Forum search & shortcuts

E mountain bikes a ...
 

[Closed] E mountain bikes a dilemma

Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So, clearly, you've not used one.

I have, and yes it makes the puffing between trail heads, and the climbs less of a ball ache.. and tbh, i like a light feel.. the one i rode (a 6 grand haibike) felt too heavy handling wise compared to my bike.. not surprising when its (approx) 20kg vs the 10kg of my bike..

anyone who rides a mountain bike, who isn't paid at the top level to do so, is doing it for fun. i

i'm not en e-biker.. but thats not true. fun yes , but fitness too.. and socialising.

the one "e-bike" guy i say hello to round here (and can jokingly heckle) says he misses being able to ride with people. i've been chatting with him when people are giving PROPER if looks could kill looks.

but he has his fun.. i've shown him to trails he doesnt know, but he's had to leave me when theres a 30 min climb for me ahead that he can do in 10. he covers serious ground BUT there are people round here who cover that kind of ground (30+ miles) without assistance.

i respect that he's having fun. but its NOT a solution if your goal is cycling fitness. as I said before, context and personal motivations are king.

keep up with your mates - fine.. but demoralising them or getting bored waiting for them? or them [i]not[/i] wanting to ride with you because of that? buyer beware! expecing to switch back to a normal bike ever and realise you've cheated yourself by not using it AS WELL.

(e.g Denis99 sounds like he's got it sorted - using it when he's tired from the normal bike NOT as a crutch. as i've said before..)

btw the OP last replied 3 pages ago with...


I was just about to type that in, go out on my own until I'm back into it.
I do miss riding

So I guess he may have formed his own conclusion..


 
Posted : 23/09/2016 12:45 pm
Posts: 3388
Free Member
 

i'm not en e-biker.. but thats not true. fun yes , but fitness too.. and socialising.

If i wanted to train, i'd go out on a road bike - much more efficient for training. if i wanted to socialise, i'd go to the pub...

I'd say very few people choose to mountain bike, if they don't enjoy it, and therefore the main reason they mtb (as opposed to, say, road ride and go to the pub) is because it's fun.


 
Posted : 23/09/2016 12:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

someone's choice to ride one is nothing to do with you. and if said person is getting back in to riding on an ebike, when they'd not get back in to it on a normal bike, i'd say that's a GOOD thing. also, i'd say that your feelings towards them amount to more than 'it being a shame'.

What it boils down to, for me, is whether e-bikes will become the norm out on the trails. If they keep getting exponentially as popular as they have in the last couple of years, they might end up doing that. And yes, that would be more than a shame.


 
Posted : 23/09/2016 1:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

What have I done 😐


 
Posted : 23/09/2016 1:31 pm
Posts: 5197
Full Member
 

As long as they don't negatively impact you, and they're 250W e-bikes, I really don't see the big deal

The more people cycling the better


 
Posted : 23/09/2016 1:32 pm
Posts: 21027
 

for me, is whether e-bikes will become the norm out on the trails. If they keep getting exponentially as popular as they have in the last couple of years, they might end up doing that. And yes, that would be more than a shame.

Just like fat bikes

Oh.


 
Posted : 23/09/2016 1:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

already seen more e-bikes than fat bikes and more regular use of e-bikes..

someone i know is going to for a ride tomorrow with 3 people on e-bikes, on his normal bike. he's pretty fit, will be interesting to hear back next week.


 
Posted : 23/09/2016 1:41 pm
Posts: 3388
Free Member
 

If they keep getting exponentially as popular as they have in the last couple of years, they might end up doing that. And yes, that would be more than a shame.

why would that be a shame? it's just people (legally) riding what is (legally) classed as a bike.

nobody'll force you to do so, so there's no issue, is there?


 
Posted : 23/09/2016 1:58 pm
Posts: 484
Free Member
 

It is a non mtb and unscientific data point (probably unrelated to the current debate) but on my commute the e-bikers seem disproportionately represented by complete knobbers.

