MegaSack DRAW - This year's winner is user - rgwb
We will be in touch
Just bought my first dslr camera which is a canon 600D with the EF-S 18-55 mm IS II Lens, should arrive Thursday bought from pixmania. Current camera is a Panasonic lumix Z10. Just wondering if anyone else has a similar dslr camera who has any advise or tips or general chat about it all. I like taking a few pics when I'm out and about so looking forward for my 600D to arrive 😉
Put it into A mode, and experiment with changing the aperture - I'm not sure how you do that on your model, but there's probably a scrollwheel to turn. Using different apertures is probably the single most important thing you can do to change how your pictures look...
Put it in M and get out there and play. There are no rules, so just get out there and play.
Thanks for the replies so far, I have been reading up online and watching some YouTube vids for some tips... Just wanna get out these and shoot! What cameras do ppl own on here then?
I'm quite happy with my EOS20d and do 99%+ on full manual and mostly boring cycling. I haven't got an artistic imagination.
Feel free to have a browse through some of my pics.
[url= http://simoncarter.zenfolio.com/ ]http://simoncarter.zenfolio.com/[/url]
Learn what f stop does, and how it relates to shutter speed and depth of field. Always use the lowest iso you can get away with.
Learn to pan.
Learn about light and colour balance which is very important indoors.
Wear sunscreen...
Shoot, lots, read, shoot some more, read.
Experiment with lighting. Get a subject and a desk lamp, light subject, change camera settings to see how they effect the photo, how aperture effects the light and DOF, move lamp around, add pieces of paper to reflect the light etc.
HAVE FUN
Just bought my first dslr camera which is a canon 600D with the EF-S 18-55 mm IS II Lens, should arrive Thursday bought from pixmania.
Get ready for a disappointing Xmas 🙁
[url= http://www.ephotozine.com/site-search/pixmania ]Seems they rank right up there with CRC for shit customer service[/url] and especially claiming to hold stock which is actually not in stock.
Don't mean to piss on yer chips, but as soon as I saw the sentence quoted above, my heart sank on your behalf - I've read an awful lot of bad things about Pixmania. If you're one of the lucky majority, you'll be fine but the unlucky few suffer badly.
Now I've spread my doom and gloom, [s]if[/s] when it does [s]eventually[/s] arrive, enjoy it. The single biggest improvement you'll make to your photos is not to buy a fast lens, a motorgrip or a tripod (all helpful though). A flash and a remote flash trigger and a light stand/Gorilla-pod will lift your images from the everyday to the extraordinary.
I got a 600d last month, love it, colour is lovely and low light performance seems amazing, like being able to turn the screen to protect it when not in use, enjoy!
PJ
Ps, got mine from bignorman, 2days to arrive
Hey there,
I'm in a similar position, did a photography course recently, then bought a 450d second hand. I am just getting to grips with it now and either keep it in M or Av mode. I have so far tried a bit of wildlife and also food photography.
Being a nerdy engineer I've found the physics part really interesting, which I've never really thought about before. Ie how aperture affects death of field, how image stabilization works, how AF works ...
Depending what you are interested in, I would definitely recommend a 50mm f1.8 lens. They're really cheap and produce great shots. prime lenses seem to be the singlespeed of the photography world!
Also I bought some close up lenses which attach to the kit lens, amazing results given that they cost around a tenner.
I keep an eye on eBay but strangely lenses don't often sell for bargain prices, compared to new prices off amazon. I have had better luck picking up cheap stuff from the local classifieds
For general Canon camera and lens advice I would recommend this site
http://photonotes.org/articles/beginner-faq/
Have a look a talkphotography.c.o.uk loads of forums and friendly advice for all levels of photography
I'm a Nikon fan-boy and got a D90. As above, playing and practicing is the best and most fun way of learning. You can't break it by playing so go for it!
I'm a fan of the "put it in Aperture priority mode" school of thought, for a simpleton like me I found straight into manual too much like hard work until I was a bit more comfortable with the various functions.
Either way have fun and get some photos on here for some constructive criticism!
this is an excellent starting point
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/3215247995/mountain-bike-photography-technique
I don't really get the "Fully Manual" thing either.
Aside from extreme cases, you seem to get just as much control using Aperture Priority (Av mode) with far less mechanical thinking required.
