[Closed] Private Education - Worth the money?

If you can afford it I'd say yes, bit of a no brainier really. Maybe thats not how it should be bit it is.

I hate to mention the middle class option but, moving house isn't an option?

I'm state educated and a state school teacher

I think the Private sector generally gets less problems from other students

But the actual quality of teaching is just as variable as the state sector, if not more so

The type of schools is also more variable

So my non answer isn't "is private school worth it" but "is this school worth it". But you probably new that

Not all state schools are equal. Not all private schools are equal.

Educate him properly - spend the money on tutors and travel.

Private schools just have better PR systems to explain away their flaws.

Wrong thread oops...

My boys are dyslexic. My eldest is profoundly so.

The state system labelled him as thick and having a poor attitude. So we ended up moving him to the independent sector. He's flourished and is now realising his fantastic potential. He's streaking ahead and has won a scholarship for September. He would have sunk in the state sector if we'd kept him there any longer.

However it's come at a price. It's really put huge financial pressure on us.
The youngest would benefit too as he'd had issues since the state system just doesn't get dyslexia whatsoever although he is at a good primary. Not sure how secondary will work out in September but hopefully he could get a scholarship at the local independent.

If your kids are mainstream and the local state schools are good then thats great. Anything needing more then you're on your own. You don't even get a tax rebate.

some of the stories about our local private school - er, in Moray - are shocking, w.r.t. the like of support for learning, dyslexia and so on. And the extras are charged for on top of already high fees. Nevertheless there is a stream of folk sending their kids there, from here (not boarding, day only). I'm not convinced but then myself, and many / most of my peers were state educated and fine with it..

Yes, how much does move of location cost? if it gets really bad surely school will implode anyway?

Private if you can afford it, although the ones I have known are some of the top privates - so I can't comment on the smaller places.

The main difference is in the attitude of the kids towards learning, teachers and each other.

+1 ampthill.

I was partly educated in the private sector, and IMHO, it wasn't the teacher's performance that made the difference overall, it was the engagement in everything by the pupil and parents- both of which tend to be higher in the private sector. The quality of teaching was as variable as the state sector was: after all, the private sector doesn't pay any more, and they're human beings too.

I'd get a copy of his standard text books, spend a few hours per week making sure he's getting the gist of what he needs to know, keep an eye on weak areas, and boost them through tutors if needed. Much cheaper, you'll stay close to your kids, and it will stretch your brain.

Well if you go private I guess you get to chose the school that suits your child. Sometimes with state you get what you get. Moving might not be an option if one sibling is at a critical period of schooling. Indeed moving can cost a few years of fees anyhow.

If you have a decent state school that suits your child then that's the golden solution imho. Sadly that hasn't been our case.

[i]It would be a stretch financially, but just affordable if we gave up expensive holidays and a few other luxuries.[/i]

Not really a stretch then, if it's just luxuries you're giving up.

My son was educated privately from 4 thru 14 (we moved to Scotland, and the only option where we live was boarding, and we didn't want that).

It doesn't really get expensive until they're in middle/senior school.

My son will never set the world alight academically, but unlike his friends he is actually able to hold an intelligent conversation - so yes, we think it was worth it... 🙂

We had the cash (good earnings), but as we didn't move to the bigger house nor get the flash cars that others we know did, we could happily afford it.

Unfortunately moving house isn't an option - need to stay near elderly parents.
The School will eventually implode, but he's only got another 2 years there and schools take time to turn around.

mikertroid - Member
My boys are dyslexic. My eldest is profoundly so.

The state system labelled him as thick and having a poor attitude. So we ended up moving him to the independent sector. He's flourished and is now realising his fantastic potential. He's streaking ahead and has won a scholarship for September. He would have sunk in the state sector if we'd kept him there any longer.

However it's come at a price. It's really put huge financial pressure on us.
The youngest would benefit too as he'd had issues since the state system just doesn't get dyslexia whatsoever although he is at a good primary. Not sure how secondary will work out in September but hopefully he could get a scholarship at the local independent.

