[Closed] Kate Middleton

Who? William and Kate? Not really a fan of the royals myself.

Pics or it didn't happen 😀 #don't obviuosly, will get you a slapped wrist...#

CAN'T FIND THEM!!!

Great headline from the Telegraph on this subject...

Kate Middleton topless photos: with camera phones and drone technology, [b]soon no one will be safe[/b]

Pretty sure I won't have a drone trying to look at my moobs as I wander around the beach

meh its just boobs

the internets full of em

It is an invasion of her privacy and I dont support it

FFS leave them be everyone is entitled to some privacy

If it matters I would get rid of the Royals but they should still be able to do things in private without us seeing the results just like everyone else.

soon no one will be safe

from Kate Middletons breasts?

from Kate Middletons breasts?

I sincerely hope so.

I expect them to be quite small and plain.

I'll be about as interested as I was in the Harry pictures. (ie. not very)

we've all got 'em. Some are just nicer to look at than others.

I expect them to be quite small and plain.

Anything more than a handful is superfluous

friend's got a theory that if they're too big they bounce in different directions and make him dizzy when the girl's on top.

No one seems to have explained why she felt the need to get them out in the first place?

I assume that their security were with them + whatever servants etc might tag along.

Surely the best way to avoid having your bits photographed is not to take your top off?

Hmmm, I wonder what the Queens are like....

No one seems to have explained why she felt the need to get them out in the first place?

On holiday. In France. Where it is really quite common for women to sunbathe topless.

Why should she not?

Wow, She's got pixelated knockers. Is she in the SAS or something?

[i]meh its just boobs

the internets full of em[/i]

Yes, but disperal is not uniform. They seem to be gathered in certain places of the web-verse.............
😀

No one seems to have explained why she felt the need to get them out in the first place?

Here we go again. At least Edukator will be happy that she's not using a burqa to conceal terrorist weapons.

[i]Why should she not? [/i]

because someone might take a photograph?

It's not like there's not been a recent precedent of semi/naked royals having photographs taken of them.

and, if they're so desparate to protect her so she doesn't go down the Diana route then saying "Look, keep your bikini top on, love, it's not that much of a problem and it'll save a lot of hassle later on' might have been good advice for her husband to give her?

Some thoughts spring to mind:

Sad

It's a pair of breasts ffs, what's the excitement?

Sad

Wrong, they/she had an expectation of privacy.

Anyone who got into position to take that photo could have been in that same position with a sniper rifle...

Anyone who got into position to take that photo could have been in that same position with a sniper rifle...

And they took a camera??? (Jesus wept what's wrong with people?) 😯

[i]they/she had an expectation of privacy[/i]

perhaps but I think it's not something they should 'expect' any more, wherever they are.

As I said it's not like there isn;t recent and historic precedent in their family of privacy being invaded.

It's sad but not unexpected, really, is it?

Yet everyone letching over her Sister's bottom during the wedding was fair game?

On holiday. In France. Where it is really quite common for women to sunbathe topless.

Why should she not?

Then her statement should read "they are just a pair of breasts, get over it", instead of claiming to be saddened that her displayed breasts were actually seen. Maybe she thinks she is lady Godiva, and none of her subjects would dare look.

Anything more than a handful is [s]superfluous[/s] a face full.

@ MSP I think anyone but a fool can see there is a huge difference between sunbathing topless in the privacy of a country retreat with your husband and having them published
She was fine with her husband seeing them but not fine with the whole world this does not seem difficult to understand.

Then her statement should read "they are just a pair of breasts, get over it"

perhaps but I think it's not something they should 'expect' any more, wherever they are.

Great. Can we look forward to [i]"Shock! The Queen Poos - Exclusive Pictures From Inside the Royal Bowl"[/i]?

GrahamS - who knows.

It is more likely to happen if the queen sits on a toilet in a middle of a field shouting 'Everyone! Everyone! Don't look at me!' though.

There is an up her skirt shot of her on tinternets.

I've heard that Channel 5 are going to broadcast some royal nookie live...

http://www.channel5.com/shows/wills-and-kate-baby-fever/episodes/wills-and-kate-baby-fever

There is an up her skirt shot of her on tinternets.

Of the queen?

It's okay, I wasn't planning on lunch today anyway.

If she was in private grounds wi her boobs out then it is an invasion of privacy to take photos from outside and publish them. The photo was taken using a massive zoom lens so its obviously not an official thing. French perverts, papparazzi pricks. I think the real issue is the pominence of closererer and more and take a break magazines and the fact that people want to look at all this celebrity bull turd, cant see the point myself, dont know em, dont care.
Wills should send harry and the boys round, whats the point of being a royal if you cant use your military to avenge your wifes good name.

I find it a bit sad on two points.

1) that a cameraman seemed to make huge effort to take the pics.
2) that people actually want to see them.

Bit vulgar.

There is an up her skirt shot of her on tinternets.

The Queen??

[img] [/img]

friend's got a theory that if they're too big they bounce in different directions and make him dizzy when the girl's on top.

He's right you know... They start to bang into each other if they're too big, sending them off in different directions!

CAN'T FIND THEM!!!

http://lmgtfy.com/

There is an up her skirt shot of her on tinternets.
The Queen??

No Kate Windsor duchess of Cambridge. Before she was of divine rights.

I find it a bit sad on two points.

