Home › Forums › Chat Forum › Oh FFS….. Really ?!
- This topic has 203 replies, 76 voices, and was last updated 1 week ago by sharkbait.
-
Oh FFS….. Really ?!
-
2boomerlivesFree Member
Why does that make any difference to the way she’s treated by Greg Wallace?
Utterly nothing. Which is why it was odd that GW was pointed out as being talentless. As well as bald. And old.
I couldn’t understand why these attributes were brought into the discussion.
Is his behaviour not enough?
Is his skill level and shiny head needed as a character tie-breaker?
1supernovaFull MemberAs usual, the main unwritten policy is don’t kill the cash cow until we absolutely have to.
ernielynchFull MemberIt’s a spent conviction she wouldn’t have to disclose in normal circumstances anyway. I couldn’t care if it was a Labour or Tory minister.
Louise Haigh disagrees and claims that she should have disclosed it:
Ms Haigh admitted that not disclosing this to her employer at the time, the insurance giant Aviva, was a “mistake”
https://news.sky.com/story/louise-haighs-resignation-prompts-internal-labour-blame-game-13263058
It would appear that the real reason she has been forced to resign is that she isn’t right-wing enough for the acting prime minister Morgan McSweeney. And she was too close to a rival of his.
johnnersFree MemberLouise Haigh disagrees and claims that she should have disclosed it:
In the article you linked Louise Haigh says not disclosing to Aviva that she’d found the missing phone was a mistake. She’s not referring to disclosing the conviction.
SandwichFull MemberIronically they got a policy for almost everything.
In the light of the allegations those are probably more honoured in the breach than to the letter!
This morning someone has handed Mr Wallace a shovel and told him to keep digging his way out of the hole he’s in!
17franksinatraFull Member“I’ve been doing MasterChef for 20 years – amateur, professional and Celebrity MasterChef – and I think in that time I have worked with over 4,000 contestants of all different ages, all different backgrounds, all walks of life,” Wallace told his more than 200,000 followers.
“And apparently now, I’m reading in the paper, there’s been 13 complaints in that time.
I’ve been working in various jobs for 30 years and in that time have worked with thousands of people of all different ages, all different backgrounds, all walks of life. There’s been zero complaints in that time. If there had been 13 I would think the problem was with me.
chrismacFull MemberAnother example of these complaints being made 10 years too late. As for that shy retiring Rod getting upset because his wife cooked food that was inedible and potentially poisonous not get upset. The phrase horse and stable door springs to mind.
4convertFull MemberThe fact that the middle aged, middle class women – mostly with secure careers that will not be impacted by having made a complaint on their ‘CV’ are the only ones making public complaints is obviously a cognitive leap too far for Mr Wallace.
As for Mr Rhodes, who there have been a number of references to both here and in the press as being the cheese to Mr Wallace’s chalk – take that cheese with a good pinch of salt. A family member (oddly employed whilst an incredibly good looking young lady – see a pattern? Draw your own conclusions – yes, you are thinking on the right lines.) has a very different take on the man.
squirrelkingFree MemberIt’s a spent conviction she wouldn’t have to disclose in normal circumstances anyway. I couldn’t care if it was a Labour or Tory minister.
Presumably no one can be rehabilitated and learn from stupid things they’ve done in the past?
Under normal circumstances, no. But this isn’t normal circumstances. The fact she failed to disclose it just says she can’t be trusted. If she’d declared it then there would be no story other than a spent conviction that she owned.
If she was convicted of one offence then she wasn’t “done over multiple allegations”
There were several allegations, one of which she was prosecuted over.
She was under no obligation, morally or otherwise, to declare a spent conviction
Er, yes, she was. Ministerial Code. Likewise for kinks and other things that can be used to extort or blackmail.
ransosFree MemberThe fact she failed to disclose it
She says she disclosed it when she was appointed to the shadow cabinet. The PM has neither confirmed nor denied her account. So you cannot say that it’s a fact that she failed to disclose it.
There were several allegations, one of which she was prosecuted over.
And? Let’s stick with her actual conviction rather than unsubstantiated allegations. I note that the judge felt that her crime was worthy of the lowest possible punishment.
Er, yes, she was. Ministerial Code. Likewise for kinks and other things that can be used to extort or blackmail.
She says she was only asked to disclose unspent convictions. In any case it’s not relevant if she had already disclosed it to her manager.
Regardless of the above, she has resigned so then hang ’em high brigade have their wish.
2martinhutchFull MemberGregg and his PA heading for the Harvester this morning.
6SandwichFull MemberOn the plus side he's just pissed off every menopausal woman in the country, which is a bit like picking a fight with a battle adapted combine harvester, so let's see how that goes for him.
