SLX versus XT chain...
 

Subscribe now and choose from over 30 free gifts worth up to £49 - Plus get £25 to spend in our shop

[Closed] SLX versus XT chainsets

20 Posts
16 Users
0 Reactions
121 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

So, is there much point in paying the extra for XT crankes & chainrings, over the SLX versions?
I know there's a tiny bit of a weight saving, but owt else?


 
Posted : 09/04/2010 7:44 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Probably not, they weigh less so you pay more money, as with most things in mtbing.

Deore ones are £50 at merlin


 
Posted : 09/04/2010 7:46 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Nope - weight IMHO although I have never tried SLX crankset and shifters - I replaced my XT rear shadow with an SLX and no functional difference - the SLX front mech is also good.

Deore chainrings are like butter IME 🙂


 
Posted : 09/04/2010 7:46 am
Posts: 8660
Full Member
 

I have an SLX chainset on one bike and an XT on the other and can't tell any difference in feel so yeah it's basically just about the slight weight difference. The XT one was second-hand and a bargain otherwise I'd have gotten SLX for that bike to.


 
Posted : 09/04/2010 7:49 am
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

I have a SLX crankset and to be honest I can’t feel any difference in stiffness or shifting performance. Shimano IMHO have made SLX the new XT, same quality for less money


 
Posted : 09/04/2010 7:51 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I run XT on my hard tail and SLX twin + bash on my full suss bike. There is a difference in the weight of the units but to be honest that's mainly due to the design and weight of the chainrings. I run middleburn rings on both sets so don't really notice too much difference.

SLX are great bargain now, especially as XT has shot up in price in the last year!


 
Posted : 09/04/2010 8:28 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

So onto my next question.... Anyone got a good SLX one to sell?! 😆

I see that CRC are offering them at a good price, shall probably just plump for one of those - cheers y'all!


 
Posted : 09/04/2010 8:47 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

if you don't need a BB then Ribble Cycles are doing the SLX for much cheepness.


 
Posted : 09/04/2010 9:54 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

SLX cranks, 40g lighter, about 40% stiffer than XTs.


 
Posted : 09/04/2010 10:39 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

SLX cranks, 40g lighter, about 40% stiffer than XTs.

Eh, you sure, not according to this, SLX are heavier than XT:

http://weightweenies.starbike.com/listings/components.php?type=cranksets&sortby=real


 
Posted : 09/04/2010 10:58 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Aye, they're supposed to be about 40g heavier according to the marketing blurb. Which isn't worth worrying about IMO!


 
Posted : 09/04/2010 11:17 am
Posts: 175
Free Member
 

SLX rings are much cheaper come replacemnt time too.


 
Posted : 09/04/2010 11:30 am
Posts: 65978
Full Member
 

Yep, Pinches is wrong, they're stiff though... People say XTR's stiffer but I can't tell any difference between my SLX and my XTR. Great cranks...


 
Posted : 09/04/2010 6:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

yes, that was meant to read XTs are 40g lighter than slx, bit of a typo


 
Posted : 09/04/2010 7:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Deore chainrings are like butter

I was thinking of throwing some Deore chainrings on my chainset, XT prices are ridiculous. Is that [i]soft[/i] like butter, or [i]smooth[/i] like butter?!


 
Posted : 09/04/2010 8:09 pm
 mboy
Posts: 12575
Free Member
 

I was thinking of throwing some Deore chainrings on my chainset, XT prices are ridiculous. Is that soft like butter, or smooth like butter?!

When your XT chainrings are worn out totally, sell the XT crank arms on to a singlespeeder for £50 or so (if they're in good nick), and buy yourself some brand new SLX cranks with rings to replace... Will cost you about £40 all in, but MUCH cheaper than buying some new chainrings on their own.

FWIW, I have both SLX triple and XT triple chainsets and the differences aren't noticable at all in use. If anything, I'd say the SLX chainrings possibly shift better, certainly they're as durable as the XT. SLX are only 27g heavier than the XT's too (not 40g as mentioned above), certainly the price difference isn't worth the money saved as a £40-50 saving could easily save a lot more than 27g elsewhere on most peoples bikes no doubt!

SLX even look pretty good too (unlike the old LX). OK, XT do still look slightly nicer, but it ain't worth £40 extra nice!


 
Posted : 09/04/2010 8:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Slx cranks and rings for 40 quid? Where?!


 
Posted : 09/04/2010 10:02 pm
Posts: 2035
Full Member
 

[i]do[/i] pay attention at the back there... 🙄

sell the XT crank arms on to a singlespeeder for £50 or so (if they're in good nick), and buy yourself some brand new SLX cranks with rings to replace... Will cost you about £40 all

so i guess they're £90, with £50 recouped 😉


 
Posted : 09/04/2010 10:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think SLX look better than XT!


 
Posted : 09/04/2010 10:42 pm
Posts: 65978
Full Member
 

I reckon so too. XT looks a lot like my un-named Shimano on my commuter, SLX has a much classier look IMO.


 
Posted : 10/04/2010 1:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Deore steel chainrings are the most durable ones I've ever used, compared to middleburn hArdcoat, raceface, ta etc. They do both alloy and steel in deore so you have to be sure you get the steel ones.


 
Posted : 10/04/2010 1:51 pm