Home Forums Chat Forum Photos you have taken in the last month of which you are proud?

Viewing 40 posts - 6,601 through 6,640 (of 7,423 total)
  • Photos you have taken in the last month of which you are proud?
  • eddiebaby
    Free Member

    Norman Parkinson would exit the Vogue offices with a model, a camera and three double slides of 10×8. He would be expected on his return to have amongst the 6 images a potential cover, a full page advert and a couple more editorial images.

    geetee1972
    Free Member

    Norman Parkinson would exit the Vogue offices with a model, a camera and three double slides of 10×8. He would be expected on his return to have amongst the 6 images a potential cover, a full page advert and a couple more editorial images.

    i.e. he would expect every shot to be a keeper.

    It’s interesting isn’t. The larger the format you’re shooting, the higher you would expect the keeper ratio to be.

    Intuitively you’d think that that was mostly driven by cost (it gets really expensive shooting large format) but mostly it’s about the nature of the process.

    The larger the format, the more deliberate the process, the higher the keeper ratio is.

    The downside of course is that it’s really hard to shoot ‘the decisive moment’ with a large format camera!

    bob_summers
    Full Member

    My ratio is somewhat skewed by shooting moving children 😆
    And shooting landscapes on 35mm tri x is a skill way beyond me! Good job I just enjoy the faff of it all.

    Pyro
    Full Member

    I thought I’d aced it on the one occasion I got 6 ‘keepers’ on a 24 roll of Velvia 50. Of course, Sod’s Law was then invoked and I got absolutely nothing on the following roll…

    GregMay
    Free Member

    Bob – 3rd photo is excellent. Print – wall – enjoy.

    yosemitepaul
    Full Member

    Versailles bubbles.

    L1007936 by Paul Whitehead[/url], on Flickr

    geetee1972
    Free Member

    Versailles bubbles.

    Ooh an M10 eh, very nice.

    Out of interest, how much shadow or highlight detail have you pulled back on that image?

    yosemitepaul
    Full Member

    Ooh an M10 eh, very nice.

    Out of interest, how much shadow or highlight detail have you pulled back on that image?

    It’s what the M was designed for!…………….No pulling back of the shadows, but I gave the highlights a good tweak so as to increase the depth of the clouds.

    polarisandy
    Free Member

    Untitled by Polarisandy[/url], on Flickr

    GregMay
    Free Member

    I played with an M10 for a few hours last month. Quite uncomfortable with the itch at the back of my head due to it.

    Must. Not. Buy.

    Andy – very good sir.

    eddiebaby
    Free Member

    I got all excited about the Canon M10 and then realised you are talking Leica… 😳

    geetee1972
    Free Member

    No pulling back of the shadows, but I gave the highlights a good tweak so as to increase the depth of the clouds.

    I thought it would be one or the other, just wasn’t sure which eway you’d gone.

    The micro contrast is lovely and I also have to say, if you’re ever going to see your 75 ‘Lux let me know. 😀

    polarisandy
    Free Member

    Cheers Greg

    Untitled by Polarisandy[/url], on Flickr

    yosemitepaul
    Full Member

    if you’re ever going to see your 75 ‘Lux let me know

    Sorry Greg, the 75 Lux though I don’t use it much is the best lens I’ve ever owned. Built in Canada about 35 yrs ago, it’s quality is superb. Just a pleasure to even hold it. It would work well on your SL but I’m not ever going to move it on!

    oxym0r0n
    Full Member

    I should definitely spend more time browsing this thread – here’s one from me. A bit blurry as was trying to focus in manual with no tripod and the person kept moving…

    GregMay
    Free Member

    Great shot, well done.

    JohnClimber
    Free Member


    Ormskirk

    JohnClimber
    Free Member

    Just googled M10…. how much?
    You could by a bike for that….. a bloody good one

    polarisandy
    Free Member

    Untitled by Polarisandy[/url], on Flickr

    GregMay
    Free Member

    John – you’ve not looked at the prices of lenses yet then?

    bob_summers
    Full Member

    … or the almost-5 grand M-D which only shoots in B/W with no LCD 😉
    http://www.reddotcameras.co.uk/m-bodies/9940-leica-m-d-typ-262-black-body.html

    Bustaspoke
    Free Member

    This is Paton mounted Josh Brookes on his way to winning the Classic TT the other Saturday.This is on the banking outside Glen Lough campsite.
    I’m happy with it for a couple of reasons.
    1) It shows how close you get to the action in road racing.
    2) I shot the image on my little Panasonic Lumix LX5 which really isn’t the tool for the job..

    geetee1972
    Free Member

    Sorry Greg, the 75 Lux though I don’t use it much is the best lens I’ve ever owned. Built in Canada about 35 yrs ago, it’s quality is superb. Just a pleasure to even hold it. It would work well on your SL but I’m not ever going to move it on!

