I caught an interview with someone who seemed to be a tory shill earlier – banging on about Dodgy Dicky Sharp and how donating to political parties shouldn’t be a bar to positions like DG of the BBC.
Putting aside that comment’s own issues, that has got precisely **** all to do with Dodgy Dicky and Alexander Boris De Pfeffel Johnson. He helped De Pfeffel secure a £800k personal loan. This isn’t about party funding it is about doing dodgy favours for dodgy mates. This person attempting to conflate the two really got my goat.
The interviewer didn’t probe at all either. What they should be asking is:
1) How can you possibly say Sharp is impartial having done a personal fave for the PM?
2) Why on earth would a serving PM need £800k at short notice in any case?
3) What does needing £800k at short notice say about that PM being open to blackmail/bribery etc?
Does the top job not require vetting? I’m pretty certain that that kind of exposure would preclude someone from a relatively junior level of the civil service or military. I know for a fact that law firms have to be very careful dealing with PEPs (Politically Exposed People).
The whole thing stinks and there is no way Sharp’s resignation should be the end of it.