djglover – regrettably true, and the only defence i can offer you is that as well as being a firefighter i’m also a worker, father, taxpayer and human being, i should be able to go to work in reasonable conditions without the threat of the sack for not agreeing to a new contract that will detrimentally affect my life, and the constant bullying that has become commonplace in the LFB.
Well I’ve never worked in an industry where I have a such a profound effect on the life and death of those that I serve, but I have been part of a unionised workforce that has negotiated pragmatically for changes in terms and conditions. As a result I had to work Saturdays, but I am grown up enough to understand that customers and markets change. It would appear that you are stuck in Victorian times
How convenient, that the militant leaders are strong enough to cajole the workforce into agreement to strike over a technicality. As far as I can gather the LFB are acting legally… and the strike appears to be over weather the union view section 188 as legal or not, no one on here knows what delaying tactics the union chiefs used to get to this situation, but I’m sceptical
Can I ask god forbid if you did have a fire in your home how quickly in minutes would you expect a fire appliance to arrive at your home?
Why do you ask that? What are you inferring, that you really aren’t needed to be on duty in the numbers that you are, due to fire prevention technology? Mmm 🙄