Subscribe now and choose from over 30 free gifts worth up to £49 - Plus get £25 to spend in our shop
BBC reporting that she’s been readmitted to the party.
Though apparently hasn't yet been selected as candidate. If she doesn't get selected she should stand as an independent.
Well, who’d have thunk it?
So a subset of Boomers, not all Boomers?
she should stand as an independent.
I could be wrong but I doubt that she would stand as an independent, I get the impression that she is too committed to the Labour Party.
Edit: Although that could change post July 4th, depending on how things pan out. I think it is plausible that there might be a new, small, but credible, left-wing party by the time of the 2029 general election.
Anyway - what is the procedure where she has the whip restored, is readmitted to the party, and yet is unlisted from the seat she's held for (checks Wiki) 37 years.
And if that happens, does it really impact on black voters? Is her treatment because of her race or what she did and said? I think we have to be careful to assume black voters will automatically side with her, do we not risk stereotyping? Black voters can have opinions on antisemitism that see beyond the race of the person that made the comments.
I think you’re being dismissive of the gingers.
She outed herself as a blatant gingerist. A gingerphobe
We need answers though. This whole election campaign so far the entire country has been asking only one question….
”what’s going on with Diane Abbot?”
Is her treatment because of her race or what she did and said?
Well she was suspended for telling the truth and then apologizing for telling the truth.
You would need to be out of your mind to believe that someone like Rachel Riley has been the victim of prejudice and racism throughout her life to the same extent as a black woman such as Diane Abbott.
I think that Diane Abbott would not have been suspended by Starmer had she been Jewish, look at the stuff that Margaret Hodge got away with!
And remember this is now all playing out against the background of the warm welcome that Elphicke received from Starmer, so we know that he is very flexible when it comes to tolerance of varying political opinions.
That's not my point or my question though. I don't deny she has been victim to horrific racism; I agreed a month or two back after the Hester comments. My question is whether irrespective of that, it's right to assume that black voters will automatically side with her over a different matter.
entire country has been asking only one question….
”what’s going on with Diane Abbot?”
Obviously not. But some people are asking "what's going on with Diane Abbott?" In fact on the news on the telly this evening there was quite a lengthy segment on that question.
The problem is that the Tories see her as a gift, ignoring the daft article she wrote (and fwiw, she apologised, did the training, so that should be the end). They see her as an asset to them in the same way corbyn is.
Starmer is on a mission so putting abbot in the lords is not surprising
I could see the point Diane Abbott was trying to make, it was badly made, she apologised, move on. The way Labour has handled it is as clumsy and prejudiced as the original "crime" IMO.
Colour is more visible than being Irish or Jewish. You can change you headware and your name by deedpoll but you can't change the colour of your skin.
Starmer is so paranoid about being accused of anti-semitism he just mumbles about Gaza. Even Biden is more forthright.
This evenings tory policy plan is to shut down underperforming uni courses & boost apprenticeships
if they did get re-elected,which the won’t, how on earth do they propose doing that?
Let me guess… there are no actual details about that because they literally dreamt it up about an hour ago
Seriously, these two had a better planned and more coherent election campaign
We all need to be more Dynamite.
Though id give the time machine a miss.😂
the victim of prejudice and racism throughout her life to the same extent
Oh, well that makes it ok then… 🙄
My wife is from the Travelling Community and the abuse I’ve had to put up with for marrying her is a disgrace and nothing compared to the contempt that that subset is held in general. But it’s ok because it’s not as bad…
Oh, well that makes it ok then… 🙄
That is what was said is it? That is the conclusion that you have come to?
Life must be hard for people who struggle with simple comprehension.
Condescending much?
While you didn’t type those exact words your meaning was pretty clear.
While you didn’t type those exact words your meaning was pretty clear.
I typed the exact words which you copied and pasted. However you chose to lift them out of context and put your own interpretation on them.
I initially thought that it was a lack of comprehension on your part but I can see now that it was deliberate.
This is what I said in its full and unedited version:
You would need to be out of your mind to believe that someone like Rachel Riley has been the victim of prejudice and racism throughout her life to the same extent as a black woman such as Diane Abbott.
I stick 100% to that comment. And I think it is insulting and offensive to black women such as Diane Abbott to pretend that someone like Rachel Riley has experienced the same level of prejudice and racism.
It's pretty disgraceful imo.
The only person making comparisons on levels of racism and abuse is you. It’s also you who is belittling the racism and abuse that others experience when compared to a black woman. That’s disgraceful.
This whole election campaign so far the entire country has been asking only one question….
