Subscribe now and choose from over 30 free gifts worth up to £49 - Plus get £25 to spend in our shop
That pheasant thread got me wondering - does anyone on here go shooting regularly - and how did you get into it?
I have no real interest in spending every weekend at it. I want to shoot a few things, taken them home and cook them every once in a while. Is there anyway you can get into it but not devote half your life to it?
We've just had the notification of the shoot dates for this winter from these, or more appropriately the dates they'll be coming through the garden with total disregard of property in hot pursuit of a stupid f*****g bird.
[url= http://www.brynkinalt.co.uk/the_estate/sporting.html ]http://www.brynkinalt.co.uk/the_estate/sporting.html[/url]
Hmmm well my Grandparents were into shooting - indeed my Grandad organized shoots. My Gran kept gun dogs until recently and would take them on shoots and be given a brace of birds to take away. But you have to move in the right circles to go on those sorts of shoots I suppose - and keeping / training those dogs takes time. Maybe just get friendly with a farmer and shoot on his land?
Remember kids
Big gun = small dick
Remember kidsBig gun = small dick
You'd need a big dick to bring down a pheasant.
Only ever done it as corporate entertainment (and not my kettle of fish really) so you can pay-to-shoot but not sure if you can do that as an individual.
Perhaps arrange an STW shooting day?
Actually as I finished typing that the full consequences ran through my head, making me feel quite queasy. Please don't, there wouldn't be a living thing within a mile, even helicopters and light aircraft would be downed.
I won a shooting day in a work raffle.
That was clay pigeons, though, rather than the messier kind.
My Grandfather was a game keeper and taught my Father to shoot, who in turn taught me and my Sister, she's not shot for years, however I've kept it up and shoot when I can and beat most of the season (I'll be out most Saturdays until the end of Jan now).
we have shooting round us - it does worry me when i see the kind of clueless dicks that are wandering round with guns near where i am
Anyone here go shooting or beating?
Having lived in Crawley, I'd say a fair amount of folk in Broadfield do.
Although the choice of implement is usually limited to sawn-off's and baseball bats.
I shoot reasonably regularly. I have a friend that owns a piece of ground and I get access to that.
Mix of pheasant, wood cock, duck, ground game and also deer.
I guess the OP has the choice of either approaching a local estate and buying a place on a shoot, or approaching one of the several agencies that exist to organise shoots. My suggestion would be to go along to your local clay pigeon club and through that check out the local landowners and shoots that are available.
G
used to do quite a bit of grouse beating,easy enough to get into, but can get a bit boring waiting for things to happen. Tried clay shooting, gave up when i was told i 'couldnt hit a bulls arse with a banjo'...!
You could try [url= http://www.gunsonpegs.com/shooting/buy/index.php ]Guns on Pegs[/url] to see if there's anything available locally.
Nothing like a good fair fight.
All those lovely people driving 4x4s out into the wilderness to kill things that make a lot of noise, fly slowly and pose no threat whatsoever. Such fine upstanding members of society.
All those lovely people driving 4x4s out into the wilderness to kill things that make a lot of noise, fly slowly and pose no threat whatsoever. Such fine upstanding members of society.
How much did you pay to keep the "wilderness" maintained and looking nice for when you ride your bike there?
Did you contribute towards the landowners expenses?
So, you're perfectly happy to freeload off the back of these upstanding members of society then? I mean, they pay a fortune so you've got somewhere to ride your bike... Suppose you're more than happy to ride along the tracks that they put in to get their evil 4x4's there? Not too good for you are they? 🙄
I am going deer stalking in May - cannot wait! Mmmm venison sausages!
I have to say that I get really pished off when people state that shooting game is morally wrong as you don't get much more free range!
if you are interested in shooting for the food possibilities then beating is a great way to get into it. There are many shoots that vary from stupid money for the very rich or do it yourself for those of us that are not blessed with shed loads of cash. If you get into the beating or picking up (you'll need a well trained dog), then you would normally be paid as well as being offered at least a brace (and sometimes a lot more). Have a look around your area, find someone who is already involved in a shoot in some way and go as a beater, they are often looking for new people. Is a great day out, sometime pretty hard work and quite rewarding once you start stocking up the freezer. Beating teams are normally a really good bunch and taking the piss out of the guns without them knowing who it is (mostly) is great sport. You may be suprised at how may interesting old fellas there are as beaters who just love what they are doing, many working with their dog. I really enjoy shooting and beating for the food reward. What area do you live?