What see is riding characterised by close passing manoeuvres, aggressive barging in the ASB and swapping from filtering outside a line of traffic to inside without observation. Basically the behaviour matches the worst that is seen of motor traffic encroaching on cycling safety and a "you can't touch me because I'm on a bike just like you" arrogance.

Maybe my attention is just drawn to the objectionable individuals and I have concluded that objectionable individuals are drawn to e-bikes. Derestriction? "none of your business, grandpa!"

My stereotypical derestricted e-bike commuter is wearing their normal business attire in the safe knowledge that they're not going to sweat. They won't be there on a rainy day as that would mean protecting yourself from road spray.

The final summing up is a narcissistic fair weather dilettante brandishing a corrosive self-entitlement. The concept of personal compromise has been rejected.

Now if I encounter an e-mountain bike exhibiting similar tendencies... Not saying. Just thinking out loud.


 
Posted : 23/09/2016 2:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Euro - Member
How about the critical folk write a list of reasons why they ride a mountain bike? Then beside each reason put the negative affect using an ebike has.

I'm sure there is the odd nutjob who only cycle uphills purely for fitness. They ride alone too, so don't miss the fun and banter of just being out with mates. They walk down hills and across flats as there's no fitness benefit using gravity to aid them. They don't mess about on jumps, berms and drops - working on their bike skills. No need for that crap as pure, undiluted, glorious fitness trumps all. They have no adventure in their lives and don't just go for a gentle ride to explore the land and admire the wonderful scenery. What possible benefit could that softie crap have on them?

Seeing as no one else has bitten yet, I will...

Variously, I like
- Having a machine that requires no energy source but me, and the simplicity this brings.
- Being able to carry the bike when things get too steep (One of my bikes is already at the limit of what I'd do this with but it's worth it down the other side).
- Getting some fresh air in the countryside.
- Blasting down the hills.
- Social stuff.
- Keeping fit and healthy.
- Occasional racing.
- Changing bits to get just the right build for the intended purpose.
- Optimising the bike for a particular purpose.

so yeah, if it comes to needing one, I'll take an e bike (by then I probably won't be riding down stuff that requires a push up), but for now I'll stick with other bikes. It does mean for longer rides I have to make compromises between burliness and pedalability, but that's fine, I like obsessing over these things. And I do think there's a big difference between optimising a bike (whether through reduced weight, adding suspension, or optimising the aero) and adding power - the HPV records wouldn't be so impressive if they were set with electric assistance, for example.


 
Posted : 23/09/2016 2:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It is a non mtb and unscientific data point (probably unrelated to the current debate) but on my commute the e-bikers seem disproportionately represented by complete knobbers.

Quite the opposite for me. Especially the tit this morning with earphones in weaving around who couldnt hear me trying to get by on the cycle path.


 
Posted : 23/09/2016 2:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

oldtalent - Member
It is a non mtb and unscientific data point (probably unrelated to the current debate) but on my commute the e-bikers seem disproportionately represented by complete knobbers.
Quite the opposite for me. Especially the tit this morning with earphones in weaving around who couldnt hear me trying to get by on the cycle path.

Surely for any subgenres of 2 wheeled fun, the one to which the writer does not belong is the defacto set of nobbers?


 
Posted : 23/09/2016 2:26 pm
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

ajantom - Member
But why? It's a lot of money for something that you don't need (obviously most of us don't really need any of our bikes, but you know what I mean) Why the need for electric assist if you can ride a normal bike. Admit it, I bet you feel that you're cheating just a little bit when you're on it

Afew reasons, probably why more people are getting ebikes.
Firstly, I have a bit of pain and strength issues with my left thigh after riding around Afan. Ride from my house to the trails, usually 30 miles in total with about 3,000 ft of climbing.
the next day I wouldn't be able to ride due to my lack of strength.
Being retired now, I can go for a ride on the ebike quite easily.

Secondly
My wife can ride the ebike and I can ride the normal bike, this way we can both get out and enjoy the ride together.

Thirdly.
Its nice to be able to go further and explore some off piste without having to slog up some of the steeper climbs.