— KJ Charles (@kjcharleswriter.com) 2024-12-01T11:19:20.159Z
This sums things up nicely.
johnnersFree MemberThere were several allegations, one of which she was prosecuted over.
Good, so not “done over multiple allegations” then. “Done over one”, to use your terminology.
Er, yes, she was. Ministerial Code. Likewise for kinks and other things that can be used to extort or blackmail.
If you are familiar with the Ministerial Code it’d be great if you would point me to the clause where it covers the obligation to declare spent criminal convictions. I’m not aware of one.
6ads678Full MemberThis threads got really confusing. It’s supposed to be about the fat bald talentless misogynistic greengrocer Gregg Wallace, why are people posting about the labour MP that resigned??
6convertFull MemberI might have missed the crossover, but why are people blithering on about Haigh on thread about Wallace when she’s got her own thread?
3MoreCashThanDashFull MemberThis is what happens when you cross the streams……
Anyway, Hugh Fearnley-Whatshisname has suggested that Wallace should be concentrating on listening rather than talking at the moment, which sounded like a pretty epic telling off by his standards.
1johnnersFree MemberThis threads got really confusing. It’s supposed to be about the fat bald talentless misogynistic greengrocer Gregg Wallace, why are people posting about the labour MP that resigned??
Guilty as charged, sorry. I was just about to post something similar bemoaning how this thread had shot off on more tangents than usual even for STW and then I got suckered into joining in.
squirrelkingFree MemberIf you are familiar with the Ministerial Code it’d be great if you would point me to the clause where it covers the obligation to declare spent criminal convictions. I’m not aware of one.
I’d imagine 1.4 b
Integrity: Holders of public office
must avoid placing themselves
under any obligation to people
or organisations that might try
inappropriately to influence
their work. They should not act
or take decisions in order to
gain financial or other material
benefits for themselves, their
family, or their friends. They must
declare and resolve any interests
and relationships.
Like I said before, that covers stuff that could be used to blackmail unduly influence an elected official.
But yeah crossed streams.
3fenderextenderFree MemberAveraging a complaint of sexual misconduct once every couple of years is nothing to be shouting about!
Who is advising this plonker?
HoratioHufnagelFree MemberWhy don’t celebs who get caught out like this ever apologise??
I mean a genuine apology rather than one of those faux “sorry if you were offended” type ones.
boomerlivesFree MemberWho is advising this plonker?
He’s set only to ‘transmit’ not ‘receive’
Si King was on the box this morning being charming and chirpy.
He’s probs already had the call.
4onehundredthidiotFull MemberGet Sean in, he’s done enough voiceover for the program and thanks to Miss zeta jones knows about trifle.
1convertFull MemberGet Sean in, he’s done enough voiceover for the program and thanks to Miss zeta jones knows about trifle.
That’s a very niche reference, but I like it! Not quite as much as I wanted to be JC back in the day, but very good never the less.
Kryton57Full MemberNow it’s got MORE worse – a contestant has come out and said such behaviour was so rife by Gregg and others (on Masterchef) that they were made to sign an NDA.
BBC in coverup yet again, and lo! We have a rise in the TV license fee to pay for the lawyers ffs!
6gonefishinFree MemberIs this a BBC thing though? I mean they broadcast it sure but they don’t make the show as far as I can tell. Are they actually involved in its production or do they just buy the finished product?
5chrismacFull MemberWhat’s it got to do with the bbc. They don’t make the programme or employ the presenters.
dissonanceFull MemberAveraging a complaint of sexual misconduct once every couple of years is nothing to be shouting about!
Ah but they are only women of a certain age so doesnt really count.
Who is advising this plonker?
Me? After being told I was being made redundant and having had a few pints to get over it.
8BoardinBobFull MemberMen like Gregg don’t need advisors. Those are for leftist woke cucks. Men like Gregg tell it like it is. What you see is what you get with men like Gregg.
3PoopscoopFull MemberI’m guessing GB News will be starting a cooking segment soon. 😉
I’m only half joking. Seems like a perfect fit.
2Cougar2Free MemberMen like Gregg don’t need advisors.
Men like Gregg need lawyers.
2Cougar2Free MemberFrom the “I See You” podcast / Facebook account:
I see you, Gregg Wallace.
Phwoar! This isn’t what you were expecting, was it? This isn’t your ordinary pud. This is a hot, fresh, sweet, salty, lip-licking gobful of comeuppance. You just can’t stop sticking your spoon in it, digging deeper and deeper, despite the PR team desperately windmilling their arms just out of shot. It’s quite something, isn’t it? We’re going to have to take you straight through to the final two. HR meetings, that is.