”what’s going on with Diane Abbot?”
To be fair, you can't blame her for being dismissive of prejudice suffered by other racial minorities. Her uncle Russ was a terrible anti-ginger, anti-Celtic, English cultural imperialist.
I and everyone I know live in non-Tory safe seats. Should I be doing anything to help?
In the Brexit vote I assumed Remain would be an easy win, so I didn't do or say anything to anyone about the whole thing.
All the projected Tory wins on https://electionmaps.uk/nowcast are a fair distance away from me and I don't have any real connection with them. Seat covering the Tweed Valley is projected to be a Tory win by 5 percentage points, which is a bit irksome as I do spend quite a few weekends a year and money in that and the also Tory neighbouring constituency.
To be fair, you can’t blame her for being dismissive of prejudice suffered by other racial minorities. Her uncle Russ was a terrible anti-ginger, anti-Celtic, English cultural imperialist.
Close the thread, we're done here.
So, Rishi's plan so far is
- Reintroduce National Service
- Alter taxes for pensioners
- Cut university courses to boost apprenticeship
Quick question, does doing an apprenticeship exempt you from National Service, or do you start afterwards, at say 20 years old? Not forgetting you're at school to the age of 18 doing maths.
Until the manifestos appear this is a really dull and incoherent campaign.
Proof - this thread is no different to the Sunak thread.
Labour are in a twist over anything remotely economically logical and the Tories are just being useless.
I'm guessing the Tories manifesto will be done with magnetic letters on a fridge and Labour will be lifting stuff from a 90s Tory garden party conversation.
And why is Ed Davey falling off a SUP?
I mean are we meant to look forward to more bullshit/lies in a suit from Starmer?
And why is Ed Davey falling off a SUP?
For the same reason that Rishi Sunak is failing at playing football.
Some advisor somewhere has arranged a photoshoot to show how Man of the People he is and he's gone along with it.
Ed Davey, action dad figure. Oh no, he's fallen in. Again.
Actually being fair to him, he was there to highlight the serious issues of pollution and water companies dumping sewage, it generated more headlines than Ed Davey going for a scenic paddle around and he also managed a joke that even falling in he still wasn't as wet as Rishi Sunak.
Which was quite funny for a politician.
God that map has my blue till it dies area as only having a predicted .6% majority for the scum.
Looks like I need to go and volunteer
So, Rishi’s plan so far is
Reintroduce National Service
Alter taxes for pensioners
Cut university courses to boost apprenticeship
For an avowed libertarian, he doesn’t sound very… erm… libertarian, does he? More Kim Jong Un than Ayn Rand
I’m half expecting him to announce the new apprenticeships will be used to bolster tractor production figures
I've just read that Labour have confirmed that they will see through the 'dangerous cycling' law which the Tories started.
Are our politicians really this thick?
The only person making comparisons on levels of racism and abuse is you.
Absolutely I am making comparisons with levels of racism, you would be living in a very strange world if you thought all levels of racism were equal.
I used the example of Rachel Riley precisely because she is a white woman, not black like Diane Abbott. The idea that they have both suffered the same level of racism throughout their lives is patently absurd.
I arrived to the UK on a boat at the age of 6 unable to speak any English, do you think I have experienced racism throughout my life? Do you think the fact that I am white and not black has had a bearing on the issue? My father's poor English and extremely strong accent did occasionally draw some abuse, do you think that was comparable with the racist abuse that Diane Abbott has experienced?
I'll remind you that the claim by the Tory Party chief doner that Diane Abbott made him hate all black women and that she should be shot made the news recently. It is pretty offensive to suggest that black people don't suffer more racism than white people.
And that sort of nonsense is likely to alienate black people from the Labour Party, understandably.
First post National Service announced poll.... Has Labour extending their lead to 27points!
https://twitter.com/antoguerrera/status/1795683085943525716?t=cJJ-qC9y6EBMPgobU-rNfw&s=19
So the National Service "bounce" is all Labour's!
More stereotyping of voting intentions by the Gaurdian this morning
My wife is now proper upset as she always thought Waitrose was the supermarket of choice by progressives and liberal thinkers! She's not happy this morning 🙂
Are our politicians really this thick?
That's a rhetorical question right?
Absolutely I am making comparisons with levels of racism, you would be living in a very strange world if you thought all levels of racism were equal.
Since members of the Travelling Community were specifically mentioned, I'd say they experience racism differently to black people and in this specific case applying a hierarchy is not really possible and understandably causes offence.
