[Closed] The European experiment is over.

wait a minute. wasn't the houses of parliament designed by one charles barry. and wasn't he aided by augustus pugin?

pugin? that doesn't sound very english. becaue it isn't. so the houses of parliament were designed as a sort anglo french immigrant project?

Scotland is a net contributor to the UK.

is that an ongoing year by year thing? or an average over the last 5-10 years or so?

a bit of Whiskey

Binners why the anti Scottish nationalist vibe when it the view of an Englishman in Scotland ?

[img] ?v=0[/img]
To be fair, Elf. This is your Parliament, you being a Londoner, not exactly pretty, the only English region with a regional assembly. Not that most of the rest of us were offered a choice, the North East had a referendum in 2004 and said a big fat no and the idea was quickly dropped for everyone else. England generally doesn't recognise the European definition of the regions as very useful.
[img] [/img]
I for one would rather the regional governments be scrapped or full independence given, rather than have postcode lotteries on services and provision.

Tower Hamlets is a borough within a city, Scotland is a country. Why are you comparing the two ?

Because TJ was trying to make the point of 'if we haven't voted for them, why should they influence our lives' kind of thing. I thought it was a fair comparison. Tower Hamlets has been quite staunchly Labour for decades, yet we still have to suffer Tory Policy. So if Scotland wants independence, then so do I.

Actually it is a very fair comparison; Tower Hamlets is the home of Canary Wharf, which is an area where billions of pounds are generated every day. If Tower Hamlets did actually become an independent nation, and the money generated spread out amongst it's population, it would be one of the wealthiest nations on Earth. As it is, it's actually one of the most deprived boroughs in the UK, and if you consider the number of very high earners who now live here, that statistic becomes all the more staggering.

And btw, the Houses of Parliament were built 3 times over budget, and completion date was over run by 20 years. Plus the geezer who designed them was influenced by European architecture.

Doesn't matter. Better.

The thatcher " economic revolution" was funded by scottish oil. She wasted all the money on paying people not to work

Michael Foot put it more poetically by describing it as : "[i]pouring North Sea oil down the gutters of unemployment[/i]"

Binners why the anti Scottish nationalist vibe when it the view of an Englishman in Scotland ?

I just find the selective memories of imbeciles like Alex Salmond incredibly offensive and short-sited. They live in ****ing la-la land.

If Scotland had had independence, then they would have been left holding the baby for RBS during the Banking crisis.

And if that had been the case then right now, you'd be making Ireland look like Switzerland

pugin? that doesn't sound very english. becaue it isn't. so the houses of parliament were designed as a sort anglo french immigrant project?

My name is Persian/Bangladeshi. I'm English. AWN Pugin was a Londoner born and bred, same as me.

Your point was?

To be fair, Elf. This is your Parliament, you being a Londoner, not exactly pretty

No it's actually really quite nice. I like it. I'm a Londoner so my opinion trumps yours. 🙂

Tails; you like that one, innit? 😉

The ignorant anti Scottish rantings on here do make me laugh.

Why are you so scared by the prospect of a sovereign nation having self rule?

Th same folk that are anti european union are pro Uk union. A very logical position I must say. 🙄

Why are you so scared by the prospect of a sovereign nation having self rule?

You are more than welcome to it.

I notice you avoid actually providing any answers to the above comments though TJ.

Is it cos we is all, like.... anti-Scottish innit?

not sure what you question is binners but you seem a touch hysterical on this issue
You find him offensive but say he lives in swearword ga ga land - I am sure he admires the respect you show him as the elected leader of the largest party in Scotland
Re RBS who really knows I am not sure they are "scottish" apart from name but yes it would have been a problem thanks god it has not affected the Uk at all - what did you say re the tory and never had it so good last week?

Shouldn't the Regional map of Northern England been Proper North (Cumberland, Westmoorland, Northumberland and Durham) (They have a lot more incommon) then North midlands Lancashire, and Yorkshire?