(though having seen some of don's excellent photos I am loathe to argue with him)
Being a nerdy engineer I've found the physics part really interesting, which I've never really thought about before. Ie how aperture affects death of field, how image stabilization works, how AF works ...
Depending what you are interested in, I would definitely recommend a 50mm f1.8 lens. They're really cheap and produce great shots. prime lenses seem to be the singlespeed of the photography world!
Also I bought some close up lenses which attach to the kit lens, amazing results given that they cost around a tenner.
Blimey! I think you might be me in a different body. 😀
Just bought my first dslr camera
...
Put it in M and get out there and play
Er, no. Not unless you want to be monumentally frustrated, this is the equivalent of learning to swim by being thrown into the 10' end.
When I got mine, I spent a couple of weeks in full Auto getting the feel for it first. When I came to get my head round the 'proper' modes (what canon call the "Creative Zone"), I didn't have to stand there hunting for buttons and menu options all the time.
I would definitely recommend a 50mm f1.8 lens.
I suspect I'm getting this for Christmas. With a sub-£100 price tag (I think it's about 70 now), it's an utter bargain. Every Canon owner should have one.
For general Canon camera and lens advice I would recommend this site
http://photonotes.org/articles/beginner-faq/
+1. It's very good.
A book called "Understanding Exposure" is a great starter.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Understanding-Exposure-3rd-Photographs-Camera/dp/0817439390
But I got it from my nearest town library.
I too use Av mode more than any other. The only common exception is when I'm using remote flash or when I'm doing something specifically creative with shutter speed.
I second the vote for a 50mm f1.8 lens. Perfect for when you really really want to separate the subject from the background, when you really really want to avoid flash in low light and for studio-type shots.
It'll be a fabulous camera BTW - enjoy!
Some other things I've thought of are:
Shoot in RAW - it gives you more headroom while processing
Buy Adobe Lightroom (saves me hours and hours and hours compared to photoshop)
Start right from the very beginning with a good workflow for copying, processing, saving and backing up of your photos.
Take good notice of the histogram.
Re: Lightroom. Get Picasa first. It's free, and it'll get you going.
Lightroom is very good, but it kicks the hell out of my laptop. I got the trial; I'm glad I didn't buy it.
It´s easy enough to use a camera in M mode, there´s an exposure meter in the viewfinder all the A and S modes do is set the exposure compensation to zero (or whatever you set it to) . Using it in A or S modes just mean you have to set the exposure compensation manualy rather than the shutter speed or appeture.
Lightroom is very good, but it kicks the hell out of my laptop
get a better laptop? it's not the software's fault.
tinas: agreed, but the difference comes when you move around and take several different images of the scene.
If you use A or S then you can just set the Exposure Compensation once and shoot away knowing that it will automatically adjust to your compensated exposure for each shot.
Whereas on Fully Manual all your shots would be taken with the same exposure, unless you adjusted it for every shot.
That can be an advantage sometimes (e.g. when taking photos to be stitched together or when you want a very consistent look), but most of the time I want the former behaviour so I can concentrate on framing.
I haven't tried Picasa (I guess it's appeared since I got LR2).
Does it do the same kind of thing? (i.e. adjustment presets, non-destructive processing, etc?).
get a better laptop? it's not the software's fault.
I didn't say it was. However, I'm not about to buy a NEW LAPTOP to run a single piece of software. Are you mad?
I'd start in P mode - auto but you can adjust stuff.
Then move to A and S modes (one of them is called something different on Canon, but I can't remember which - I think that S (shutter priority) is called T on Canons??)
I only really use manual when I have lots of time to fiddle around getting things just so, perhaps taking pics of some flowers using a tripod. Or if I want a constant exposure for things like panorama's or if I am doing a long exposure night shot......
That understanding exposure book linked to above looks good.
I think that S (shutter priority) is called T on Canons??)
It's "T" for "Time", yes. (From memory, I think it's actually Tv and Av).
i bought a d3100 a few months back and i think it's great. Then last week i bought a 35mm f1.8 lens and it's even better. A mates brother in law who is a pro photographer for Rolex said stick to shutter prority at first.
I suspect the 600d is a great camera, and has HD video which is quality!
I'm still using a 5 year old 400d, and to be honest I love it!
When I first got it I didn't really understand all the settings etc... So I read the manual. I have to say it's a must really. very helpful and provides lots of tips.
Like Stumpy said, start in P mode, then once you are confident, move to AV.