You just can’t say anything any more, can you? Not without some uppity middle-aged woman of a certain age running off to the complaints department. Why is it always the more world-weary and financially secure ones that get offended? Why is it only the ones with established careers – who have been dealing with tedious men in the workplace for years – that are always so keen to take you down a peg or two?
It’s never the junior freelancers, or the terrified members of the public stood in front of a TV camera for the first time in their lives, melting down as they mangle a quenelle under the pressure. You distinctly remember nearly all of them laughing. So hard, in fact, that some of them still had tears in their eyes an hour later. Keep going with that pattern recognition, Gregg. You’re so close to actually getting it.
Nope, it’s gone. This isn’t the time for quiet self-reflection about your own conduct! There’s just one thing this situation calls for, and it’s to film a video blaming the women. That’ll deal with those nasty accusations of misogyny. It should also put to bed this silly idea that you might not know just how offensively you come across. Who needs experts in defensive comms, when you can just manifest and self-actualise your own victory in this Total PR War?
Who’d have thought it could come to this? Well, apart from Popbitch that is, who have been recording examples of your ad-libbed comic genius for posterity dating back years. It’s almost as if everyone around you has been sick of your shit for ages, quietly seething with resentment for how desperately uncomfortable you made them feel. Why not tell Popbitch, when all you want is for someone – anyone – to actually challenge the creeps on their bullshit? It’s not like BBC management were taking any of them seriously.
Every off-colour joke you’ve ever told, each of them leaping straight over that firmly established line of cheeky British daytime TV innuendo. Why go for wit, when you can leap straight into ‘every woman who hears this joke suddenly craving a scalding hot shower’ territory? So many of them, quoted in Typewriter in that double-spaced newsletter. I mean really, where’s the harm? It’s just ‘banter,’ isn’t it? A bit of slap and tickle, cheeky wink, Yakety-Sax themed cheekiness.
What does that dish remind me of? I know, it’s my aunt’s c**t! An apparent quote from you there. One that inexplicably ended up on the cutting room floor. Why, I have no idea – it’s an expertly written bit of harmlessly suggestive wordplay that could have been lifted directly out of any of the Carry On films.
I’m sure everybody on set roared with laughter that day, particularly the women. Like the time you told another contestant in front of Ulrika Johnsson that they were handling a fish ‘like a rapist attempting foreplay.’ I can’t think of a single reason why as many as one in four women wouldn’t have roared with laughter at that one.
Wasn’t that the day Monica completely coincidentally snapped a knife sharpener, the corner of one of her eyes twitching? Oh how we laughed, as that jagged spar of steel bounced and twanged across the studio floor before embedding itself in the door of a microwave. It was all just harmless fun!
But why stop there? What’s the difference between jam and jelly, Gregg? You don’t present Masterchef for twenty years just to get more than a dozen complaints of workplace harassment jellied up your arse! Wait, what do you mean I’m ‘suspended with pay pending an investigation?’ This is political correctness gone mad! Didn’t you read my column? I’m just a normal bloke!
No wonder you’re so ruffled. It’s an injustice, isn’t it? It’s classism, that’s what it is – they can’t stand the working boy for having done good. You’re being persecuted by the middle-class liberal elites, the humourless ones who can’t take a bit of harmless banter. It’s definitely not narcissism that causes you to instantly recast yourself as the wronged hero of this story. I can practically hear the word “woke” bubbling up in your throat from here.
I can feel it rising through your convulsing body, a throttled battle cry of frustrated anger that will soon erupt forth like Caesar first learning to speak. I give it a week, max, before you finally snap and grab that cattle prod, roaring “WOOOOOOKE!” across social media like every other grotesque boor that thinks it’s a magic word for excusing their bullshit.
Actually thinking about it, maybe we should drop the Caesar analogy. You shouldn’t grab the cattle prod. You’ll only end up windmilling it at an intern.
I see you, Gregg Wallace. I **** see you.
3MoreCashThanDashFull MemberITV breakfast were suggesting his next role could be as a Reform candidate given his attitudes.
Went see Paddy McGuinness last night (surprisingly good btw) and he opened with “sweating like Gregg Wallace at a WI meeting….”
FuzzyWuzzyFull MemberI’m guessing GB News will be starting a cooking segment soon.
I’m thinking more he’ll go to the US once Trump is President and join the circuit of ex-pat ‘celebrity’ **** over there.
Cougar2Free MemberDo we actually know his political leanings? I mean, we could probably guess, but we’d be guessing.
2piemonsterFree MemberDo we actually know his political leanings?
Russell Brand just spat his cornflakes out at the idea of existing political leanings being more important than monetising the anti woke market.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.