I'm amazed that is still happening support for dyslexia sounds really good from all the schools my partner has taught at. It is also very saddening as this is exactly what happened to me and I only just learnt my alphabet by 9-10 due to my mum pulling me out of school and teaching me herself then going to a private school (late 80s). This is after a illiterate grandfather and fairly limited literacy father have been through the same system. Affected my confidence a lot. I don't think the private school I went to was academically very good but it was good at helping severely dyslexic people like me. Killed my parents financially. I still got in quite bit of trouble, I think I would have been expelled in a normal school without any help though... I hated the snobbery that existed amongst some children and parents. Hope your kid do well.

If I'd lived 10 mile down the road it would have been fine as the next state school was fine. Not every one can move, either due to financial reason or job. For instance my parents were renting a farm, so you can't just move!

I still think state is best if you have a good one near by.

Private schools are only available to parents who have the ability to pay, are your jobs guaranteed for the school life if not are scholarships, grants etc available.

Will your kid be acceptable to the school, they do pick and choose so as not to upset or delay the more educated kids in school.

Is your kid clever enough topass the entry exams if they have any.

Make a formal complaint to board of gouvenors and the eduction authoity or wait till june when all schools will become private schools if cameroooon gets back in, but highly unlikely .

I hate to mention the middle class option but, moving house isn't an option?

I think the Private sector generally gets less problems from other students

But the actual quality of teaching is just as variable as the state sector, if not more so

The type of schools is also more variable

So my non answer isn't "is private school worth it" but "is this school worth it".

This. There are poor independent schools, particularly in the primary sector, so check out as much as possible.
My mother was the headteacher of a very successful large state primary school. Some of the privately educated children who came to her school were up to a year behind by the age of 7 in some developmental areas, others were similarly advanced. What makes the difference is the quality of the teacher. I am sure I saw a study that suggested it is better to be in a 'poor' school with an excellent teacher, than an 'excellent' school with a poor teacher in charge of your child. So investigate as much as possible.

If the kid is not at least average, then yes he will benefit.

If he is naturally not so smart then no matter how much you spend, he will still be crap.

I know plenty of private school students now grown up, some bright and successful while others genetically a little slow working in low end jobs.

I think he would pass an entrance exam, he is a pretty bright kid.
In fact one of our major complaints about his current school is how they treat more able kids - they cancelled the "gifted and talented" scheme and also stopped all streaming - all kids are taught together, regardless of ability. He just isn't being stretched, and it isn't helped by having different supply teachers all the time.

??

If the kid is not at least average, then yes he will benefit.

If he is naturally not so smart then no matter how much you spend, he will still be cra

Did they not teach you how to use the reflexive pronoun at Elgin kCal 🙂

I hate to mention the middle class option but, moving house isn't an option?

I'm state educated and a state school teacher

I think the Private sector generally gets less problems from other students

But the actual quality of teaching is just as variable as the state sector, if not more so

The type of schools is also more variable

So my non answer isn't "is private school worth it" but "is this school worth it". But you probably new that

I'm going to guess that it's not English you teach?

I think he would pass an entrance exam, he is a pretty bright kid.
In fact one of our major complaints about his current school is how they treat more able kids - they cancelled the "gifted and talented" scheme and also stopped all streaming - all kids are taught together, regardless of ability. He just isn't being stretched, and it isn't helped by having different supply teachers all the time.

It would be worth your while looking into the options for private education.

@TheBrick

It's like some schools are in the 19th century. The eldest was berated for writing left handed only a few years ago.
So my left handed son writes with his right hand. Great for a dyslexic!!!

I'm going to guess that it's not English you teach?

LOL

No a dyslexic physics teachers

Between me and 20 very bright 17 year olds I generally get there with the spelling and grammar

Perhaps something a little different to consider. I'm extremely grateful to have gone to boarding school on a scholarship. I certainly feel it was a good education and I really enjoyed myself and got very good grades etc. But it took me a long time to adjust to 'civilian' life after the public school bubble. Orwell puts it much better than I could but essentially I came out with views on normal people which a am so terribly ashamed to have had. I would say it took about 5 years of working in 'working-class' jobs and making friends with normal people from low socioeconomic backgrounds while at uni to really overcome the deep rooted upper-class sentiments that I had instilled in me. I even used to be so embarrassed about sounding posh that I put-on a local accent in an attempt to fit in.