Look forward to seeing some shots 🙂
In terms of software, I use Photoscape. It's free, very user friendly, and very clever!
Oh and for some inspiration (and to be awestruck at how talented some folk on here are) take a look at this thread:
I've found my lens of choice for a 450d is the 17-85 cannon do - not horrifically expensive and produces great results through enough of the range to make it an 'all-day' lens of choice.
I also have the 50mm f1.8 and the Sigma 10-22mm which are both decent lenses too, have spent some time using an old 80-200 and the f4 70-200mm too.
There is a lot to learn and you will have a lot of fun capturing images with it. Enjoy 🙂
Don't buy anything else until you've worked out what kinds of photography you like - sure, you could spend shed loads on wireless flash stuff, but that useless for landscapes, for example...
OMG how many replies!!! This is all great... Just an update... I rang and cancelled my order with pixmania as I found that I could get it from jessops for the same price (£50 cash back from canon and about £15 from quidco) so bought it today and it looks great, really good build quality from what I can see. Just spent the last hr looking through the menus and working my way around things, took a lot of shots in the living room ( mainly Xmas decorations lol). Loaded them up and they look great... Well better than my old camera anyway. I stuck to auto, so you guys recommend starting on aperture priority?? Why is this may I ask. Also thanks for the website links I'll take a look this evening!
I think I will be into macro pics as I find them amazing... What's a good macro lense or what are these inserts I can buy? Will they work with the stock lense that came with the camera?
Thanks again.
Chris
I stuck to auto, so you guys recommend starting on aperture priority?? Why is this may I ask.
It's the first real step towards taking control of what the camera does and actively deciding how you want your picture to look, instead of just passively accepting what Auto thinks you want.
Have a look at [url= http://www.talkphotography.co.uk/ ]talk photography[/url] loads of forums and friendly advice for all levels of photography
ftfy
Er, no. Not unless you want to be monumentally frustrated, this is the equivalent of learning to swim by being thrown into the 10' end.
I would disagree as the risks are far less, I don't think photography is complicated.
I think it is important to learn that one action has an affect elsewhere and that doesn't happen if you fix one of the points.
each to their own.
Get your head round exposure and how aperture, shutter speed and iso work in relation to one another, really is the key to getting the photos that you want
Don't agree about the Understanding Exposure book, hardly mentions the histogram which is another vital aid to getting well exposed photos. I always recommend this book [url= http://www.amazon.co.uk/Digital-Landscape-Photography-Barbara-Gerlach/dp/0240810937 ]Exposure[/url] it might say landscapes in the title, but have never read anything which explains exposure better
I think I have a lot of learning ahead of me 😉
, so you guys recommend starting on aperture priority?? Why is this may I ask.
Basically, aperture, shutter speed and ISO all affect the exposure of your photos.
ISO is the sensitivity of the sensor. The higher the ISO, the more sensitive the sensor; so the less light you need, but the more "noise" / interference you get on the final shot.
Aperture is how wide open the lens is. For complicated reasons, the lower the aperture number, the wider open (sometimes referred to as "faster") the lens. Shutter is the length of time you expose the shot for. Assuming a fixed ISO for simplicity, the wider the aperture the faster the shutter for a given shot.
Imagine filling a bucket from a hose; to fill the bucket, if you have a narrower hose (aperture) you have to run the tap for longer (shutter speed) to fill the bucket, and vice versa. And, if you have a smaller bucket (higher ISO), you need less water (light) to fill it.
So why wouldn't you just shoot wide open all the time? Because aperture directly affects 'depth of field' - how much of the shot is in focus. The lovely portrait shots you see with the face pin sharp and the background all blurry, that's with a wide open aperture. Too wide however, and you'll have someone's eyes in focus and their ears blurred(*). As an aside, a longer zoom lens will also give you a shallower DoF.
In Av and Tv mode, you directly control the Aperture or Shutter respectively, and the camera automatically adjusts everything else around it to try and get a decent exposure (this was the bit I didn't get and was the 'eureka' moment for me when I got my 450D). Which you use depends which you need control of.
For sport shots say, you may need a short exposure to freeze action, or a longer exposure to add motion blur (shooting streaky waterfalls perhaps). In this case you'd shoot in Tv mode to get the effect you're looking for. For day to day walking around in good light conditions though, you'll generally want to control depth of field and speed will be less important. For this reason, Av is the default position for many people, but it does depend wholly what you're shooting.
