Home › Forums › Chat Forum › EU Referendum – are you in or out?
- This topic has 0 replies, 919 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by Cougar.
-
EU Referendum – are you in or out?
-
tjagainFull Member
You guys are still forgetting half the Labour front bench and 100mps have said publicly they will vote against any attempts to delay or stop brexit. Corbyn is as boxed in as May by his own parliamentarians. No other labour leader could do anything different.
If Corbyn comes out for a second referendum he will lose any vote on it – thats clear. Tories would be whipped against it, a few would rebel. Labour would be whipped for it and dozens would rebel and half his front bench would resign including many of the so called moderates.
binnersFull MemberBowglie- same reason as he won’t condemn the regime in Venezuela as the oil-rich ‘socialist’ country crumbles into civil war, poverty and starvation.
My enemies enemy is my friend in Corbyn’s simplistic 1970’s worldview.
He’s a useful idiot for Putin, the hard right of the Tory party and all manner of other thoroughly unpleasant entities just through his sheer pig-headed stupidity
bowglieFull MemberI wonder if one of the main problems in Britain is the right wing press, and until someone has the balls to say that they’re only supporting the Tories and Brexit so that their multimillionaire owners can keep avoiding paying tax…and dodge Leveson2.
Unfortunately, I can’t see any high profile opposition MP’s standing up and using parliamentary privelidge to call out the tax dodging bas***ds in the press and Tory party.
bowglieFull MemberHe’s a useful idiot for Putin, the hard right of the Tory party and all manner of other thoroughly unpleasant entities just through his sheer pig-headed stupidity
Unfortunately for the country, I think you’re right. I’ve always had the feeling that he’s just another pig-headed personality cult dictator that’ll have to be dragged kicking and screaming from the leadership.
dannyhFree MemberWe wouldn’t have the problem of the likes of the Daily Mail if it wasn’t able to tap into a rich seam of ignorance, prejudice, self-righteousness, stupidity, racism, xenophobia and pettiness.
Unfortunately there is a rich seam of all the above to unite their fellow arseholes. And ultimately, that is what we are talking about here. Arseholes.
binnersFull MemberOwen Smith on channel 4 news now saying Corbyn is enabling a xenophobic, nativist, racist right-wing Brexit that betrays every single Labour Party value
Bang on!
I hope this marks the beginning of the party membership finally seeing through Corbyn’s Brexiteer stance, his MPs growing a pair and doing something to stop it/him
tjagainFull MemberNO chance of the labour MPs growing a pair – 100 of them are insisting that brexit goes ahead and half the front bench will resign if corbyn supports a second referendum or attempts to stop / delay brexit
If corbyn really wanted a hard brexit would he be pushing for this softest of soft leaves? Its the only position that he can carry most of his MPs along with.
Do you really want to see a labour party split with 100+ mps voting against the labour whiop if Labour propose a second referendum? Make no mistake – thats what would happen.
Its the spineless nincompops that are labour MPs that are the problem here
iffoverloadFree Memberdammit, its time we got organised and rebelled against this kind of shenanigins
lets go and form a protest queue in the great british tradition
EdukatorFree MemberAlways been suspicious how Corbs used the Stop the War campaign to get rid of Blair, and then they did F*** all to stop the carnage in Syria.
So what was leader of the opposition Corbyn supposed to do in Syria?
I hate to defend the clown but would rather reproach him for not doing things he could do than things he can’t do.
Edit: caught out by the page lag again, this is now water under the bridge.
binnersFull MemberAgain… where are you getting these stats from about who will and won’t rebel/resign?
Jezza talks the talk, but when push comes to shove – every time – he whips his MPs to enable a hard Brexit
roneFull Memberhate to say it, but all of you going mental about what is basically a sensible approach to delivering a soft brexit, are basically just pissed off because you’ve finally realised brexit isn’t going to be cancelled. Brexit is happening, get used to it. Whether it’s in no-deal, hard or soft form is still to be seen, but you really need to take your heads out of the sand
You speak absolute sense.
The hysteria on here rather than then pragmatism is bewildering.
I’m looking forward to the tiny centrist breakaway party of Owen Smith and the Yvette ‘vote for more wars’ cooper.
Good luck with that.
olddogFull MemberIsn’t there another thread about Corbyn specifically if you want to discuss Syria etc not just Brexit
May and her mates must be mighty relieved by the fact that Corbyn personally seems to be taking a large chunk of the blame for the Brexit disaster created and continuously mishandled by the Tories.
kelvinFull Memberhalf the Labour front bench
Because anyone publicly saying what needs saying about brexit has been kicked off the front bench. The Labour back benches is full of talented MPs ready to take their place in a shadow cabinet.
