I can’t imagine it’s going to have lines quoted for years to come (although I think one character’s name might), but it was a well made, brilliant, feel good, action movie. The recipe was just right, with enough nods and calls backs to the original to make you laugh and smile. The plot was utterly pointless, but that didn’t matter at all, as it was only there in service of the homage to the original and the set pieces.
Just seen it. Utter nonsense, but all the better for it. Even has a scene vaguely like the Kelly McGuillis sex scene, without the sex, that means you can go for a wee and get another beer.
Really enjoyed it. Well worth going to see. Although it does get really silly at the end – Top Gun meets Impossible Mission with a bit of Behind Enemy Lines.
I’ve been avoiding this thread all week! Just got back from seeing it and absolutely loved it. My 12 year old (who loved the first one) said this is is his new favourite film – I’m so proud 🙂
Saw it last night and it was every bit as brilliant as hoped.
Super cheesy, wonderfully nostalgic and hit all the right notes. The first 10 mins were immense, and it continued in that vain. First film in ages that I want to see again in the cinema.
I’m not going to lie, at the first BONG of the Top Gun theme, I actually welled up a bit.
Just returned – I found it oddly emotional, not helped perhaps by our IMAX being turned up to 11, the afterburner moments where shaking the place! All the right good things though for our age group, an excellent homage to the first, and brilliant for 13yo Jnr who loved it – with a choice of Army or RAF cadets in 2 years he’s made his choice already!
Just back, was a great nostalgia driven 2 hours that was complete fantasy and suspending the brain stuff, as always, Tom Cruise just likes to do fun action stuff, realism is for others, he does like doing that weird run in every movie as well though, and there’s plenty here as well!
I think overall they made this one even sillier than the original, and thankfully they really never took themselves that seriously when doing it, which made it fun, nostalgic and silly, but with those heartwarming moments where they put some real crowd pleasers in.
Enjoyable at some levels but the aviation geek in me was cringing at some of the scenes. That “Nighthawk” thing he was flying at the start only had side windows ffs and don’t get me started on the SAM’s.
The SAM’s (surface to air missiles) shown in the film look like the Soviet era S-125.
These are radar guided with a range of about 35km. The film shows them locking on to planes at very short distances whereas their minimum engagement range is around 3.5km. The missiles are also fooled by flares being pumped out by the US planes – that would only work for heat seeking missiles such as the Sidewinder rather than radar guided missiles like the S-125.
Some of this missiles explode quite close to the US planes and would, in real life, severely damage them down due to the large proximity warhead on the missile. In the film the planes carry on flying without any issues.
If this mythical country that the US are attacking has fifth generation fighters (F22 and F35 equivalents) then they would surely have better SAM’s such as the Russian Pantsir which can engage at short ranges and could deal with low flying aircraft better than the S-125.
I guess the S-125 looks cooler though so that’s what they went with.
I stole most of this info from the site at the link below. It is worth a read after seeing the film if you are a plane nerd.
Enjoyable at some levels but the aviation geek in me was cringing at some of the scenes. That “Nighthawk” thing he was flying at the start only had side windows ffs and don’t get me started on the SAM’s.
Yeah, but that’s the fun, he took a $200 million prototype and achieved the test point, but then kept pushing and crashed it, he also managed to go through that security checkpoint at about 40mph!
I think the SAMs were there for show and the last bit, they also appeared to miss the 20 TLAMs that flew past them ;o)
The film also used the phrase 5th generation a lot, but then had those aircraft have the absolute opposite strengths and weaknesses of a 5th gen aircraft!
But again, it’s switch brain off fun that’s basically having modern aircraft having WW1 dogfights!
When they were explaining the TG mission did anyone else think it sounded remarkably similar to the 622 squadron film?!!!
(Low flying through valleys with AA on top and a very steep climb out after dropping the bombs)