Indeed - Chickens make a lot of noise, fly slowly and pose no threat whatsoever, and nobody seems to have a problem with paying to have their heads chopped off in a factory... is that a fair fight Herman?
What's worse do we reckon? Upper class chinless inbreds blasting away 'for fun' or the witless, forelock tugging sychophants who help them? The countryside got on just fine before they crawled out of the primordial soup and it'll survive just fine when both die out, probably within the next couple of generations.
😉
Ah, of course, anyone into shooting is an inbred, upper class chinless wonder, and anyone working on a shoot is a prole?
I suppose all mountainbikers are overweight middle class IT bods, failed XC racers who wear dayglo lycra and know nothing about the countryside? you know, if we're stereotyping like...
PS - good way to get into beating is to scope out some local country pubs on a saturday afternoon - if there's one with a car park full of rovers etc, then quite often you'll find the shoot in there.. in for a pint a few times, get chatting...
Given the suicidal nature of most pheasants, and that I'll probably kill as many with my car as any weekend shooter will, I can't see the problem.
In fact, I'd say that they have a far nicer time of things than battery chickens to whom death is probably a welcome release.
The countryside got on just fine before they crawled out of the primordial soup
Funny, but I thought hunting was pretty much the first thing we did when coalesced out of the primordial soup, probably before we climbed out of the water, and certainly long before we came out of the trees.
So Zulu-eleven, overbite or underbite?
Neither Yossarian - But Lady Chaterly's Lover certainly played a role in my young career choice, and there's nowt as filthy as a posh bird 😉
Funny, but I thought hunting was pretty much the first thing we did when coalesced out of the primordial soup, probably before we climbed out of the water, and certainly long before we came out of the trees.
It's not hunting my love, it's a bloodsport. Very different thing.
Fair play z11, what is it about posh birds??? 😉
they like a bit of rough.
Not really into shooting, but one of the local gamekeepers brings along a variety of dead stuff to eat which is nice.
I suppose all mountainbikers are overweight middle class IT bods, failed XC racers who wear dayglo lycra and know nothing about the countryside? you know, if we're stereotyping like..
That does cover quite a few though 😀
Saw a bunch of shooters all dressed up in Tescos early last Saturday. Looked like they'd turned up for a Jeeves and Wooster casting session.
It's not hunting my love, it's a bloodsport.
but as every shot bird is picked up and sold to a game dealer / given to beaters as a reward for their time then it is hunting!
Very different thing.
Why? We hunted because we had to, now some do because they want to.
As children we rode bikes because they got us places faster than walking and we weren't allowed to drive cars, now we can and still we ride bikes. Is that wrong because we do it for fun not becasue we don't have a choice?
i go on a rough shoot, they don't put many birds down and it only costs a couple of hundred a year bags are small only 15-25 birds with about 4-6 guns and as many beaters and guns swap with beaters. it's just a social thing on boxing day and a few other weekends, no tugging of forelock just a bit of banter and a stretch of the legs.
the woodland was left unmanaged before this and took at lot of work with thinning/brush-cutting/pond dredging etc which was in no way profitable for those involved.
used to beat on a big keepered shoot in my youth, good fun especially doing posh accents over the radios to take the piss out of the guns 🙂
I wouldn't bother bbsb, you're clearly floundering after a single post on the difference. I'd just leave it there tbh
It's not hunting my love, it's a bloodsport. Very different thing.
Nope - not as far as I'm concerned - I'm sure some people do it just because they enjoy killing, but that's not what interests me.
I like eating game, consider it to be entirely ethical, and because I'm not a hypocrite, I’m interested in being involved in the whole lifecycle of eating meat. Much better than to have the de-sensitized relationship with a packet of supermarket-packed mince that characterises most people's approach to what they put in their mouths.
Thanks for the tips from helpful people – I reckon that beating is the way to go.
I wouldn't bother bbsb, you're clearly floundering after a single post on the difference. I'd just leave it there tbh
I spy an Edinburgh Defence, early variation
I spy an Edinburgh Defence, early variation
indeed, however the sicilian and queens gambit have been much in evidence lately.