Corbyn is not in a corner, reluctantly supporting Brexit, he wants Brexit. Hard. Anyone supporting a Soft Brexit, or another vote, has been sidelined by his team. Portraying him as at the mercy of the very people he has chosen to surround himself with, because they won’t question his approach, is grade A bullshit.
binnersFull MemberAt least two thirds of Labour MPs are strongly pro-remain. So where you get 100 of them resigning I’ve no idea
Feel free to enlighten me
Just about everyone outside the inner cabal/front bench think, correctly, that Corbyn is a brexiteer clown, so who’s going to resign?
Just seen on Channel 4 news that Tony Lloyd is shadow Northern Ireland Secretary. Who knew? Hear that? That really is the sound of the bottom of a barrel being scraped. Can’t be long before he runs out of similar minded 70’s relics to support his Brexit stance and surround himself with in his Islington echo chamber.
All his backbenchers think he’s a **** and can’t wait to see the back of him so they can try and drag the party back into the 21st century instead of 1973, and that includes being pro EU instead of being in some Bennite backwater
EdukatorFree MemberSo back on tpic, May got nothing out of Junker, zilch. Which is exactly what he was mandated by the 27 to give her. The only stuff they’re talking about is non-binding stuff outside the agreement(deal) offered and refused by parliament.
slowoldmanFull Memberlets go and form a protest queue in the great british tradition
Yes lets. After you.
NorthwindFull Memberbinners
Subscriber
Owen Smith on channel 4 news now saying Corbyn is enabling a xenophobic, nativist, racist right-wing Brexit that betrays every single Labour Party value
Someone should remind Owen Smith he tried to bring down Corbyn before, got his ass absolutely whipped, then instantly declared that they were bezzie mates. Still, he’s one step ahead of Chuka Umanna, forever throwing peanuts but too scared to ever get on the stage.
AFAIC Corbyn actually did something very smart here. He’s extended a reasonable offer that May won’t and can’t take, because her own party would eat her. It’s pretty close to what he’s demanded before- but moved enough that it’s a compromise so people can’t reasonably claim any more that he’s refusing to negotiate. And it means that May’s going to back to parliament and insist hers is the only possible deal (again) and can’t be improved (again) while there’s a better proposal right there in front of her that she’s refused and that her own nutters won’t accept.
And when it does go back to the commons, obviously one of the big risks is that people do panic and vote for May’s shitty brexit out of fear of May’s even shittier no-deal brexit. This puts another option on the table other than calling it all off- which means people can vote against May without instantly being put into the “no deal psycho” or “no brexit traitor” groups. Which imo is just 100% positive.
And also he’s given the EU something to be visibily reasonable about at the exact point the ultras are claiming that Europe isn’t listening. They can’t accept it- they’re not negotiating with him- so again no risk but it improves the visuals.
If there was any chance of May accepting his offer I’d say it was a terrible idea, but there isn’t.
ransosFree MemberOwen Smith on channel 4 news now saying Corbyn is enabling a xenophobic, nativist, racist right-wing Brexit that betrays every single Labour Party value
As we all know, Owen Smith definitely represents the views of the membership.
mattyfezFull MemberA good analysis NW.. But the vice is tightening, there’s very little room for the UK to manuvere now. That’s both good and bad.. Good in that it will force our politicians to actually do something.
Bad in that no one knows what they might do with the in fighting in both parties as they are both broken and dysfunctional.NorthwindFull Membermattyfez
Member
A good analysis NW.. But the vice is tightening, there’s very little room for the UK to manuvere now.
TBH I don’t think that’s true- we can’t maneouvre but not because there’s no room, only because some idiot dropped the anchor in the wrong place. Nicely demonstrated by May’s new demands being more or less laughed at, while Corbyn’s comments get treated with more respect and seriousness despite him not even being in power,not because they’re amazing but just because they’re not basically moronic.
Also, neither of us can spell manuva.
tjagainFull MemberWhere do I get the hundred MPs that say they will vote against any delay? – publicly declared positions reported in many places. Same as the half the front bench will resign. Maybe less would when push comes to shove but there is no doubt there is a large swathe of labour MPs who believe the ” will of the people ” shtick
these are the folk who may be for remain but believe that their constituents will kick them out if they don’t back leave.
epicycloFull MemberIt’s all in the great British tradition of the Charge of the Light Brigade.