Read the Canon FAQ link above - it covers all this in better detail and accuracy than I could hope to explain.
(* - bad example, humour me)
Basically, aperture, shutter speed and ISO all affect the exposure of your photos.ISO is the sensitivity of the sensor. The higher the ISO, the more sensitive the sensor; so the less light you need, but the more "noise" / interference you get on the final shot.
Aperture is how wide open the lens is. For complicated reasons, the lower the aperture number, the wider open (sometimes referred to as "faster") the lens. Shutter is the length of time you expose the shot for. Assuming a fixed ISO for simplicity, the wider the aperture the faster the shutter for a shot.
Imagine filling a bucket from a hose; to fill the bucket, if you have a narrower hose (aperture) you have to run the tap for longer (shutter speed) to fill the bucket. If you have a bigger or smaller bucket (lower or higher ISO), you need less water (light) to fill it.
So why wouldn't you just shoot wide open all the time? Because aperture directly affects 'depth of field' - how much of the shot is in focus. The lovely portrait shots you see with the face pin sharp and the background all blurry, that's with a wide open aperture. Too wide however, and you'll have someone's eyes in focus and their ears blurred(*). As an aside, a longer zoom lens will also give you a shallower DoF.
In Av and Tv mode, you directly control the Aperture or Shutter respectively, and the camera automatically adjusts everything else around it to try and get a decent exposure (this was the bit I didn't get and was the 'eureka' moment for me when I got my 450D). Which you use depends which you need control of.
For sport shots say, you may need a short exposure to freeze action, or a longer exposure to add motion blur (shooting streaky waterfalls perhaps). In this case you'd shoot in Tv mode to get the effect you're looking for. For day to day walking around in good light conditions though, you'll generally want to control depth of field and speed will be less important. For this reason, Av is the default position for many people, but it does depend wholly what you're shooting.
Read the Canon FAQ link above - it covers all this in better detail and accuracy than I could hope to explain.
Well that's confused the shit out of me.
[img] http://www.smileys4me.com/getsmiley.php?show=2141 [/img]
I wasn't talking to you, manual boy.
(-:
(EDIT - edited slightly for clarity)
My advice would be to just get out there and have fun with it, and when the weather's pants have a look online for some ideas for things like water splash images which can be done in the comfort of your kitchen.
I'd also recommend Talk Photography, a great place for all sorts of advice and inspiration.
Have fun! 😀
I advise to buy one of these books
Had bought a similar book but on the Canon G10
for my daughter.
This guy takes you through assignments whilst learning your camera
Take a look at link.
[url= http://www.amazon.co.uk/Canon-EOS-Rebel-T3i-600D/dp/032177664X/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1324499890&sr=1-1 ]Canon 600D Book[/url]
I didn't say it was. However, I'm not about to buy a NEW LAPTOP to run a single piece of software. Are you mad?
sorry yes. i buy laptops to run just 1-2 pieces of specific software. (capture1/photoshop)
Chris
For macro photography you can quickly get started with a set of close up or diopter lenses. This is basically the equivalent of using a magnifying glass. Stick them on your Christmas list, they are great fun.
They screw on to the front of your lens just like a filter. You need to buy the right size for your lens, which for your kit lens will be 58mm. There are plenty on eBay, but I got mine cheaper from my local camera shop.
It is pretty much essential to use a tripod, as it is impossible to focus and frame such a tiny area if the camera is wobbling about.
Also if the thing you're shooting is moving about (e.g. an insect on a branch) then you might need to use a fast shutter speed, and hence a wide aperture to get enough light in. This is where your kit lens might struggle, as the aperture can only go as big as f4 or f5.6. I guess this is where a proper macro lens will be more suitable, but then you're talking more cash.
Have a read of this
http://photonotes.org/articles/beginner-faq/lenses.html#closeup
can i suggest the books by Scott Kelby? As a new owner of a d70s i got hold of the complete guide to the d70 by Thom Hogan and frankly shat myself at the technical nature of his work. it was very thorough but very technical and whilst it was sinking in, i didn't have any real understanding of how to take pictures with the camera, more an understanding of how the camera worked.
The Scott Kelby books are written in plain english (i expect some people will hate them)but each page covers one topic and its focussed on taking good pictures.