Now, now bbsb, where have i advocated factory farming as a suitable alternative to shooting hmmm?? Nowhere, so don't try and put words in my mouth. Ta.
A bit of honesty is needed that's all. Shooting is about the social hierarchy. It's no different from golf or fox hunting. Except you have to shoot animals. Thats the truth.
Helios - If your looking for beating it's worth having a look at [url= http://pubs.myfunforum.org/index.php?component=indexpage ]PUBS[/url] and [url= http://www.nobs.org.uk/ ]NOBs[/url] (although it costs £5 to use the NOBs forum!).
Where abouts are you?
Suffolk/Cambridgeshire way - but I ain't clicking on that NOBs link until you tell me what it is!
[img]
[/img]
[img] http://www.autotrader.co.uk/EDITORIAL/slideshow/holland/holland_8
.jpg[/img]
[img] http://www.autotrader.co.uk/EDITORIAL/slideshow/holland/holland_10.jp g" target="_blank">
http://www.autotrader.co.uk/EDITORIAL/slideshow/holland/holland_10.jp g"/> [/img]
An Edinburgh defence? I thought I was doing you a favour!!!!
Ok then
Why? We hunted because we had to, now some do because they want to.
As children we rode bikes because they got us places faster than walking and we weren't allowed to drive cars, now we can and still we ride bikes. Is that wrong because we do it for fun not becasue we don't have a choice?
You don't understand the different between having to do something to survive and wanting to do something for pleasure? Sometimes the two are linked but in this case it's not possible to make a moral case for shooting, unless you base it on a comparison with factory farming which is every bit as bankrupt.
Your analogy with riding bikes is hilarious. And utterly irrelevant. But funny still.
and how did you get into it?
if you need to ask etc.
Perhaps arrange an STW shooting day?
WCA with a shotgun 😯
yossarian - as mentioned elsewhere not everyone involved is a Toff or a 'witless, forelock tugging sycophant' (although that is the traditional image). Most of us just enjoy being outside in beautiful countryside with good company and a shared interest in field-sports / field-craft where we come away with a good appetite and something for the pot! but hey we're all entitled to our own opinions!
Helios -NOBs is the National Organisation of Beaters and Pickers up!
A bit of honesty is needed that's all. Shooting is about the social hierarchy. It's no different from golf or fox hunting. Except you have to shoot animals. Thats the truth.
except you're talking out of your arse. i know people that shoot for the pot that would have nothing to do with the fox hunt or tugging their forelocks. just ordinary working blokes that are happy to source their own food.
My minor problem with hunting is based on the experience of meeting a few out on the moors - the clients had massive attitudes ( staff were ok ) etc - have met some ok types too but it definitely doesnt float my boat to pay to kill animals - I have shot clays and thats ok in my book...
However each to their own - My biggest issue with shooting estates as I see it is the organised killing ( ILLEGAL ) of birds of prey in the name of protecting shooting estate businesses.
I know that not all game keepers are bad but I bet a lot of them are ordered to do it and even tourist drawing white tailed eagles in scotland are not immune - however scotland is punishing landowners there now by withholding grants etc if raptors are found suspiciously 'dead ' on their land. In england / forest of bowland the issue with hen harriers is interesting. Even recently up in the peak that case of a sparrowhawk...
I am a keen RSPB member and the stories / phots I have seen of poisoned raptors and other 'vermin' ( foxes / badgers etc ) and even peoples pet dogs are horrific. I know 2x wildlife officers in the police and they all have stories of being unable to prosecute due to lack of evidence/resources or simply society / courts not being willing to act.
Bear that in mind that if you pay to shoot then you are party to this.
I think that shooting live animanls for sport is frankly an anachronism that deserves to die out like bear baiting. I have no issue shooting clays etc.
Why anyone would feel the need to pay in some cases many 1000s to shoot game birds I have no idea. Maybe its just me. I dont buy the whole ' it gives people in the countryside jobs ' arguement either. Set up other buisiness - farm / diversify.
Its a complex issue.
paul
Helios, last day of the season is often given over to the beaters to shoot if they have a gun. That's the time when someone may let you have a shoot, it was my route to the "blood sport".
Roasted a lovely cock pheasant on Sunday, made stock with the bones and there was enough left over for a curry this week. Pheasant is really good in a curry.
Shooting hens on a moor? I'd rather shoot clay pigeons. Or cans. It's more difficult.