Only they’re charging our own lines.
And all the casualties will be us.
mattyfezFull MemberI agree mostly but..
idiot dropped the anchor in the wrong place
It does not matter, the UK was never going to get a better deal than it already had.. So the placement of the anchor was, and still is, largely irrelevant.
.
kelvinFull Memberhalf the front bench
‘Half’ of either, or both, of the front benches resigning is pretty much normal politics these days. Both leaders have survived that kind of ‘manuva’ by ministers and shadow ministers a few times already. The back benches are already full of people who have resigned or been fired over Brexit policy. More to come. Some you might even notice.
thepuristFull MemberHuffington Post reporting on the US lobbyist’s view of what they want from a future US-UK trade deal.
Lobbyists for big firms made more than 130 demands, which include:
- Changing how NHS chiefs buy drugs to suit big US pharmaceutical companies
- Britain scraps its safety-first approach to safety and food standards
- Law changes that would allow foreign companies to sue the British state
- Removal of protections for traditional British products.
Just an example of what DFDS Liam would be up against. He hasn’t got a chance.
bikebouyFree MemberWe have a solution, a solution proposed by a staunch Brexit supporter here at work.
Pack your bags Scotland you are moving to Ireland and the Irish are moving to Scotland.
No border issues, except the Sea.
Off you trot..
🤣🤷♂️
And i’d say that’s a fairly typical attitude from a Beexiteer.
koldunFree MemberWe wouldn’t have the problem of the likes of the Daily Mail if it wasn’t able to tap into a
rich seamraging flood of ignorance, prejudice, self-righteousness, stupidity, racism, xenophobia and pettiness.FIFY
kimbersFull MemberGood analysis (if a little optimistic) of labours plans here http://www.politics.co.uk/blogs/2019/02/07/labour-s-new-brexit-policy-looks-an-awful-lot-like-norway-pl
My worry is that May will simply never go for it, which leaves everything unchanged & a choice of Mays deal Vs no deal.
As for DFDS fox, that huffpost is terrifying considering how desperately out of his depth he is, even worse in a no deal scenario where we would be so desperate for trade deals we’d be shafted by everyone.
DrJFull MemberMy worry is that May will simply never go for it, which leaves everything unchanged & a choice of Mays deal Vs no deal.
This has been the plan since last year, IMO. At the last moment Labour will support it on the basis of some vague assurance that maybe at some point in the future the govt will perhaps consider doing something for the poor folk below stairs.
nedrapierFull MemberHuffington Post reporting on the US lobbyist’s view of what they want from a future US-UK trade deal.
And that, given the complete lack of control over US politicians being totally owned by lobby groups, is rather scary:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNjckHXBNBI
And what a position we’ll be in to do a trade deal with the US that looks after UK interests. All the cards, they need us more they we need them, etc.
PrinceJohnFull MemberSo a quick poll – who’s the worst PM out of May & Thatcher?
molgripsFree MemberMy worry is that May will simply never go for it
Does she have to though? Isn’t there enough centre ground who’ll go for it and get it through?
pihaFree MemberSo a quick poll – who’s the worst PM out of May & Thatcher?
Corbyn
hot_fiatFull MemberMay, Thatcher at least had a plan, no matter how heartless or destructive that was.
mikewsmithFree MemberMay, no plan and thoroughly incompetent and unable to put any kind of fear into her MP’s or listen to them – you either need to lead or listen.
Do I get points for being able to read the question and know who has been a PM?
kimbersFull MemberMays problem has been the lies………
She lied to Business- that she could keep frictionless trade & lied that Nissan didnt get extra cash
She lied to the EU- signed the WA, then reneged on it, lied that she wouldnt go round barnier & tried twice to go straight to heads of state, icluding the googletranslate letter farce
She lied to MPs (first about no GE) then later about when the meaningful b=vote would be etc
She lied to her party- when she said last december that teh backstop wasnt the CU (they were too dumb to notice, it was only when geoffry Cox pointed it out they got uset)
She lied to voters when she said that she thought ‘No Deal was better than a bad deal’ which is bollox coz her deal is a bad deal yet she knows that No deal is much worse….
I know all politicians lie, but she has eroded all trust, Im amazed she doesnt get called out more often
The topic ‘EU Referendum – are you in or out?’ is closed to new replies.