Home Forums Bike Forum Mavic Crossmax ST VS Mavic Crosstrail

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Mavic Crossmax ST VS Mavic Crosstrail
  • oscillatewildly
    Free Member

    righty as the crossmax are quite expensive, even with a hefty discount, what exactly is the difference between these two models?

    looking at the blurb on the site there is a 60gram weigh saving from st to crosstrail, so neither here nor there!!! the price doesnt reflect the saving either at almost double the RRP!

    so it looks like the crosstrail is full UST, has the same rim width, weighs in at 1650 grams and has different spokes (steel compared to zircal?!?!)

    the crosstrail will knock off nearly 300 grams ~ of weight from the wheels which is a fair chunk

    it also appears that the new 2013 crosstrail also has the new freehub which is the same as the ST

    ok the crossmax look a bit better, but seriously struggling to see any difference apart from spokes and 60gram weight saving?

    help!

    M1llh0use
    Free Member

    i’ve got both.

    crosstrail hub is louder (might need lube though!!), marginal weight differance, crossmax st looks better.

    oscillatewildly
    Free Member

    cheers millhouse – so no real world differences then? same sort of feel, repsonsiveness, build quality etc?

    crossmax does look better, but then the crosstrail loosk a million times better than a pro2/flow wheelset

    not bothered about hub noise, as i have a pro2 at moment! weight difference is 60grams

    im struggling to see any other phyiscal differences, even the 2013 crosstrail has the newer/improved/better hub too

    M1llh0use
    Free Member

    If i was buying again, for the ~£200 difference i’d go for crosstrails. or crossmax SX for the wider (21mm) rim.

    oscillatewildly
    Free Member

    cheers bud – one last quickie, are the internal rim widths the same?

    M1llh0use
    Free Member

    as far as i know, yeah. 19mm

    crossmax ST:
    RIMS
    Material: Maxtal
    Color: black anodized
    Joint: SUP
    Drilling: Fore
    Disc brake specific profile
    Weight reduction: ISM
    Valve hole diameter: 6.5 mm
    Tyre: UST Tubeless and tubetype
    Internal width: 19 mm, asymmetrical
    ETRTO size: 559x19C
    Recommended tyre sizes: 1.5 to 2.3

    crosstrail:
    RIMS
    Material: Maxtal
    Color: black anodized
    Joint: SUP
    Drilling: Fore
    Disc brake specific profile
    Weight reduction: ISM
    Valve hole diameter: 6.5 mm
    Tyre: UST Tubeless and tubetype
    Internal width: 19 mm, asymmetrical
    ETRTO size: 559x19C
    Recommended tyre sizes: 1.5 to 2.3

    oscillatewildly
    Free Member

    thanks millhouse! topman!

    seems a no brainer really to get the crosstrails – still look a good package, probably a little less stiff due to the spokes, but im sure they will be as stiff as my old xm819 mavic rims, and probably not much different to the flows – also saving 350 grams or there abouts so should feel a little better climbing!

    M1llh0use
    Free Member

    well a friend borrowed the c456 that the crosstrails are on and properly bounced the rear on a kerb with a VERY bad bunnyhop and there’s not a sign of it with it being out of true so they are fairly strong 😆

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)

The topic ‘Mavic Crossmax ST VS Mavic Crosstrail’ is closed to new replies.