Why are you so scared by the prospect of a sovereign nation having self rule?

It's nothing of the sort.

I would suggest its more in response to the kind of petulant whining of a well provided for but ultimately ungrateful little child that's stamping its feet and threatening to run away from home...

good point sod Cumbria who wants it anyway

Good point stoner when you view them like that why would they not want to stay in a union with you - cut them free then teach them a lesson??
Bet this was said about the colonies at the time they wanted freedom eh jumped up little upstarts after all we have done for them etc
Show some respect people?

The real answers are obvious. I can't be bothered with arguing with little Englander rantings. Its pointless.

For example if Scotland had been independent would the RBS have been working under the same regulatory regime and have got into so much trouble? YOur point is a total non point.

It makes me so mad, as its Andy Marry syndrome in reverse.

When he win's he's British, when he olses he's Scottish

RBS were always held up as a 'Scottish' success story. The truth of the matter is that they gt a very British bail out.

If they had been as Scottish as claimed and based in the capital of an independent state then no amount of oil or gas would be getting the Scots out of that particular hole

I was in my English, British, mother of all parliaments 2 weeks ago. Man, that place is PIMPED inside!

if Scotland had been independent would the RBS have been working under the same regulatory regime and have got into so much trouble?

well.... they (Salmond et al) were holding Icelands low-Tax 'miracle' up as a shining example. So I reckon we can assume, given their approach to banking regulation, that the whole mess would be considerably worse

For an economist TJ, you don't seem to pick up on the obvious

Why are you so scared by the prospect of a sovereign nation having self rule?

Scotland's not a Sovereign Nation.

In order to do so, Scotland would have to first declare independence (I assume some sort of referendum would be needed here), then appoint a Head of State. Then , it'd need it's own currency and all that. All sorts of political stuff.

One of the biggest problems would be how to sort out it's military. I mean, that's all been funded by British taxpayers, and I can't see the Queen letting Scotland have any troops and weapons and that. There's the delicate matter of nuclear weapons to be considered.

Cheeze, have you actually sat down and considered what a monumentally huge task it would be? And the years, perhaps even decades, of economic instability? Not to mention rival factions within Scotland itself jostling for power. What about the roles of the Churches?

See, it's all very well to bang on about independence, but Scotland has benefitted from being part of the UK. Now that there's a bit of money in oil, some people want to push all that history aside, just to enjoy the fleeting benefits of a finite supply of natural resources.

In short, Scotland would be buggered.

Best leave things as they are, eh?

Binners - brilliant - you know what the theoretical independent Scotlands policy on banking regulation would be? you are a genius.

Elf - its nothing to do with money and never has been - its a bout self determination.

TJ - I'm not guessing. Its on the record. The countries they sought to emulate - Ireland and Iceland specifically - supported the idea of LESS banking regulation and less corporation tax. This was they're economic model.

And look where it got them. There but for the grace of god......

Elf - its nothing to do with money and never has been - its a bout self determination.

Ha ha! 😆

That's one of the funniest, if not [i]the[/i] funniest, things you've ever posted on here!

'Nothing to do with money'; no 'course it's not! 😆

The funniest thing would be watching them trying to make that stupid "Scots" language (i.e. English as spoken by drunken rednecks) the offeeshil language of guvvermint.

Really? An independent Scotland would have had less banking regulation? fascinating. You are so prescient. Can you do farsight as well?

So where do you get this info about the banking regulation from? Or are you merely guessing?

its a bout self determination.

You've always been short of a bit of determination TJ. I'm seeing your point now 🙂

Living in boring conformist Scandinavia I can just say think yourselves lucky for living in the diverse, beautiful, chaotic and interesting place that the UK and British Isles are. Its a little more "soporific" living here but after travelling for 4 hours on the train from Lund to Stockholm I can say once you have seen one tree you have seen the all.

