. Picture quality isn’t that great from it, but it will at least shoot in RAW (DNG format), so photos can be somewhat rescued!

Took the dog a stroll to Durris Forest today – there’s a stone circle there (in Clune Wood) I wanted to see.

kasper-durris-1 by Jamie Emerson[/url], on Flickr

kasper-durris-2 by Jamie Emerson[/url], on Flickr

The new(ish) sculpture on Hornsbridge roundabout, Chesterfield and Crooked Spire in the background

DSC00687-3 by davetheblade[/url], on Flickr

Really like the starling shot ^^^

Nothing special. Nothing technical. Just really quite like this one. Not even nastily over-processed (relatively speaking).

2017 12 02 bike 84 03 by Rob P[/url], on Flickr

Untitled by Polarisandy[/url], on Flickr

A simple point and shoot snapshot from this morning with no processing (other than a small crop). Fujifilm X30 on Auto

Underated camera the X30. I’m still using my X10, but it’s stating to get a bit kooky.

A simple point and shoot snapshot from this morning with no processing (other than a small crop). Fujifilm X30 on Auto

Lovelty pastoral scene.

BTW since the image will be a JPEG it will have been processed.

Considering it came off my phone during a walk at the woods with the kids and dogs whilst simultaneously messing around with Lightroom, I was quite pleased with how this came out.

Took this last year as my first attempt at long exposure times.
Dark light by John Stanley[/url], on Flickr

this morning on my email came a link to a photographer whose book I bought earlier this year. There was a link to her gallery including this shot.
http://www.juliaannagospodarou.com/Architecture/Architecture/i-5Q95QXV/A
Much better than mine but does show how two people take two different approaches to the same thing. We probably stood in the same place to within a few inches.

Here is a link to her gallery
http://www.juliaannagospodarou.com/Architecture/Architecture/

Much better than mine

I don’t agree, I don’t think hers is much better than yours. I actually prefer yours.

In truth thought this is a style of shooting that I’m not overly keen on but that’s a personal preference. The examples on the page you link to though a utterly ghastly, over indulgent saccharine and HDRd to within an inch of their pixels. Your images still looks like it’s real and I much prefer it.

The examples on the page you link to though a utterly ghastly, over indulgent saccharine…

In your opinion, as you say.

They are certainly heavily processed. Some work better than others, though, and your statement could apply to many of the photos on this thread. In my opinion.

Not “proud” but just a nice view to wake up to this morning:

Looking North from Langbank by Jon Douglas[/url], on Flickr

Took this a couple of weeks ago:

Trawsfynydd by tillydog[/url], on Flickr

It was a beautiful, still morning.

The examples on the page you link to though a utterly ghastly, over indulgent saccharine and HDRd to within an inch of their pixels. Your images still looks like it’s real and I much prefer it.

Hey Greg, I think you are wrong but don’t want to derail this thread any more than this. Let me get my head together and start a new one or start your own and I’ll comment.
It’s all subjective though innit?

Untitled by Polarisandy[/url], on Flickr

A few from a dander up Ben Lomond yesterday that I am pleased with.

Ben Lomond by Euan Camlin[/url], on Flickr

Ben Lomond by Euan Camlin[/url], on Flickr

Ben Lomond by Euan Camlin[/url], on Flickr

Ben Lomond by Euan Camlin[/url], on Flickr

Ben Lomond by Euan Camlin[/url], on Flickr

Hey Greg, I think you are wrong but don’t want to derail this thread any more than this.

Fair enough…..I still prefer your image though 😀 but thuis must be the first time there was a disagreement online where one individual thought the other person was the better party and that party didn’t agree with the assessment. 😯

Some cracking landscapes – I’d hang jad’s misty scene on the wall… Here’s yet another photo of someone else’s dog taken at Counteswells yesterday.

maisie-counteswells by Jamie Emerson[/url], on Flickr

[/url]Bon bons for breakfast by Matthew Hampshire[/url], on Flickr[/img]

Untitled by Polarisandy[/url], on Flickr

[/url]Instant Karma by Matthew Hampshire[/url], on Flickr[/img]

That Ghia! What a shame.