So now I feel in some ways I've benefited from living both ends of the spectrum, I know intimitely how both ends live, see the other, their problems etc, and I can act myself around everyone. I work with a couple of single/drug-using-parent kids from the poorest areas on my city and it pains me to know that they are almost doomed to repeat the cycle of their parents but I do what I can to help raise their aspirations and reading etc. but I feel a little guilty at my privilege
A part of me feels somewhat marrooned in the middle. Not actually having come from a landowning family (far from it) so not actually part of the elite but also seen by most people I know as 'their posh friend' as if I don't have my own people.

Sorry that rambled a little bit like therapy but just bear in mind that it's not just education that kids receive in public/private school.

Orwell's thoughts on it here http://www.telelib.com/authors/O/OrwellGeorge/prose/RoadToWiganPier/wiganpierpart_9.html

So my left handed son writes with his right hand. Great for a dyslexic!!!

That is unbelievable! True face palm! I'd be reporting that.

project - Member
Private schools are only available to parents who have the ability to pay, are your jobs guaranteed for the school life if not are scholarships, grants etc available.

Any advice gratefully received!

Not wishing to appear callous, I would put my childs education/future before elderly parents, I would expect my parents to understand.

All the best with whatever decision you do make.

@TheBrick

We just removed him and concentrated on rebuilding his confidence. The teacher in question was retiring soon thank God, so she had limited ability to ruin any more kids educational chances. However the Head was as bad. No point in battling that one as we were being labelled as Middle class whingers with a thick child.

cheekyboy - Member
Not wishing to appear callous, I would put my childs education/future before elderly parents, I would expect my parents to understand.

No offence taken, it's a fair point.
There are other, more selfish, reasons for not moving - we love the house and village we live in and our jobs mean moving is not that simple.

I'm privately/grammar educated and I'm on here.

Make of that wat u will 🙂

Less flippantly, on an issue I've reflected on many a time, the impact of good parents had more influence on who I am, rather than my schooling.

bikemike1968 - Member

I think he would pass an entrance exam, he is a pretty bright kid.
In fact one of our major complaints about his current school is how they treat more able kids - they cancelled the "gifted and talented" scheme and also stopped all streaming - all kids are taught together, regardless of ability. He just isn't being stretched, and it isn't helped by having different supply teachers all the time.

The alternative is to get private tutor(s) that come to your house to teach the kids few times a week for few hours.

Might work out cheaper so long as the kid is not too tired.

🙂

If you're relying on teachers to stretch a 9 year old, then you're probably not best placed to assess his chances in an entrance exam. Know what I'm saying Mike?

I'm guessing this isn't a compliment 😀

Our motives are these - We only have one kid and we want to set him up for life to the best of our ability. We consider a good education to be essential for this. He is a bright kid (if he wasn't, I'd encourage him to learn a trade) and his current school is failing him, with no reasonable free alternative. We can afford (just) to get him to a private school where he might better be able to reach his potential. Is that such a bad thing?

Go for it. We didn't regret it. It was hard financially but worth it. Of course, we'll never know how he would have done at a state school.

We consider a good education to be essential for this. He is a bright kid (if he wasn't, I'd encourage him to learn a trade)

GOT TO BE THE MOST PATHETIC POINTLESS ANSWER EVER POSTED, us tradesmen have done a 4 year or longer apprenticeship, studied at college, and gained further educational skills,along with trade skills,etc.

Generally yes - a brilliant investment in theory - but has to correct for YOUR child. It's a personal choice not anyone else's

20-30% of pupils are on some form of financial assistance - so not as out of reach as some like to pretend.

Our motives are these - We only have one kid and we want to set him up for life to the best of our ability. We consider a good education to be essential for this. He is a bright kid (if he wasn't, I'd encourage him to learn a trade) and his current school is failing him, with no reasonable free alternative. We can afford (just) to get him to a private school where he might better be able to reach his potential. Is that such a bad thing?

GOT TO BE THE MOST PATHETIC POINTLESS ANSWER EVER POSTED, us tradesmen have done a 4 year or longer apprenticeship, studied at college, and gained further educational skills,along with trade skills,etc.

No need to shout. I'm a mechanic myself and don't see "being on the tools" as a bad career choice .I'm not trying to put down anybody else's job. But I do think that a better education will give him more choices as to what career he has.