    Smart move and yes it would work very well on my SL, thanks for reminding me! To be honest, it’s not a lens I really should be thinking about owning. Really it’s not different enough from the 50 Lux I already have, to justfy owning both. I’d be better off going for a 90. But then, I like the idea of shooting 80% of everything with my 50 and the balacne with my 35.

    I’m happy for you that you love it so much. I hope you keep on enjoying it.

    Just googled M10…. how much?

    Ha, quite frankly those are amateurish prices. Try financing one of these:

    Or even:

    This is the very pinnacle of camera technology (well outside of NASA at any rate) and either would set you back between £35k and £40k.

    Russell96
    Full Member

    GregMay
    Free Member

    Didn’t Phase One do a £100k mono only back at one stage?

    redthunder
    Free Member

    Shirehampton Public Hall 2017 by SGMTB[/url], on Flickr

    JohnClimber
    Free Member

    unclezaskar
    Free Member

    first outing with Fuji X-E1 was to Goodwood revival – initially was not sure if leaving DSLR and lenses at home was the best idea, but as trackside photo time was limited I concentrated instead on paddock and ‘atmosphere’ shots..

    restricted myself to just 3 primes (28mm/55mm/100mm) but overall I am really chuffed with how it went..here are a few favourites + link to Flickr album.

    Untitled by jon bawden[/url], on Flickr

    Peddle car race.. by jon bawden[/url], on Flickr

    Some last minute advice.. by jon bawden[/url], on Flickr

    Goodwood revival style.. by jon bawden[/url], on Flickr

    Sky reflections.. by jon bawden[/url], on Flickr

    Ford GT40 by jon bawden[/url], on Flickr

    https://flic.kr/s/aHsm8t7ZHk

    C&C always welcome..

    eddiebaby
    Free Member

    Really love the Goodwood stuff. I’ve not been but always do the Silverstone Classic. Looking forward to the Le Mans Historic next year.

    polarisandy
    Free Member

    Untitled by Polarisandy[/url], on Flickr

    polarisandy
    Free Member

    Untitled by Polarisandy[/url], on Flickr

    lazlowoodbine
    Free Member

    It’s not the photo I’m proud of, it’s crap. But I am proud that I repaired the lens you can see in pieces in it.

    [/url]

    Some small screws yesterday

    [/url]

    trailofdestruction
    Free Member

    polarisandy
    Free Member

    Untitled by Polarisandy[/url], on Flickr

    geetee1972
    Free Member

    Apparently I have a habit of only choosing ‘old, decrepit and falling down people’ so I’m trying to make amends.

    These are part of a series of a friend of a friend. As well as having a wonderful daughter, Maureen also has two Masters Degrees and has set up a charity to help victims of deomstic violence. Very few people have both warmth and agreeableness combined with a comanding presence and gravitas. It’s a rare combination.

    The Queen of Zimbabwe by Greg Turner[/url], on Flickr

    Untitled by Greg Turner[/url], on Flickr

    My take on Platon by Greg Turner[/url], on Flickr

    ampthill
    Full Member

    Striding Edge and hikers…

    Striding Edge by John Clinch[/url], on Flickr

    mikey74
    Free Member

    RS1_5958 by Mike Kennedy[/url], on Flickr

    I like this one from my walk near Seaford, today: However, it does show up the poor quality of the depth of field I get with my 18-55 kit lens. I knew I should have swapped to my 35mm 1.8 🙄

    The photo itself is pretty much straight out of the camera, other than a little push of the exposure.

    Another one, from earlier in the day:

    RS1_5901 by Mike Kennedy[/url], on Flickr

    The irony is that both of the above shots actually turned out to have been taken at, or very close to, 35mm focal length.

    ampthill
    Full Member

    At the same f stop and focal length all lenses have basically the same depth of field

    IMHO the shallow depth of field works well here

    mikey74
    Free Member

    Thank you for your last comment. I was mainly referring to the quality of the “bokeh” (I hate that word): It just looks a little busy to me.

    bob_summers
    Full Member

    Well done with those Greg. Only criticism from me would be the background halo around the subject on the last is a bit distracting. Fwiw I could not see the reasoning behind the broken decrepit comments. I didn’t see any evidence of that on your Flickr page.

Viewing 40 posts - 6,601 through 6,640 (of 7,423 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.