1) that a cameraman seemed to make huge effort to take the pics.

Money innit! MANY Thousands of quids to be made from just one photo even, the guy that took those probably earnt a year's Salary for most people just off an hours work!

2) that people actually want to see them.

She's famous... But not only that, she's also quite attractive! I'm not defending it, far from it, but there's a ready market there of people willing to pay if you get me. I think she should have as much privacy as anyone else, but sadly she won't ever get it because of who she is!

Bit vulgar.

The world is full of vulgar people... The world is also full of men who like to look at tits! C'est la vie.

[quote> http://lmgtfy.com/

But you havent GTFM. Lazy.

But you havent GTFM. Lazy

Agreed... lazy

seen em...

not my cup of tea...

I prefer those that have a little less highness 😆

It's a pair of breasts ffs, what's the excitement?

what's the excitement? It's a pair of breasts

Wills should send harry and the boys round, whats the point of being a royal if you cant use your military to avenge your wifes good name.

Good idea - but what would he do with a France when it surrenders? 😉

not my cup of tea..

Do you prefer peckers?

Would this be the same Kate Middleton who got the attention of her rich bloke meal ticket by wearing a see through dress on a catwalk? Couldn't make it up!

Good idea - but what would he do with a France when it surrenders?

I vote a bit of good old fashioned Rape and Pillage... Harry will be spot on for that at least! 😉

She can walk naked doing the LEJoG as far as I care.

She can walk naked doing the LEJoG as far as I care.

She will run the wrath of the terminally offended of STW though

Well, she did choose to marry into the Family. Wills and Harry had no choice. Her job is not that hard:

Stay extremely thin
Talk posh
Keep boobs out of sight.

I hope she doesn't go all "pity me I'm the victim here" like that Diana airhead.

like that Diana airhead.

That would be the same airhead who devoted the latter part of her life to helping the most vulnerable in the world, including clearing minefields.

Good to see you presumably do something more worthwhile with your time.

No that would be the Diana airhead who self-promoted by latching onto any and every charity that she believed would improve her public profile.

Would this be the same Kate Middleton who got the attention of her rich bloke meal ticket by wearing a see through dress on a catwalk?

Does the phrase "Reasonable expectation of privacy" mean anything?

Besides, I suspect "see through" was tabloid hyperbole. One couldn't see the Royal vajazzle. It was more like a fairly plain bikini with some fishnet draped over it.

She had a good PR agent. You really think she came up with that one herself ? Still, at least she had the sense not to get her baps out. Or sell contact with Prince Andrew to under cover journalists. Not good at picking wives those lads.

I'm surprised no-one has posted a link to them yet.

Hopefully this won't get me the banhammer:

[url=

No that would be the Diana airhead who self-promoted by latching onto any and every charity that she believed would improve her public profile.

Ah yes, oh course, [i]that[/i] Diana 🙄

Jamie to the stocks [see what i did there] with you for that link

Seen em due to bein a perv....she should have surgery!!!

What a waste of good forum time...

The Chateau websit had an image looking out from the point she was when the pics were taken.

You can clearly see the public road the pic was taken from.

'Expectation of privacy' has to include 'being in a private place', surely?

[i]What a waste of good forum time...[/i]

Surely that's the whole point ❓

Good thing she didn't get them out near a school in Scotland, the Poliss would be slinging her in the jail.

'Expectation of privacy' has to include 'being in a private place', surely?

Hmm.. it was described by the local correspondent as being a private château in a remote area, set within 600 acres of private estate.

dabble - Member

French perverts

Yep, it's definately only the french that do stuff like that. What's weird about this is that this sort of shot isn't uncommon at all, and a big chunk of our press thrives on them, but that's absolutely fine unless it's our new queen of hearts innit.

...private château in a remote area, set within 600 acres of private estate.

Tough at the top.

/bitter

DezB - Member
What a waste of good forum time...

Surely that's the whole point

Well, I kind of meant its a low quality opportunity to waste time when surely there are higher quality opportunities to waste time on the forum. Although since controversy was ba**ed even thats hard to come by.

The photo was taken using a massive zoom lens so its obviously not an official thing.

What lens do they use for the official royal topless photoshoot?

Can't find the pic, so I made my own.
[url= ]#hot[/url]

[edit]Now [i]that's[/i] wastin time baby.

No-one looks at your thruppeny bits on the guillotine....

Anything more than a handful is super[s]fluous[/s]b

FTFY.

ourmaninthenorth - Member

No-one looks at your thruppeny bits on the guillotine....

I do- but sadly even with the internet there's a distinct lack of good execution-porn material 🙁

even with the internet there's a distinct lack of good execution-porn material

PM me. 😉

what would he do with a France when it surrenders?

To quote Heney V we would only be "reclaiming our just inheritances" as most of it belongs to us anyway....

Just heard that the magazine is owned by Silvio Berlusconi - should've guessed that one 😉

wgaf?

wgaf?

*insert comment pointing out you must do to a degree, otherwise you wouldn't have opened, then posted in the thread*

I'm predicting headlines along the lines of "The Muchness of Cambridge"

What next? - Prince Philip meatspinning on the balcony of buck-house?

It was well known that one of the tactics used by Diana was to notify the paparazzi of where she would be, then complain afterwards about intrusion in order to garner public support, she was an expert media manipulator. Like mother like son and daughter in-law.

I predict a banning...