Private education may or may not improve your childs education. I say dont do it. There are good and not so good state schools. Also dont be fooled into thinking that just because your childs school is currently having problems it means your childs educational progress is harmed for good. learning doea not work that way it is very non linear. If you feel there are gaps in your childs education you are the parent fill them in yourself or use tutors but the quality of tutors varies too. I say as a parent and a former teacher. In fact i worked in what was deamed a failing school (and it was) but many students still did well, oddly enough it was those students who took an interest in theirs education. This shows the power of parental influence.

As parents we do worry alot about our childs education but remember your education at school is just one part of your childs education and education is more to with building self confidence than facts. Confident people suceed in what they do. Good grades do not lead to confidence and like wise confidence does not lead to good grades. Good schools build self confidence everything else is actually secondary contary to popular and goverment opinion. State schools can acheive this, even the school i worked in did this so can private schools. Like wose both types of schools can fail at this important task miserably.

My two penneth.
I was apparently a clever child, I went to a primary of 32 kids, total from year 1 to 6. 4 kids in my total year group. I was ahead of most but not all when moving to big school.
I did well, I did chemistry at uni, I'm now a builder.
My kids,x2, good primary, eldest now in year 8, big school Mrs ws didn't want her to attend due to no uniform and calling teachers by first name. She's flying, top 5 in her year in maths and science however her English is bobbins. Laddo year 5, incredible grasp of written English and ability to spell, however three years ago was writing backwards from right to left across the page, to the point where we wondered if he was right.
My point, which as usual I'm sure no one will read on here is kids are kids, they will achieve as much as they want to and as much time as you invest in them to help.
Friendships count for a lot so think wisely before removing them from the current environment they enjoy.

I would say if you can't move to get him into the best state school then think about it carefully. The fees are only a part of the cost. School teams and trips etc will add a massive lump to this. If we had not got our son into the two best state Schools in Durham (in my biased opinion) I would have put him in a private school and moved into the catchment area and waited for a place. We were very lucky. You don't have to settle for the local comprehensive any more. Both schools that our son attended were not in his catchment area but they had places and we drove him there and picked him up. It's a pain but it's the best thing we've ever done.

the 'big' private school up this way - St Bees - has just announced they are closing in August due to financial pressure (presume low intake again next year).
Rowan Atkinson is an old boy.

Private education is a very broad term, taking in a whole variety of educational institutions and experiences. At best the advice will be anecdotal and too individual to get a general view.

For me, it was great. For my sister it was a disaster.

TBH it was more to do with the specific institutions, rather than whether private education is better or worse than the state sector. The same is as true of the state sector: Mrs North is one of 10 from her state school year of 80 kids to end up with a PhD.

My main advice is this: the differential is money. Ask a very direct question on what happens to your son if you can't pay. You don't want to bugger up his education because he has to be hoiked out if you can't civer the fees.

Oh and I speak as someone educated privately and who has a child in state education. I ended up in the private sector for similar reasons: class size of over 40, slipping teaching standards as a result, etc.

I will be keeping a close eye on how my daughter progresses - private is an option if I think it's the right thing for her.

But I don't earn megabucks, so wouldn't want to make a one way mistake....

As a state-educated teacher in a state school whose kids are going to a state school, I think all kids should go to a good state school. But I would, wouldn't I?

I had a great state education as did the other half... Moved to the countryside from inner city Manchester partly for better schools.

Ended up sending my daughter here... http://www.knutsfordguardian.co.uk/news/11065114.display/ which was a massive mistake

Tried for two years to make up the difference with Kumon which was good but not a rounded education and it's a lot of work!

By the time we decided "enough is enough" everyone else had taken any spare places nearby... So we now have to pay for private education. Spent 3 months absolutely ****ing fuming with the shit teachers who had hidden in a rural school to take the piss and got sacked on a full pension... But it all worked out in the end. She's very happy and the school is great.

My biggest advice is "do what you think is right. Ignore anyone else. Don't beat yourself up about the choices"

20-30% of pupils are on some form of financial assistance - so not as out of reach as some like to pretend.

My own personal politics mean I could never choose it and turned it down form myself on a full scholarship.
Generally , as money matters in a capitalist society, it gives a better outcome, if it did not no one would pay for it. Its still not the right fit for everyone.

Move

Things to bear in mind, unless it has changed in recent years.

Teachers at private schools don't necessarily have to be qualified teachers, this applied to secondary, not sure about primary.

