Forum menu
Mid travel FS 29r -...
 

[Closed] Mid travel FS 29r - what to add to my list

Posts: 2370
Full Member
 

BigR - Member
What is it?

Mboy's bike is an Evil The Following.

Pretty stunning it looks too.


 
Posted : 12/06/2015 7:50 am
Posts: 17778
Full Member
 

Where are you guys getting the 66.5 HA on the Phantom from?

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 12/06/2015 8:11 am
 Euro
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My Following with the link in its low setting and a 140mm fork has a 66deg HA. Not long ago that was the preserve of DH bikes only, but I can tell you it really works on this bike..

Are you running a 140mm fork?


 
Posted : 12/06/2015 8:24 am
Posts: 920
Free Member
 

3 rides in, and this has genuinely blown me away so far...

Hear this man. If you want suspension & geo that drives you forwards and makes you raise your game, rather than covering your arse with a big fluffy feather pillow, **try one.

** be aware new bike buzz may be a factor here, but I can only speak as I find.


 
Posted : 12/06/2015 9:27 am
Posts: 14169
Full Member
 

Where are you guys getting the 66.5 HA on the Phantom from?

If you run a 140mm fork with it in the slack/low setting. That gives you the same BB height (341mm) as a 120mm fork in the neutral setting but 1.5 deg slacker head angle.


 
Posted : 12/06/2015 9:33 am
Posts: 17778
Full Member
 

In that case.

Tallboy LT is 135mm travel with a 69.4 deg HA.

If you put a 160 fork and a 1.5 degree headset in a Tallboy you come out with 66.9deg HA. 🙂


 
Posted : 12/06/2015 9:40 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Just in the process of getting all the bits together to build my first ever FS, it's also a 29er of mid length travel.

Can't wait to get it up and running.


 
Posted : 12/06/2015 9:51 am
Posts: 14169
Full Member
 

If you put a 160 fork and a 1.5 degree headset in a Tallboy you come out with 66.9deg HA.

Except it's only warrantied up to a 150mm fork - and if you stick a -1.5 deg angleset into a Phantom it has a 65 deg HA. 😛


 
Posted : 12/06/2015 11:06 am
 st
Posts: 1445
Full Member
 

After being tempted by the Canyon Spectral I ended up going for a Whyte 129s from the classifieds.

3 rides in and I'm impressed. I fitted a 140mm Revelation and it's rides really well.

Tyre clearance on the back is crap though so it's worth considering. I had a 2.3 Spesh Purgatory and it rubbed when riding out of the saddle on the first ride so I'm trying other options at the moment.

It definitely feels better in tight twisty stuff than my Trek Stache 20" hardtail.


 
Posted : 12/06/2015 12:11 pm
Posts: 17778
Full Member
 

Except it's only warrantied up to a 150mm fork

That'd be why they told me it'd be fine with a 160 in then. 😉
One of the boys from Jungle also has a 160 in his.

65 is going to limit it somewhat on the climbs. 😛
Though if a was looking for a shorter travel bike the Phantom would be up there.


 
Posted : 12/06/2015 1:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

After being tempted by the Canyon Spectral I ended up going for a Whyte 129s from the classifieds.

I'm just building, or will be, a 129-SCR and was wondering about tyre choice, I was aware the clearance is on the small side.

I like the Geax Gato and hoping they will fit, they don't have really tall tread so should be just the ticket.


 
Posted : 12/06/2015 2:08 pm
 DeeW
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Tyre clearance is a tight on those Whytes. Had one a while back. Fitted a new tyre, then put wheel in frame, then pumped up tyre. Came to take the wheel out and couldn't get it out without letting the tyre down. Was the side knobs that were the problem rather than height of tyre.


 
Posted : 12/06/2015 9:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Canyon spectral 8.9 and spend £900 on something else. I've just ordered one delivery prob mid January, so I need to start saving a bit quicker than I had envisaged!

If I have a windfall I would swap the frame out for a following, that looks epic.

How come the SC Tallboy gets great reviews and the canyon get slated for being too short/steep, despite being longer and slacker that the tallboy?


 
Posted : 14/12/2015 10:09 pm
Posts: 40432
Free Member
 

Wonder what the OP got in the end.

Tom200 - I dunno if that's really a commonly held view. Don't see a lot of love for the tallboy on here at all tbh. Overpriced and out of date IMO.


 
Posted : 14/12/2015 11:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Hammerhead Thumper 130mm


 
Posted : 14/12/2015 11:09 pm
 LAT
Posts: 2405
Free Member
 

Tallboy gets great reviews and the canyon get slated for being too short/steep, despite being longer and slacker that the tallboy

How recent are the reviews you're looking at? When the tallboy was new it was one of the first/few good handling 29er FS bikes. When the Tallboy LT was released it was one of the few longer travel FS 29ers that handled well. The Tallboys still ride and handle well, but bikes have become longer with slacker head angles. The Spectral reviews may be more recent with the bike being compared longer and slacker alternatives.


 
Posted : 15/12/2015 3:14 am
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

How come the SC Tallboy gets great reviews and the canyon get slated for being too short/steep, despite being longer and slacker that the tallboy?

My general experience with SC VPP bikes is that it doesn't ride like the numbers, once your sat on/in the bike the HA works better than the number suggests, though this is a tricky concept for those that shop/paint by numbers


 
Posted : 15/12/2015 3:27 am
Page 2 / 2