Fourthly
I don't feel like its cheating, but it does feel good to ride like i was some 40 years ago. Nice cadence uphill and the climbs become very different when you have a degree of speed, as opposed to my slogging away.


 
Posted : 23/09/2016 3:21 pm
Posts: 17783
Full Member
 

I'm struggling to see why people with E bikes are even bothering to reply to some of the stuff on here.
If you want to ride on that alone is good enough reason and it's f all to do with anyone else.


 
Posted : 23/09/2016 4:02 pm
Posts: 1754
Full Member
 

Recently heard about a family of 3 in Swinley. Dad was overweight but struggling along on a good old fashioned manual bike

Mother, also overweight, was riding an electric bike.

Child under 12, massively overweight, riding an e-bike

Do other people find it staggering that a fat kid is given an electric bike to get fit/enjoy the countryside??


 
Posted : 23/09/2016 5:04 pm
 cozz
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well this thread is Giving me de ja vu
So many opinions from people that have not had a go on an e bike but have decided they hate them

The same as around 6 years ago, when I was one of the first people
To post threads about fat bikes. People who hadn't seen one, hadn't ridden one had already made
Their (narrow) minds up. Now many of you have one, have ridden one and have had fun on one

And Although some e bike owners have only that bike
All this crap about not having earnt it! I work so in earn and by whatever bike I want to ride

So although I've got a caad fat1, stooge, pugsley, spot ralleye, now I've also got an E
Bike I'm not a mtber any more ?!?


 
Posted : 23/09/2016 5:04 pm
Posts: 1754
Full Member
 

Bloody good article this - add a little balance to the discussion

http://www.singletracks.com/blog/mtb-columns/over-a-beer-why-ebikes-are-the-spawn-of-satan-mostly/


 
Posted : 23/09/2016 5:04 pm
 cozz
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Really ? Just read it. The guy has no problems with e bikes as long as you are
Commuting on them! But doesn't like them off road. What a prick !

So what about when I commute 15 miles through the woods to work Does that make me the spawn of the devil or not. I'm so confused !


 
Posted : 23/09/2016 5:12 pm
Posts: 7630
Free Member
 

boltonjon, you've proclaimed numerous times on front page articles about e bikes that you are going to leave this site because it shows too much support for e bikes. Is it not time you took your ill informed opinions elsewhere?

I see no overweight kids on bikes round here. I'd rather see them on an e-bike, at least starting to get fit, than doing no exercise at all.


 
Posted : 23/09/2016 5:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ultimately ebikes are selfish, So long as I have my fun who cares about the environmental impact of my bloated contraption and its batteries, right?

Whatever spin you want to put on it, an ebike has a larger environmental footprint than a conventional bike...from the manufacture and disposal of the batteries to trail damage.

Of course they are fun, but legal and moral are two different things.

Fwiw,...I was at Drumlanrig castle today riding and popped in for a chat with Rik, and he doesn't want bloated ebikes anywhere near the natural trails there.


 
Posted : 23/09/2016 5:41 pm
Posts: 21027
 

Of course they are fun

The only part of your post that wasn't utter horse shit.


 
Posted : 23/09/2016 5:48 pm
Posts: 1754
Full Member
 

Is it not time you took your ill informed opinions elsewhere?

Fully informed pal and completely entitled to my opinion, as are you - half the fun of this forum

An extract from one of today's articles "dodgy Chinese ePeds that threatened to eat Interbike 2016 whole"

Maybe even STW staff are getting a little worried about the whole e-bike craze...


 
Posted : 23/09/2016 5:56 pm
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

Dumbbot

You mean the environmentally friendly internal combustion engines that roll up at all the trail centres across the UK with mountain bikes in tow......

Not more trail damage than an normal bike, in fact some of the fastest riders uphill are probably causing more erosion.

Who is Rik? Is he some sort of police God who will dictate who rides where and when?

It's just riding a bike and having some fun, perhaps we need to have some form of ration on an individual's fun these days.


 
Posted : 23/09/2016 6:13 pm
Page 4 / 4