It may not be immediately obvious that someone is a member of the Travelling Community. However, racism toward the Travelling Community is accepted in a way that racism toward Black people is not.
Pretty much any thread involving the Travelling Community shows this racism is accepted even on a liberal place like STW. That's why the threads get closed straight away (and I'm not sure but I think they completely disappear).
So yes, not all racism is the same but you have to be very careful when you start talking about hierarchies.
First post National Service announced poll…
Seems like the electorate is interested in delivering some kind of 'national service', just not the one Rishi envisaged.
Meanwhile, the LibDems are even more desperate for attention than usual. Chucking yourself into a lake full of sewage intentionally just to get your picture in the papers instead of Nigel.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/videos/cjkkn6pvgppo
Pretty much any thread involving the Travelling Community shows this racism is accepted even on a liberal place like STW.
Yup, definitely. Anti-Romany prejudice is the only form of racism which is widely considered acceptable by the liberal middle-classes, no doubt about it.
Yup, definitely. Anti-Romany prejudice is the only form of racism which is widely considered acceptable by the liberal middle-classes, no doubt about it.
Agree, but it applies to all travellers, not just the Romany subset.
This evenings tory policy plan is to shut down underperforming uni courses & boost apprenticeships
if they did get re-elected,which the won’t, how on earth do they propose doing that?
They're already doing it. The fees universities get from home students are worth 40% less in real terms than they were ten years ago. Starmer has pretty much ruled out increasing grants too. 'Poor performing' courses are easy to identify for potential students due to student outcomes surveying - if low enrolments make a course unviable, then it goes.
40% of UK universities are forecasting an unsustainable loss this year (ending 31st July). And that includes more than a few Russell Group unis.
The Tories do not want a highly educated, mobile workforce with prospects. They want a largely captive, low rights, low paid service class to service them, their families and pensioners.
If I was a recent graduate these days, I'd have ****ed off overseas about a week after graduation.
@matt_outandabout It’s disappointing, but depends whether it’s part of a review of all roads offences or not. Also could do with seeing what their plan for active travel is (LDs have said they will restore ATE’s funding, presume Greens have too) but on past form there’s a worry they’ll focus on the Hard Working Motorist.
Decent (IMO ETC) article by a Conservative writer in the Guardian today:
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/may/29/tory-party?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
touches on the difference between the message and the messenger amongst other topics
Agree, but it applies to all travellers, not just the Romany subset.
New age travellers, for example, can definitely be the victims of prejudice but it isn't racism. There is specific racism against the Romany community, even those who are settled and live in houses.
Everyone has a right to choose their lifestyle, everyone has the right to be different, but it is unhelpful imo to lump all prejudice as racism.
I used the example of Rachel Riley precisely because she is a white woman
Yup. As well as throwing travellers under the bus, you chose a blonde half Jewish woman as your example precisely because her appearance suited your purpose of minimising the racism experienced by Jews in general.
What would you call someone who tried to minimise the racism experienced by black people by using Zendaya as their example?
New age travellers, for example, can definitely be the victims of prejudice but it isn’t racism. There is specific racism against the Romany community, even those who are settled and live in houses.
Yes and it also applies to Irish travellers who are genetically distinct from the rest of the Irish population and legally an ethnic minority in Ireland (North and South I believe). I don't think they have that legal status in UK (apart from NI) where they are grouped together with Roma and others as GRT - Gypsies, Romany and Travellers.
When you become a landowner, travellers become a worry - nothing to do with racism, just glad it's not 1991 right now. Therefore obvious Tory hate targets.
The most ferocious racism I have ever encountered was in Romania just after Ceausescu was deposed, aimed at Roma. After that, Hungary aimed at Romanians, I get the impression they have moved on to other targets. Funnily enough in Erdely/Transylvania did not hear much Romanian - Hungarian stuff even though it was close to war at times.
New age travellers
No one was refereeing to New Age Travellers. But I suspect you knew that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Itinerant_groups_in_Europe
As for the Diane Abbott thing, it seems she had a mutually beneficial agreement with Starmer to have the whip restored and then stand down as an MP
But someone briefed the Times ahead of her announcement, either to humiliate her or to undermine Starmer
It's a sign that something has gone very wrong with the country when a discussion about the general election descends into a weird, Guardian -reader identity politics discrimination point scoring exercise between a TV game show hostess and a far left Labour MP who despite her many many flaws has been returned to the house of commons continually for 37 years
What would you call someone who tried to minimise the racism experienced by black people by using Zendaya as their example?
I'd probably point them to the interview linked below where she said this;
"Unfortunately, I have a bit of a privilege compared to my darker sisters and brothers," she said.