TJ is one of those proud little Englanders defending his patch. Even if it is in another part of the land. They have the same kind here in Skåne (maybe a bit more rightwing though) and with the distance of being a foreigner in another country you think WTF do they want to do that (independance for a tiddly bit of land only to get trampled by the likes of Germany)? And then you realise the main reason seems to be that some power crazed politician will get their hard on from being in charge how ever meaningless that power is.

TJ - this is from Alex Salmonds speech "Shaping Scotland future' delivered in 2008. Shortly before there was, how shall we say.... a bit of an inciednt with the economy

"Scotland looks out to an Arc of Prosperity around us. Ireland, Iceland, Norway, Finland and Denmark. All small independent nations. All stable, secure and prosperous.

Of all these nations, no example is more impressive and inspiring than Ireland. And none is more relevant to the decisions that Scotland faces today.

So I have come to Dublin to set out our aspirations for Scotland's future - how we will create a Celtic Lion economy to match the Celtic Tiger on this side of the Irish Sea.

Full transcript here:

http://www.scotland.gov.uk/News/This-Week/Speeches/First-Minister/dublin

I couldn't tell you, in all honesty, whether he still holds these views. Perhaps you should ask him

http://www.snp.org/node/10359

Scotland can change to a better future and be part of northern Europe's arc of prosperity. We have three countries Ireland to our west, Iceland to our north and Norway to our east - all in the top six wealthiest countries in the world. In contrast devolved Scotland is in 18th place. We can join that arc of prosperity.

"But, with independence, and matching the success of Europe's small, powerhouse economies, Scots can, within a decade, enjoy greater wealth - worth £4000 for every man, woman and child in our country.

"I find it appalling that London Labour claims Scotland is uniquely unable to prosper with independence, especially as Ireland, Iceland and Norway all claimed their independence in the 20th century.

[u]"With the right pro-Scottish business policies lower tax, support for innovators and improvements to our national infrastructure[/u] and a real Scottish government, we have the potential to deliver for Scotland the same success now being enjoyed by our nearest neighbours. If they can do it, so can we."

I think we know what that particularly petulant child meant, dont you?

elf why so funny? Freedom is what the independent people/parties - what ha smoney got to do with this ?
Stoner why ,despite your contempt for the small child, do you feel the need to decide what it does?
Attitudes like this tend to enforce the view that English people are generally dismissive of the Scottish people. This tends to make them angry/annoyed and more likely to leave the union . You do your cause a dis service with your petty insults.

elf why so funny?

Because TJ's been banging on about 'Scottish' Oil for the last couple of hours, then says Scottish independence has 'nothing to do with money'. Yeah, right. 😆

Anyway, I'm bored now. Does anyone want to share ideas about Parliamentary buildings around the World?

Always thought Brazil's Congresso Nacional in Brasilia was utterly unique and really quite stunning:

[img] [/img]

Of course you can rely on the Italians to have something impressive:

[img] [/img]

This one in Budapest is stunning:

[img] [/img]

And from the huge to the really quite small, but no less significant to it's people, the Solomon Islands:

[img] [/img]

More pics of yer faves, please!

Interesting reading an irish paper last weekend and seeing the genuine sense of shame they have now, at losing their soverignty.

As one said, "sovereignty is like an old clock whose ticking you only notice when it is absent".

You do your cause a dis service with your petty insults.

And wasn't Stoner's good buddy Georgie Porgie over there a few years back singing Ireland's praises too? I'm sure there's a long list of eejits who have been to Dublin and lauded Fianna Fáil's policies who are being pilloried for it now. It's old news.

losing their soverignty

Oh FFS, you sound like my mother. They haven't lost their sovereignty, they just have to do what bigger fish tell them to do with their money for a while. The tricolour hasn't been lowered from the Dáil yet.

TandemJeremy - Member
You still keep peddling this canard. The flow of money is the other way. Scottish money supports England. This is a fact.

The south east are the subsidy junkies sucking money out of the rest of the UK, Scotland is a net contributor to the UK.

