69er ... Great fun!
 

[Closed] 69er ... Great fun!

47 Posts
27 Users
0 Reactions
324 Views
Posts: 2140
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Stuck a 29in wheel in the rigid fork on my (26er) inbred, popped a pair of faster rolling tyres (Maxxis Ardents Vs the Chunky Monkey/Smorgasbord I had before, dropped the SS gearing (32/16 - 32/17) ... What a difference!

Anyone else having 69er shenanigans?


 
Posted : 18/02/2019 10:52 pm
Posts: 16241
Full Member
 

If there are no picture it never really happened!😏


 
Posted : 18/02/2019 11:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Anyone else having 69er shenanigans?

FFS don’t ask for picks.. 🙈


 
Posted : 18/02/2019 11:04 pm
Posts: 1343
Free Member
 

Indeed

Tried gravel/cx bike... Lasted a while before I realised that a flat bar rigid is almost as fast and actually betterer (for me)

Cheap as chips shed parts build and i love it (apart from the on-one QC on the special edition inbred)


 
Posted : 18/02/2019 11:21 pm
Posts: 16241
Full Member
 

^^ Pic not working for me?


 
Posted : 18/02/2019 11:23 pm
Posts: 1343
Free Member
 

Na nor me... 🙂

You will have to imagine it.... Black... Inbred... Rigid.. With wheels... Seat..and er a 69er. In France by a sign, me beer in hand, sun shining down. French maidens dancing behind me.

Out of all the forums I am on this one is possible the most useless user unfriendly pile of ones and zeros I have seen. Slightly off topic I know but it should not be hard to post a picture directly! Will resort to photobucket rather than Dropbox.


 
Posted : 18/02/2019 11:29 pm
Posts: 11605
Free Member
 

What does a 29" wheel actually do aside from introduce more rolling weight and screw with the geometry?


 
Posted : 18/02/2019 11:30 pm
Posts: 7849
Full Member
 

I've done that to my 456 before. Works really well. I've got suspension in there at the moment but it's great when the outside world is ultra mucky.


 
Posted : 18/02/2019 11:31 pm
Posts: 1343
Free Member
 

Squirrelking... Well it does not screw geo. In fact the axle to crown measurement with a 29er wheel in on a 26" fork is actually the same as the bouncy fork I replaced. I found the inbred front end quite low anyway so now running rigid with no sag the geo is perfect.

Front wheel rolls over stuff better and the smaller rear accelerates quickly.

Probably would not go out my way to build with new bits... But with a mix of parts lying around as most of us do it works really well. Ride it more than my cdf at the mo as its just more suited for the kind of riding I do (and commuting)


 
Posted : 18/02/2019 11:37 pm
Posts: 7849
Full Member
 

I'm with the don on this. Exactly my experience. I wouldn't buy one from the shop but as a parts bin special great fun.


 
Posted : 18/02/2019 11:46 pm
 geex
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What does a 29″ wheel actually do

rolls over stuff slightly betterer, particularly in a straightish line.
holds more momentum, but oddly aren't necessarily moar stable.
Turns in slowerer (and behaves slightly differently when leant over cornering).
brakes less efficienty for the same size disc.
Accelerates slowerer.
flexes moar.
iz weakerer.
iz uglier and doesn't pull da pretty ladies (pic works for me 😉 )

They'll never catch on...

Smaller wheels are moar fun, strongerer, nimlberer, cheaper and lighterer

#264LYFYO


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 1:57 am
Posts: 24362
Full Member
Posts: 2808
Full Member
 

I'm doing 6andahalf9er

tea!


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 3:50 am
Posts: 551
Free Member
 

Link

Not 69 but the wheel probably isn't much smaller! Alfine rear hub for the ultimate winter killer


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 6:50 am
Posts: 6259
Full Member
 

Currently got my old Indy Fab SS setup as a kind of 69er....26" rear wheel, and 27.5+ front.
Works surprisingly well.


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 7:43 am
Posts: 12555
Free Member
 

If you are going to do 69er at least do it properly. I remember really wanting one of these 12 years ago.

Trek 69er


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 7:45 am
Posts: 7561
Free Member
 

I’ve always been amused when much is poured over geometrically on here and yet people seem commonly happy to raise the handlebars on a bike, not by using a stem or bar but by putting a longer fork or bigger wheel or both in there.


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 8:04 am
Posts: 2808
Full Member
 

I’ve always been amused when much is poured over geometrically on here and yet people seem commonly happy to raise the handlebars on a bike, not by using a stem or bar but by putting a longer fork or bigger wheel or both in there

or putting a smaller wheel in the back.


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 8:14 am
Posts: 744
Free Member
 

Still ride my Trek 69er SS. Still rate it as the most enjoyable bike I own.

Can't post a picture of it, so that could all be lies (but it isn't)


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 8:56 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

OP - sounds like fun. Hope you enjoy it.