We sure are JE, we sure are!
Talking out of my arse trailmonkey? I think not.
Kill it cook it eat it.
Talking out of my arse trailmonkey? I think not.
but you quite clearly are, because as i pointed out to you......
i know people that shoot for the pot that would have nothing to do with the fox hunt or tugging their forelocks
sometimes, not everyone conforms to the stereotypes that would help to confirm your worldview.
Clay pigeon shooting is fun and rough shooting is even better as you get to take the rabbit/pigeon/pheasant home and have a tasty meal....got to love the blinkered views on here, can't remember who's post it was but which Pillock tried to say golf and shooting are about social hierarchy?.....some people at a shoot enjoy the whole Tweed ensemble but most people are very normal and wear jeans....I find it just as ridiculous when some penis on this forum spunks several thousand on a bike capable of descending Ben Nevis but rides around the Surrey Hills instead.....complete with hydration pack, armour and motorcross style baggies etc etc...each their own I suppose?!
sometimes, not everyone conforms to the stereotypes that would help to confirm your worldview.
You are right, not everyone does. Unfortunately for you the majority do. If you don't then bravo!
You don't understand the different between having to do something to survive and wanting to do something for pleasure? Sometimes the two are linked but in this case it's not possible to make a moral case for shooting
im happy for shooting to be banned as long as everything else that has an impact on any environment or ecosystem is also banned unless it is essential for our survival
your green beans from kenya, plasma tv and fancy-dan aluminium bouncy bike all have an impact on animal life.
I can't do that in London
I've lived in the country all my life and at no point have I ever had the desire to go shooting/hunting.
My brothers ex-girlfriends family ran a farm that diversified into providing shooting days for wealthy folk (£4k a day). If they didn't get many pheasants out in the fields, the owner would scare a load of ducks off their lake so the toffs could shoot them, pretty much from point blank range. And thats a 'sport' is it?
Ever fired a shotgun? I went clay shooting not so long ago (a friends farm) and the fact that you can wave the gun about in a different direction to the clay and still hit it goes to show the amount of skill required. I was bored rigid after about an hour, maybe I should have pointed it at some wildlife instead to spice things up...
Additionally you can often here the local farmers and their bitches riding about on their quads at night shooting rabbits in the name of pest control. What a load of bollocks.
I've little time or respect for anyone that enjoys doing it, regardless of how they might justify it.
im happy for shooting to be banned as long as everything else that has an impact on any environment or ecosystem is also banned unless it is essential for our survival
your green beans from kenya, plasma tv and fancy-dan aluminium bouncy bike all have an impact on animal life.
I do like a proportionate response. 🙂
Zulu, I ride in Wild Park (Council owned), Stanmer Park (also council owned and happen to work for...the council. Other than this I occasionally get to ride at Leith Hill (National Trust). I'm also vegetarian, so agree with your point about chicken. Funny you should make the parallel, does one example of unethical behaviour qualify another?
Your point about be somehow scrounging off shooters seems a little weak. If a wide trail is there for working 4x4s to get out and do maintenance (see Leith Hill above) then again, you fail to make a solid point. I hardly think the wider trails I ride on are made by people simply going out to shoot things.
I think that shooting something that neither poses a threat or can defend itself to be unnecessarily cruel. To do this for entertainment seems worse to me. You don't attempt to address the issue, rather simply try and pick holes in my statements.
I obviously can't change your mind, nor would I want to. But don't deny what you are doing to be a fair fight.
You don't understand the different between having to do something to survive and wanting to do something for pleasure? Sometimes the two are linked but in this case it's not possible to make a moral case for shooting
Unless you're a Vegan, the moral necessity argument fall's flat on its face
There is no reason whatsoever for anyone in the UK, or most of the rest of the world, to eat meat - no lack of dietary protein from other sources, Millions of people worldwide survive with perfect health without eating meat.
We eat meat because we like it, and because its socially acceptable to do so. Anyone in western society who easts meat does so entirely for pleasure, with no necessity, and no survival based need.
Edit:
Herman, the roads out on to the moors in the uplands of the UK are almost without fail there for shooting access, and a great many "legacy" paths and trails in the Northern half of the UK were built to take people to and from the big shooting estates, hell, a nice big lump of the rail network was built for it - we, as riders benefit from this on a daily basis, we also benefit from getting to ride on lovely heather moorland, which is maintained in a healthy status almost entirely for shooting. add in the patchwork quilt of hedges and woods that, again were there for shooting, and the sport has shaped our own sport in a way like no other.