Might be a marmite thing but i really liked it and it has given me good ideas and enthusiasm for getting out there.
^^ I would second the Scott Kelby books. I've got one that is more to do with Photoshop, than photographic techniques, but it is easy to follow. He does have a 'style' that some people don't like, but I quite like the light hearted approach.
Talk Photography for tips on shooting, processing and everything else camera related.
Lightroom for image processing, its very easy to use.
A HQ UV filter to protect the lens.
Do a 'photo a day' blog.
Try not to shoot in Auto, you won't learn much.. If you are not sure on the correct settings, set it to auto, see what it comes up with, then set it back to Av/S/P/M and use those settings and go from there.
Try not to shoot in Auto, you won't learn much.. If you are not sure on the correct settings, set it to auto, see what it comes up with, then set it back to Av/S/P/M and use those settings and go from there.
This is exactly why I say use the manual setting, to get away from the preset and learn how to use the camera.
Look at the subject and decide what's important.
A building, for example, f number somewhere in the middle as you want a reasonable depth of field, get the composition right. Then play to get the right shutter speed.
A fast moving object. Shutter speed is more important here, first set the shutter speed to 1/250sec (for example) then look to get the correct f number.
Maybe you'll find that the light conditions won't allow you to take a decent photo based on the above, that's chapter 2.
Y'all have a good one now and I expect lots of festive photos in a week or sos time.
[img] http://www.smileys4me.com/getsmiley.php?show=2143 [/img]
Well so far there's a lot of info, tips and links with this thread!! Darn confusing lol. Guess its just trial and error...
Just had the Scott kelby book and it's great, very easy to follow thanks
Look at the subject and decide what's important.
A building, for example, f number somewhere in the middle as you want a reasonable depth of field, get the composition right. Then play to get the right shutter speed.
A fast moving object. Shutter speed is more important here, first set the shutter speed to 1/250sec (for example) then look to get the correct f number.
Or to paraphrase: use Av to set the aperture for the building, and the camera will do the playing about to get the right shutter; use Tv for the fast moving object, and the camera will faff about and get the aperture right.
Maybe you'll find that the light conditions won't allow you to take a decent photo based on the above, that's chapter 2.
Then you should venture towards 'M'
😉
If I were you zokes, I'd actually leave it on auto. You'll find things a lot less complicated and you'll use a lot less of your significant brain power.
Not quite sure why that's needed, D_S. Telling a novice to use the most complicated setting on his new purchase doesn't make much sense IMO, especially when settings such as Av and Tv exist to save the faffing.
I'm fine without the photography hints though, I reckon I can use a camera well enough for my purposes. But thanks for your concern, it's touching...
TBH, I don't think that using the manual setting is complicated as you're only dealing with two parameters. Complicated would be the introduction of ISO, bracketing, high speed synched flashes and special effects from the camera and not photochop, using photochop etc, etc.
I would like to think that the OP has a certain level of intelligence, unless of course he rides a single speed fixie and drives an automatic car.
I'll try to explain my point of view.
A lens is an entry point of light and in any given conditions there is a quantity of light.
For the sake of argument lets think of light in squared metres, 4m2 for example.
Taking a square shape we need 2X2m to arrive at 4m2, correct?
Using any fixed parameter you will always leave with the same shot, given the conditions (4m2) are the same.
But we also know that:
2x2=4
1X4=4
0,5X8=4
etc.
So, by playing with the aperture I have to play with the shutter speed and based on the example we now have 3 different looking shots for the same level of light. And that is the key to understanding how a camera works and how to visualise what you want before taking the picture rather than taking a picture and with a bit of luck being able to say [i]that's nice[/i].
Bearing in mind that there is no correct or incorrect way, this is my simple understanding.
nice camera - my advice is just to enjoy - for now. The kit lens is OK but will limit your ability to take some of those really fancy pro looking shots. having saisd that, fancy lenses wouldn't be my first upgrade. (a polarising filter and an external flash would be) I'd take a look at some online photography tutorials to get to grip with what you should be able to do with our new toy.
try writ out a list of types of photo you want to take , Im stuck on music gig photos at the moment. www.pjkimages.tumblr.com but have captured some nice(imo) motorsport,party,wedding and people shots.
Oh and keep an eye open on ebay for lense bargains. I have an adapter for EOS to 42mm screw lense which means cheap old fashioned lenses are easy use. Take some photos and post them here .