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 9:02 am
Posts: 2091
Full Member
 

kerley

Member
If you are going to do 69er at least do it properly.

Find a Singular Hummingbird frame, with it’s proper rigid fork.
Funnily enough, I have several.


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 9:33 am
 PJay
Posts: 4864
Free Member
 

[url= https://uc92bf767b5d97465b26bd6361c6.previews.dropboxusercontent.com/p/thumb/AAUeU8VLNp6c1JkHqS7F21KbKGgrYmzhmRzRudIfv3Z7JwAYR3AlxT6hy3qxwxHVn7_LFaN-60kZxpWUEP7RJdc0pg1iDbr_wH3tgnCB1VLClPsAw9QrnZ4Ntlm3TLgQzKuCCv-IyteeiM7VR-zuZC1E9qDGK2oLNlECzmKx23QFg685bfW_YIitxjWkmt23MjiMjLfJ8R-ZaV9FJU5hzTpE5O8-Z01Xjvkn6eiIxnmFYXtAd8rj2yWEOsG7b8czaFRP9kf9VHjUP1WN1E1l7FR2/p.jpe g" target="_blank">https://uc92bf767b5d97465b26bd6361c6.previews.dropboxusercontent.com/p/thumb/AAUeU8VLNp6c1JkHqS7F21KbKGgrYmzhmRzRudIfv3Z7JwAYR3AlxT6hy3qxwxHVn7_LFaN-60kZxpWUEP7RJdc0pg1iDbr_wH3tgnCB1VLClPsAw9QrnZ4Ntlm3TLgQzKuCCv-IyteeiM7VR-zuZC1E9qDGK2oLNlECzmKx23QFg685bfW_YIitxjWkmt23MjiMjLfJ8R-ZaV9FJU5hzTpE5O8-Z01Xjvkn6eiIxnmFYXtAd8rj2yWEOsG7b8czaFRP9kf9VHjUP1WN1E1l7FR2/p.jpe g"/> [/img][/url]


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 9:37 am
Posts: 30337
Full Member
 

or putting a smaller wheel in the back.

Using a spare 26 rear wheel is a great way to change the geom in an old 275 frame … lower (BB), slacker (headangle) … doesn't raise the bars though.


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 9:38 am
Posts: 2140
Full Member
Topic starter
 

What does a 29″ wheel actually do aside from introduce more rolling weight and screw with the geometry?

Maybe. But the wheel is lighter than the 26 wheel that came out.

In a totally non-scientific way, it made a significant difference. Rolls (over stuff) better, raising the front a touch and slackening the HA a notch did seem to make for a more confident ride.

I've enjoyed my SS rigid 26er, but there's no escaping it's bloody hard work at times ... Changing it to a 69er (also with a slightly lower gear) made a surprising difference and was overall a nicer, and slightly less gruelling experience.


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 10:55 am
Posts: 11605
Free Member
 

Well it does not screw geo. In fact the axle to crown measurement with a 29er wheel in on a 26″ fork is actually the same as the bouncy fork I replaced.

Umm. Yeah. Why wouldn't it be? Try comparing the ground to crown height. and I didn't say it would screw, I said it would screw with. Different meaning.

@geex 29" rolls over stuff better, sure, no arguments here. I might be stuck in the past but that's more a financial thing than being a luddite. How about the smaller wheel on the back though?

In a totally non-scientific way, it made a significant difference. Rolls (over stuff) better, raising the front a touch and slackening the HA a notch did seem to make for a more confident ride.

That's more what I was after, so it's basically a ghetto method of achieving what an angleset also accomplishes.


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 11:25 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Inbred 69-er?

Been there, done that, very fond memories.

69er 1

69er 2

69er 3

Still riding odd-wheeler till this day. But nowadays in full suss guise.

Wycior

Cheers!
I.


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 12:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yep, did the same and it was fun - but fully rigid singlespeed got a bit wearing after a bit, so put gears and 29" wheels with CX tyres in it for a cheap "gravel" bike - tyre clearance is tight as f*** with a 26" frame though! For anyone wondering about the effects on geo etc, I'm too clueless to notice so its' all good 😉


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 12:17 pm
Posts: 2140
Full Member
Topic starter
 

@IvanMTB ... Those look like they'll topple over backwards! 29er fork AND wheel in a 26er frame? Think mine is a little more balanced with just the 29er wheel in a 26 rigid fork ... Will sort out a photo in a bit.

so put gears and 29″ wheels with CX tyres in it for a cheap “gravel” bike – tyre clearance is tight as f*** with a 26″ frame though

I thought about that. But would only get a 35c tyre on a 29er wheel at the rear, and have gravel bike(s) anyway.


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 12:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You are not the first person telling me that hardtailonly 🙂

But I never had any issues on the uphills.

No front wheel wandering, not toppling backwards. In fact that was much nicer climber then when it was in full 26er guise...

inbred

Looking forward to see your pix.