You could get a superbly intelligent physicist teaching physics, with no teaching qualifications, which doesn't mean much until kids with more specific learning needs come along.

Different private schools have different outlooks on discipline as well. If the Sheikhs 6 kids are being ****s in classes, but he is going to send another half ddozen to the school, you don't kick them out or rock the boat.

Other private schools are very strict and do wonderful things.

I currently have two students leaving us in June to head to the UK for IGCSE at a school which is costing their dad 36kGBP per year each boarding plus all the extras - but the results for that school is hugely impressive. 100% a*-c IGCSE 97%A/A* 91%A*

As someone who has worked in both camps there is no perfect answer. There are fantastic state schools, just as there are less than satisfactory privates. And it's always worth remembering that not all private schools are equal...
What I will say is that some of the opportunities that arise from a private education just are not there from a state education ( and whether that is right or wrong is a debate for another day), but any opportunity has to be taken by the pupils, so support at home is still as essential.
If you are seriously considering the private option I'd recommend visiting as many as possible, listen to the children / staff taking the tours, and picture your children there, not yourself. There are so many facets to school life it's hard to make the right choice, and the financial aspect for the parent is just one of them.
It's a huge commitment and investment for both parent and child, but the potential for the children can be huge.

A

s a state-educated teacher in a state school whose kids are going to a state school, I think all kids should go to a good state school. But I would, wouldn't I?

So do I but I wouldnt criticise anyone for making a decision that is best for their child. To answer the op is it worth it well the stats say yes an emphatic yes. Privately educated people earn more even if they have the same degree as a state educated kid.

Teachers as state schools dont need to be qualified now either Quirrel.

In my humble opinion state education is currently an underfunded, beurocratic mess of epic proportions with the emphasis on testing testing testing and not learning and its getting worse.

A huge amount depends on the alternative. If you've got a good state school (maybe grammar school) locally, then that's a no-brainer. If you have some sink comprehensive, going private may be the best long-term investment you can make in your child's future. I've seen both cases.

Some of the weakest teachers I ever worked with went off and found jobs in private schools. I suppose they might have done better there. The local HMC boarding school to me bends over backwards for students with any sort of learning difficulty, psychological testing, extra times in exams, asking for exam papers to be remarked, and the kids do well. I'm not quite so sure how well they'd cope without all that support.
Most parents justify sending their kids to these places because they're too slow, too average, too bright to have their needs catered for. I taught in state schools in working class areas which managed to produce kids who went on to be professionals, academics, lawyers, medics and one girl I taught went on to be an M.P. after a PPE degree. They were also pretty good at spotting learning difficulties and putting in place a raft of measure to help facilitate progress. I'd go down the extra tuition route if I was concerned.

@donald - lol, no, I was not in the top flight for English by any means.
It was not one of my favoured, or favourite subjects..

Make of that what you will.

The parents here sending children to private school are a mixed bunch, there is some fear of the CfE and what it means, but I can't help thinking that there a large component of keeping up with the Jones' (local farmer/builder is down that route), prestige, and almost a fashion. It's no' cheap though. Eye watering.

I think one of the biggest plus points for private is the quantity and quality of sport available.

We have two children and I'm not sure even with are very good incomes we could justify the cost. We prefer to give them as much support at home as we can - after all education isn't just about the school. Life experiences too, trips out relevant to their current topics etc.

We're both state educated and have done well, whereas friends who were privately educated at great expense to their parents, haven't done measurably better. University is about the life experience it gives as much as the degree. Regarding trades, why the heck not if they want to, I've not got a practical bone in my body, despite my dad being in a trade, but I do agree to give them every opportunity at the right time for them.

We're lucky that we have a great primary school that they go to. As it happens it was also my school, but my wife's is equally as good. We're very lucky in that respect of where we happen to live. I'm also a governor at their school, and yes it has issues but on the whole they get a very balanced education. If we were spending say £30k/ pa on their educations I'd be disappointed if they weren't Oxbridge qualified medics or other professions at the end of their academic careers, as isn't that what we'd expect for the amount of money we'd end-up spending over the length of their time in education.

I would also add that, at least in Scotland, there is an impact weighting down the way for eligibility to get into Scottish universities, further down the line - i.e. that a given child of exam results X from a state school, which doesn't get such good results, will be weighted far higher than one from a 'good' state school and certainly one from a private school..

