David Icke at Wembley last Saturday

Anyone remember ‘The White March’ ?
In 1996 over a quarter of a million Belgians took the streets of Brussels in protest of the Dutroux paedophile scandal .. It would be pretty hard to argue that the state wasn’t complicit in some sort of cover up .. Folk can engage in back and forth mudslinging all day but that won’t make the elephant in the room disappear ..

Bang on Noltae… The Dutroux affair is very intriguing, with several claims of links to prominent politicians and Belgian and Dutch Royalty.

You know, the one that you brought up, where it was found to be a massive hoax and the claimant got found guilty of perjury.

2 sides to every story though isn’t there; funny how one of the victims got $1,000,000 in compensation if it was a hoax…

Next you’ll be telling me that MK-ULTRA is a hoax

Wow,

I never knew Princess Diana was a nonce! But there she is, in the same room as Jimmy Savile, so it must be true.

several claims of links

See Cougar’s post above. Pretty much anyone can claim anything. Doesn’t make it true.

and the Queen Mum, God bless her. Nonce.

I never knew Princess Diana was a nonce! But there she is, in the same room as Jimmy Savile, so it must be true.

For what it’s worth, I cast no judgement on Diana, but it is a bit weird that Jimmy Savile acted as an intermediary between both Charles and Diana and Andrew and Fergie, don’t you think?

There’s no doubt he was a close confidant of the Palace.

Ah the old “they met once so they must be part of a shadowy conspiracy” photo. Always a good one:

Anyone remember ‘The White March’ ?
In 1996 over a quarter of a million Belgians took the streets of Brussels in protest of the Dutroux paedophile scandal .. It would be pretty hard to argue that the state wasn’t complicit in some sort of cover up ..

Never heard of it, so I looked it up.

At first, the anger amongst the Belgian people was directed mainly at Dutroux himself, but it quickly targeted the police, the justice department and the politicians as well. Many Belgians denounced the police and government for botching the investigation into the earlier kidnappings and failing to arrest Dutroux earlier, allowing him to kill off the first four victims.

(emphasis mine)

There’s a world of difference between “botching the investigation” and a state-sanctioned cover-up campaign. Not that I’m saying there wasn’t, I’ve no idea, but rather than being “pretty hard to argue” it’d appear that it’s actually quite easy.

The White March and subsequent activist groups, as far as I can gather, were pushing for Parliamentary reform rather than on a nonce-hunt.

There’s no doubt he was a close confidant of the Palace.

Are you saying Neil Warnock is involved somehow?

Try again Graham:

For what it’s worth, I cast no judgement on Diana, but it is a bit weird that Jimmy Savile acted as an intermediary between both Charles and Diana and Andrew and Fergie, don’t you think?

There’s no doubt he was a close confidant of the Palace.

Apparently he was 1st introduced to the Royals in the 60s by Lord Mountbatten, who it seems was involved in the Kincora Scandal

it is a bit weird that Jimmy Savile acted as an intermediary between both Charles and Diana and Andrew and Fergie, don’t you think?

I don’t know; did he?

There’s no doubt he was a close confidant of the Palace.

And? He didn’t have his Jim’ll Fix It I’m a Dirty Great Big Nonce badge on so it’s entirely possible, likely even, that like the rest of the country they thought he was a nice old man who was good with children.

Put it this way. Say you find out one day that someone you knew, who is now deceased, was involved in some form of criminal activity. Does that automatically make you complicit?

There is a huge difference between “people knew each other” and “they were all in it together.” Don’t you see that? It might be the case that they were all in it together, but that’s a tremendous leap of logic.

Apparently…seems….

Can’t you see it yet?

I don’t need to try again – you’re still at it, casting vague “it is a bit weird don’t you think” accusations with no actual evidence.

Is it weird that royals met a prominent celebrity who (at the time) was known for popular family entertainment and raising money for charity?

No.

Is it weird that some people in positions of power, like Saville, have abused that power?

No.

Does that mean there is a secret global nonce conspiracy involving tens of thousands of people, including the Illuminati, the Vatican, the British Royal family, satanist paedos, the CIA, the police, the courts, child protection, psychiatrists, religious leaders, the media, the lizard people and Dan Brown?

Erm… no.

.

(and it is a bit weird that “psychiatrists” are named as part of the conspiracy, don’t you think? 😉 )

There is a huge difference between “people knew each other” and “they were all in it together.” Don’t you see that? It might be the case that they were all in it together, but that’s a tremendous leap of logic.

That’s a very fair point. However when you find how close he was to the Royals (having had a mysterious falling out with Prince Philip, but remaining close to Charles) and how many other abusers are in the close circles of the Royals, things become clearer.

On that note, just why are our noble Monarchy so coy?

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/royal-family-granted-new-right-of-secrecy-2179148.html

Is it weird that royals met a prominent celebrity who (at the time) was known for popular family entertainment and raising money for charity?

Is it weird that he was a regular visitor and close enough to act as a counsellor at rough patches in the marriages of Charles and Di and Andrew and Fergie?

The evidence he was close and central was he fell out with one of them.
Please say that was satire.

The evidence he was close and central was he fell out with one of them.
Please say that was satire.

Poor interpretation there, keep reading:

Is it weird that he was a regular visitor and close enough to act as a counsellor at rough patches in the marriages of Charles and Di and Andrew and Fergie?