Cheers!
I.


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 12:37 pm
Posts: 2140
Full Member
Topic starter
 

This is the result ...


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 12:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Nice one <thumbsup>

Cheers!
I.


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 1:26 pm
Posts: 3041
Full Member
 

My , er, 7.59+er.


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 1:29 pm
Posts: 3041
Full Member
 

Or not...
Guess I should have used Dracs iPad.


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 1:30 pm
 Del
Posts: 8237
Full Member
 

I’ve always been amused when much is poured over geometrically on here and yet people seem commonly happy to raise the handlebars on a bike, not by using a stem or bar but by putting a longer fork or bigger wheel or both in there.

Hold on - didn't you supply a 456 69er to dirt for a test once?

I'm more curious to know how a 26 wheel accelerates more quickly than a 29 when they're attached to the same frame.... 😀


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 1:57 pm
Posts: 551
Free Member
 

I’m more curious to know how a 26 wheel accelerates more quickly than a 29 when they’re attached to the same frame

You just get half the acceleration increase over a full 29er


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 3:13 pm
Posts: 8327
Full Member
 

The frame compresses but don't worry as it stretches again as you slow down due to the greater momentum of the front wheel.


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 3:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I thought it got low and slacker in use then goes upright when you brake or slow down.


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 3:39 pm
Posts: 2524
Free Member
 

675pluser
This was a 69er, now a 67.5plusser.
6720er
This is my 49er, it used to have a fatter tyre on the front,


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 4:08 pm
Posts: 8327
Full Member
 

I thought it got low and slacker in use then goes upright when you brake or slow down.

If it's doing that then you've made the elementary mistake of putting the 26" wheel at the front and the 29" at the back.


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 4:12 pm
Posts: 86
Free Member
 

Ran my rigid Inbred (440mm fork) as a 69er for quite some time and it was good however the steering had a slight tendancy to feel a little floppy, probably the fork needed a little more offset (think the Hummingbird ones were like that).

It is now a 67.5er with a 2.5 WT Minion up front and is much better than it was as a 69er and I prefer it to when it was a rigid 26.


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 6:46 pm
Posts: 8327
Full Member
 

restlessshawn that was my experience with the the steering as well with a rigid 440mm fork, I liked the way it rolled over things a little better though. I'll have to give the the 27.5 3" tyred wheel of my Ramin 3 a try.


 
Posted : 19/02/2019 9:52 pm
Posts: 2524
Free Member
 

If you choose right you can fit a decent sized 29" tyre in a 420mm fork, which would be the better option for 69ering a 100mm suspension 26er frame.


 
Posted : 20/02/2019 12:18 pm
Posts: 2091
Full Member
 

restlessshawn

Member
Ran my rigid Inbred (440mm fork) as a 69er for quite some time and it was good however the steering had a slight tendancy to feel a little floppy, probably the fork needed a little more offset (think the Hummingbird ones were like that).

Yes, the Hummingbird forks are 445 a/c and 55mm offset, so you have less trail and no low speed floppiness. An added advantage is that the front centre is slightly increased.
But, whatever, the Hummingbird is a wonderful handling bike. I’d buy an updated version in a shot - so, 27.5 rear, 29 front, 30.9mm seat tube and two degree slacker head angle. Columbus or Reynolds 853.

Plus, if I had a set of 140mm 29” forks,(preferably Marzocchi) I’d be trying a 29” front wheel in one of my LV 301’s, Tobi Leonhardt stylee.


 
Posted : 20/02/2019 1:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[IMG] [/IMG]
Loving mine right now….


 
Posted : 22/02/2019 7:12 pm
Posts: 1343
Free Member
 

Oh this is still going! Brant what the hell do you know about bikes* the 69er config on the inbred has transformed the bike. I guess it's all just personal preference at the end of the day. Far too much is sprouted about mm's here and there but for 99 percent of us the changes are insignifcant....well unless you are a strava sausage like me 🙂

All I can say is the inbred in standard config with my 100mm Reba's was poor. Running 26" forks and a 29" front wheel its great.

Still trying to battle with this terrible forum to post a pic. Be back in 2027.

*I know you have a little bit to do with the inbred 🙂


 
Posted : 22/02/2019 7:33 pm
Posts: 6581
Free Member
 

Had a few rides on one in 2008. Quite nice although I seem to remember not liking the steering on slow/tight stuff

https://www.flickr.com/photos/simondbarnes/2804316298


 
Posted : 22/02/2019 7:49 pm
 Del
Posts: 8237
Full Member
 

Oi, knottie! This wheel is small, but that one is far away? You can't just come back on here posting a bike leaning against a rail. It's a post or nothing fella!


 
Posted : 24/02/2019 5:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[IMG] [/IMG]
Bike and bits against a fence (Del, not many posts this way).


 
Posted : 25/02/2019 6:17 am