"Can I honestly say that I've had to face the same racism and struggles as a woman with darker skin? No, I cannot."
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/newsbeat-43879480
No one was refereeing to New Age Travellers. But I suspect you knew that.
No I referred to new age travellers, I specifically said that I was using them as an example. You suspect that I knew that?
you chose a blonde half Jewish woman as your example precisely because her appearance suited your purpose of minimising the racism experienced by Jews in general.
I chose a blonde half Jewish woman precisely because it makes my point. You think that I should have chosen an example which doesn't make my point?
a blonde half Jewish woman
With an Irish surname!!!! Her life must be a living hell.
I think it’s probably a measure of how beige and uninspiring it all is, along with the result being pretty much a foregone conclusion.
The press have jumped on the Diane Abbot thing because it makes a change from Sunaks latest gaffe, standing in front of a road sign pointing to Nob End, or something similar
The thing I find it illustrates more than anything is just how parochial and insular London politics is
No I referred to new age travellers, I specifically said that I was using them as an example. You suspect that I knew that?
You seemed to be saying that Romani were the only Travellers entitled to describe the abuse the receive as racism while all the other Travelling Communities are a lifestyle choice that can be grouped in with New Age Travellers.
You are the one who is referring to the term "travelling", which is a lifestyle, not me.
But someone briefed the Times ahead of her announcement, either to humiliate her or to undermine Starmer
More I think about it, makes no sense for starmers team to have negotiated a deal and then blow it up in the middle of a GE
Smacks more of someone just trying to undermine Starmer, whoever briefed the Times will be in trouble if found out!
You are the one who is referring to the term “travelling”, which is a lifestyle, not me.
All these groups are random individuals who decided to pursue the same lifestyle?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Itinerant_groups_in_EuropeI think your comment was specifically made to undermine the legitimacy of these ethnic groups.
Either that or you mis-spoke and instead of acknowledging it you've decided to double down.
There you have it.
All these groups are random individuals who decided to pursue the same lifestyle?
I specifically said that the Romany community suffers racism even when they are settled, it is not necessarily connected to their lifestyle.
I am not sure what point you are trying to make but the point I am making is that prejudice based on racism and prejudice based on lifestyle is not exactly the same thing.
OK, let's try this.
Irish Travellers and New Age Travellers are both groups that have made a lifestyle choice rather than being a distinct ethnic group.
Do you agree or disagree?
"So yes, not all racism is the same but you have to be very careful when you start talking about hierarchies."
I agree 100% with this. Abbott was silly to say what she did in the way that she did, even though there was an underlying truth in it. As for using it as an excuse to end her career, that's shameful. I know she's said a number of silly things but no-one's perfect and she's been an inspirational figure for many years.
The truth is that Abbot has suffered a decline as an individual over many years. She has always been provocative and outspoken and disliked for it - and that is a good quality for a radical politician to have. She has been the subject of awful racist and sexist and every other form of abuse. But now her behaviour is erratic. She should have stepped back as an MP years agoThe problem about the racism minimising letter to the newspaper isn't that it's wrong or insulting to her constituents - it's that she is firing off batshit emails in the middle of the night. She should have stepped back as an MP years ago.
The thing I find it illustrates more than anything is just how parochial and insular London politics is
Yes, but you also draw that conclusion from the number of chocolate chips in your tea break biscuits tbf. Anyway, back to discussing Sunak, Truss, Reeves, Cleverly and various other non-London MPs.
PS if "the provinces" of England voted like London, we wouldn't have had a Tory government for donkeys years. Maybe you lot outside the metropolis could sort your shit out?
It’s a sign that something has gone very wrong with the country when a discussion about the general election descends into a weird, Guardian -reader identity politics discrimination point scoring exercise between a TV game show hostess and a far left Labour MP who despite her many many flaws has been returned to the house of commons continually for 37 years
Your statement leads me to think that you think this place represents 'the country'. Are you high or hysterical?
It certainly sums up STW perfectly.
You are the one who is referring to the term “travelling”, which is a lifestyle, not me.
All itinerant travellers, apart from Roma are just pursuing a 'lifestyle' wow! That makes it sound like the Irish travelling community and others are just #vanlifers doing it for shits and giggles and instagram likes. Their community is centuries old and they are considered a distinct ethnic group.
Irish Travellers … have made a lifestyle choice rather than being a distinct ethnic group.