If we were spending say £30k/ pa on their educations I'd be disappointed if they weren't Oxbridge qualified medics or other professions at the end of their academic careers

Is that really the point of education 😉 ?

Oxbridge is not for everyone, so bizarre universal goal IMO.

How about well educated and happy?

£15k a year to go private?

**** that. You could import a smart kid from Asia for a lot less.

I put both my kids through private school and don't regret it, despite the expense. My wife is a teacher and has taught at comprehensives as well as private schools (she taught at the school my kids went to for most of the time they were there) so we're well aware of the differences. While there are of course variations in teacher quality the private schools can pick and choose a bit more and are less tolerant of failing teachers which helps - however what helps more is that the kids and their parents are pretty much all focused on a successful outcome which means there tend to me a lot less discipline problems getting in the way of the teaching. In some of the state schools my wife worked at it seemed at times like her job was more about surviving the day than it was about being able to teach as there were so many problems.

There are some excellent state schools however - we moved house a couple of years after my first kid started private school and the local primary and secondary there were both very good. If we hadn't already made the decision to go the private route we'd definitely have considered sending them to those local schools. Partly because the schools are good the house prices in that area are quite high though, so it's not necessarily the cheap option!

£15k a year to go private?

That seems par for the course here in London where my wife teaches now, but in Edinburgh the school my kids went to was closer to half that.

You should read the book Freakonomics, there's a section in that dedicated to the statistics surrounding private education. Bottom line is that paying for private education does not improve your child's results, the biggest factors affecting your child's performance is their home life and upbringing.

One word: Expensive.
Haven't read all this thread, so apologies if this has been said already, but when doing your financial calculations, make sure you factor in private school fee inflation.
I worked at a private school for a maternity cover once and if you can't keep up with the fees, you are out. They may be registered charities, but they are ruthless and it is ultimately a monetary transaction.

You should read the book Freakonomics, there's a section in that dedicated to the statistics surrounding private education. Bottom line is that paying for private education does not improve your child's results, the biggest factors affecting your child's performance is their home life and upbringing.

Sure it's a point of view, but just because someone wrote it in a book doesn't necessarily make it true. My wife and I both went to shit comprehensives and decided to put our kids to a good private school. My daughter might have done just as well at a decent comprehensive but in my son's case I think it's very, very likely that his outcome was significantly better from the private school then it would have been from even a decent state school. From a shit comprehensive like the one I went to I think it very unlikely he'd have achieved the necessary grades to get to a decent university.

Indeed wiganer. The MOST important factor, although that shouldn't extend to doing their course work for them. A great benefit of boarding is kids HAVE to do their own work!!

I worked at a private school for a maternity cover once and if you can't keep up with the fees, you are out. They may be registered charities, but they are ruthless and it is ultimately a monetary transaction.

Without exception the private schools my wife has worked at had a fund available to cover kids who's parents were struggling. A couple of my sons friends were only able to complete their time at the school due to the family foundation covering their costs - including all the costs of trips etc. as well as the fees. Ok they might have been less inclined to do so if the kids had been in primary 3 at the time instead of year 4 or so of secondary, but it definitely wasn't uncommon and there certainly wasn't a "boot them out the door if they miss one payment" attitude you're implying.

Sure it's a point of view, but just because someone wrote it in a book doesn't necessarily make it true. My wife and I both went to shit comprehensives and decided to put our kids to a good private school. My daughter might have done just as well at a decent comprehensive but in my son's case I think it's very, very likely that his outcome was significantly better from the private school then it would have been from even a decent state school. From a shit comprehensive like the one I went to I think it very unlikely he'd have achieved the necessary grades to get to a decent university.

Read the book and form your own opinion. It's written by two fairly smart academics based on evidence, so not really a point of view, more a representation of findings.

Privately educated people earn more even if they have the same degree as a state educated kid.

