Ceramic BBs
 

MegaSack DRAW - This year's winner is user - rgwb
We will be in touch

[Closed] Ceramic BBs

18 Posts
15 Users
0 Reactions
87 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

are they worth the extra money
performance
lifespan etc


 
Posted : 10/01/2009 10:32 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yep, I recommend a Hope one...


 
Posted : 10/01/2009 10:51 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

2nd hope seems to be doing better than my xt, had a little creaking from new but that soon went away


 
Posted : 10/01/2009 12:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Liking my Hope.


 
Posted : 10/01/2009 6:02 pm
Posts: 30
Free Member
 

yea i like my hope one too.
lasting much better, and still perfect smooth after a few months of winter riding.


 
Posted : 10/01/2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

At £75 from CRC (£95 in an emergency from your LBS) it should effin' well last for 5 years minimum.

If there was ever need of an illustration of just why external BB cranksets are a poor design, look no further than the need to spunk inordinate amounts of cash up the wall to have a fighting chance of keeping them turning.


 
Posted : 10/01/2009 6:12 pm
Posts: 17771
Full Member
 

After three of my supershite ceramic bb's fell apart without the aid of either rocks pressure washers or being installed by a monkey I'm going to try a King bb.

Just waiting until the grease injection tool becomes available.
To me pumping fresh grease in there on a regular basis seems to be the only option for keeping these things running.


 
Posted : 10/01/2009 6:22 pm
Posts: 6722
Full Member
 

Hope for me too. Still going strong after a lot of evil gloop abuse. A £90 emergency LBS purchase but is still going strong after quite a while.


 
Posted : 10/01/2009 7:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

sss, you dont rate the 'supershite' ones then?

was considering taking the plunge....


 
Posted : 10/01/2009 7:41 pm
Posts: 3573
Free Member
 

hope here too - super smooth. noticeably more smooth than XTR.


 
Posted : 10/01/2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 17771
Full Member
 

epo.

after three of em all doing the same thing no.

standard XT's last longer and cost much less.


 
Posted : 10/01/2009 8:43 pm
Posts: 17771
Full Member
 

epo.

after three of em all doing the same thing no.

standard XT's last longer and cost much less.


 
Posted : 10/01/2009 8:44 pm
Posts: 17771
Full Member
 

Woha.

not sure how that happened.


 
Posted : 10/01/2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7129
Full Member
 

I've heard standard XT's last longer and cost much less.


 
Posted : 10/01/2009 8:55 pm
Posts: 17771
Full Member
 

Where'd you hear that then? 😉


 
Posted : 10/01/2009 8:58 pm
Posts: 4968
Free Member
 

SS ones are rubbish - lasted one 3 rides before going gritty, their sintered pads are good though.


 
Posted : 10/01/2009 9:26 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Never tried them but the acros (from balfa) ceramic BBs have a 2 year guarantee. Some of their headsets a 10 year guarantee!!! My next BB is coming from them!


 
Posted : 11/01/2009 2:05 am
 jedi
Posts: 10238
Full Member
 

i have had an acros xc one on my demo9 for well over a year now and its good as the day i put it on 🙂


 
Posted : 11/01/2009 9:04 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've never had a problem with standard Shimano ones TBH, but those King ones look like a good idea well executed.


 
Posted : 11/01/2009 9:10 am