Traditionally, Irish Travellers are a nomadic group of people from Ireland but have a separate identity, heritage and culture to the community in general. An Irish Traveller presence can be traced back to 12th century Ireland, with migrations to Great Britain in the early 19th century. The Irish Traveller community is categorised as an ethnic minority group under the Race Relations Act, 1976 (amended 2000); the Human Rights Act 1998; and the Equality Act 2010.
https://travellermovement.org.uk/gypsy-roma-and-traveller-history-and-culture
I think you lot are guilty of prejudice. You treat being a Tory MP as some kind of lifestyle choice that should be condemned. But the truth is that many of these people have never known anything else. They're born into it, and whole families are affected - look at the Johnsons. Researchers have actually identified three generations of Tory living in the same estates, like the Churchill. Often they marry within their same insular community - like the Hamiltons or Elphickes. They use jargon that outsiders don't understand. People judge them by their accent and clothes and schools. Some of them go through a libertarian phase in their 20s when they use cocaine ("I'm socially liberal and economically conservative!") but many of them end up falling back into their communities, repeating the cycle with their own children.
I arrived to the UK on a boat at the age of 6 unable to speak any English, do you think I have experienced racism throughout my life?
Honest answer? Yes I do, and I also suspect Diane Abbott has. And probably Rachel Riley too.
Now as a 6 foot rugby playing university educated middle class white male Scot arriving in Yorkshire in 1992, do you think I experienced a bit of racism?
Of course I did, though I’m willing to bet not as often as Diane Abbott. Still doesn’t make what I experienced right
And not just me. Carrying my three year old home from nursery about 10 years ago when he had a Saltire on one cheek and a George Cross on the other (my wife is English) some folk start shouting abuse at him. Not at me. At a three year old. (For amusement I literally turned the other cheek which actually shut them up very fast.)
Most folk everywhere are lovely, there’s gits everywhere too.
All racism is wrong, not just big racism.
Born and brought up in deep Tory, family party members, social fabric of village is The Party, Party coach trip highlight of the Summer. There were these dodgy liberal types often from Chapel families, they were tolerated.
Ironically I rejected it all after a stint in a boarding school. Was lucky to meet some of the bus tour lot after 40 years and tell them that I had never voted for their damn party and never will.
Minds of our own.
no true gipsy fallacy
The travellers ( sorry I presume they are travellers they could be the caravan club) have moved onto the football pitch behind our house.
I'm sure they will pick up all their rubbish and restore the pitch so that the school can have their sports day.
They might even provide some prizes.
@pictonroad what's interesting to me, is that he's saying that more realism is needed, which is exactly what Starmer and his team are being criticised for?
'Race' is a social construction, not a term used by anthropologists. Race and racism are variously employed when it suits and we have examples of 'race' being synonymous with lifestyle, religion, consanguineous parentage, nationality, skin colour etc. However, if we look at where different groups are more likely to find themselves in the class system then it does lend evidence to the idea of a hierarchy of racism.
The travellers ( sorry I presume they are travellers they could be the caravan club) have moved onto the football pitch behind our house.
I’m sure they will pick up all their rubbish and restore the pitch so that the school can have their sports day.
They might even provide some prizes.
Just to keep this vaguely on topic, who is in charge of your local council as they are the ones who are required to provide adequate stopping places for Travelling communities?
I can't see many Tory run councils (or, for that matter, many Labour run ones) putting too much effort into fulfilling their obligations to ensure there is as little friction between Travelling communities and the local community as possible.
She should have stepped back as an MP years ago
Years ago? She is massively popular with the people that she represents in Parliament.
75% of them voted for her in 2017.
"Just to keep this vaguely on topic, who is in charge of your local council as they are the ones who are required to provide adequate stopping places for Travelling communities?"
The council is run by a residents association.
As a motorcyclist in the 80s I probably wouldn't be allowed in a pub.
So us nasty bikers would do you runs for hospitals and show that we were nice people.
If the travellers cleared up after themselves and maybe tried to better their reputation I'm sure they wouldn't have such a bad rep.
The council is run by a residents association.
And has the residents association fulfilled it's obligation to provide stopping places?
If the travellers cleared up after themselves and maybe tried to better their reputation I’m sure they wouldn’t have such a bad rep.
And the thread sets off in the predicted direction...
BBC Headline
Diane Abbott says she's been barred from standing as Labour MP at election
But in the article it says:
In a post on X, Ms Abbott said she was "delighted" to have been readmitted to the parliamentary party.
"I will be campaigning for a Labour victory," she said.
"But I am very dismayed that numerous reports suggest I have been barred as a candidate."
"Numerous reports suggesting" is not the same as "I have been barred".