There is a huge difference between “people knew each other” and “they were all in it together.”

If we consider the “six points of seperation” idea too, we are all involved. 😮

having had a mysterious falling out with Prince Philip, but remaining close to Charles

Ooh, I wonder what that was about. It must be relevant to something.

Is it weird that he was a regular visitor and close enough to act as a counsellor at rough patches in the marriages of Charles and Di and Andrew and Fergie?

I’m not sure. Is it?

Is it weird that he was a regular visitor and close enough to act as a counsellor at rough patches in the marriages of Charles and Di and Andrew and Fergie?

I don’t think it is weird no.

If you think it is, then please explain why ?

And also what it has to do with global peadophile conspiracy theories.

Is it weird that he was a regular visitor and close enough to act as a counsellor at rough patches in the marriages of Charles and Di and Andrew and Fergie?

I’m sure you have some compelling evidence of this (?) but no, I don’t think it is particularly weird that people trusted him.

Not sure a lifelong bachelor would have been my first choice of marriage counsellor, but it takes all sorts.

I’m not saying anything in case the lizards get me but isn’t it obvious?

Bloody hell. I just realised that I have a friend who met the pope. I think there may be a pic on fb of it. She’s part of it!!!!! 😯

And further, I’ve realised that her mum knew Posh Spice (before she was famous) who is clearly part of a global conspiracy to keep women insecure and feeling fat and therefore subservient!!!!

ZOMG!!!!!!

I need to go dark!

nemesis,

pah, I was on Crackerjack, where they told me that I would lose the final game as they did boy-girl rotations and it was a girl due to win, so she got board games and easy questions and I got blown up beach balls and harder questions. It was quite literally a conspiracy… duh duh duuuuuuuhhh.

and next door they were filming Jim’ll fix it.

ZOMG i’m part of the control sctucture 😯

Poor interpretation there

yes it was and finally we agree.

I hope the irony of me selectively quoting and cheery picking my evidence does not go unnoticed and of course WOOSH to the first point and I suspect this one hence i made it explicit.

I hope the irony of me selectively quoting and cheery picking my evidence does not go unnoticed

Oh, you’re one of them 😉

Oh god!

…and it gets worse

But that means ALL cyclists are part of the global conspiracy!!!!!

The Daily Mail was right all along!

Is it weird that he was a regular visitor and close enough to act as a counsellor at rough patches in the marriages of Charles and Di and Andrew and Fergie?

He clearly wasn’t very good at it, though.

OH NOES! Brant is (or at least was!) a lizard overlord!

I’ve worked it out. Since we’ve established that all cyclists are part of the conspiracy, Jivehoney is actually a plant, peddling the truth in a deliberately flaky way to hide the truth!!!!!!!!!!!!!

OH NOES! Brant is (or at least was!) a lizard overlord!

.. and he is obviously close to STW’s ruling class, and by extension the MODS. Cougar, named after an animal, just like lizards are animals 😯

Pff, as if I’d be involved in any kind of conspiracy, you people are so suspicious

If only somewhere was holding an inquiry into this sort of stuff somewhere in the world.
oh look they are
Of course the establishment probably only sanctioned it after getting all their people out and doing mind control on the rest. Really surprised this didn’t make it onto jh’s reading list.

Meanwhile, in the UK:

So far the home office has selected 2 chairs to head the inquiry who have had to step down, due to links to people involved in abuse/coverup…

Not to mention collusion with the home office to try and limit public exposure of said links.

This picture includes the latest Fiona Woolf, who stood down on Friday and was taken the morning of the day that she went before the Home Affairs Select Committee and said she wasn’t part of the establishment:

Nothing to hide there then.

Strange that the terms of reference avoided Kincora and Jersey amongst other things.

We’ll see what happens in a little while once Theresa May has had another go at preventing complete implosion of the home office.

So you didn’t bother to read any of the Australian stuff despite it being exactly what you seem interested in. Perhaps it doesn’t agree with you.

Mandy Rice-Davies applies

Strewth mate, calm down ya flaming galah!!

I’m aware of several cases down in Australia, but there is so much to compile from all over the world that I haven’t had time to do great deal of research down under yet.

Used to have a flat mate who was brought up in care near Melbourne and he’d tell me stories of horrific abuse, but at the time, I didn’t really believe him.

After all, they are ‘care’ homes right, set up to look after the vulnerable, not abuse and traffic them.

So I do understand it’s hard to conceive and I’ve been wrong about it in my time, but we can’t keep pretending it doesn’t occur.

Like I said, it’s an international thing and it’s far from pretty.

Thanks for the link.

I’m not really sure what that photo above proves?? 😕

But I completely agree that the selection process has been a farce.

Out of interest though, who (or how) would you select to chair that investigation?

Seems to me it is pretty difficult to find someone who would be qualified to chair a Royal Commission, but has no ties to “the establishment”.

Especially as your MACPC diagram clearly rules out anyone from justice, child protection, family courts, police or politics.

Lottery/Tombola – we all get a number even loons and establishment types and trust it to chance 😉

One of those it is hard to get balance in that they need to be knowledgeable and informed and yet somehow be at a distance
Some “maverick” Human right lawyers have been suggested- Mike Mansfield for example- by victims groups.

I like the soothing musak of Tubular Bells as much as the next man, but I can’t see how it would help here.

Im saving this thread to read before I go to bed tonight..will i be disappointed?