Interesting concept there GlenP.
Perhaps you’re missing the point – Full degrease of a chain removes anything that will make grit stick to, on or in a chains links, which means if you think about it, what goes in also comes out. Different people have a different take on how to remove the dirty degreaser that caries the grit out, but I’m sure you see the point.
I think you’re mistaken that your chain doesn’t have any grit in it because you haven’t ‘washed it in’. The gaps on the rollers are hardly sub-micron tolerances after all. I would agree that if you choose to use dry lube, then there will be little adherence of dirt/grit out on the trail though.
I can also see that running a dry chain would be better than running one constantly full of grit, but I imagine your drive train power losses would be greater than average; if that’s an issue to you.
Throw in riding style, shifting technique, local terrain, washing habits, choice of lube, rider weight and power output and of course it all goes out the window.
I happen to agree with Elliptic – co-incidentally we ride the same place – perhaps this has something to do with it.
Its easy to find the prevailing view of chain lubrication on the web (look for industrial uses since there’s little on mtb chains)
One final thing – One persons ‘dead’ chain is another persons slightly worn one, so this is all balderdash really – there’s no confirmed end point to allow comparison of how long a chain lasts under the myriad of regimes that riders use anyway.
Like elliptic says -YMMV. Just because it works for you in your riding paradigm doesn’t mean it will work for anyone else. Prevailing opinion both here and across industrial applications involving high torque, dirty conditions and slow rev conditions is against your limited and anecdotal advice though.