I think that shooting something that neither poses a threat or can defend itself to be unnecessarily cruel. To do this for entertainment seems worse to me.
Firstly, see my point above about the sheer lack of necessity of eating any meat, we kill animal purely to facilitate the demands of pleasure and entertainment on a daily basis. Personally I think there's a lot greater honesty and integrity in killing an animal yourself, than paying someone to do it, and in my experience and opinion, the true unnecessary cruelty is in intensive farming methods, done only to satisfy our demand for cheap meat - if all meat had to be shot, out in the wild, then I'm damn sure it would cost a hell of a lot more, and we'd eat a lot less of it.
I think that shooting something that neither poses a threat or can defend itself to be unnecessarily cruel.
Eating without shooting it would be cruel.
Unless you're a Vegan, the moral necessity argument fall's flat on its face
Oh come on. The moral argument against shooting animals for sport is cast iron. It doesn't rely on veganism. T
There is no reason whatsoever for anyone in the UK, or most of the rest of the world, to eat meat - no lack of dietary protein from other sources, Millions of people worldwide survive with perfect health without eating meat.
Quite right, but we aren't having an argument about [b]eating[/b] meat are we?
We eat meat because we like it, and because its socially acceptable to do so. Anyone in western society who easts meat does so entirely for pleasure, with no necessity, and no survival based need.
Again quite right, but that's a different argument.
There is no argument for shooting animals for pleasure in the British countryside that holds up to any kind of scrutiny, moral or otherwise. Pretending that there is fine but you are only fooling yourself. Which is also fine.
There is no argument for [s]shooting animals for pleasure in the British countryside[/s] killing or breeding any animals for meat or dairy products that holds up to any kind of scrutiny, moral or otherwise.
FTFY
Yossarian, tell me one difference, morally, between shooting a pheasant, and killing a chicken!
Hah! You haven't fixed anything for me.
Of course there's an argument for breeding animals for their products, there just isn't one that confuses controlled compassionate slaughter with shooting for pleasure.
Yossarian, tell me one difference, morally, between shooting a pheasant, and killing a chicken!
I'm probably going to say the pleasure derived from shooting. As you've already said a number of times we dont actually need meat. Doesn't that make enjoying the kill even more mawkish by your own standards?
Suppose you're more than happy to ride along the tracks that they put in to get their evil 4x4's there?
no
footpath's yes.
Of course there's an argument for breeding animals for their products, there just isn't one that confuses controlled compassionate slaughter with shooting for pleasure.
I don't support any form of 'hunting' that is just about bloodlust, such as fox hunting and some pheasant shoots and that, cos it's not about killing for food, it's about killing for sport. Deal with your inadequacies rather than trying to 'prove' yourself by killing stuff.
But isn't there something innate within us that drives us to hunt? Go to Norway, and it's part of their cultural heritage to hunt, and it's not really a 'sport' in the same way it is here. It is part of their tradition, and a way of obtaining food. Here, it's more about the social aspects and being able to brag about how many birds you bagged etc.
No problem with a small group out to kill a few game birds for food and that though. As Z-11 sez;what's the difference there to killing chickens bred for slaughter?
You don't really have to go shooting though to get pheasants. Just pick 'em up off the motorways.
WCA with a shotgun
Please, no.... 😯
I think there are alot of people making presumptions about something they have little real experience of, however that will never change (and I'm as guilty, but on other topics). One thing I do know is that people will never agree on this one so it's best to 'agree to disagree' before this gets ugly and has to be pulled by the mods!
Here, it's more about the social aspects and being able to brag about how many birds you bagged etc.
maybe for the gentry it is but your average country dweller (not domiciled townies) it's very much part of the way of life, produce gets shared around be it fruit, game, vegetables etc. they get swapped or given away with no money changing hands.
this certainly happens in my parents village where most people welcome a rabbit or brace of pheasants left hanging by their door.
maybe for the gentry it is but your average country dweller (not domiciled townies) it's very much part of the way of life
Yeah I understand that, and don't have a problem with it. It's the ego-boosting hunting parties what as someone sed above people pay loads of money to go on, that I object to. Cos the primary purpose is not to get food. It's for 'sport'.