I'm sure that is true

But correlation isn't causation.There are alot of other factors at work here

To the OP

1. What are your options looking like for Secondary Schools. That would be a bigger concern to me than finishing Primary

2. What does junior think. My car share budy was sure she'd get her son into the local private school free on a rugby scholarship. But he declined the offer. But the local Secondary is pretty good here

3. Have you spoken to the current head. The supply teacher thing is a pain. Just ask what they expect for next year. They may have already appointed an amazing teacher for your sons class from next year. Or decided that they'll give the group to an experienced reliable teacher as they know the group was messed about this year

Any way all the best and I hope you find a solution

Indeed wiganer. The MOST important factor, although that shouldn't extend to doing their course work for them. A great benefit of boarding is kids HAVE to do their own work!!

At Boarding School the teachers can do it instead!

[url= http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1489700/Teacher-did-Prince-Harrys-exam-paintings.html ]link[/url]

My personal experience, I went to state schools until 13. I was heading the wrong way, in the wrong crowds, getting into trouble and not interested in school or learning in the slightest.

I discussed the situation with my parents and I was lucky enough to get into a local independent school in the last year that the government offered assistant places and was also offered a part scholarship.

The school slowly but surely transformed me. It was not an instant fix, but the teachers and staff were more willing and able to spend time and by the time I entered 6th form I was loving it.

I would say that as a broad generalisation the teachers are better in independent schools. The pay and conditions are usually better, which attracts the best teachers.

The options for sport & arts was far superior, although this is only comparing 2 particular schools. Instead of having the choice of rugby, rugby or rugby I was able to pick and choose from anything I wanted to do and pupils were able to start new clubs or sports if they wanted.

The decision is very much dependant on the individual person and the area, but if I am able to put any children we have through an independent education, then I will bend over backwards to make it a possibility. The one caveat is that I wouldn't let them board until 13 at the earliest if boarding becomes the only option.

The state system labelled him as thick and having a poor attitude

Just to clarify - I don't think the SYSTEM labelled him thick, just that particular school.

I went to a private secondary school, can't say I particularly liked it. Sometimes it's better in life to be happy.

The main reason that private schools often to better than state schools is because there's an entrance exam - if you take the most able kids in an area at exams at age 11, it's quite likely that a large number of those will do well at age 16 regardless of the quality of teaching they receive.

Read the book and form your own opinion.

No thanks - I've no need as I've 20 years of personal experience to draw on. Are you sure you're read it because what little I've seen about it on the web seems to contradict the results you're suggesting. For example you said that it says the biggest impact on a child's education is upbringing etc. but the book actually contains a chapter called: "Chapter 5: The negligible effects of good parenting on education"

It's written by two fairly smart academics based on evidence, so not really a point of view, more a representation of findings.

One academic and one writer. It also doesn't sound like it's a serious academic work and there is a lot of critics of it, including that their findings were actually caused by statistical errors in their evaluation.

Sounds like a bag of shit to be honest.

epicsteve - Member
Read the book and form your own opinion.
No thanks - I've no need as I've 20 years of personal experience to draw on....Sounds like a bag of shit to be honest.

Sounds like good experience there then.

In my version BTW, Ch 5 is "What makes a perfect parent?" Are there different versions?

Among the several pages in the book is the pretty simple observation:"a child whose parents are highly educated typically does well in school: no surprise there. A family with a lot of schooling tends to value schooling."

Some "shit"!?!? 😯

Teachers as state schools dont need to be qualified now either Quirrel.

How to devalue a profession in one go.

Talk to mr gove.

Some "shit"!?!?

You paid good money for that?

Without exception the private schools my wife has worked at had a fund available to cover kids who's parents were struggling

Cool so i could send my kid for one term the stop paying and they will keep him for the next 11 years...good to know.
Whilst they will help out the odd struggling case its pretty obvious its financial model requires students who pay the fees which is basically what the poster said.

No thanks - I've no need

I have not read the book so I cannot comment on it.

Teachers as state schools dont need to be qualified now either Quirrel.

In academies and free schools

The LEA schools still need QTS

Epic Steve, re getting booted from private schools if the money runs out, admittedly I only have experience of one school, so I imagine it depends where you send the kids. But if the family goes bankrupt, which is not uncommon, then there is no possibility of the kids for being able to stay for more than a year. The other parents would be asking, why are we then paying XX amount a year?!
My pennies worth: I attended a "failing" state school on a council estate, but I succeeded, ending up with a PhD from Oxford. The private school sector gets good results because they churn out the coursework, revising it again and again until it is A star.
I would be in favour of bringing back grammar schools, but I wouldn't want to start another war on this here forum!