So this is not correct then? (click for bigger) Just a question, not trolling.

[url= http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2512/4127096187_f0dd3c993c_o_d.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2512/4127096187_f0dd3c993c_o_d.jp g"/> [/img][/url]

Sorry but what a load of rubbish everybody from euro-sceptics to the likes of the SNP speak. The real "organisations" that are controlling your lives are not the European parliament or Brussels or Westminster but the big corporations. Just look at the Tesco thread for how "Democracy" works. Money talks.

losing their soverignty

Oh FFS, you sound like my mother

Well she was right, you shouldnt sleep with girls of easy virtue!

elfin, my point being that the houses of parliament being that quintessentially english building for the teeny tiny englanders when really it isn't and has that whole mish mash of influence going on in it.

and geda, less diverse than say malmo? or my family for that matter who are all argentinian/chilean/korean/english/french/swedish and some sort of middle eastern that i haven't quite figured out. kind of the worst sort of immigrants from a sweden democrat perspective.

Oh FFS, you sound like my mother. They haven't lost their sovereignty, they just have to do what bigger fish tell them to do with their money for a while. The tricolour hasn't been lowered from the Dáil yet.

Just quoting what I read, don't get upset poppet.

A basic measure of sovereignty is being able to set your own taxes and spending is it not? Perhaps we would be more sensitive to it's existence if we were in the same position.

Swiss01 the whole point of Sweden in sameness surely?

Jantes Law..

The ten rules state:

1. Don't think you're anything special.
2. Don't think you're as much as us.
3. Don't think you're wiser than us.
4. Don't convince yourself that you're better than us.
5. Don't think you know more than us.
6. Don't think you are more than us.
7. Don't think you are good at anything.
8. Don't laugh at us.
9. Don't think anyone cares about you.
10. Don't think you can teach us anything.

An eleventh rule recognized in the novel is:

11. Don't think there's anything we don't know about you

Yankee law:
[i]The taxi drives near "L'arc de Triomphe":

Texan : "What is that ?"
Taxi Driver: "It is our triumphal arch"
Texan: "How long did it take to build it ?"
Taxi Driver: "It should have took five years"
Texan: "Heh, in my country it takes 3 days"

The taxi drives near "Notre Dame":

Texan: "What is that ?"
Taxi Driver: "It is our church, Notre Dame"
Texan: "How long did it take to build it ?"
Taxi Driver: "Hooo, near 40 years."
Texan: "Heh, in my country it takes 6 days"

Now the taxi driver starts to be a little bit nervous.
It is now driving near "La Tour Eiffel":

Texan: "What is that ?"
Taxi Driver: "What ? I do not know, it was not there this morning"[/i]

This is my favourite Fred

[img] [/img]

Very relevant to this thread. Built as an alternative seat of government. It was from when us northerners were getting uppity about not having the influence our wealth-generation merited. Sound familiar?

It was however built by contributions from local businessmen, instead of the taxpayers money from a neighboring country you claim to despise 😉

elfin, my point being that the houses of parliament being that quintessentially english building for the teeny tiny englanders when really it isn't and has that whole mish mash of influence going on in it.

What on Earth are you talking about? 🙄

Sorry, you've lost me.

Meanwhile....

The Stortinget Norwegian Parliament in Oslo:

[img] [/img]

Great Hall in the Palace of Westminster:

[img] [/img]

Bangladesh Parliament, Dacca:

[img] [/img]

I'm not getting upset but all this bollocks of losing sovereignty is bollocks and hysterics. Don't blame me for pointing out when you and other gullible eejits fall for it...poppet 🙂 It's Irish media hyperbole designed to whip up the public and destabilise the government.

Stoner's latter point is far more pertinent 😀

That's a town hall Binners, so not relevant on this thread I'm afraid. 🙁

It's not bad, but I'm afraid Bradford's is better. Sorry.

[img] [/img]

[img] [/img]

World famous crescent etc