The Norwegian hunters I spoke to are quite against the British Hunting Party thing, cos they see it as unnecessary killing. They believe in working with nature, not breeding game speshly like they do here.
Few months back my neighbour gave me a small rabbit his friend had killed that morning. That's about killing for food, not pleasure. I have no problem with people enjoying the hunting process, cos as I said surely it's something innate in us to want to hunt, but just shooting birds to beat your mate's tally etc is pathetic.
Made a right nice little pie with the rabbit; mushrooms, drop of red wine and that. Lovely.
Helios where are you? if you're near to me, Oxfordshire/Warwickshire Border, then I'd gladly sort you out a days beating to see what its like on a small shoot.
I beat on a few shoots the (big Posh shoots and small local shoots) I enjoy taking my dog out and getting him to do what he was bred for.
My son and grandson (only nine months between them) both beat with us and use the money they earn to buy presents for everyone at Xmas.
Other than maybe having a chip on your shoulder about toffs or whatever, what exactly is the problem people have with shooting?
I'm no expert, but if I was an animal I'd rather cruise about the country free range for a while then get shot than not live at all/live in captivity to ultimately meet the same fate.
I've done a bit, but be warned, following my tale you won't want to be a beater.
I didn't really want to, been anti the whole 'establishment' hunting thing ever since i can remember, but the father in law, ex military, colonel, insisted he was going to make me a 'man'. Although I've never hunted I've always had a keen interest in guns and shooting (target) so it turned out i was a fair shot and must confess a certain thrill and guilty pleasure as I brought down my fair share of pheasants. Everything I shot either I ate or someone i knew did.
Anyway all was well until one particular shoot when a bird broke and flew along the tree line, i fired, probably to low if I'm honest and I guess others did, anyway there was this howl from the woods just off to my left, turned out a beater had been shot and in the nuts of all places, so wouldn't show us, it was a ricochet, i assumed mine and put my hands up to it and never shot again.
However the worse bit was the dressing down I got from the colonel, not for shooting the bloke, but for putting my hand up to it, apparently one doesn't admit to shooting beaters, bad form and all that and some time later it turned out it probably wasn't me it was more likely the guy to my right who shot at an angle more likely to have hit the victim, but nevertheless that was it for me, never again, bad enough folk get shot, worse there's culture of not copping to it if it's you.
A salutary tale to you potential beaters - I wouldn't if I were you.
Some hunting shooting fishing is deliberately cruel such as deer hunting / fox hunting with dogs - deliberately done so as to prolong the chase and of no utility whatsoever.
some such as deer shooting isn't and some such as pheasant shooting is just completely false.
The birds are bread for shooting and only released a few weeks before hand. Its just live target shooting.
You cannot lump all hunting together - some has few bad effects and some good ones but much is barbaric blood lust.
I will get flamed for this as a no nothing townie - however we all know that this is true its just some pretend it isn't so as to satisfy their blood lust
I can shoot the cat from 10ft if I've not beaten off for a week.
Used to beat when I was about 14/15, £5 a day and free beer at the end of the day wasn't bad at all. Plus I learnt a lot from the old boys about wildlife, the great outdoors (TM), and the odd smattering of survivalism / etc.
I still get a few birds now and then from a mate who shoots, because I'm not (legally) allowed a gun any more 😐 - a decent local butcher would have a game contact. Like some clubs, they sometimes can be quite cliquey, so you may spend a while finding a shooting club you feel like you'd spend time with.
The birds are bread for shooting and only released a few weeks before hand. Its just live target shooting.
Really TJ... OK, then How many weeks?
How would that compare with the number of weeks between hatching and slaughter of your average free range chicken? (6-8 weeks intensive, 12-14 weeks for free range or organic... note, thats total age!)
What would be an realistic achievable return rate (ie. If I release 1000 birds, how many would I expect to have shot by the end of the season on 1st Feb?
C'mon, you want to show that you're not a know nothing townie... show me? its just a couple of fairly easy questions for you, impress me 🙂
Tell you what... one final question... how many pheasants are released annually on the Queens famous Sandringham estate? go on, take a guess...
Shooting birds is for morons.
(Unless you eat EVERYTHING you shoot)
Possibly not the best way to bag a bird.



